Deposit Your Pledge Into a Bank and Freely Elect to be Bankrupt and Insolvent

[motla68]

A great job done by Onlashuk putting together a Report Treatise to use as a guide, especially for the newbies in our group that are having a hard time putting things together this will give you perspective.
Onlashuk has been my right hand man so to speak at meetings, we have had many discussions during the times when I was mentoring him. Just so happens that he is also a great writer and speaker more so talented then myself I believe.

>> Read on >>

__________________________________________________ ______________________________

Deposit Your Pledge into a Bank and Freely Elect to be Bankrupt and Insolvent

The first thing that I want to bring to your attention is that you are subject to taxation because of a pledge that has been made by you, and more than likely, you are unaware of this, and how this pledge is affirmed and reaffirmed daily, in so many different ways. However, for the duration of this composition, I AM going to share with you my experience and perception as to how this plays out in one very simple way. And through this, you will find out why it is that I say, one of the most powerful statements that can aid in correcting ANY mistake is, who gave everything she had back to the Treasury obligating the Treasury to fulfilling her needs in returnmake a pledge that elects backing up the rendering of the people to be both bankrupt and insolvent. Now, how pleasant a thought is this that we have all contributed to the financial demise of not just ourselves, but also everybody else by the simple action of making a deposit/pledge into what we think is our bank account? Can you think of any better motivation to allow Treasury to do its job than this? The Widow agreed to allow Treasury to do its job, why should we not follow her example?

Page (1 of 2)

[motla68]

depositto commit to one as a pledgeto place in a bank, as a sum of money subject to order.intrusted to the care of another; especially, money lodged with a bank or banker, subject to order; anything given as pledgegiven to them; or to any of their officers, then it has been pledged to them. Remember this the next time a Police Officer asks you to give to him/her a drivers license, registration, and proof of insurance, and you do it without expressing to him/her that these documents are for his/her benefit and not for your own benefit, because they belong to the STATE and not to you. Hmm, is this another hint as to how a pledge is unknowingly and unwittingly expressed as the Colonel said? Furthermore, every single time a deposit is being made into a bank account wherein the NAME is being indorsed upon its backside, a pledge is being made; a pledge that attests, affirms, and elects for bankruptcy and insolvency according to what the Colonel said. This is why, at the very-very least, a limited indorsement showing the intent of lawful money is imperative, and needs to be expressed by whoever is putting the indorsement upon the backside.

Finally, I believe this is the reason and purpose for, which is through the creation of debt, and by participating in that world as a debtor/sinner/slave which ultimately will end up in death, decay, and destruction because of bankruptcy and insolvency, resulting from not rendering the debtor/sinner/slave things of Caesar, back to Caesar.

We were all born without money, and since money was never created in the beginning by a famous line such as,

Page (2 of 2)
__________________________________________________ _____________________________

I would like to think this has been both enlightening and beneficial to all.

Peace be upon you.

[Michael Joseph]

My ten year old daughter and I played a game of Monopoly the other night. After it was over; I asked her what was more important Property or Money? She said Money. So I said what if I put Hotels on Every Property and I give you all the money, who do you think will win the game? She said, of course me. I have all the money.

So we set up the experiment and both started at Go. She made it around the board 4.5 times and she was bankrupt.

Then, I asked her a second question: Who did we buy the Property from? Her response, THE BANK.

So I asked her, after the game is over where does all the money go? Her response, THE BANK.

A Century of the Self - feeding the Ego is almost certain to lead to doom.


Shalom.

[motla68]

Wonderful story MJ, thanks for sharing! I had also watched an inspiring video story in the UK today about a trust called the Woodlands Trust, they are buying up all the land they can to return it back to it's original creation for the benefit of the people instead of corporate control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COLvqjHBWHU

[David Merrill]

[SIZE="3"]This is why Coresource Solutions position has not only been to make use of a limited signature indorsement expressing a lawful money intent, [12USC411 - (if you still must make use of a bank account for the NAME)] but much more importantly to send everything back to the Treasury as the Widow did...

Peace be upon you.

That is what you have shown us:

I am of the opinion the redemption of lawful money is the only action at play. There is no birth certificate funding or hypothecation upon the birth certificate.

[Frederick Burrell]

While it is true that we were not born with a fistful of money at birth, neither were we born with cloths on, or a roof over our head. Are you then suggesting that we all take off our cloths and run around naked, and burn our houses down.

Of the many definitions available why do you choose one that implies a hidden agenda. Can I not give to someone something of value, to hold for me, without selling my soul. I have an arrangement with a man who holds something for me and I have negotiated with him for his time and expense to watch over my belongings. I do not see a problem. fB

[Michael Joseph]

While it is true that we were not born with a fistful of money at birth, neither were we born with cloths on, or a roof over our head. Are you then suggesting that we all take off our cloths and run around naked, and burn our houses down.

Of the many definitions available why do you choose one that implies a hidden agenda. Can I not give to someone something of value, to hold for me, without selling my soul. I have an arrangement with a man who holds something for me and I have negotiated with him for his time and expense to watch over my belongings. I do not see a problem. fB

Hey man, i don't want to see you naked; and i know you don't want to see me naked.

I opt that we barter with some money or wheat or something; cause I am gonna want some clothes...

[Frederick Burrell]

You got that right. Not only that but it gets plenty cold in the winter. But if we are wearing cloths, does that mean we are partaking of two worlds. fB

[David Merrill]

I am through reading between the lines for CoreSource Materials and Methods. Motla68 went off on a rant in the Success Stories threads and then went on a childish Delete spree. Admin mopped up after his mess and that might have been a mistake. We would have better left it there for people to see.

Nothing has happened with CoreSource as far as I am concerned. The Masons are supposed to be secretive like that but they allow me to peruse their Museum and Library every time I go. So what is up with Motla68? With all this naked guy talk arising from his antics, I am not sure I even want to hear what he wants from me for a glimpse of his papering package!


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Frederick Burrell]

Hey David, I thought because we weren't born with cloths or money if you feel spiritually inclined to have to give one, you must give up the other. Have you never listen to the Batman (4 corners) vids. Same 4 corners i've seen you post. But Motla seems to be adding in some new twists. They are there in the Batman vids but a little more subdued. I have heard of some successes with it. Motla has a talkshoe with about 30 talks on it ranging from 5min to a couple of hrs. I think there is a link under his avatar.. Enjoy. fB

http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/25279

[David Merrill]

Thirty TalkShoes?

That's not going to happen. A few people are convinced there is something happening here. Not me. I am convinced that a convincing evidence package could be provided, but that is too big of an obstacle. What that does is convince me that it is a sham.

It is easy to scan the ticket and sanitize it in Paint, then show the papering package with enough details left to convince me that the two items are associated. Even so, I can accept that no responses or correspondence after that point are a success - but we are not getting that from Motla68. I will look for it, yesterday I believe; an example of what I find annoying about what Motla68 is posting here.


P.S. That did not take long:

I have showed many things, some were clipped because the size limit for this forum did not allow for the attachments, MJ has even been sent full files in the past in which we have had many of conversation on. So maybe in his words he can expound on that from his own words, because mine seem to not have any effect. I share my experiences and point in the directions, but I cannot serve up in the way you all are expecting me to, have not done that for anyone who had come through Coresource either because some due diligence is expected on their part. I have found if they discover some things on their own they retain it longer instead of having to answer the same questions or prove the same points over and over again.

There it is!

He is not divulging edifying information because he is accomodating the way he perceives we will not be edified by the edifying information. Whereas I would greatly prefer he simply divulge the edifying information. Sorry I got lewd, for the homophobic readers, but I really want to know what he wants out of us and me, just to see what he is talking about. Does he want money? Is he protecting this intellectual property like it is his patent?

There is no excuse for him to deliver thirty TalkShoe presentations about something that he has not documented! Just show us the documentation Motla68!

[Frederick Burrell]

Agreed. I point blank ask him for back ground info. side stepped me all the way. fB

[motla68]

Just show us the documentation Motla68!

Ok, let me connect the dots one last time on this for you all since there seems to be some incoherency here. The documents I am putting through to courts e.t.c. are wrapped in robin-egg blue paper which means they are in the private passed through the public and everything is done on the private side for public matters. for me to to show you the exact documents would be a dishonor.
It is the same as if a friend shared something with you privately and then you went and told the whole neighborhood about it. It has nothing to do with some esoteric agenda, it is just respect for your neighbors business. All I can do is tell you about it which I have done, if you missed it, the 2 tickets expressed can be found at a blog: http://onlashuk.wordpress.com/
If someone is to lazy to click on a couple links and read to see it then the liability is the responsibility of the one bringing the complaint.

With that I have shared much the same, if you put the fingers in motion and look and listen you will see that I am sharing a lot more then you all would believe. Sometimes it takes writing things down on paper to get thoughts put together. First it was the radio, then the television, then computer games, now computers that even follow are movements and there is starting to be computer that will even read our minds, when will society put away the conveniences and use their brain for what it was intended?

I myself went through the time and effort of matching up the paper from libel in review in the suitors category to show the similarities of what a CS member would say in court to what was shown in that paper. Will you not do equally the same and put the same time and effort in?

Good luck with that, I have done here what I am able to show. If what I have shown is not enough for you all to do some discovery on your own then I guess it is just not for you.

[motla68]

Agreed. I point blank ask him for back ground info. side stepped me all the way. fB

FB , listen to what you are typing here.. please.

You have 83 posts I am seeing right now and this will make 189 for me and you say I am not giving background information? take the blinders off, what have you done here to add to anything worth using yourself? Both you and Anthony have done nothing but bash other people because of what you do not have, well what have you given?

2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

You have to find truth for yourself, I cannot give it to you.
If you have no difficulties in your life then why are you here? If your not going to produce anything then at least stop bickering about what you have not been given.

[Frederick Burrell]

Molta

I think you are doing your best to share the information you think everyone should follow for altruistic motives. You presume to much though. You assume from the way you address people that you have all the answers and we are just dumb stumble bums. I had listened to Batman 6 month before meeting you. I like most of what he had to say, I say most. I never had to chance to question him. I did have the chance to ask you some questions all of which you side stepped in my opinion. Specifically I asked about the back ground info on what you perceived the presidents role in having remorse and trying to set things right. From what I heard you and batman expressing you believe the government trust, corp is doing the right thing by us, but we are the one's messing it up. I have pointed out many, what I perceive as flaws in your logic what you have not addressed. One being your stance on money.

I pointed out your weren't born with money, clothes, a house. Why do you single out money as the only thing that is evil and must be eliminated from our lives to be right with God, whatever you perceive that to be, when we have many things in our lives we did not receive when we took bodies on this plane. Either get rid of them all or use them all as they were meant to be used. I hope this helps you see my frustration in dealing with you. I have heard many stories about your method, tape recording of it being used in court etc. I like many parts of it. I would just like a little more background info on how you came to some of the beliefs you came to. You are very Idealistic, I just want to bring your Idealism into a level of reality that works for me. Getting rid of all my money, clothes, house, etc. just does not work for me. Its all or nothing. I do not see money as the great Satan. Or money as a master I must reject in favor of God or vise versa. If you do that is fine. But don't expect me to go along with what I would consider foolishness at best. PS you need to get rid of that condescending attitude also. You do not know me but assume because I do not agree with you that I have not been given any thing, any truth. . Why is it that so many people in the sovereignty movement get such a self rightous aditude and believe they are the only one's doing it right. So if you would like to continue this relationship you need to be more considerate and less self assuming. fB