High Court of Chancery

[Trust Guy]

Pre 1842 . Hummm . . . I’ll need to dig out my videos taken at the 1990 Center for Action doo daww and listen to Howard’s account again. I do not recall his stating such . Then again I was somewhat fixated on the Bankruptcy and Reservations of Right aspects for some time . Bankruptcy especially after receiving an anonymous postal delivery from Ft. Collins Colorado of Daniel E. Petersen’s brief on the Bankruptcy .

[David Merrill]

Pre 1842 . Hummm . . . I’ll need to dig out my videos taken at the 1990 Center for Action doo daww and listen to Howard’s account again. I do not recall his stating such . Then again I was somewhat fixated on the Bankruptcy and Reservations of Right aspects for some time . Bankruptcy especially after receiving an anonymous postal delivery from Ft. Collins Colorado of Daniel E. Petersen’s brief on the Bankruptcy .

How recently did that arrive?

Can you give us the Case # so I can read it off PACER?

[Trust Guy]

Let me think . It was before LeRoy Schweitzer and Dan Petersen left Colorado . So that would have been maybe 1992 ish ?

It just showed up one day . The Ft. Collins postmark made me think of The Committee of the States folks . Or maybe The Committee of Correspondence ? I’ve forgotten who was active at that time . My little group of study partners reffed and shepardised every cite .

I’ll look for it today , weather and chores permitting .

[David Merrill]

That's way before PACER anyway. It would be interesting if you scan it though. I heard that PETERSEN was loosed from prison only to lien some judges and be the first back in for bogus liens on the 2007 legislation. I thought maybe you were talking a bit more recent paper.

Another thought crossed my mind about this.

There is one advantage to One Form - and that is all the judges become generic. It once was that there were a variety of different judges for all the different jurisdictions, including Chancery.

[Trust Guy]

Well, it’s not upstairs here . Be happy to scan it on up . Should be easy to spot provided I locate the right case of references . Generated a thick binder of law library copies .

I can not be certain of the time frame . I’m remembering this study being before I got neck deep in the Buck Act and Government in Trust .

Still a few specialized Judges . There are something like 19 or 21 authorized Federal tax case Judges that circuit ride out of DC . If you can get to them rather than be duped into IRS Tax “Court” . If you’re charged criminally they are easier to schedule . But a lawyer doesn’t seem to know about such things and represents you right into acquiesce to an unqualified personage presiding .

What a racket .

I also consider this part of an effective questioning of Trust in traffic matters . Trust matters belong in Equity . The Traffic Court is usually an administrative function often openly overseen by a Magistrate .

[Trust Guy]

Not in the studio . At least I turned up the J. B. Nelson and Informer x-reffs .

Boy , humidity around here has really taken it’s toll .

[Trust Guy]

Tried to put this up for your information . Web Host is still a pain on file permissions since moving to their New and Improved blah blah blah .

Out of deference those here , I found this online . There are other , smaller , file versions available with a quick search , but this matches mine . Photo copied from his original . Less chance for alteration . So, here’s a little something in the vein from JB to tide you over . December 1991 . Courtesy U.S.A. The Republic .

RE : SENATE REPORT NO. 93-549, Etc. pdf 6.64 mb

[David Merrill]

Tried to put this up for your information . Web Host is still a pain on file permissions since moving to their New and Improved blah blah blah .

Out of deference those here , I found this online . There are other , smaller , file versions available with a quick search , but this matches mine . Photo copied from his original . Less chance for alteration . So, here’s a little something in the vein from JB to tide you over . December 1991 . Courtesy U.S.A. The Republic .

RE : SENATE REPORT NO. 93-549, Etc. pdf 6.64 mb

That revives a lot of nostalgia within me. Thanks for that letter!

[Trust Guy]

Ah ,the good ol’ days . ( shudder )

Thanks for the impetus to get this chore started . Was putting it off till later in the year . Always possible excitement when poking around the out buildings during hornet nesting season .

Turned up my 1981 law course by George Lee Kindred , of all things forgotten . Maybe I’ll even find Guerrilla Gorilla by that fellow up Alaska way . Should be good for a few giggles .

[shikamaru]

If the U.S. is bankrupt, who is the creditor?

IMF?

[dreloc]

Court of Chancery

Is there a way to turn a statutory court into a court of Chancery?

[David Merrill]

Welcome Dreloc!

That is an interesting question.

[george]

Welcome Dreloc!

That is an interesting question.

not to mention the syncro-ring it has to it.. hi Dreloc.

refreshing to see this thread again because I couldnt begin to comprehend the significance of it back when I first read it, not that now I can completely either.

someone on Rod Class's call that walter brought to our attention in the notary thread mentioned that it is a possibility. may want to check that (if it wasnt yourself that mentioned it there?)

[pumpkin]

If a court is admiralty, and one of the parties submits an affidavit to the fact that there is 'no contract concerning the matter', does that not end any admiralty question? It would seem to do something of the sort, combined with a demand for findings of fact and conclusions of law, would take the court out of admiralty. Am I mistaken that admiralty requires a contract?

[shikamaru]

If a court is admiralty, and one of the parties submits an affidavit to the fact that there is 'no contract concerning the matter', does that not end any admiralty question? It would seem to do something of the sort, combined with a demand for findings of fact and conclusions of law, would take the court out of admiralty. Am I mistaken that admiralty requires a contract?

You could start with the treatise "Benedict on Admiralty".
You'll be able to find a copy on Google Books.
The older versions are more clear in understanding than more recent versions.

You can thank the late, great "Informer" for this tip.