The East India Company: The Original Corporate Raiders

[allodial]

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2012

One man holding the office of president in 30 countries might leave the impression of a single presidential office although the offices be in fact separate offices. The Queen of New Zealand, the Queen of Australia, the Queen of Canada are separate offices. If a crown goes on a queen's head how can she be that which she wears on her head? Who is the utmost source of power and authority: (1) the crowned, (2) the one who puts the crown on the head of the one crowned, or (3) the one who owns the crown.

Re: Unam Sanctum

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3963[/ATTACH]

It is said that when some of the Templars were captured and queried, eventually they allegedly admitted that they worshiped "Baphomet" and that such may have been misunderstood in that they really instead were saying "Mahomet" (Mohammed). Though yet still it is alleged that among certain secret societies, statues of Baphomet are common. Anyways, taken with 'rumors' of Freemasons saying that they outwardly pretend to be "Christians" or "Judahites" but secretly are Islamists and putting that together with history, an interesting picture emerges. No surprise Islam is being promoted if not forced or coerced in Europe and throughout the Levant. The Simonian syncretism is errantly mistaken for the "Real McCoy" or the original doctrinal system.

It must be understood that "Christian" is what Judeans and former-Gentiles that continued the house of Judah with Jesus/Yeshua were called at Antioch but they were otherwise known as "holy ones". However, doctrine of those that were called Christians extended back to before the time of Abraham but cannot be attributed to Abraham's native society FOR HE WAS CALLED OUT AND SET APART FROM THEM. It was a continuation because it was the Hebrew/Abrahamic/Melchizedek belief systems and those clearly predate the existence of Rome and Babylon and have more to do with Old Dynastic Egypt than with Babylon or Rome. The idea of Rome originating these things just seems to boggle the mind that such an idea could even be entertained. Melchizedek and Abraham lived before Nebuchadnezzar. Rome wasn't established until 753 BC or so. Rome is similar to Amor or Amorite backwards, and is said to have been partly established by Romulus and Remus ("Sumer" spelled backwards). Rome was moreso associated with the Etruscan belief system before the Babylon-Rome merger after Attalus II and under Julius Caesar.

In the book The People That History Forgot, Erwin L. Martin lucidates that Babylonian and Simonian doctrines and ideas drifted Westward. So while I make zero statements for or against a particular religion or political system here, a key point is that, claiming something originated something else when it is clearly false is offensive and deceptive: that Rome or Babylon originated organic Israelite/Judahite Hebrew/Melchizedek-associated Christianity, clearly that could not be the case. As for Simonianism or Islam, that is up to the reader to investigate. The "pesky" facts matter simple because lies are not true. The one named at Exodus 3:14 clearly didn't have a penchant for strange gods and syncretism: he has warned consistently of the dangers of sycnretism and the consequences (see: conflict of laws) thereof.



Before Rome Was...
It must be understood that before Roman Catholic missionaries made it to Africa, the British Isles and the area called India (afaik an Ethiopian or Egyptian province), Israelite/Judahite Hebrew/Melchizedek-associated Christianity was already established in those places. Again, the point isn't about being for or against this or that: it is truth of the record because again if someone is deliberately telling lies or evidences being deluded then the reliability of their words or doctrines can be considered soundly.

The Templar Inns and Mosques
The Templars as the scans allude weren't associated with the law schools of the English churches but of the law schools associated with Mosques. So again, you see why Islam is being promoted in Europe. But it is also important to see where Islam originated. The historical record alludes to Crusaders making a change of religion. (Related: The Dark History of the Templars)

He answered and hath said, `Lo, I am seeing four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the appearance of the fourth [is] like to a son of the gods.' Daniel 3:25 (YLT)

According to the Book of Daniel, the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar and his trusteeship had limits. He had tried to get the saints to worship him, to bow down to him. That was ultra vires and a major no-no. But "one like the Son God" intervened. The "one like the Son of God" existed before Rome existed. Rome did not create him. Even if Nebuchadnezzar or any modern-day counterpart claimed to be the origination or creator of the Son of God or of the man in the fire at Daniel 3:25 in order to attain worship by association-and-proxy, would such a claim necessarily be true?

Re: Syncretism and Idols
While one can apologize for idols and symbol worship, exactly what liability might such apologists incur for re-installing a veil in the temple in place of that which was removed or torn asunder? And by whose authority would such a veil be re-installed?

Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost. And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God. --Matthew 27:50-54

The scriptures refer to God separating of light and darkness. Who then are those who make a hobby of undoing that separation?

[David Merrill]

Failing to judge the Separation undoes it.

If a crown goes on a queen's head how can she be that which she wears on her head? Who is the utmost source of power and authority: (1) the crowned, (2) the one who puts the crown on the head of the one crowned, or (3) the one who owns the crown.

My Crown was to forgive Ken WAPNICK as John, who commercialized A Course in Miracles knowing that Bill was dosing Helen with LSD.

My "quiet spell" has my synchronously pondering the question. There is little or no record that the Van Pelt Manor was on a Patroon Patent like Killian RENSELLAER of August 13, 1630. So I too wonder who had the authority to designate the land as a perpetual inheritance in the 1629 Charter.






This strikes me the same as my taking all the courses for being a Licensed Practitioner in Science of Mind but when it came down to it, I never intended to get the license. So Teunis Jansen Laenan VAN PELT chartered/piloted the Red Tree with seventy souls, qualifying but maybe never requested any licensing from the Dutch East Indies or any other Trading Company?

The Papal Bull comes from Prosbul. This is a Talmudic term for a respected Rabbi to change God's Law. I believe that will unlock some more Keys to unravel a few more mysteries. When we read the anglicized "Bull" we might have connotations about the animal or even its excrement. One thing done away by Prosbul shortly after the life of Jesus was the Jubilee, the seven year Release of Deuteronomy 15:1 specifically. There were only a few significant rabbinic prosbuls.

Michael Joseph will be particularly interested I think. I will look around for what I saved many years back. My point is that any law passed against the scriptures is null and void. Therefore why pursue a license to accommodate such law? So this Papal Bull does not have any authority, just the physical base force found in a china shop.

[David Merrill]

P.S. Where does it become Adam blessed with the authority of nomenclature. (SPELLS.)

[Michael Joseph]

Michael Joseph will be particularly interested I think. I will look around for what I saved many years back. My point is that any law passed against the scriptures is null and void. Therefore why pursue a license to accommodate such law? So this Papal Bull does not have any authority, just the physical base force found in a china shop.

There is no Canon Law absent Divine Law. And therefore there are no other law forms is there is no Canon Law. It is simple, if vicar, then perform your office. If no performance of the office, then default judgment. You ever heard of a Resulting Trust? Think about that for a moment. No really stop and really think about the foregoing for a moment. And then read Hosea 4:6 to its entirety.

Divine law is over and above the law of the air (Cannon), the law of the water (Merchant/Admiralty) and the law of the land (National Constitutional)

The Fiat dollar is not based on just Faith, it is backed by Indentures from your ancestors that are UNPAID... If you do not come out of your earthly Father's house, the sins of the Fathers are visited on you.

Read between the lines - Legal Name = Given Name + Surname.

Who will say RESTORE? Isaiah 42:22. Those ten toes are destined to be hit by a Stone. For the Beast had Seven heads [Religions] and ten crowns [ten family dynasties].....

Can the child within my heart rise above? I will stake a claim upon which relief may be granted. For my King is Yehoshuah - there is no power but of God. What will you do Onesimus? And how will Philemon receive you? If poorly says "Paul the Aged" - put it on my account!

The gospel of Christ is the POWER and the WISDOM of God.

Shalom and Blessings,
MJ

[David Merrill]

Here is a link to the Prosbul I mentioned.

HILLEL INSTITUTED THE PROSBUL. We have learnt elsewhere: A prosbul prevents the remission of debts [in the Sabbatical year]. This is one of the regulations made by Hillel the Elder. For he saw that people were unwilling to lend money to one another and disregarded the precept laid down in the Torah, Beware that there he not a base thought in thine heart saying, etc. He therefore decided to institute the prosbul. The text of the prosbul is as follows: 'I hand over to you, So-and-so, the judges in such-and-such a place, [my bonds], so that I may be able to recover any money owing to me from So-and-so at any time I shall desire'; and the prosbul was to be signed by the judges or witnesses.

But is it possible that where according to the Torah the seventh year releases Hillel should ordain that it should not release?

[allodial]

The Fiat dollar is not based on just Faith, it is backed by Indentures from your ancestors that are UNPAID...

The fiat dollar (meaning the FRN) is based on floating debentures over persons and things in the district.

Re: Vicars of Christ
Vicar means "instead of" as if Christ or God were dead or absent. Who needs a vicar for someone that is alive and present? Errant AFAIK is the idea that Rome-Babylon defeated Yeshua the Anointed and took over the entire Judahite/Davidic estate and co-regency is contrary to the scriptures (he asserted that the only reason they were able to have at him is because the Father allowed it as part of a plan--he knew what they would do and they played into their own bloodlust). According to the scriptures, the kingdom is conferred on the saints and Christ. A proper grasp on the divine council paradigm, (pre- 70 A.D. concepts of) merkaba and the OT throne motifs (I'm not talking about any post 70AD Talmudic or any Kaballistic writings on Merkaba but the book of Ezekiel, Psalms 82 and the like instead) blows all confusion and boggle out of the water (Eph. 1 & 2). Even the Centurion who had his daughter healed remotely had a firmer grasp on this than others in his day. The strong impression is that the Idumeans or Roman System perceived some kind of co-regency of Yeshua/Jesus with the one named at Exodus 3:14 and figure they owned it as a result of crucifixion/conquest ('capture the society, capture their god'--remember Simon Magus tried to make a purchase of divine power)--thus the mocking signage "King of the Judeans" (what was related to me was that the signage was done because it was intended as a form of 'finalization of conquest'--to somehow seize and possess the Davidic co-regency -> Essau/Edom vs. Jacob/Israel). No doubt, Pilate like his Centurion underling got the gist of this and so he wanted no part of it.

The history of wide-spread killing of non-Roman-Catholic saints/believers perfect makes sense as part of an orchestrated, fully-conscious effort against the divine council's activities on the planet--MEANING THAT SOMEONE IS FULLY AWARE OF WHAT THEY DOING to the extent that are specifically targeting heirs. As things move forward, it is very likely that many will start to see such intense outpourings and manifestations of divine power through the saints.

According to scripture, Jesus Christ and the saints have been in session since the ascension ~30 A.D. Scripturally, such authority was never concentrated in a single man or European or Asian or African monarch or king. 30 A.D. was long before Constantine's time.

BTW, last year or so, a scriptural based spiritual warfare group began praying and interceding to remove witchcraft and sorcery from their region, within a few weeks I noticed that a prominent building associated with a very well-known society went up for sale. It struck me as being far from mere coincidence.

Rome and Persia's Secret
In the 2015 Christmas episode of Arrow, in a casual conversation one character explains Christmas to someone from another reality: that it is a celebration of killing Jesus Christ (of dismissing him--of his (dis)MISSAL)! One might figure she didn't mean what she said but that is what many have said before including but not limited to the creator of a site (christmasisalie.com) about Christmas that is heavily censored. I believe there are very upstanding folks who are Roman Catholics, Protestants and non-Protestants. It may be that some organizations are prone to corruptions that must necessarily be dealt with one way or another.

Every year Nativity Scenes promoting worship and adoration of statutes of the baby Jesus in the manger. Likely, a baby in a manger is a lot easier to handle than a fully-grown divine co-regent with a scepter in his hand along with thousands if not millions sharing the co-regency with him. It has been suggested that tearing of the veil meant tearing of the 'protective shield' between the presence of God and those who perpetrated regicide against the divine council: judgement.

Re: Iran and Christmas
Despite all of the fuss about Iran: Christmas trees are put up around December 25th in Iran. Someone shared photos with me. No surprise, if you know where the Christmas tree originated (Persia)! It was illegal to celebrate Christmas in United states of America for the longest time (just maybe because celebrating regicide against the divine council was highly frowned upon and regarded to be abhorrent?)

Re: Isaiah 63
There are those who glean from Isaiah 63 that the text suggests the Messiah in the nativity sense coming from Edom. The impression I get is that the figure's robes is traveling from Edom and his robes are stained with blood because he just Edom visited judgement upon Edom.

For your {you = Edom/Esau afaik} violence against your brother Jacob shame shall cover you , and you shall be cut off for ever. In the day that you stood on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots on Jerusalem, even you were as one of them. But you should not have looked on the day of your brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither should you have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither should you have spoken proudly in the day of distress. Obadiah 1:10-12

While there may have been Idumeans/Edomites who sincerely became Judahites (then they would have become Judahites rather than Idumeans), Obadiah 1:10-12 is referring to Edom. I am very much reminded of the Idumeans helping Rome and Ptolemy (who was over Egypt at the time, thus highly suggestive of "king of the south") with the seiges of Jeruslem, Israel and Judah from 130AD to 70AD. At that time, were not the Idumeans as "one of them" as in allegedly part of Judah and also as "one of them" among the strangers laying siege around 70AD? Did not the Roman soldiers cast lots at the crucifixion? Were not the Herodians and company considering how they would divvy up Judah and Israel? Is Edom doing the same thing to the saints this very day? (Related: ; ; Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union).

War Against the Saints
War against the saints might just be intended to be war against the divine council. If the book of Enoch has any validity, then it might be giving clues as to who or whose progeny would have the propensity to wage such a war.

[xparte]

[David Merrill]

A Post of many Pearls:

Thus the economic imperialism Crown
this concept of the state must take the same road the concept of the Church has traveled.

Therefore Forgiveness is the difference between uniting church and state, or putting them to war with one another.

Is not that the essence of Futurism - the idea that we get a seat on the bleachers being the LORD's special elect? The Great Tribulation will be spared us, we get to watch the show!

[xparte]

Thus the economic imperialism Crown or physical guilt
is a concept of the state so it must take the same road and the concept of the Church has traveled.The economy is auto- administered, the political state is no longer the absolute, all-inclusive entity, but is exclusively concerned with cannon rights alone,not devine our spiritual/cultural life is truly free, forgiveness 101 forgive them statesman for they know what they do.TRUMP the TRUTH

[allodial]

Thus the economic imperialism Crown or physical guilt
is a concept of the state so it must take the same road and the concept of the Church has traveled.The economy is auto- administered, the political state is no longer the absolute, all-inclusive entity, but is exclusively concerned with cannon rights alone,not devine our spiritual/cultural life is truly free, forgiveness 101 forgive them statesman for they know what they do.TRUMP the TRUTH

There is one thing to extract something from the Bible and implement it. It is another to project into the Bible something that is not there.

The image of the spiritual world in physical institutions, that is, the state which exists here on earth, but which is really an image of heavenly facts and personalities, but not a true image.

If one people has a sky full if Nimrod, war and mammon how can the resulting "earth below" be for them patterned after a heaven full of the divine council ruled by the one named at Exodus 3:14? Different constellations, different models, different outcomes?



P.S. It has dawned one me that the crescent moon with the centered star is much like a bow and arrow with the star being where the grip on the bow or the tail of the bow would be. It is said that Qos was the name of the god the Edomites worshiped. One of Herod the Great's key governors (placed over Idumea by Herod) was named Costobarus (which means something like Qos is mighty). Qos is said to be mean 'bow' or to be the 'god of storms'. Qos/Kaus reminds of the word 'chaos'. Its worth noting, the Idumeans were still mindful of Qos worship even in Herod the Great's time. Was not Esau a hunter like Nimrod?

[xparte]

[xparte]

[David Merrill]

Thus the economic imperialism Crown or physical guilt
is a concept of the state so it must take the same road and the concept of the Church has traveled.The economy is auto- administered, the political state is no longer the absolute, all-inclusive entity, but is exclusively concerned with cannon rights alone,not devine our spiritual/cultural life is truly free, forgiveness 101 forgive them statesman for they know what they do.TRUMP the TRUTH

Yes!!

Conversing with a trust expert, he questioned my Process Server's loyalty - How could I trust them? It was the intonation of the authority - being that the breach, waiting a month to serve the US Supreme Court opened up my authority. In words though, I explained how I could "trust" frightened people to behave in certain ways consistently. An hour and a half after closing, the process server came through sending my witness, eyes and evidence. This is the Patroon minutes for my Trustee character for the Resulting Trust. You want to save this to your disk:

[allodial]

Those that aim to profit from guilt and carnal persons would aim to benefit from obscuring true and sound doctrine: imagine being given power, wisdom and hedges which help you avoid the generation of, say, "bad karma" or "bad mojo" for yourself (whether in respect of your inner and immediate biosphere, any biological contracts, social-political sphere or otherwise) and in general help you steer clear of trouble and to keep trouble away from you. Now, those that would aim to profit from ensnaring you (don't hunters tend to be competent with snares and such?) of course probably wouldn't want you to be aware of such doctrine and might even make a point to entice you as much as possible with counterfeits. However, as they say: "You can't keep a good man down." The pushing of counterfeits has ulterior motive: maintaining a captive audience--the opposite direction of liberty.

"For my yoke is easy and my burden is light." --Matthew 11:30

The true walk isn't about guilt. Its about liberty, abundance, joy, wisdom, freedom from the law of sin and death. The bad propaganda against the true doctrine seems to moreso benefit men hunters, keeping folks carnal, vulgar, profane and in the dark might be a strategy for maintaining a supple of two-legged livestock, eh? And on that note, specialists at manipulating carnal crowds probably prefer democracy based on simple majority votes.

[David Merrill]

There is one thing to extract something from the Bible and implement it. It is another to project into the Bible something that is not there.

Thank you once again Allodial. I believe you validate my point about Prosbul (Papal Bull).


P.S. I may have meant xparte - but you are both great! It seems to me that you both have separate doors to the same library some times.