The Informer, James Montgomery, Dr. Frank Wiswall, and more !!

[Goldi]

IN OTHER WORDS, although the Informer aka Harry Coombs was correct on his research, how the "f" did it ever come to apply to the people? And if it did apply, where is the contract with express terms and full disclosure so that any of the people could OPT OUT OF THAT PIECE OF SHIT LEGISLATION?

[ManOntheLand]

IN OTHER WORDS, although the Informer aka Harry Coombs was correct on his research, how the "f" did it ever come to apply to the people? And if it did apply, where is the contract with express terms and full disclosure so that any of the people could OPT OUT OF THAT PIECE OF SHIT LEGISLATION?

Think of the system as an insurance program for the Federal Reserve currency. For any insurance company to be profitable, it is essential to get as many people as possible to pay in, while keeping claims as low as possible. This requires that participants not know too much about how the scheme works, otherwise they probably would not participate. This is called adverse selection. The American people provide a guarantee of the value of Fed Reserve currency by way of unknowingly making themselves liable for income tax. This keeps the money coming in to make the interest payments on the U.S. debt.

Since we do have inalienable rights, the only way such a scheme can work is to dupe people into waiving those rights by contract. The fact that it works that way must be kept secret as much as possible, or it could never work. A small minority of people have figured out how it works, but this number must be kept as low as possible to keep the system going.

[ManOntheLand]

All of that admiralty stuff is fine and dandy, and it truly is in effect today. However that is all about commercial vessels. Where did YOU become a commercial vessel? Oh, you mean you weren't given express notice of that, so you could figure out how to navigate thru the laws of same? Uh oh. After all, you're just a man or woman. What the "f" would you be doing following any of the laws of the sea, while you're on land?

The Informer has a great article entitled Fiction of Law (if I recall correctly). Also see the Supreme Court in The Huntress, where they reveal that revenue cases have always been in the admiralty. Check out the book "Are You Lost at C?" for more detail on admiralty.

[shikamaru]

All of that admiralty stuff is fine and dandy, and it truly is in effect today. However that is all about commercial vessels. Where did YOU become a commercial vessel? Oh, you mean you weren't given express notice of that, so you could figure out how to navigate thru the laws of same? Uh oh. After all, you're just a man or woman. What the "f" would you be doing following any of the laws of the sea, while you're on land?

You are aware that commerce and the high seas have had ties for thousands of years, yes?

[shikamaru]

IN OTHER WORDS, although the Informer aka Harry Coombs was correct on his research, how the "f" did it ever come to apply to the people? And if it did apply, where is the contract with express terms and full disclosure so that any of the people could OPT OUT OF THAT PIECE OF SHIT LEGISLATION?

Which people do you speak of?
The people at large or the private association styled "The People"?

[shikamaru]

The Informer has a great article entitled Fiction of Law (if I recall correctly). Also see the Supreme Court in The Huntress, where they reveal that revenue cases have always been in the admiralty. Check out the book "Are You Lost at C?" for more detail on admiralty.

Not always.

Revenue cases were handled in England through the Courts of the Exchequer.

Revenue cases in the colonies were initially in courts at law, but the king could never sustain any convictions.
These revenue cases were moved to admiralty to remove the jury as an impediment. The chancellors of admiralty were given a cut of all cases they made convictions in too.

[ManOntheLand]

Thanks for the correction, shikamaru. You have encapsulated the inherent injustice of admiralty jurisdiction on land: removing the jury. How and why revenue cases came to be in the admiralty is a very important point, I believe.

I was trying to convey (albeit imprecisely) that revenue cases have been considered to be in the admiralty in America since adoption of the Constitution for the USA. According to Are you Lost At C? the Supreme Court said in The Huntress: "in this country, revenue causes had so long been the subject of Admiralty cognizance, that congress considered them as civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction..."

I hope this circumstance can be made clear to all those in the tax honesty community complaining that Americans' rights are ignored in federal court regarding income tax.

[David Merrill]

That will probably prepare you for this.

[shikamaru]

Thanks for the correction, shikamaru. You have encapsulated the inherent injustice of admiralty jurisdiction on land: removing the jury. How and why revenue cases came to be in the admiralty is a very important point, I believe.

I was trying to convey (albeit imprecisely) that revenue cases have been considered to be in the admiralty in America since adoption of the Constitution for the USA. According to Are you Lost At C? the Supreme Court said in The Huntress: "in this country, revenue causes had so long been the subject of Admiralty cognizance, that congress considered them as civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction..."

I hope this circumstance can be made clear to all those in the tax honesty community complaining that Americans' rights are ignored in federal court regarding income tax.

Not only that, civil cases concerning taxes are conducted in Article I (legislative) courts.

Criminal cases are conducted in Article III courts.

Only Article III courts are judicial courts.
Article I courts are something else entirely .....

[shikamaru]

Vyzgoth's Archive of the Informer and James Montgomery

http://thinkorbebeaten.com/informer.html

http://thinkorbebeaten.com/montgomery.html

[David Merrill]

I believe that this is a rare find on the Internet, speaking of Frank WISWALL. I noticed it was cited in the "Secret Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction" paper and tracked it down. It had been scrubbed off the Internet pretty well. I ordered it from Proctor WISWALL's wife but she never sent it or responded. She treated me like a troublemaker.

[allodial]

On another forum, someone asserted that most of the old ancient Mesopotamian kingdoms were established as "watershed kingdoms" meaning that they were intentionally fixed on bodies of water or at locations below the high-tide mark. Washington, D.C. is on (en and on in Spanish are the same) the Potomac. Psalms 24:2 came to mind.

For He on the seas hath founded it, And on the floods He doth establish it. (YLT)

If I recall correctly, "the sea" in the Book of Revelations represents the people or a 'multitude or nation of people'.

'The waters that thou didst see, where the whore doth sit, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues;' Revelations 17:15 (YLT)

Related:
Sea or Waters (Index to Symbols, Understanding Prophetic Symbols And Apocalyptic Language Of The Bible By Comparing Symbols From Old And New Testament Prophecies)

[David Merrill]

This is interesting in light that Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel - Tel Aviv is. That is to say - Tyre, a coastal city. Tyre was and still could be argued to be through the Babylonian Jew, Babylon's western port city.

[allodial]

This is interesting in light that Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel - Tel Aviv is. That is to say - Tyre, a coastal city. Tyre was and still could be argued to be through the Babylonian Jew, Babylon's western port city.

Not sure how relevant this is but I recall recently watching an interview with Donald Trump (maybe I can find a video link) where he was asked if he would support moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Trump from what I recall said "Yes." There's something hiding between the lines and you seem to be shining the light on it: conflicting claims. Could it be one of: Babylon's idea of total, forever conquest vs God's right to end the tutelage or captivity period? For some reason this comes to mind: James Bond's main nemesis in the movie Spectre (2016) is: Ernst Stavlo blAUvelt..Jacob vs Esau encoded. Te Aviv as capital is very telling esp. if Tel Aviv = Tyre.

Related:
Jerusalem or Tel Aviv?

[allodial]