Who gave us the authority to administrate the strawman account, can you prove it?

[motla68]

To avoid hearsay in a court of law not only will they want to see a signed
certified and sealed document they will also need to speak with the person/
man whom gave that authority to administrate an account they created.

I keep asking lower and upper echelons who is the qualified/authorized
trustee as some of you have. The lower says go to upper, but you talk
to upper and they are remaining silent on the issue.
The only evidence found is within federal court case documents of
every court case it says the U.S. District attorney's office is the trustee
for the United States, but this is a huge office, a friend told me he got
a reply back once that said each office worker in that office is assigned
to only answer specific questions, not it is just a matter of finding the
correct person to as the right questions to.

A little further thought on this, are you a natural resource, are you part of the
land i.e. connected directly to it?
The Trustees have a responsibility to protect natural resources.. light bulb!
Source: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/33/40/I/2706

With a military occupation in place do you feel as if they are attempting to
control you? Could it be they have a trust in us, but we do not have trust
with them? Where does their authority come from? Lets investigate -->>

natural law
n.
A law or body of laws that derives from nature and is believed to be binding
upon human actions apart from or in conjunction with laws established by
human authority.
1. (Philosophy) an ethical belief or system of beliefs supposed to be inherent in
human nature and discoverable by reason rather than revelation
3. (Philosophy) the philosophical doctrine that the authority of the legal
system or of certain laws derives from their justifiability by reason, and indeed
that a legal system which cannot be so justified has no authority
Source: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/natural+law

[shikamaru]

There is no "strawman account".

A strawman is a third party intervener working on behalf of a principal to provide themselves as a front typically in a commercial matter.

There is some sort of account or record. That I do agree with.

[motla68]

There is some sort of account or record. That I do agree with.

ok, then same questions for account or record. ... who and prove it?

[David Merrill]

The account is like this fellow issuing a bonded promissory note. The Fed issues promissory notes called Federal Reserve notes and Drew Allen RAYNER (72) is a Fed bank. He too, has been creating Fed notes all his working life by endorsing the back of his paychecks. He has been bonding the extra promissory notes by approving the fractional lending. Do you get that? Because he has been bonding notes, he is bonded to administrate for those notes. There is no account associated with his SSN or birth certificate because his bonded promissory notes have been out in circulation with the Fed's and all the other Fed banks' BPNs.

Drew Allen is in trouble for (presumably) demanding change - which could be considered theft - resulting in fraud charges. The fraud is not on the $171.50, it is on the $4.50 he demanded the City create for him in change by making the bonded promissory note out for $175!

Here is evidence what I am saying is true. Look at this docket entry from some time ago. That entry, and the scrubbed Doc 20 (which I would really like to read) shows payment in full of the exact amount ordered by the federal judge by this bonded promissory note. I looked again yesterday:

The fellow issuing the bonding, I am certain, believes in accounts associated with SSNs and birth certificates, rather than endorsement on notes in circulation. Therefore he got nervous

[motla68]

This will be very huge story that will definitely go viral if he is successful.
A true test of the question.

Thanks

[David Merrill]

Is it just me, or does everybody have to register now?

http://www.sunherald.com/2011/07/21/3291485/speeding-ticket-led-to-fraud-charges.html

[shikamaru]

ok, then same questions for account or record. ... who and prove it?

I would say the account or record works on assumption.

The account or record is a benefit or use.

[John Booth]

I would say the account or record works on assumption.

The account or record is a benefit or use.

...or use - what if the ACCOUNT NAME is the TRUST [in that instant situation] and the Roles [pick one of three available] are up for grabs so to speak

[shikamaru]

...or use - what if the ACCOUNT NAME is the TRUST [in that instant situation] and the Roles [pick one of three available] are up for grabs so to speak

Hence ... the keyword assumption .

[motla68]

Is it just me, or does everybody have to register now?


http://www.sunherald.com/2011/07/21/...d-charges.html

Your buying, selling, signing for swapping of securities owned by a government corporation, I would think all who are even acting in persona of banking and brokerage entities would need to be registered to do this, yes. Unless your the King or Queen of that corporation? But then again we are suppose to be in the world, not of it, so why play in it?

[David Merrill]

Your buying, selling, signing for swapping of securities owned by a government corporation, I would think all who are even acting in persona of banking and brokerage entities would need to be registered to do this, yes. Unless your the King or Queen of that corporation? But then again we are suppose to be in the world, not of it, so why play in it?

I went a few rounds with Bean about this on SJC;


Basically, by right, I receive cash for my intellectual property.

One of the suitors and I enjoy a few games of chess about every day, at a restaurant of our choosing on the moment. - Any and all of which will accept only FRNs.

I am almost always hungry when I step up to the counter or the waitress takes our order. Once I get that way, there is only one way I have found to solve the problem so I buy some food and eat it. Problem solved.

You seem to be proposing some kind of solution and if it is practicable, I am not understanding you.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[motla68]

Quasi means; Similar but not genuine. As in a previous post when added

" Quasi-Natural " or how about another term with the word used:

Quasi-Corporation ;

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quasi_public_corporation.asp

Please learn these distinctions, gold and silver with man's stamp on it
is just quasi-gold or quasi-silver.

Are you a genuine natural resource ?

[motla68]

I would say the account or record works on assumption.

The account or record is a benefit or use.

GILBERT'S LAW BOOK ON EQUITY

""But while the Chancery Court regards the beneficiary as the real owner in order more fully to guard his interests and assert his rights, it, also, regards him the real owner as to his liabilities, and, except in cases where the trust is
declared by a will or deed duly registered, will subject his interest in the trust property to the satisfaction of his debts, on a proper bill filed for that purpose, as hereafter shown. In dealing with the beneficiary's interest in the trust property Equity follows the law, and treats such property as descendible, devisable and alienable.


In all cases of trusts, including trust deeds, assignments for the benefit of creditors, and even constructive and resulting trusts, the Chancery Courts are ever ready to lend a helping hand to the beneficiary as against him who holds the legal title. ""

Without a trust to will things into, or a trust where things are already moved into, In their eyes is just a duck in a lone lake somewhere with hunters circling and there is not a no trespassing sign anywhere to protect you. Just ask any elderly native american if the indians had legal trusts before the english came.

Without a trust setup I think the only angle you could take it is the statutory title I posted yesterday in reference to the protection of natural resources held in their
trust. When you trademark something by their government it is the same thing as a ship out in the water with a U.S. Flag attached to it in bond via simple constructive
trust where you have no standing in right to self determination.

[shikamaru]

GILBERT'S LAW BOOK ON EQUITY

""But while the Chancery Court regards the beneficiary as the real owner in order more fully to guard his interests and assert his rights, it, also, regards him the real owner as to his liabilities, and, except in cases where the trust is
declared by a will or deed duly registered, will subject his interest in the trust property to the satisfaction of his debts, on a proper bill filed for that purpose, as hereafter shown. In dealing with the beneficiary's interest in the trust property Equity follows the law, and treats such property as descendible, devisable and alienable.


In all cases of trusts, including trust deeds, assignments for the benefit of creditors, and even constructive and resulting trusts, the Chancery Courts are ever ready to lend a helping hand to the beneficiary as against him who holds the legal title. ""

Without a trust to will things into, or a trust where things are already moved into, In their eyes is just a duck in a lone lake somewhere with hunters circling and there is not a no trespassing sign anywhere to protect you. Just ask any elderly native american if the indians had legal trusts before the english came.

Without a trust setup I think the only angle you could take it is the statutory title I posted yesterday in reference to the protection of natural resources held in their
trust. When you trademark something by their government it is the same thing as a ship out in the water with a U.S. Flag attached to it in bond via simple constructive
trust where you have no standing in right to self determination.

Personally, I'm focusing on unifying the rights and duties of a given res into my tenure only.

Secondly, this all presumes that government as trustee actually has trustees in office. Those offices appear to be vacant. He who assumes that office better have the proof to boot.

The whole operation from birth certificates to offices of trusteeship appears to work on assumpsit.
When you start pressing the matter within any sort of hearing, I expect there to be fleeing .

[David Merrill]

Thank you!


I have been explaining it in terms of classical thermodynamics for a while now. To impose that trusteeship upon the government trustee you have to describe the parameters of the trust. Usually this would require explaining trust law to an attorney. - Futile.

On the other hand, if you can get them to testify about the trust structure and you are adept at record-forming...