Really, the best thing you can do is...

**george** · 02-24-16, 10:21 PM

hi David

Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

Somebody is seeking help about a warrant for a friend who cannot afford to purchase the Lesson Plan at the moment:

thanks for this!

if one were to try and find out what constitutes a proper oath of office in the state they are associated, how might they go about this?

is proper oath instructions in each states constitution? do we need the earliest constitution or latest?

thanks

**David Merrill** · 02-25-16, 03:37 AM

Originally posted by george View Post

thanks for this!

if one were to try and find out what constitutes a proper oath of office in the state they are associated, how might they go about this?

is proper oath instructions in each states constitution? do we need the earliest constitution or latest?

thanks

There might be a section called Officers of Judiciary. Maybe with both establish where the oaths are required to be published. It would make sense that county judges are required to file at the county clerk and recorder while district judges have to file with the Secretary of State or Protonotary of the Commonwealth.

Look at the Statutes about Courts. Form of Oath should be specified. Also the Secretary of State should have the Oath of Office form in conformity with statute online.

You probably want to be looking at current law and constitutions. But if you cannot find your way above then look in the older renditions and find out how, when and especially why it was written out or otherwise obscured.

**walter** · 02-26-16, 05:23 PM

Here is a different perspective.

In Canada if one didn't show up to a summons for court then a bench warrant is issued.
This means they don't come looking for you like coming and knocking on your door etc.
But if you use the NAME when stopped by police for any other issue you are going to jail to answer for the charges.
So what does that tell you?
If you use the NAME you are using their property in usufruct. They have to get you in that act of using the usufruct.

So,
On birth certificate application forms they have a box to fill up that states what you are going to use the BC for.
My thoughts are what if you fill up that section on the form for why you want a BC with "discharge obligations".
And keep copies of the form before you send it away.
Would they give you a new BC? I don't know but if they did you will have a hammer of a paper record for discharge.
Remember whose signed that BC. It wasn't you. So why accept liability on it?

I mention this because I myself would not go to court anymore.
They are to good at screwing one over so not showing up stops them in their tracks.
One must be very knowledgeable and calm in court to slay the dragon because all they do is lie cheat and steal.
I get into it and go toe to toe with the judge which might not be the best thing but that is just me. Its a fight.

So the above idea is for saying its their NAME which they created so you have the liability for it.

The other method would be yes it is my NAME where did you get permission to use it?
In Canada the Privacy Act states who can use the NAME and for what purpose.
If the one bringing the charge on the NAME is not the one mentioned in the Act then they have no standing in court.
Now they are committing a crime of unauthorized use of the NAME. They are dead in the water.
In Canada the AG has use of the NAME but when one goes to court the AG is nowhere around.
Its a crown prosecutor doing the dirty work. If they don't have a power of attorney from the AG before you go to court they have no standing. And once the game starts its to late for them to get it.

So with that said picture this.
You walk into the court building and see the NAME written on the paper hanging on the wall beside the court room door.
You stand up and state who put the NAME there in a private venue for profit?
Where is their POA to use the NAME?
Oh...you don't have one...no standing dismiss this charge and don't let this happen again.
The reason why you can make that claim of owning the NAME because they will not and could not say otherwise with out admitting they own it and hold liability on it. Once they admit it they have no job.

Something for you to chew on.
It comes down to who your friend is in the long run.

**David Merrill** · 02-26-16, 07:13 PM

I presume this timing is by the Holy Spirit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEux0uOqtUg

Canadian suitors are finding remedy, even publication on PACER. The law boundary is "district" and that seems to have been expanded through Bretton Woods to all SDR nations, and even BRICS in evasion, trying to form their own basket, and China trying that prior to that cannot evade the denomination DOLLAR.

So who is owner?

Title - entitlement, and Certificate of Title - Registered Owner.

I have studied under an allegedly ex-priest and learned, The Roman Catholic church knows that Mary MAGDALENE was Jesus CHRIST's wife and that they logically would have had children. In fact the fledgling papacy fabricated vicious rumors that Mary was a whore...

My point is that while he had this French Connection correct, being familiar with my Gospel of Pragmatism he would look directly at me while teaching that Jesus died on the Cross and was resurrected by supernatural powers. Why lie?

I don't care why, because I figured that out real fast - business plan. I could go on and on about the commercial priestcraft but here my point is simply that Ownership flew out the window with the Lie. I watched the rerun of Kung Fu with eight-year old mandarin-playing Jodie FOSTER. CAINE preserved her innocence above his own life. - So she could own something called the truth.

This Triumvirate of Vatican/City of London/Washington DC is nothing because it cannot own a thing until it faces the truth.

**Michael Joseph** · 02-26-16, 08:03 PM

Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

I presume this timing is by the Holy Spirit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEux0uOqtUg

Canadian suitors are finding remedy, even publication on PACER. The law boundary is "district" and that seems to have been expanded through Bretton Woods to all SDR nations, and even BRICS in evasion, trying to form their own basket, and China trying that prior to that cannot evade the denomination DOLLAR.

So who is owner?

Title - entitlement, and Certificate of Title - Registered Owner.

I have studied under an allegedly ex-priest and learned, The Roman Catholic church knows that Mary MAGDALENE was Jesus CHRIST's wife and that they logically would have had children. In fact the fledgling papacy fabricated vicious rumors that Mary was a whore...

My point is that while he had this French Connection correct, being familiar with my Gospel of Pragmatism he would look directly at me while teaching that Jesus died on the Cross and was resurrected by supernatural powers. Why lie?

I don't care why, because I figured that out real fast - business plan. I could go on and on about the commercial priestcraft but here my point is simply that Ownership flew out the window with the Lie. I watched the rerun of Kung Fu with eight-year old mandarin-playing Jodie FOSTER. CAINE preserved her innocence above his own life. - So she could own something called the truth.

This Triumvirate of Vatican/City of London/Washington DC is nothing because it cannot own a thing until it faces the truth.

Unlicensed Use is an infringement upon intellectual property. In case anyone has noticed, and I know you have, the Laws are copyrighted. Thus there is a closed law boundary and one who is licensed is automatically subject to those laws and statutes that govern the license. Otherwise for one to make an unlicensed use is a trespass. And thus since one presumes to be the trustee, even though he or she is not, then that one also gets the liability of his/her misdeed. The courts make a use of a construct called a CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST. And the trustee is in "trustee de son tort".

Said in a metaphysical way - if one refuses to dream, then one will live under the dream of another! Now if you wish me to refer to Scripture there are numerous references but I will choose two then elaborate.

Rom_8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,

and

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

well maybe three verses to make it plain.

Psalms 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.

Comment: We can see in verse 6 that "all of you are children of the most High"....but we now see that a creature was formed [that is by FIAT] For God said and it was! So now the creature was MADE SUBJECT to vanity according to a certain hope!

Therefore the Creature is subject to Ceasar's world. And the Creature gives unto Ceasar what is Ceasars. The hope however is that CONSCIENCE would develop within by Experience [a baptism by Fire]. Once Conscience comes, then also comes choice! Those who do nothing remain subject to uses established by others [Cestui Que Use] for the terre-tenant.

For the citizenry are joint-tenants IN THE SOVEREIGNTY. And those who would not make a use of their own minds and rather subject themselves either willingly or in ignorance are subjects nevertheless. What is the worst is those who are willingly ignorant is this not sin? Now then, the Scriptures declare the same! For they declare that once one is MADE a member of the Commonwealth of Israel, then that one is a Co-Heir in God.

What folks are seeing in State is a bad reflection in a glass [mirror]. And we are being transformed.

2Co_3:18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.

See now that the Creature is FIAT when you frame the argument in regard to God-Kind. But the FIAT Creature is being transformed into Christ. This is the work of God by Grace.

So look at the State whereof and wherein you reside....what do you see in the mirror reflection?

Shalom,
Michael Joseph

**David Merrill** · 02-26-16, 08:20 PM

Thank you Michael Joseph;

Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

I presume this timing is by the Holy Spirit:

**xparte** · 02-26-16, 08:39 PM

if one didn't show up to a summons for court then a bench warrant is issued.
This means they don't come looking for you like coming and knocking on your door etc.
But if you use the NAME when stopped by police for any other issue you are going to jail to answer for the charges.What i would add is if they show up at the door its the Criminal identification you already provided, if you were finger printed this just adds another tool they use to collect you at the door is upon release you agree to go to court a summons and promise to appear or undertaking digging a hole.the warrant that allows kidnapping is giving finger prints dusting the car never identify s the driver you do.The warrant is a benefit cheque it is you and the NAME they can hold that NAME 72hrs or 24hrs without charge if using true name only they have a show cause and say how did he identify himself with a DL the fact you never provided one and the leo on the stand was not the ares sting officer makes no difference . Good offence offense a breach of a law or rule; an illegal act.
"neither offense violates any federal law"
synonyms: crime, illegal/unlawful act, whats a defense nothing defending a claim is already accepting blame traffic matters without victims are warrants valid it might be time to oath the warrant all municipal warrants are criminally administrative. How about a forum dedicated on warrants if it just generalized it wont effect a members discourse at any suitors expense. Being aware the site entertains both it might be entertaining to share the warrant less arrests.Private or public. Walter the bench now our last place to start a fight both of us been there. The allegorical shared arrests i will impart a few with some scrubbing first.pattern basics fight and flight .

**David Merrill** · 02-26-16, 08:43 PM

When a beneficiary interlopes a corpus property of the trust, taking "ownership" control from the Trustee that forms the CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST.

So, is it your name?

ANSWER: Is another question... Did you use it to identify yourself?

**xparte** · 02-26-16, 08:58 PM

In a small jurisdiction the trouble maker is my Name when one avoids it the NAME the historical or bibliographer LEO or clerk looks under legend and trouble maker or marker comes alive.without a true name full mental case jacket your drug into evidence as a NAME.Warrants for NAMES paper cuts.how to avoid being NAMED can it be said verbally without voice.

**David Merrill** · 02-26-16, 09:47 PM

I suggest that you rely on the LEO's training. He is trained to be able to testify, "How did the defendant identify himself?"

That is so ingrained that it is usually in the first couple sentences out of the LEO's mouth after being sworn in.

I am not showing you that driver license card for identification purposes.

**Michael Joseph** · 02-26-16, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

I suggest that you rely on the LEO's training. He is trained to be able to testify, "How did the defendant identify himself?"

That is so ingrained that it is usually in the first couple sentences out of the LEO's mouth after being sworn in.

TESTI-FY. With hand on nuts Abraham enters into a Covenant. May that which thou thinkest to do upon me happen to you if you default.

Gen 24:2 And Abraham said unto his eldest servant of his house, that ruled over all that he had, Put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh:

Gen 24:3 And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell:

Gen 24:8 And if the woman will not be willing to follow thee, then thou shalt be clear from this my oath: only bring not my son thither again.

Gen 24:9 And the servant put his hand under the thigh of Abraham his master, and sware to him concerning that matter.

Gen 21:27 And Abraham took sheep and oxen, and gave them unto Abimelech; and both of them made a covenant.

Gen 21:28 And Abraham set seven ewe lambs of the flock by themselves.

Gen 21:29 And Abimelech said unto Abraham, What mean these seven ewe lambs which thou hast set by themselves?

Gen 21:30 And he said, For these seven ewe lambs shalt thou take of my hand, that they may be a witness unto me, that I have digged this well.

Gen 21:31 Wherefore he called that place Beersheba; because there they sware both of them.

Beer-Sheba - the place where one SEVEN's himself - or the Well of the Oath. TESTI-fy. Peter, how do you impregnate the State of Being? Funny language, yes?

How to you give TESTI-MONEY. In God We Trust. From your nuts to your brain. How do you impregnate the State of Being you desire?

We are commanded not to plow the field with another man's heifer. Do you understand? Advertising signs prey on the simple telling them that they can do what has never been done. For Ham uncovered the nakedness of his Father. He slept with his Mother! Not literally mind you as all of you formalists might think. But metaphysically he grabbed his daddy by his nuts. You get it now?

Do you ever hear that voice of doubt whispering in your ear? When you are in your love feast "drunk on the new wine", do you ever hear "Ham" coming into your tent whispering a new wind [spirit] of doubt, or perhaps fear? Will you allow Ham to "plow the field with your heifer?"

Better said will you let another man - impregnate - the woman [sub-conscious mind]? It appears the collective have allowed other men to plow the field [world] with their very own heifer. She belongs now to another as they all join in chorus on one GREAT SOCIETY - they all buzz along like busy little bees - not knowing for one second that they are being controlled by that which they hate! Controlled by Religion thru guilt and fear! Controlled by State by same means. Controlled by emotion by the natural use of the woman. The woman of course is completely blind to the fact that she is a pawn in this control game for she is just like all others seeking security and self satisfaction in flesh.

Thusly all are blind to the root that feeds the tree. And they kill the woman of Spirit under a Vanilla Sky. Just ask Tom.

They say that patriotism is a last refuge of a scoundrel - Bob Dylan

Mat 13:24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seedHear, and understand:

Mat 15:11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

Don't you know that the TONGUE has the power to set on fire the course of nature.... TESTI-fy and sow the sperm [I mean seed] into the Consciousness of Man. Do you plant weeds or good seed?

James 3:6 And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.

And just because I like this one....

Let it be LOVE brethren.

**george** · 02-27-16, 01:17 AM

good stuff everyone!

this thought came to me out of the blue today..

what if mom was to formally rescind her signature on the COLB? I have read no mention of this anywhere and may should have asked in the BC thread but since walter had mentioned the BC here, I figured I would mention it.

MJ,

interesting thing about the word Test. Ferrari made the Testa Rossa, in english Testa Rossa means Red Head so Testa = Head.

interesting, eh?

oh and Ferrari is the only automobile that Im aware of that has officially been blessed by the pope LOL I saw that over 20 years ago, he actually made the hand gestures and kissed the car!

and that was all I needed to see to make up my mind on how unrighteous that OFFICE can be.

**Michael Joseph** · 02-27-16, 02:08 AM

Originally posted by george View Post

good stuff everyone!

this thought came to me out of the blue today..

what if mom was to formally renounce her signature on the COLB? I have read no mention of this anywhere and may should have asked in the BC thread but since walter had mentioned the BC here, I figured I would mention it.

MJ,

interesting thing about the word Test. Ferrari made the Testa Rossa, in english Testa Rossa means Red Head so Testa = Head.

interesting, eh?

oh and Ferrari is the only automobile that Im aware of that has officially been blessed by the pope LOL I saw that over 20 years ago, he actually made the hand gestures and kissed the car!

and that was all I needed to see to make up my mind on how unrighteous that OFFICE can be.

Study the book of Enoch. The angels made a pledge to each other with their very Honor and their Lives. Does that remind you of some other writing you may have read? This pledge was the beginning of the formation of State.

**george** · 02-27-16, 05:45 AM

Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post

Study the book of Enoch. The angels made a pledge to each other with their very Honor and their Lives. Does that remind you of some other writing you may have read? This pledge was the beginning of the formation of State.

the pact that the fallen ones made to take man's daughters or another one?

but I still dont have a knack for reading this stuff the way you do. Ive picked up a lot from you here that way. how to spot the allegories and metaphors. some of it really does make more sense that way for sure.

what is the allegory for mans daughters? if an angel is not a physical being then it doesnt make sense that they had sex with daughters of men or that a daughter could birth a giant.

edit: there does seem to be some evidence and conspiracy to hide that evidence of real physical giants in the past here on earth though. but I havnt any first hand knowledge of it.

that Ken Cousins vid recently linked on another thread, I had a look at all his vids. interesting guy! non biblical type but hit some key notes that I like but hes of the opinion this is a prison planet instead of a school which I find a difficult pill to swallow myself.

but yeah, that sorta does remind me of the pledge that formed the state. hmmmm.. thanks for that angle to ponder MJ