Quo Warranto

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5956

    #16
    You are new and I would risk making you feel unwelcome if I shared my feelings.

    Several suitors in the brain trust got involved with James Timothy TURNER now in federal prison. The mental model I prefer is that oath = separation = sin. This Biblical Hebrew word is both the Mark on Cain's forehead and on the foreheads and hands of those who follow God. Respectively the Sons of Cain and the Sons of Man (Seth). This authority over evil has been lawfully granted to the Sons of Cain so that they will not repeat killing Abel, upon the Sons of Man. But when the Sons of Man come against the Sons of Cain the results are consistently that the Sons of Cain prevail.

    If you can find a better explanation for the justice God doled out to Cain after murdering Abel the that is good for you. The model works for me.

    The Federal Reserve Act, furnishing elastic currency is a criminal syndicalism organized by Congress. Therefore Congress had to deliver the remedy, which Congress did at Section 16. If you want out of contract with the banksters there is the remedy right there.

    For the signers of that paper, there is the Court Security Act of 2007.
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • lis
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 5

      #17
      Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
      You are new and I would risk making you feel unwelcome if I shared my feelings.

      Several suitors in the brain trust got involved with James Timothy TURNER now in federal prison. The mental model I prefer is that oath = separation = sin. This Biblical Hebrew word is both the Mark on Cain's forehead and on the foreheads and hands of those who follow God. Respectively the Sons of Cain and the Sons of Man (Seth). This authority over evil has been lawfully granted to the Sons of Cain so that they will not repeat killing Abel, upon the Sons of Man. But when the Sons of Man come against the Sons of Cain the results are consistently that the Sons of Cain prevail.

      If you can find a better explanation for the justice God doled out to Cain after murdering Abel the that is good for you. The model works for me.

      The Federal Reserve Act, furnishing elastic currency is a criminal syndicalism organized by Congress. Therefore Congress had to deliver the remedy, which Congress did at Section 16. If you want out of contract with the banksters there is the remedy right there.

      For the signers of that paper, there is the Court Security Act of 2007.
      Forgive me, David. For this newbie, you might as well speak Martian. Your reply has nothing to do with my question regarding NLA and its efforts. Thanks.

      Comment

      • lis
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2014
        • 5

        #18
        Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
        You are new and I would risk making you feel unwelcome if I shared my feelings.

        Several suitors in the brain trust got involved with James Timothy TURNER now in federal prison. The mental model I prefer is that oath = separation = sin. This Biblical Hebrew word is both the Mark on Cain's forehead and on the foreheads and hands of those who follow God. Respectively the Sons of Cain and the Sons of Man (Seth). This authority over evil has been lawfully granted to the Sons of Cain so that they will not repeat killing Abel, upon the Sons of Man. But when the Sons of Man come against the Sons of Cain the results are consistently that the Sons of Cain prevail.

        If you can find a better explanation for the justice God doled out to Cain after murdering Abel the that is good for you. The model works for me.

        The Federal Reserve Act, furnishing elastic currency is a criminal syndicalism organized by Congress. Therefore Congress had to deliver the remedy, which Congress did at Section 16. If you want out of contract with the banksters there is the remedy right there.

        For the signers of that paper, there is the Court Security Act of 2007.
        I've heard about Tim Turner, but have not yet explored his work. What did he do so heinous as to warrant federal prison? Did he have access to trial by jury in a court of record? Thanks.

        Comment

        • Chex
          Senior Member
          • May 2011
          • 1032

          #19
          Tim Turner indicted for tax crimes [i]f two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States



          From Title 18-CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
          Last edited by Chex; 12-01-14, 10:31 PM.
          "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

          Comment

          • David Merrill
            Administrator
            • Mar 2011
            • 5956

            #20
            Originally posted by lis View Post
            I've heard about Tim Turner, but have not yet explored his work. What did he do so heinous as to warrant federal prison? Did he have access to trial by jury in a court of record? Thanks.
            Tim tried to do the same thing as this paper you present here. My close friend got involved and Tim made promises that this superfluous jurisdiction your presentment describes could not support and so he went to jail. What I am going to dredge up, rather than putting on you for dredging it up, is like repeating a painful accident for me; you know - when you are in pain and thinking you didn't learn the last time you did exactly the same mistake.

            I can justify it by explaining to any readers about the court of record you seem to think these ad hoc gatherings of endorsers might be capable of. Pay close attention to Page 5 - notice the Great Seal of Authority and then remember that I served this directly on the Justices of the Tenth Circuit.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	Tenth Circuit Courthouse.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	230.8 KB
ID:	41226

            If you look at about any definition for amicus curiae you will learn that both parties must consent to the filing unless the amicus comes from a State. And so you see that it was filed without any talk of prosecuting me for using the Great Seal, which is a Class 5 felony if you are not affiliated with State business. I am the Trustee of the resulting trust aka Patroon. - Nothing special, just know and keep the record - court of record, get it?

            I was hoping that they could be lenient about sentencing, which they were. And I was hoping they would shut down the intelligence mill - which they did not, until nearly a year later.


            Regards,

            David Merrill.


            P.S. Sorry, that pdf is too large for the Attachments:

            Click image for larger version

Name:	Amicus Curiae5 s.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	123.3 KB
ID:	41227
            Last edited by David Merrill; 12-02-14, 12:58 AM.
            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
            www.bishopcastle.us
            www.bishopcastle.mobi

            Comment

            • allodial
              Senior Member
              • May 2011
              • 2866

              #21
              One thing that is interesting about the document (Quo Warranto) is that the assertion of the "Constitution of the United States" having a "capstone" "Bill of Rights". It would seem that to the contrary the Constitution for the United States of America has a bill of rights and that the "Constitution of the United States" (as in "Arrangement/Makeup/Constellation of the United States" as a whole thing) is something more abstract and comprehensive or macroscopic than the 1788 charter.

              Lots of verbiage problems in the Quo Warranto document.

              "The prime directive ordained by the American People "
              Star Trek? Wut? The American People aren't the People of America.

              Re: Tim Turner.. I have long suspected he was part of an intelligence mill and sting operation. My observation is that he or those associated with him were analyzing lawful remedies and then sending out 'stooges' to make the remedies or those asserting them look bad. Such done by the Feds is IMHO felony conspiracy against rights and a a very nasty type of barratry or champerty.

              Re the Quo Warranto document it seems simpler to use a writ of mandamus on a rogue officer and appoint a higher official to deal with that rogue officer if he/she fails to get in line. Judges, like sheriffs, are peace officers too or at least some of them.

              The writ of mandamus is probably the most useful, universally available (even to subjects) of all of the prerogative or extraordinary writs. Writs of prohibition and orders to show cause are useful too.
              Last edited by allodial; 12-02-14, 03:30 AM.
              All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

              "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
              "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
              Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

              Comment

              • shikamaru
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 1630

                #22
                Originally posted by pumpkin View Post
                I have read some about Quo Warranto. It being a parogative writ, the right is not in its issue, but in its answer. The respondant must answer by what authority he acts. But as in all cases, the identity of the one who issues the writ will make all the difference in the world. Make sure to identify yourself as one of the people, created in the image of God, and endowed by your creator with certain inalienable rights. There are many entities other than people, and an answer that may fail concerning the rights of the people, will be sufficient if applied to another entity. Don't let the court or anyone else assume anything about you.
                Great point.

                Comment

                Working...
                X