Social Security Number

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tomasz Zygmunt
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 3

    #1

    Social Security Number

    A Social Security Number is required to work in the United States, the territory owned by and subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. Employers register as federal employers, thereby, making employees federal employees.
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5949

    #2
    Employers register as federal employers?
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • Tomasz Zygmunt
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Perhaps ignorant CPA's and attorneys register employer clients as federal employers thus placing them on federal territory and making their employees federal employees, employed in the Unidted States.

      Comment

      • EZrhythm
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 257

        #4
        Since the system acts on presumptions, isn't evidence toward the presumption that a business is a federal employer when a business applies for and receives an EIN? (Employer Identification Number)

        Comment

        • David Merrill
          Administrator
          • Mar 2011
          • 5949

          #5
          I have no doubt you have it right Tom. I was hoping for a new and solid verification. - Like a federal employee filing form that is required for Employers to use that would be conclusive evidence that when a new employer registers with the IRS, the employer is obviously filing as a federal employee?
          www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
          www.bishopcastle.us
          www.bishopcastle.mobi

          Comment

          • JohnnyCash

            #6
            Bankster Slave Record XXX-XX-1313

            Presented for your viewing pleasure, here are the "Estimated Benefits" and "Earnings Record" I recently received from the Social Security Administration. As the trust account records show, I spent many years enriching the international banking cabal. I'm past feeling angry about that, in fact I'm happy to have learned enough about the scam to have escaped it successfully (beginning 2008). Thank You all! And as far as modern plantation wage-earners go, you can see I was a reluctant slave, quite below average. Sorry Banksters. HA!


            Comment

            • David Merrill
              Administrator
              • Mar 2011
              • 5949

              #7
              Thanks for showing us your success story!!
              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
              www.bishopcastle.us
              www.bishopcastle.mobi

              Comment

              • shikamaru
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 1630

                #8
                Originally posted by JohnnyCash View Post
                Presented for your viewing pleasure, here are the "Estimated Benefits" and "Earnings Record" I recently received from the Social Security Administration. As the trust account records show, I spent many years enriching the international banking cabal. I'm past feeling angry about that, in fact I'm happy to have learned enough about the scam to have escaped it successfully (beginning 2008). Thank You all! And as far as modern plantation wage-earners go, you can see I was a reluctant slave, quite below average. Sorry Banksters. HA!
                If Social Security is a trust, a beneficiary should be able to resign and waive the benefits to terminate the trust relationship.

                I'm most interested in how "the Informer" removed himself as beneficiary from the trust. Glad I have his broadcasts .

                Comment

                • David Merrill
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 5949

                  #9
                  Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
                  If Social Security is a trust, a beneficiary should be able to resign and waive the benefits to terminate the trust relationship.

                  I'm most interested in how "the Informer" removed himself as beneficiary from the trust. Glad I have his broadcasts .

                  Please isolate anything you find and link us directly to the passage; cite Minute Mark for example.


                  Crosstalk:

                  I like reading Suitor’s expression of inquiry. It puts the question to the Social Security Trust as though there is somebody there to read it. I have heard that the actual Trust indenture is in a banking envelope in a safety deposit box. When Congress makes adjustments to the original indenture a courier replaces the last schedule in the safety deposit box. So in that sense it seems silly to be talking to a zipper envelope in a safety deposit box but it makes my approach rather attractive. If you say you have a SSN, then you are the beneficiary and the government is the trustee or grantor. If you say that you do not have a SSN then there is no trust in place. The Manager of the SSI office here explained this to me many years ago. The lady at the counter wanted me arrested for wanting to get rid of my SSN. She was even annoyed that the Manager came out and explained it all to me politely.

                  We do not have a process to get rid of Social Security Numbers. When did you request a SSN?

                  When I was about fourteen.

                  When you wish to use your SSN, how do you do that?

                  I write it down or say it to somebody taking it down.

                  Stop doing that.
                  Last edited by David Merrill; 01-10-12, 02:01 PM.
                  www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                  www.bishopcastle.us
                  www.bishopcastle.mobi

                  Comment

                  • shikamaru
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 1630

                    #10
                    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
                    Please isolate anything you find and link us directly to the passage; cite Minute Mark for example.
                    The audios are in this thread:

                    http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...wall-and-more-!!

                    I'm not sure which one it is though.

                    Comment

                    • Shuftin
                      Member
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 30

                      #11
                      Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
                      If Social Security is a trust, a beneficiary should be able to resign and waive the benefits to terminate the trust relationship.

                      I'm most interested in how "the Informer" removed himself as beneficiary from the trust. Glad I have his broadcasts .
                      I had a link to the informer [website] with corresponding information on the old forum which was lost when it went down. From my understanding and memory, the informer discovered, possible from the IRS Code, that a SSN is composed of a nine [not ten] digit number having zero alphabetic letters. When one retires, the IRS attaches a tenth symbol, the letter "A" to the tail-end of the SSN. By doing so, the IRS converts a valid SSN into a non-valid SSN and one then becomes a beneficiary. Or words to that effect.

                      I wish I could remember better but maybe this will give you some direction. Then again, possibly it was the SSA rather than the IRS that attached the additional symbol "A" to the tail-end of the SSN. In either event, one loses his SSN upon retirement and one is then issued something that is not a valid SSN.

                      Things similar are not the same.

                      My knee-jerk reaction at the time of reading was: In order to stand forth and speak Truthfully saying "I have no SSN" is to simply retire. The documentation of TPTB become proof-positive that one no longer has a valid SSN.

                      Comment

                      • shikamaru
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 1630

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Shuftin View Post
                        I had a link to the informer [website] with corresponding information on the old forum which was lost when it went down. From my understanding and memory, the informer discovered, possible from the IRS Code, that a SSN is composed of a nine [not ten] digit number having zero alphabetic letters. When one retires, the IRS attaches a tenth symbol, the letter "A" to the tail-end of the SSN. By doing so, the IRS converts a valid SSN into a non-valid SSN and one then becomes a beneficiary. Or words to that effect.

                        I wish I could remember better but maybe this will give you some direction. Then again, possibly it was the SSA rather than the IRS that attached the additional symbol "A" to the tail-end of the SSN. In either event, one loses his SSN upon retirement and one is then issued something that is not a valid SSN.

                        Things similar are not the same.

                        My knee-jerk reaction at the time of reading was: In order to stand forth and speak Truthfully saying "I have no SSN" is to simply retire. The documentation of TPTB become proof-positive that one no longer has a valid SSN.
                        Here is my cluster of "the Informer" as well as James Montgomery and others of interesting note:

                        Comment

                        • IgraineS
                          Junior Member
                          • Mar 2012
                          • 1

                          #13
                          Class war between haves and have nots over raising Social Security age

                          Social Security age has turned into a contentious problem, as the prosperous see it as a deficit hog and the poor see it as a lifeline. It appears to be as much of a class war as it has ever been. Resource for this article: Class war between haves and have nots over raising Social Security age. For me, it's alright.

                          Comment

                          • allodial
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2011
                            • 2866

                            #14
                            Retire can mean to leave public service or the like.

                            1. To withdraw; to retreat; to go from company or from a public place into privacy; as, to retire from the world; to retire from notice.

                            2. To retreat from action or danger; as, to retire from battle.

                            3. To withdraw from a public station. General Washington, in 1796, retired to private life.

                            4. To break up, as a company or assembly. The company retired at eleven o'clock.

                            5. To depart or withdraw for safety or for pleasure. Men retire from the town in summer for health and pleasure. But in South Carolina, the planters retire from their estates to Charleston, or to an isle near the town.

                            6. To recede; to fall back. The shore of the sea retires in bays and gulfs.(Webster's 1828)
                            Last edited by allodial; 03-06-12, 08:32 PM.
                            All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

                            "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
                            "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
                            Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

                            Comment

                            • jesse james

                              #15
                              Hey let me ask you guys a question .........has anybody here actually read the Social Security Act?

                              The reason why I ask if anybody has read the Act is because Social Security defines "state" using the federal territory description.

                              (e) State, United States, and citizen
                              For purposes of this chapter?
                              (1) State
                              The term ?State? includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
                              (2) United States
                              The term ?United States? when used in a geographical sense includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
                              An individual who is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (but not otherwise a citizen of the United States) shall be considered, for purposes of this section, as a citizen of the United States.
                              Not only are the federal union state overlays included in this definition........ so are the territories and possessions.

                              Social security isnt hiding anything from you....you just werent inform how to read and understand law.
                              By participating in SS you are actively well within federal jurisdiction.

                              Heres more to confirm and document.

                              Title 5
                              USC : Title 5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES

                              (13) the term ?Federal personnel? means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).
                              Anybody care to guess who administers Social security?
                              The government of the united states thats who!
                              And if you are not convinced-

                              26usc 3101
                              (a) Old-age, survivors, and disability insurance
                              In addition to other taxes, there is hereby imposed on the income of every individual a tax equal to the following percentages of the wages (as defined in section 3121 (a)) received by him with respect to employment (as defined in section 3121 (b))?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X