Wonderful Shungite

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5949

    #16
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    See the attached Rectification of Judiciary - first, Colorado where the fiat began in America and second, The Crown. Note how the stipulation to abide in the state constitution has been revoked for the Trustees.
    You might be new here so that the Territory of Colorado history is lost in years-old threads. Colorado began as a war chest formed by BUCHANNAN and inherited by LINCOLN on the eve of the Civil War. The Territorial Governor GILPIN was a venerated Mason who issued notes for paying the Union soldiers.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Form of Oath bill HB 18-1138 Colorado 7 24 18 passed TRUSTEE.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	246.0 KB
ID:	44560


    My point this post is that the stipulation about pursuant to the state constitution is redundant. says the official will be abiding in the constitutions.



    24-12-101. Form of oath or affirmation for public office - requirements for
    oath or affirmation. (1) Whenever anyWHEN A person isrequired to take an oath
    OR AFFIRMATION before he THE PERSON enters upon the discharge of any A PUBLIC
    office OR position, or business or on any other lawful occasion, it is lawful for any
    person employed to administer the oath to administer it in the following form: The
    person swearing, with his hand uplifted, shall swear "by the everliving God" THE
    FORM OF THE OATH OR AFFIRMATION IS AS FOLLOWS:

    I [NAME], DO [SELECT SWEAR OR AFFIRM] THAT I WILL SUPPORT THE
    CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF
    COLORADO,AND THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF COLORADO,AND WILL FAITHFULLY
    PERFORM THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF [NAME OF OFFICE OR POSITION] UPON
    WHICH I AM ABOUT TO ENTER TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY.
    It is within the oath of office and now that it is corrected, the form of oath, it is unnecessary to assert the bonding is to the constitution in the legislature. But this would provide that the Secretary of State must be rejecting any and all oaths that are deviant in form.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath GROHS 2019_Page_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	309.7 KB
ID:	44562

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath GROHS 2019_Page_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	226.5 KB
ID:	44563

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath GROHS 2019 s.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	470.2 KB
ID:	44561


    There you have the indictment. The Secretary of State is where you go to buy a copy of the annotated and current state constitution. The Custodian. Yet the same official is keeping record of deviant oaths? The point is that when order becomes deviant from form, it is disease - cancer.

    Also, my point is that albeit we may see it as very slow, this is the first forward progress (2016 Jubilee) we have had in judicial oversight in over 153 years.
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • David Merrill
      Administrator
      • Mar 2011
      • 5949

      #17
      This is how buckyballs heal cancer. They remind the DNA how it is supposed to be. - What it is supposed to look like.
      www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
      www.bishopcastle.us
      www.bishopcastle.mobi

      Comment

      • xparte
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2014
        • 742

        #18
        I once heard the folks in the dessert were given manna or Maize Manna was the supernatural food God gave to the Israelites during their 40-year wandering in the desert. ... Manna is also known in the Bible as the "bread of heaven," "corn of heaven," "angel's food," and "spiritual meat. So the good angels were organic and green giants jacob and the beanstalks you mean corn eating gold before monsanto just a Maize no matter whose boiling or creaming corn. This is a scripted scene outta Life of Brian Well, Brian,... your father isn't Mr. Cohen.

        BRIAN: I never thought he was.

        MANDY: Now, none of your cheek! He was a Roman, Brian. He was a centurion in the Roman army.

        BRIAN: You mean... you were raped?

        MANDY: Well, at first, yes.

        BRIAN: Who was it?

        MANDY: Heh. Nortius Maximus his name was. Hmm. Promised me the known world he did. I was to be taken to Rome, House by the Forum. Slaves. Asses' milk. (As much gold as I could eat.} Then, he, having his way with me had... voom! Like a rat out of an aqueduct.

        BRIAN: The bastard!

        MANDY: Yeah. So, next time you go on about the 'bloody Romans', don't forget you're one of them.

        BRIAN: I'm not a Roman, Mum, and I never will be! I'm a Kike! A Yid! A Hebe! A Hook-nose! I'm Kosher, Mum! I'm a Red Sea Pedestrian, and proud of it!

        Comment

        • David Merrill
          Administrator
          • Mar 2011
          • 5949

          #19
          Originally posted by xparte View Post
          I once heard the folks in the dessert were given manna or Maize Manna was the supernatural food God gave to the Israelites during their 40-year wandering in the desert. ... Manna is also known in the Bible as the "bread of heaven," "corn of heaven," "angel's food," and "spiritual meat. So the good angels were organic and green giants jacob and the beanstalks you mean corn eating gold before monsanto just a Maize no matter whose boiling or creaming corn. This is a scripted scene outta Life of Brian Well, Brian,... your father isn't Mr. Cohen.

          BRIAN: I never thought he was.

          MANDY: Now, none of your cheek! He was a Roman, Brian. He was a centurion in the Roman army.

          BRIAN: You mean... you were raped?

          MANDY: Well, at first, yes.

          BRIAN: Who was it?

          MANDY: Heh. Nortius Maximus his name was. Hmm. Promised me the known world he did. I was to be taken to Rome, House by the Forum. Slaves. Asses' milk. (As much gold as I could eat.} Then, he, having his way with me had... voom! Like a rat out of an aqueduct.

          BRIAN: The bastard!

          MANDY: Yeah. So, next time you go on about the 'bloody Romans', don't forget you're one of them.

          BRIAN: I'm not a Roman, Mum, and I never will be! I'm a Kike! A Yid! A Hebe! A Hook-nose! I'm Kosher, Mum! I'm a Red Sea Pedestrian, and proud of it!
          For now, I am focused on the Sovereign and Independent City of London - The Square Mile. The Crown. Quoting a Canadian official in an email...

          The RCMP LAYS INFORMATION THE CLERK FILES A COMPLAINT A SUMMONS OR PROMISE TO APPEAR IS ISSUED OR A WARRANT .THE PROVINCE HIRES RCMP BECAUSE THEY ARE FEDERAL AND THIS ENABLES THE CRIMINAL CODE " THE CROWN HAS WHAT?

          The Crown has no investigative powers in Canada so if you have evidence you wish the Crown to consider in determining whether the charge is to proceed, that would need to be given to the investigating police agency who would then forward it to the Crown. Further, the matter will be proceeding by summary conviction and therefore the matter will be dealt with by a provincial court judge. Thanks
          This opens the Bank of England for business.

          America is a plantation that won the right of internal revenue taxation by Revolutionary War. It is all there in the genes.

          www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
          www.bishopcastle.us
          www.bishopcastle.mobi

          Comment

          • xparte
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2014
            • 742

            #20
            (As much gold as I could eat.) MISJOINDER, NON-JOINDER AND PARTIES INCORRECTLY
            NAMED
            Proceeding not to be Defeated
            5.04 (1) No proceeding shall be defeated by reason of the misjoinder or
            non-joinder of any party and the court may, in a proceeding,
            determine the issues in dispute so far as they affect the rights of
            the parties to the proceeding and pronounce judgment without
            prejudice to the rights of all persons who are not parties.
            Adding, Deleting or Substituting Parties
            (2) At any stage of a proceeding the court may by order add, delete
            or substitute a party or correct the name of a party incorrectly
            named, on such terms as are just, unless prejudice would result
            that could not be compensated for by costs or an adjournment.
            Adding Plaintiff or Applicant
            (3) No person shall be added as a plaintiff or applicant unless the
            person's consent is filed. RCMP = QUEEN Crown = Province to consider in determining whether the charge is to proceed + CLERKS complaint docking a complaint , that would need to be given to the investigating police agency who would then forward it to the Crown provincial prosecutions . Parties without standing are the 1/informants 2nd/the Clerks /complainant 3rd/ provincial crowns . The Bruno case asks if its Federal its should be in a federal court Supreme Court of Canada the corporate Court in OTTAWA. The Authority for federal crown resides there and only there. The Clerks Complaint process is done in writing under oath and also under penalty of perjury The bonding is federal the business is provincial . Underlying the fact a provincial Clerk is not a federal clerk RCMP cant submit the criminal complaint in any provincial matter just lay that information under CCC and the Clerk files . Bruno attacks standing If the Oath she took is a provincial one her federal standing is vacant. I am generally speaking of no victim no crime those oaths aren't attainable for reasons i have tried to explain . Dead In law or a corporate Person or its corporate agent = the rcmp the clerk crown judge and Nortius Maximus the fiduciary five. promissory notes and negotiable paper instruments living on paper dead on arrival . Ontario its whose to Discover.

            Comment

            • David Merrill
              Administrator
              • Mar 2011
              • 5949

              #21
              Originally posted by xparte View Post
              (As much gold as I could eat.) No person shall be added as a plaintiff or applicant unless the
              person's consent is filed.
              That is what I have been doing - I call it verification of signature - consent.
              Attached Files
              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
              www.bishopcastle.us
              www.bishopcastle.mobi

              Comment

              • xparte
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2014
                • 742

                #22
                The party against whom the complaint is made is the defendant;No person shall be added as a plaintiff or applicant (claimants the defendants unless the
                person's consent is filed.) "complainant" denotes the complaining witness in a criminal proceeding.So in civil law cases, a plaintiff is often called a claimant. ... The plaintiff isn't the victim. Depending on the crime, the government entity that has jurisdiction is considered the plaintiff.person's consent is filed. The INFORMANT BELIEVES ON REASONABLE GROUNDS THAT ON 30th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 TIME 12PM at or near CITY TORONTO EAST Section of the CCC a violation .under Controlled Drugs and Substances Act or a driving violation Highway Traffic Act. The informants again have a belief on reasonable grounds I can only guess at the grounds being IDENTITY MISJOINDER, NON-JOINDER AND PARTIES INCORRECTLY
                NAMED Consenting to the complaint is a filing affair

                Comment

                • xparte
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 742

                  #23
                  Verification on reasonable grounds Me the informant believes the Clerk has added Me to a proceeding as a applicant or applying begging for punishment benefits and JUSTICE = JUST US filed or complaining on myself The Clerk needs a delivering under threat of perjury filing me into a case against my person not even my private legal one the dead bonds giveaway . Taking on her oath as a plaintiff might put the square mile on administrative leave The Queen has no vacant office its her court agents wearing her crown .Her Majesty needs official permission to enter the City of London. Simply because she isn't DEAD just on paper autonomous jurisdiction David Merrill Oath Slayer

                  Comment

                  • David Merrill
                    Administrator
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 5949

                    #24
                    The Queen has no vacant office its her court agents wearing her crown.
                    In other words, the "Judges" with the DEVIANT oaths are banc tellers. They work for the Crown too, but for the plantation with its right of internal revenue (taxation) granted thru the Revolutionary War.
                    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                    www.bishopcastle.us
                    www.bishopcastle.mobi

                    Comment

                    • Michael Joseph
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 1596

                      #25
                      Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
                      In other words, the "Judges" with the DEVIANT oaths are banc tellers. They work for the Crown too, but for the plantation with its right of internal revenue (taxation) granted thru the Revolutionary War.
                      I like your style. How can an Estate exist outside of Kingdom? For all Estates flow from the Titular Head of the Throne. Since England as vassal to Rome [renting the Crown] subjects all of her plantations to the same contract. Domestically speaking there is sovereignty but internationally speaking the debtor is slave or subject to the lender. And since England she rents her Crown - well enough said.
                      The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

                      Lawful Money Trust Website

                      Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST

                      ONE man or woman can make a difference!

                      Comment

                      • David Merrill
                        Administrator
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 5949

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post
                        I like your style. How can an Estate exist outside of Kingdom? For all Estates flow from the Titular Head of the Throne. Since England as vassal to Rome [renting the Crown] subjects all of her plantations to the same contract. Domestically speaking there is sovereignty but internationally speaking the debtor is slave or subject to the lender. And since England she rents her Crown - well enough said.
                        Wonderful. Christians so often forget or never even realize that Paul was first and foremost Roman. The genealogy is linked thru Claudia Rufina. When I have time I will search this through GARDNER's books but I understand that the King of Britain was expunged from the record, but he was Eusubius in 2 TImothy 4:21. The intention was his name be forgotten and sure enough, it is not coming to mind - maybe King RUFINA? Rome after the conquest changed it to Eusubius. He was still the king, but now was a Roman king, a vassal king. So Paul went home to England as a Roman citizen. England was a vassal of Rome.

                        I think a suitor told me about this but he might be a member here too.



                        P.S. Here are some more Keys. Pudens is mentioned in the same Bible verse.
                        Last edited by David Merrill; 12-01-19, 03:49 AM.
                        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                        www.bishopcastle.us
                        www.bishopcastle.mobi

                        Comment

                        • David Merrill
                          Administrator
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 5949

                          #27
                          I found a small piece for a pendant that shows particularly prominent impact ridges. Beautiful! This high carbon 60 mineraloid is truly remarkable. I gave a piece to a cancer researcher at church and she is intuitively rubbing it on her hands in hopes it will restore youthful skin.

                          This is the sort of thing I am really pioneering. I find it surprising that GARDNER's work is not posthumous Nobel Prize material:

                          www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                          www.bishopcastle.us
                          www.bishopcastle.mobi

                          Comment

                          • David Merrill
                            Administrator
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 5949

                            #28
                            This snippet seems more interesting at the moment.



                            Notice the burn marks where the ancients redacted black vitriol (sulfuric acid) for the Baghdad Batteries.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	Baghdad battery.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	5.1 KB
ID:	44594

                            Journey on the link above from El Kab, the famous Nile city to the Sinai Peninsula, Hathor Temple and then to Sinai in Arabia of the Bible. Look from the real Mt Sinai across the theatrical burn on the ridge between Mt Sinai and the valley below where the Israelites built their altars.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	altars from Horeb.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	18.0 KB
ID:	44595
                            Last edited by David Merrill; 01-18-20, 10:19 AM.
                            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                            www.bishopcastle.us
                            www.bishopcastle.mobi

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X