If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. If you would like to post in these forums please send a PM directly to David Merrill.
All transactions on PayPal and elsewhere are demanded to be redeemed in lawful money as found in Section 16 of the Fed Act and at Title 12 USC 411.
Thank you so much for enjoying StSC! If you are getting popups please try clearing your browser cache.
Government Sues Biggest U.S. Banks Over Mortgage-Backed Investments
I find this particularly interesting. They are referred to as agencies.
"The lawsuits were filed Friday by the Federal Housing Finance Agency which oversees Fannie and Freddie, the two agencies that buy mortgages loans and mortgage securities issued by the lenders."
Are Fannie and Freddie banks or private corporations?
Or compound the mess. I managed to summarize the whole deal quite nicely in my opinion:
It was a gambling racket that even GEITHNER got into in mid-May to extend the Deadline for Congress to August 2nd - for the Debt Ceiling Debacle. Look at the Appendix - the Extraordinary Measures. The first one was to start selling off the mortgage-backed securities.
Bundling was the scam. It lost record of ownership (The Note) so the certificates never had any value at all. Trusting in them was folly and trusting in that newly created market was just plain greedy. When you get greedy and lose, I doubt you have the right to sue.
I like my theory that Chase picked this fight by suing over one home in Oregon. Therefore I will be bumping my thread too.
The cases are Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Bank of America Corp. (BAC), 11-CV-6195; FHFA v. Barclays Bank Plc., 11-CV- 6190; FHFA v. Citigroup, 11-CV-6196; FHFA v. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA) Inc., 11-CV-6200; FHFA v. Deutsche Bank AG, 11- CV-6192; FHFA v. First Horizon National Corp., 11-CV-6193; FHFA v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 11-CV-6198; FHFA v. HSBC North America Holdings Inc., 11-CV-6189; FHFA v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 11-CV- 6188; FHFA v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 11-CV-6202; FHFA v. Nomura Holding America Inc., 11-CV-6201; FHFA v. SG Americas Inc., 11- CV-6203, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
That gives a much easier snapshot for less PACER charges.
Comment