law_war_manual june2015

[george]

hi all,

not sure how legit this is but I came across it elsewhere on the internet.

http://www.dod.mil/dodgc/images/law_war_manual15.pdf

[allodial]

Sure its legit. Compiled, updated and comprehensive war rules. However, a big question is: is the UN party to or subject to the treaties which bind its members?

Related:

• Law of Land Warfare [FM27-10 (Land)]
• NWP 1-14M (Naval)
• New Pentagon War Law Manual - RPA (6/22/2015)
• New Pentagon War Law Manual Is Totally Cool With CIA-Style Drone Attacks (Popular Science)
• International Law of War Association
• British Manual of Military Law

[shikamaru]

Politics is war (analogue).

[Canadian solution]

The thread that deals with Boris and usufruct I believe developed many of their ideas out of UN treaties, Law of Nations, enemy combatant etc

https://www.iamsomedude.com

Doug555 is probably better qualified to comment on than me

Canadiansolution

[Chex]

Boris

[allodial]

Boris like many others that make youtube videos, etc. has likely been reading our forums and things we've been discussing for decades. I specifically have for decades (so as DM) mentioned the Lieber Code, Law of Land Warfare, Law of Naval Warfare (being applied on land ala Admiralty / Maritime contracts), Invisible Contracts (book), etc. Over and over it has been stated that the U.S. Government has taken a form of martial law since 1862.

[Michael Joseph]

Boris

[pumpkin]

"If the Usufruct is PERFECT, then that means the End User could not alter or destroy the Thing, they could only Use and Enjoy."

The question then is, what is the trust property?

[Chex]

iamsomedude?

[allodial]

"Res" means thing. The res with respect to a trust would simply refer to that which is being held in trust also known as the trust corpus or the trust estate. The term usufruct is nifty but Boris hasn't seemed to arrive at realization that a military in occupation is not the sovereign. A resident is not necessarily the beneficiary. There is a term called remainderman.

Furthermore, the right of using and abusing neither vests in state officers nor in the occupying military. One of the ancient functions military is to dispense civil government until lawful government can be restore. However, even a military has a source of authority.