If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. If you would like to post in these forums please send a PM directly to David Merrill.
All transactions on PayPal and elsewhere are demanded to be redeemed in lawful money as found in Section 16 of the Fed Act and at Title 12 USC 411.
Thank you so much for enjoying StSC! If you are getting popups please try clearing your browser cache.
Form 110 - Designation of Exempt Person (and Instructions)
...Until recently, with the "Omission" of the Trading with the Enemy Act from the Bankers' Code, the common man or woman endorsing private credit from the Fed has been considered a state bank.
Thank you Allodial, that should open a few more eyes than mine,
David Merrill.
...Until recently, with the "Omission" of the Trading with the Enemy Act from the Bankers' Code, the common man or woman endorsing private credit from the Fed has been considered a state bank.
Thank you Allodial, that should open a few more eyes than mine,
David Merrill.
P.S. I have saved the files to disk.
I figured it would be interesting at the least to you and others. Also, the form (as Chex has pointed out also) that there are those who are exempt from FinCEN transaction reports. Psycopathic, envious or shady tellers have been known to file nasty FinCEN reports out of spite--with the exemption certificate in place I suspect tellers and bank staff would be open to sever criminal and civil liability should they do such things in face of an exemption. Conceivably a substitute certificate could be executed by an accountholder or the like and served on the bank through Treasury (i.e. copy to the bank w/ certificate of service and original to Treasury --by fax or by mail).
P.S. Something tells me that, where applicable, a "Certificate of Exemption In Lieu of FinCEN Form 110" might go well with a W8 or the like.
- Protection of nonpublic personal information.
(a) Privacy obligation policy
It is the policy of the Congress that each financial institution has an affirmative and continuing obligation to respect the privacy of its customers
Regulatory authority
(1) Rulemaking
(A) In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have authority to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter with respect to financial institutions and other persons subject to their respective jurisdiction under section 6805 of this title (and notwithstanding subtitle B of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 [12 U.S.C. 5511 et seq.]), except that the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall not have authority to prescribe regulations with respect to the standards under section 6801 of this title.
.
This subchapter and the regulations prescribed thereunder shall be enforced by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Federal functional regulators, the State insurance authorities, and the Federal Trade Commission with respect to financial institutions and other persons subject to their jurisdiction under applicable law as follows:
31 CFR 1010.520 Definitions is responsible for enforcing its Privacy of Consumer Financial Information Rule (Privacy Rule). Anyone who uses this Guide should also review the Privacy Rule, found at 16 C.F.R. Part 313 (May 24, 2000).
The primary purpose of the W-8 form is to indicate to mutual fund companies and brokers that a foreign investor isn't subject to standard taxation practices where ... to indicate to mutual fund companies and brokers that a foreign investor isn't subject to standard taxation practices where investment income is not taxed.
In a nutshell, a W 8 form is used by foreign businesses and non-resident aliens earning income from U.S. sources. Its purpose is mainly to let ... You probably don't have to worry about the W 8 form -- unless you're a non-resident alien. American citizens generally do not need to use W 8 forms, nor do resident aliens -- instead, they would use the corresponding W-9 form that certifies their tax identification number.
The primary purpose of the W-8 form is to indicate to mutual fund companies and brokers that a foreign investor isn't subject to standard taxation practices where ... to indicate to mutual fund companies and brokers that a foreign investor isn't subject to standard taxation practices where investment income is not taxed.
That (quote from Investopedia) is "kosher pig poop seasoned with hen's teeth"--it just ain't so. The W8 is for anyone who is not citizen or national of the United States. Many banks may refuse to or are unable to provide bank accounts which are non-interest bearing which can result in reportable income for U.S. residents or U.S. citizens. A W8 or substitute document can be utilized by anyone who is not a citizen or national of the United States to assert their foreign status. The W8 can be utilized in any U.S. situation where there is or could be income. This is important considering that that one can be, say, a Texan and be foreign to the United States.
In a nutshell, a W 8 form is used by foreign businesses and non-resident aliens earning income from U.S. sources. Its purpose is mainly to let ... You probably don't have to worry about the W 8 form -- unless you're a non-resident alien. American citizens generally do not need to use W 8 forms, nor do resident aliens -- instead, they would use the corresponding W-9 form that certifies their tax identification number.[/URL]
That (quote from Investopedia) is "kosher pig poop seasoned with hen's teeth"--it just ain't so. The W8 is for anyone who is not citizen or national of the United States. Many banks may refuse to or are unable to provide bank accounts which are non-interest bearing which can result in reportable income for U.S. residents or U.S. citizens. A W8 or substitute document can be utilized by anyone who is not a citizen or national of the United States to assert their foreign status. The W8 can be utilized in any U.S. situation where there is or could be income. This is important considering that that one can be, say, a Texan and be foreign to the United States.
The term "American citizen" means U.S. citizen.
The term "American citizen" means U.S. citizen....also means national of the United States.......no distinction among the 3 terms.
And true.....a Texan would be foreign to the United States....just as the invading usurper "United States" is foreign to the Nation "Texas".
The term "American citizen" means U.S. citizen....also means national of the United States.......no distinction among the 3 terms.
And true.....a Texan would be foreign to the United States....just as the invading usurper "United States" is foreign to the Nation "Texas".
That may be the case though I don't recall any statutory definition showing American citizen (U.S. citizen or citizen of the United States) to include U.S. nationals (but it could). The key distinction worth noting, IMHO, is whether or not one regarded to be a citizen of the United States is in fact a "person born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States".
P.S. Florida government officials are on record referring to Florida as a nation.
It is codified at 8 USC 1101(a)(22).....with (B) referring to the territories
Each of the several states is a nation....all but practically abandoned by the people who are currently participating in the federal benefits & privileges program.
But Fedgov knows they're there......,here's an obscure reference in section 5.23 of the Government Style Manual
In designating the natives of the States, the following forms will be used.
Alabamian
Louisianian
Ohioan
Alaskan
Mainer
Oklahoman
Arizonan
Marylander
Oregonian
Arkansan
Massachusettsan
Pennsylvanian
Californian
Michiganian
Rhode Islander
Coloradan
Minnesotan
South Carolinian
Connecticuter
Mississippian
South Dakotan
Delawarean
Missourian
Tennessean
Floridian
Montanan
Texan
Georgian
Nebraskan
Utahn
Hawaiian
Nevadan
Vermonter
Idahoan
New Hampshirite
Virginian
Illinoisan
New Jerseyan
Washingtonian
Indianian
New Mexican
West Virginian
Iowan
New Yorker
Wisconsinite
Kansan
North Carolinian
Wyomingite
Kentuckian
North Dakotan
Grammatically correct....I'm New Yorker........not "a" New Yorker. But I left that land more than half my life ago for Florida. So I now claim Floridian as my nationality (also long enuff to qualify as "1/2 cracker" ;-]
Alien An individual who is not a U.S. citizen or U.S. national.
U.S. National An individual who owes his sole allegiance to the United States, including all U.S. citizens, and including some individuals who are not U.S. citizens. For tax purposes the term "U.S. national" refers to individuals who were born in American Samoa or were born in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands who have made the election to be treated as U.S. nationals and not as U.S. citizens.
Immigrant An alien who has been granted the right by the USCIS to reside permanently in the United States and to work without restrictions in the United States
Nonimmigrant An alien who has been granted the right by the USCIS to reside temporarily in the United States. Each nonimmigrant is admitted into the United States in the nonimmigrant status, which corresponds to the class of visa with which, or purpose for which, he entered the United States.
Grammatically correct....I'm New Yorker........not "a" New Yorker. But I left that land more than half my life ago for Florida. So I now claim Floridian as my nationality (also long enuff to qualify as "1/2 cracker" ;-]
If one fails to indicate otherwise, they will presume upon you the status of 'person born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States' (i.e. a U.S. citizen per the 14th amendment) and corporate status generally.
The presumption of your membership is HISTORICALLY accomplished in three ways:
1. By land (jus soli)
2. By blood (jus sanguinis)
3. Your continued consent to be governed, by fact or presumption of law.
But an express rescission of all the ties that bind & pledging allegiance per 8USC1481(a)(2) is in accord w/ obtaining a Certificate of Nationality issued by Secretary of State. I'm sure certified copies noticed to local/state authorities may place one "with standing".
The presumption of your membership is HISTORICALLY accomplished in three ways:
1. By land (jus soli)
2. By blood (jus sanguinis)
3. Your continued consent to be governed, by fact or presumption of law.
But an express rescission of all the ties that bind & pledging allegiance per 8USC1481(a)(2) is in accord w/ obtaining a Certificate of Nationality issued by Secretary of State. I'm sure certified copies noticed to local/state authorities may place one "with standing".
Tip: Florida Nationality has little to nothing to do with D.C. IMHO, if you're looking to DC for that, you're looking in the wrong place. Regarding jus soli and jus sanguinis, consider that you have jurisdictions running in parallel.
Absolutely right.....I'm not looking to DC for legitimacy on a State National declaration. That's my declaration of allegiance & I stand by it.....can't seek validation from without.
No, I see 8usc1502 as the "do not detain" statute --> Fed SoS let's his "STATE OF" SoS know about an "American national" "in his district". STATE OF SoS --> ALSO wearing the State SoS hat simultaneously (that foreign state to the US), is now obliged to let his agents know about one's corrected status. I know....."works on paper".....but that's how I interpret 1502's language.
By that time however, all the players should know who you are by declaration....via registered mail. They sure can't rebut that.....their "law" doesn't allow it. 'Course, you've got to "govern yourself accordingly"
The 14th alters the nature of allegiance, without the consent of the people, by reversing paramount allegiance away from the state and towards the Feds by making "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, ....[are] SUBJECT to the jurisdiction....." of Congress.
......funny how the "expatriation act" [15 stat 223 ch249] was passed the day before 7/27/68 the 14th Amendment was ratified 7/28/68.
About those parallel jurisdictions......I imagine claiming the BC might place one in either
That is the thing, certain, if not all, state officials have 'two faces': one is for their obligations on the federal side and the other is their obligations on the organic state side.
Comment