Sheriff Clarke: ‘Assault’ on Policing Hasn’t Been Seen Since 60s

[shikamaru]

People are the collective man; male and female created He them.

Has this always been the case in these United States throughout its history?

[Michael Joseph]

Has this always been the case in these United States throughout its history?

shikamaru, as you well know, Business Trusts have been formed in the history of mankind and man has chosen to engage himself under the Shade of those trusts for his/her benefit in societal living. I suppose here we go again around the wheel. I wonder when will men learn of the roots that understand the tree instead of looking at its "pretty leaves".

I think it was years ago when you and I went around the wheel to discuss the nature of trusts - it is somewhere here at this site. You strike me as one who is a self starter and while I don't know you I am sure that you own and control your own business affairs. Now consider what a fool would I be to say - this is what you will do tomorrow regarding your business affairs.

And yet, this is what folks do, as you well know. Claiming to be the Settlors when in fact they have no office at all in the trust. In fact at best they are 3rd party beneficiaries thinking themselves to be the People. These TAKE against the Will. Therefore give them the liability they choose.

Psa 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them: and that which should have been for their welfare, let it become a trap.

Psa 69:25 Let their habitation be desolate; and let none dwell in their tents.

Psa 69:28 Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous.

Psa 109:8 Let his days be few; and let another take his office.

------------------

Yep, that looks like civil death to me. How about you? And yet, it is more than that. Surely an enlightened mind would never think to steal. And yet, many seek to take against the will claiming that which is not theirs to claim. I would never claim an interest in the business you built.

Let another take his office - here is your license to marry, to drive, to work.... i'd say that is a pretty desolate habitation when the rulers of the land see the men and women as property [slaves] that must be licensed. Yet when ignorance rules darkness comes. And folks think they are that which they are not.

Yet when one is true to himself and looks at his life one will have to answer the question - do I have a marriage license, a drivers license a business license, etc. And these same will harass another for trying to explain the concept of "the People". These are the same who come running begging for help when their "status quo" violently changes.

Declare Thyself - and God said "let there be Light". Amen.


Shalom,
Michael Joseph

P.S. When money becomes number one, don't expect the policing power to serve the men and women in society. I witnessed a foreclosure on a residential estate years ago whereof the policing power showed up with 14 swat outfitted officers with automatic weaponry. The man sitting inside the house was just there playing his piano. Fear is a double edged sword. It appears the deceivers are being deceived.

[BLBereans]

Your scope is too wide. This is a subtle attempt at a wholesale dismissive.



Thus, unarmed means to gun them down?
I thought police officers were trained to handle such situations professionally? Perhaps they aren't as competent, as we've been led to believe?



False narrative of your own construction.

In the case of Tamir Rice, he was gunned down within 3 seconds of contact with the officer. The officer hadn't even given him a warning.
In the case of Eric Gardner, he was strangled to death with an illegal choke hold.
In the case of John Crawford III, he was merely holding a pellet gun while on the phone, while the officer decided to play "Counterstrike".

Can you explain to me where the three individuals above were "acting out destructively and violently".

I find it peculiar that Ryan Groiux can go on a rampage in Arizona and James E. Holmes can shoot up a movie theater, yet they can manage to capture them alive?

Heaven forbid a black male has a toy gun, sell cigarettes, or hold a pellet gun while talking on a cellphone in a store. Judge Dredd time?



What makes it credible is that it has shone a light on police brutality, especially with regard to African-Americans, in these United States.
It has also shone a light on judicial and governmental conrruption in Ferguson. So much so that the state supreme court of Missouri took charge of all cases involving the municipality of Ferguson, MO.



Rather than condemnation, how about informing them?
If a person or group of persons won't take the time to inform themselves after being led to water, it will be what it will be.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Sentencing_Act

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014...04463789858002

Your request has been extinguished.

Since the thread was started for reasons of hearing the opinion of Sheriff Clark, a "black/brown/african-american" man or whatever the "accepted" terminology is to describe someone with dark skin, I will stick with his take on the matter. Not only do I agree with most of what he says, I also recognize he is "in the trenches" and is more knowledgeable about these issues/matters than you or I.

Once you put on a badge and risk your life for others, as he has done, then you can pontificate regarding the state of affairs regarding thugs and criminals who embrace thievery and threaten people's lives and end up being portrayed as victims in the God-less and biased main-stream media in order to perpetuate hate and the defeatist mind-set among the misinformed and ignorant.

Again, I doubt (meaning it's my opinion) that Sheriff Clarke, a man who is the same race as Tamir Rice, Eric Gardner, John Crawford III and Michael Brown, would agree with your broad-based assertions.

Of course, I could be wrong...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=sheriff+david+clarke

... or maybe not.

[shikamaru]

Since the thread was started for reasons of hearing the opinion of Sheriff Clark, a "black/brown/african-american" man or whatever the "accepted" terminology is to describe someone with dark skin, I will stick with his take on the matter. Not only do I agree with most of what he says, I also recognize he is "in the trenches" and is more knowledgeable about these issues/matters than you or I.

He is knowledgeable on his opinion only. Nothing more.
Law enforcement is nothing more than a private, standing army of the municipality.

Once you put on a badge and risk your life for others, as he has done, then you can pontificate regarding the state of affairs regarding thugs and criminals who embrace thievery and threaten people's lives and end up being portrayed as victims in the God-less and biased main-stream media in order to perpetuate hate and the defeatist mind-set among the misinformed and ignorant.

You lead with donning the badge.
You are blind with regard to police brutality. They've been getting away with it for decades. May the light be shone on all officers with their color of law activities or extra judicial actions.

Again, I doubt (meaning it's my opinion) that Sheriff Clarke, a man who is the same race as Tamir Rice, Eric Gardner, John Crawford III and Michael Brown, would agree with your broad-based assertions.

Of course, I could be wrong...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=sheriff+david+clarke

... or maybe not.

If he doesn't agree, something is wrong with him.
Take that one to the bank.

Just so that you know, even African-Americans who were police officers have experienced police brutality when the engaging officers didn't know they were police officers. There is a cancer in law enforcement. That cancer is racism.

[Michael Joseph]

How anyone can trust the police today is totally beyond me. Is it no wonder folks are compelled to carry a gun in their vehicles. One to protect themselves from insane folks on the road and two from the police. Never in a million years would I allow myself to be pulled over on a road shoulder. If I pull over at all, I drive to the next public well lit gas station where I might call the trustee to come get the vehicle should I meet an ignorant blow hard who carries a gun and was bullied as a young child.

Not all police mind you are like this but facts are facts too many are. Therefore I have zero trust in the police. If we lack a contract then there is no jurisdiction. The judge seems to agree.

Racism and Ignorance.

Regards,
MJ

[shikamaru]

shikamaru, as you well know, Business Trusts have been formed in the history of mankind and man has chosen to engage himself under the Shade of those trusts for his/her benefit in societal living. I suppose here we go again around the wheel. I wonder when will men learn of the roots that understand the tree instead of looking at its "pretty leaves".

I think it was years ago when you and I went around the wheel to discuss the nature of trusts - it is somewhere here at this site. You strike me as one who is a self starter and while I don't know you I am sure that you own and control your own business affairs. Now consider what a fool would I be to say - this is what you will do tomorrow regarding your business affairs.

And yet, this is what folks do, as you well know. Claiming to be the Settlors when in fact they have no office at all in the trust. In fact at best they are 3rd party beneficiaries thinking themselves to be the People. These TAKE against the Will. Therefore give them the liability they choose.

Psa 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them: and that which should have been for their welfare, let it become a trap.

Psa 69:25 Let their habitation be desolate; and let none dwell in their tents.

Psa 69:28 Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous.

Psa 109:8 Let his days be few; and let another take his office.

------------------

Yep, that looks like civil death to me. How about you? And yet, it is more than that. Surely an enlightened mind would never think to steal. And yet, many seek to take against the will claiming that which is not theirs to claim. I would never claim an interest in the business you built.

Let another take his office - here is your license to marry, to drive, to work.... i'd say that is a pretty desolate habitation when the rulers of the land see the men and women as property [slaves] that must be licensed. Yet when ignorance rules darkness comes. And folks think they are that which they are not.

Yet when one is true to himself and looks at his life one will have to answer the question - do I have a marriage license, a drivers license a business license, etc. And these same will harass another for trying to explain the concept of "the People". These are the same who come running begging for help when their "status quo" violently changes.

Declare Thyself - and God said "let there be Light". Amen.


Shalom,
Michael Joseph

P.S. When money becomes number one, don't expect the policing power to serve the men and women in society. I witnessed a foreclosure on a residential estate years ago whereof the policing power showed up with 14 swat outfitted officers with automatic weaponry. The man sitting inside the house was just there playing his piano. Fear is a double edged sword. It appears the deceivers are being deceived.

I'm curious as to what BLBereans' reply will be to those questions.

You hear many say that "the People" is all people, but I don't think the courts are of that opinion.
This certain wouldn't have been the case historically in these United States.
The people who originally called themselves "the People" acted in their own interests. I think Barron v. City of Baltimore (1833) spelled this out with regard to "The People" of the United States.

In any event, it would seem to me that "the People" today are mere figurehead of the political corporations.

[shikamaru]

How anyone can trust the police today is totally beyond me. Is it no wonder folks are compelled to carry a gun in their vehicles. One to protect themselves from insane folks on the road and two from the police. Never in a million years would I allow myself to be pulled over on a road shoulder. If I pull over at all, I drive to the next public well lit gas station where I might call the trustee to come get the vehicle should I meet an ignorant blow hard who carries a gun and was bullied as a young child.

Not all police mind you are like this but facts are facts too many are. Therefore I have zero trust in the police. If we lack a contract then there is no jurisdiction. The judge seems to agree.

Racism and Ignorance.

Regards,
MJ

"The Cathedral" (faith in government institutions) is crumbling .

Nothing new here though since government has its roots in religion, thus the many parallels.

[allodial]

Just so that you know, even African-Americans who were police officers have experienced police brutality when the engaging officers didn't know they were police officers. There is a cancer in law enforcement. That cancer is racism.

If police were required to place their religious beliefs on a public register, you will likely see a pattern--same with politicians. The said thing is most in the USA would presumed others to be Christians--even up through the end of the 90s. The reason why Christians would get a bad rap is because of so many Nimrodists, atheists or the like posing as Christians to get votes.

And yet, many seek to take against the will claiming that which is not theirs to claim. I would never claim an interest in the business you built.

It is very much possible to step into and rightfully take up a claim or office in the event of a breech of trust. Believe me, if XYZ Group fiduciaries went ultra vires enough to a heinous, disdainful or obnoxious extent and injury or loss resulted, I can find many ways to step in and take up claims of the trustees. Another can "takes his office" much like Superman takes place of a missing aircraft engine on an airliner in mid-flight--for the greater good and for his own good.

I witnessed a foreclosure on a residential estate years ago whereof the policing power showed up with 14 swat outfitted officers with automatic weaponry. The man sitting inside the house was just there playing his piano. Fear is a double edged sword. It appears the deceivers are being deceived.

Similarly, I have witnessed someone sit on a lease without paying. He said "you owe me for what you have done or failed to do and until you pay me or until the rent due offsets the amount you owe me, I'm staying". The owner of the building had fancy lawyers and millions of dollars at their disposal. But when it came right down to it, the sheriff would not come. After nosing around, one of the managers said "We can't evict him". The wouldn't even go into the unit! They were told that not only could they not evict him but that the sheriff wouldn't come.

I don't know you I am sure that you own and control your own business affairs. Now consider what a fool would I be to say - this is what you will do tomorrow regarding your business affairs.

I wouldn't be so fast to come to that conclusion. If an employee of ACME Steel burns your house down and kills your favorite dog and they wind up owing you $1B, I'd imagine you'd get into a position of control PDQ especially at a bankruptcy proceeding. The view you expressed might hinder you from seeing how or why the FRB could 'rule' for so long and why the trust might be extended under drawn-out bankruptcy proceedings. Government isn't immune--but even a trustee would be limited by the terms of the trust agreement (which is why they keep trying to modify the Constitution and add ridiculous laws--more money, more money, more money). Severe breeches of trust can give rise to some quite interesting arrangements.

It might be that bankruptcy itself is a breech carrying with it an implied certificate of incompetency with the 'errant' trustee presumed to be 'lost at sea' for seven years.

On another note, the consequence of severe breech of trust by the Romans and others against Jesus Christ might have a great significance.

And yet, this is what folks do, as you well know. Claiming to be the Settlors when in fact they have no office at all in the trust. In fact at best they are 3rd party beneficiaries thinking themselves to be the People. These TAKE against the Will. Therefore give them the liability they choose.

Posterity ~= successors (not necessarily bloodline related). If those People passed away, how can one claim to be one of them unless one happens to be hundreds of years old?

[Michael Joseph]

I'm curious as to what BLBereans' reply will be to those questions.

You hear many say that "the People" is all people, but I don't think the courts are of that opinion.
This certain wouldn't have been the case historically in these United States.
The people who originally called themselves "the People" acted in their own interests. I think Barron v. City of Baltimore (1833) spelled this out with regard to "The People" of the United States.

In any event, it would seem to me that "the People" today are mere figurehead of the political corporations.

I did that work years ago. You are spot on. Thou shall not steal will be enforced. It is Divine Law.


"The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of individual States. Each State established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated. The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation, and best calculated to promote their interests. The powers they conferred on this government were to be exercised by itself, and the limitations on power, if expressed in general terms, are naturally and necessarily applicable to the government created by the instrument. They are limitations of power granted in the instrument itself, not of distinct governments framed by different persons and for different purposes."

[allodial]

I did that work years ago. You are spot on. Thou shall not steal will be enforced. It is Divine Law.


"The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of individual States. Each State established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated. The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation, and best calculated to promote their interests. The powers they conferred on this government were to be exercised by itself, and the limitations on power, if expressed in general terms, are naturally and necessarily applicable to the government created by the instrument. They are limitations of power granted in the instrument itself, not of distinct governments framed by different persons and for different purposes."

Meaning subjects of the United States were allowed to form a government in the Territory of United States which is comprised of those territories ceded to the (singular) United States (a Federal State) by organic non-federal states of America (i.e. Virginia, Georgia, Maryland, New York and so on)? It does seem that the United States (Federal State) was created by several (instead of 'quantity' as in 'sever' -> having a severed nature with respect to each other, not connected, distinct and different from each other, 'different', 'disjoint', 'disconnected', separate as opposed 'united') states of America. (Several as in synonym for 'foreign', 'different').

[BLBereans]

He is knowledgeable on his opinion only. Nothing more.
Law enforcement is nothing more than a private, standing army of the municipality.



You lead with donning the badge.
You are blind with regard to police brutality. They've been getting away with it for decades. May the light be shone on all officers with their color of law activities or extra judicial actions.



If he doesn't agree, something is wrong with him.
Take that one to the bank.

Just so that you know, even African-Americans who were police officers have experienced police brutality when the engaging officers didn't know they were police officers. There is a cancer in law enforcement. That cancer is racism.

I value his opinion more than yours on the matter.

One serves when donning a badge; as in not knowing whether or not I will go home tonight, thanks to the potential encounters with thugs and thieves who are portrayed as innocent victims.

I believe you are blinded by the same inane narrative and ideology that permeates what most people call "news".

It is a waste of time to debate someone who opines, "If he doesn't agree with me, something is wrong with him." I think there may be another chair available on "The View"; you should inquire as you might find like-minded "intellectuals" who spew the same nonsense.

Too many people are quick to play the "race-card" instead of the "face-card"; take a look in the mirror before you impugn an entire organization or group of people.

There are bad cops, bad teachers, bad professors, bad doctors, bad parents, bad preachers and bad forum posters; that does not mean the entire group should be painted with the same brush.

They are still living souls and are as flawed as you and I are; do you proclaim a special elite status over and above the rest of humanity?

Who would most kind-hearted and peaceful people, regardless of race, be more afraid of when approached in a dark alley at night; someone like Michael Brown or someone like Darren Wilson?

End of discussion.

[BLBereans]

I'm curious as to what BLBereans' reply will be to those questions.

You hear many say that "the People" is all people, but I don't think the courts are of that opinion.
This certain wouldn't have been the case historically in these United States.
The people who originally called themselves "the People" acted in their own interests. I think Barron v. City of Baltimore (1833) spelled this out with regard to "The People" of the United States.

In any event, it would seem to me that "the People" today are mere figurehead of the political corporations.

Why would you be curious as to what "BLBereans'" reply will be?

Can anyone here prove it, with first hand knowledge and testimony, that one was privy to the development, sentiments and intentions behind 'The Declaration' and 'The Constitution'?

[allodial]

It might be that a lot of folks have a problem believing and coming to terms with the reality of there being a group of disturbers in most every important social organism who have the purpose of creating and promoting strife, division, turmoil, death, bloodshed, etc. There are many good cops. The Michael Brown case and others like it were probably specifically designed and carried out to have a destabilizing effect.

The PYSOPs purveyors are even putting cops in the cross fire. Sheriff Clarke is probably aware of it. It is likely worth noting that Clarke has been part of the Constitutional sheriffs movement which seems to be a very important in safeguarding the States from becoming over-run by Neo-Nazi Federalized liberal extremism. Many cops have been coming out saying that they got into their jobs for one reason and them find out that they are being used to raise money even if through unlawful means.

Wicomico County Sheriff Mike Lewis made national headlines in September after telling a local news station, "As long as I'm the sheriff in this county, I will not allow the federal government to come in here and strip my citizens of their right to bear arms. I can tell you this, if they attempt to do that, it would be an all-out civil war, no question about it."(Source: Media Matters for America article - Oct. 9, 2014)

Sheriff Clarke's statements might be best viewed with realization of the attacks that have been made against sheriffs. Sheriffs are not "police" in the typical sense. Sheriffs are like Attorneys General but for a specific county. One duty of a sheriff is to protect a county from invasion. Regular police, typically peace officers first, however, tend to be employees of municipal corporations employed to enforce municipal policies/codes.

If one studies the undermining of sheriffs departments in the USA over the past twenty years, Sheriff Clarke's stance might come into better clarity. The U.S. Attorney General is also supposed to protect the USA against invasion and against subversion--if an AG ignores subversive legislation or activity he isn't doing his job. It seems that one way or another Sheriff Clarke is making a point about that.


We have people banning gay marriage which it was never in the power of any Queen or King of England to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple and yet while the same attorneys general got voted into office by the same people, they ignore the people's choices on the basis of a case were a judge said marriage has nothing to do with "sexual intercourse" but yet the same attorneys general take that same case as an excuse to allow anal sex literature to be passed out to 6th graders? (IF MARRIAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEXUAL INTERCOURSE THEN WHY ARE USING THAT CASE AS AN EXCUSE TO IGNORE LAWS AGAINST PASSING OUT ANAL SEX PORN TO LITTLE KIDS ?) Even if one doesn't care about the underlying matter, the trend of total disregard for the laws on the books should be of concern.

And they claim that laws against "interracial marriage" to be on the same level as laws against homosexual marriage. While it might be true that the States never had an organic right in law to stop a man and a maiden Christians from marrying (under the right circumstances), it is true that a citizen never had the right to engage in practices which promote disease (AFAIK not even 'straight people' have that right). Unlike the God-given or inherent rights of "Blacks", the alleged 'gay 'rights' never were. The rights of "Blacks" were rights that always were but were being conspired against--two different things.


Joe Arapaio is actually doing his job.
Most people don't hear much about sheriffs because of the usurp-ative move to undermine and underfund sheriffs that has been going on since probably the 80s--they know sheriffs have a lot of power and they are responsible for protecting the county from invasion, usurpers, unconstitutional activities, etc. People look at Sheriff Arapaio and think he's nutty or out of place: IT IS HIS JOB to stop even the Feds from pulling a fast one on his county.


Hollywood has been in on the gambit because they have been clever to give the impression of sheriffs being a think of the past..Wild Wild West. Believe it or not, there was this actor who became President of the United States who was a key player in passing legislation to internationalize and federalize law enforcement.

The modern office of sheriff in the United States descends from a one-thousand-year-old English tradition: a "shire-reeve" (shire-keeper) is the oldest appointment of the English crown. Because county governments were typically the first established units of government in newly settled American territories, sheriffs were among the first elected public officials in an area and thus developed a leading role in local law enforcement.

A dichotomy frequently exists today between a sheriff's jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of a local police department. A metropolitan area may encompass an entire county or more; police departments and sheriffs will often maintain concurrent jurisdiction in the overlapping area. A sheriff may assume {should read 'presume'} that a local police department will do its duty in enforcing the law, but the primary obligation rests with the sheriff and requires him to act when evidence of neglect of that duty exists.(Source: definition of Shire-Reve - http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/)

Related:

• Domestic NWO Sellouts Quietly Attempting to Undermine the Constitutional Trump Card of America's Sheriffs
• State Legislative Actions In Protest of Federal Actions
• Sheriffs Say NO To Gun Control - CSPOA
• Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association
• County Sheriff Project

[BLBereans]

Bingo.

And even if the scenario wasn't a planned "psy-op", any occurrence which would lend itself to being a tool for the operatives seeking to exploit, will be pounced upon and manipulated after the fact in order to facilitate the agenda you have laid out in your post.

Sheriff Clarke has the confidence of the people even after the barrage of outside influence who sought to intentionally undermine and smear this man precisely because he is black and doesn't sing the same tune that the exploiters, masquerading as advocates, want him to sing. He cares not for Democrat or Republican; only for common sense and truth.

Apparently, the divisive rhetoric is more palatable for those who continue buying into the defeatist race-mongering mind-set.

[shikamaru]

I value his opinion more than yours on the matter.

Good to know. Your opinion and his hold just as much value to me in kind.

One serves when donning a badge; as in not knowing whether or not I will go home tonight, thanks to the potential encounters with thugs and thieves who are portrayed as innocent victims.

He serves alright... his master.... which is the municipality.
He serves "the prince" not the people.

You are aware there are a myriad of court cases where it states law enforcement has no burden, duty, or obligation to protect and serve any individual?

I believe you are blinded by the same inane narrative and ideology that permeates what most people call "news".

I believe you are blinded by your own prejudices and social programming.

Law enforcement is private, standing army of the municipality.

It is a waste of time to debate someone who opines, "If he doesn't agree with me, something is wrong with him." I think there may be another chair available on "The View"; you should inquire as you might find like-minded "intellectuals" who spew the same nonsense.

Pot calling kettle? You are projecting.
Rather than making ad-hominem attacks, maintain your attacks on my position.

Too many people are quick to play the "race-card" instead of the "face-card"; take a look in the mirror before you impugn an entire organization or group of people.

Too may Caucasians are quick to play the "race-card" card rather than seeing the truth and reality of racism, prejudice, and its history in these United States. Denigration and ignoring the past with its present resultants won't fix the issues.

This federation was founded on racism. It was built on racism.
Its public corporate charters (constitutions), whether federal or State, were deeply impacted by racism.

It continues to thrive on racism.

Racism is a social AND economic system based on the contrived supremacy of one group over another.
It is also a subtle (and often times not so subtle) form of warfare. Slavery, itself, is a form of warfare and its continuation.
Think of racism as a silent weapon for a quiet war.

You need to see reality for what it is rather than the fairy tales you've come to believe from public schooling, social programming, and the media.

There are bad cops, bad teachers, bad professors, bad doctors, bad parents, bad preachers and bad forum posters; that does not mean the entire group should be painted with the same brush.

For once in this whole discussion, there is something we agree upon.

They are still living souls and are as flawed as you and I are; do you proclaim a special elite status over and above the rest of humanity?

Funny you mention that, isn't that what white supremacy is all about? It seems a group of people have already done this.
I'll construe this as projection again.

End of discussion.

When you are ready to continue your enlightenment, I'll be here for ya.