What makes a taxpayer?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chex
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 1032

    #16
    A contract intends to formalize an agreement between two or more parties, in relation to a particular subject. Contracts can cover an extremely broad range of matters, including the sale of goods or real property, the terms of employment or of an independent contractor relationship, the settlement of a dispute, and ownership of intellectual property developed as part of a work for hire.

    The Elements of a Contract

    Typically, in order to be enforceable, a contract must involve the following elements:

    A "Meeting of the Minds" (Mutual Consent)

    The parties to the contract have a mutual understanding of what the contract covers. For example, in a contract for the sale of a "mustang", the buyer thinks he will obtain a car and the seller believes he is contracting to sell a horse, there is no meeting of the minds and the contract will likely be held unenforceable.

    Offer and Acceptance

    The contract involves an offer (or more than one offer) to another party, who accepts the offer. For example, in a contract for the sale of a piano, the seller may offer the piano to the buyer for $1,000.00. The buyer's acceptance of that offer is a necessary part of creating a binding contract for the sale of the piano.

    In order to be valid, the parties to a contract must exchange something of value. In the case of the sale of a piano, the buyer receives something of value in the form of the piano, and the seller receives the frn money.

    While the validity of consideration may be subject to attack on the basis that it is illusory (e.g., one party receives only what the other party was already obligated to provide), or that there is a failure of consideration (e.g., the consideration received by one party is essentially worthless), these defenses will not let a party to a contract escape the consequences of bad negotiation. For example, if a seller enters into a contract to sell a piano for $100, and later gets an offer from somebody else for $1,000, the seller can't revoke the contract on the basis that the piano was worth a lot more than he bargained to receive.

    A typical "breach of contract" action, the party alleging the breach will recite that it performed all of its duties under the contract, whereas the other party failed to perform its duties or obligations.

    In order to be enforceable, a contract cannot violate "public policy".

    There are generally three key things involved in the process: the problem, the player, and the policy. The problem is the issue that needs to be addressed, the player is the individual or group that is influential in forming a plan to address the problem in question, and the policy is the finalized course of action decided upon by the government.

    If the subject matter of a contract is illegal, you cannot enforce the contract. A contract for the sale of illegal drugs, for example, violates public policy and is not enforceable.

    Absent proof of the terms of the contract, a party may be unable to enforce the contract or may be forced to settle for less than the original bargain. Thus, even when there is not an opportunity to draft up a formal contract, it is good practice to always make some sort of writing, signed by both parties, to memorialize the key terms of an agreement.
    Last edited by Chex; 12-31-13, 04:15 PM.
    "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

    Comment

    • allodial
      Senior Member
      • May 2011
      • 2866

      #17
      The tax ID has value. The right to work has value. The driver license has value. The social security card has value.
      Last edited by allodial; 12-31-13, 04:51 PM.
      All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

      "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
      "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
      Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

      Comment

      • Chex
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 1032

        #18
        Originally posted by allodial View Post
        The tax ID has value. The right to work has value. The driver license has value. The social security card has value.
        I agree they absolutely have value
        "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

        Comment

        • powder
          Member
          • May 2011
          • 38

          #19
          Originally posted by Anthony Joseph View Post
          On what contract are two signatures found, memorializing a meeting of the minds in agreement, that one is a taxpayer?
          An endorsement does not have to be in ink.

          Comment

          • Anthony Joseph

            #20
            Originally posted by powder View Post
            An endorsement does not have to be in ink.
            'IRS' and 'United States' cannot speak or do anything.

            Only man can make a claim against another man.

            Only man can rob property from another man.

            Only man can interfere with the rights of another man.

            Only man can wrong another man.

            If you give life to the 'office' or 'cloak' that a man tries to hide behind (by agreeing that you hear or see it) when causing you harm or injury then you also give life to the realm of codes, statutes and 'legalese' relating to said office or cloak.

            Can you decipher code? Do you understand legalese? Do you believe statutes bind you? If someone is making a claim against you, that someone MUST appear and verify in living voice said claim on the record else there is no claim and no case.

            Plaintiff must appear. Plaintiff must verify claim and press the record. A man has a right to face and question his accuser in open court. This is ancient law which is still superior if a man invokes it properly. No one but the claimant may testify if a man knows how to hold and keep his court. One without firsthand knowledge is merely speaking hearsay. Paper is valueless without a man to verify what is written on it on the record in open court.

            That is how a common law court of record operates if a man requires it and knows how to keep it, regardless of who is moving the claim or what jurisdiction the claimant begins from.

            I am in the process of learning this and applying it; I haven't mastered it as of yet.

            Comment

            • froze25
              Member
              • Dec 2013
              • 71

              #21
              My biggest challenge is finding reading material that teaches a man/woman on invoking common law, understanding jurisdiction and bringing a claim forward. Any suggested books or reading material.

              Comment

              • allodial
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 2866

                #22
                Originally posted by froze25 View Post
                My biggest challenge is finding reading material that teaches a man/woman on invoking common law, understanding jurisdiction and bringing a claim forward. Any suggested books or reading material.
                And why would one bring common law into a court of equity?
                All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

                "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
                "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
                Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

                Comment

                • froze25
                  Member
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 71

                  #23
                  I don't think you would but wouldn't you bring an equity action into a common law claim?

                  Comment

                  • allodial
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 2866

                    #24
                    Originally posted by froze25 View Post
                    I don't think you would but wouldn't you bring an equity action into a common law claim?
                    It might help to first determine what common law and equity are respectively (as in theory or philosophy) and then consider practice, pleadings or procedure. A visit to a law library might be quite helpful. Consider that if a case was against you: * if it were an equity case you might get fined or ordered to stay away from a certain person; * if it were a common law case you might be hung. What is your favorite?

                    Like with any topic, there might be books that are theoretical (or philosophical) in nature. There might also be those books which pertain to practice (or praxis or application). Perhaps that might help. It might be worth noting that "common law" might be relative to a given society. Also, the rules, regulations or systematic of a court tend to be referred to as "procedure".

                    Related terms: pleading, practice, equity, equitable maxims, common law.

                    Originally posted by froze25 View Post
                    My biggest challenge is finding reading material....
                    Google, library, yahoo, duckduckgo, etc.
                    Last edited by allodial; 01-02-14, 12:05 AM.
                    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

                    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
                    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
                    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

                    Comment

                    • Chex
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 1032

                      #25
                      Originally posted by froze25 View Post
                      My biggest challenge is finding reading material that teaches a man/woman on invoking common law, understanding jurisdiction and bringing a claim forward. Any suggested books or reading material.
                      Here you go froze25.

                      James Graham Cannon
                      Author of Clearing-houses, Bank credits, Proportion of balances to discounts, Bank defalcations, Individual credits, Buying commercial paper, Profit or loss on bank accounts, Honest money for all


                      http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr...=relevancerank

                      Social Credit By Clifford Hugh Douglas http://nationalvanguard.org/books/so...ch_douglas.pdf
                      "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

                      Comment

                      • Anthony Joseph

                        #26
                        There is a reason why those who act for 'IRS' direct you to "petition" the "tax court". This is an intentional "flip tactic" to get you to bear the burden of proof. You must now prove you "don't owe" instead of whoever made the initial claim proving you "do owe". As petitioner, you become the Plaintiff, with all the burden, and the Defendant (IRS) need not appear or testify in that specific court setting and jurisdiction. Take a wild guess who will win 99.99% of the time?

                        Instead, why not make a good faith effort to settle the matter on the private side by requiring the claimant to make a verifiable claim of the alleged debt due? Keep a record of your efforts and give notification to the one who will move the claim that you will require the Plaintiff appear and verify the claim against you on the record under oath or affirmation. If the Plaintiff does not appear to verify the claim, the moving party is committing barratry; a trespass which is a wrong causing harm to a man and injury to his property.

                        The key is to hold and keep your court of record at common law as a man without allowing the jurisdiction to flip back to statutory/civil/etc. Remember, you are not "you", so don't ever answer to it; even in writing.

                        The letters/notices from 'IRS' always state that "you" owe a debt in the body of the letter.

                        i; a man, am NOT "you".

                        Comment

                        • Jethro
                          Member
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 87

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Anthony Joseph View Post
                          The letters/notices from 'IRS' always state that "you" owe a debt in the body of the letter.
                          And those letters/notices always begin with "Dear Taxpayer:". You = taxpayer.

                          Comment

                          • Jethro
                            Member
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 87

                            #28
                            Originally posted by allodial View Post
                            1] In Canada, USA, UK, NZ, Australia, etc. applying for a tax ID or the like or some similar revenue oriented account (note: a Social Security Account Number is not a taxpayer ID although the digits can be used as an account number at the IRS;
                            I have a friend who recently obtained an official copy of his purported application for a Social Security Number (also known as an "SS-5" Form). At the bottom of the Form it read "Internal Revenue Service". Internal Revenue Service only deals with taxpayers, therefore the Social Security Account Number must also be a taxpayer ID number from its inception.

                            Comment

                            • Anthony Joseph

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Jethro View Post
                              And those letters/notices always begin with "Dear Taxpayer:". You = taxpayer.
                              You signifies plural/duality; meaning a man who acts in capacity of a person or an office.

                              i; a man, am NOT "you".

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X