King v. Burwell u.s. supreme court no. 14-114

[Chex]

http://news.yahoo.com/end-obamacare-...-politics.html

[Chex]

The section of the ACA (section 1401) that is relevant to this issue does not contain "typos".

It is not unclear or vague in what it says. There is no question about what the words in

Section 1401 mean because those words include these words "as established in Section 1311".

Section 1311 calls for the creation and operation of health insurance exchanges by each state.

Section 1321(c)`allows for the federal government to establish an exchange if the state fails to do so.

Section1401 makes no mention of federal exchanges or Section 1321(c).

It is clearly obvious that the authors of the ACA tried to use the threat of not being eligible for federal subsidies to scare/force the states to set up their own exchanges.

Now that their attempted extortion did not work in a majority of the states they want everyone to ignore what they actually wrote. To claim otherwise is a blatant lie.

[pumpkin]

This is a simple case of judicial expansion. The judiciary cannot expand upon the definitions and words of the statutes passed by the legislature. I have yet heard of any case brought by 'one of the people' against the ACA. Government placing a tax upon medical equipment is an act directly against the right to life and the quality of it. Government fucks up everything it touches, and the people had better get them OUT of health care. The 'deduction' is a trap anyway. There should be no 'deductions' as their should be no income tax upon the people of the several states.

[Chex]

This is a simple case of judicial expansion. The judiciary cannot expand upon the definitions and words of the statutes passed by the legislature. I have yet heard of any case brought by 'one of the people' against the ACA. Government placing a tax upon medical equipment is an act directly against the right to life and the quality of it. Government fucks up everything it touches, and the people had better get them OUT of health care. The 'deduction' is a trap anyway. There should be no 'deductions' as their should be no income tax upon the people of the several states.

"My Sentiments Exactly"

[allodial]

When government is in business to compete with the citizenry and private persons and when banks are spy operations, no surprise? Welcome to the United American Soviet Union? Union as in public service workers' unions out to hold countries hostage under Debtor-Creditor law?

[Chex]

http://www.bloombergview.com/article...are?cmpid=yhoo