First Success At Bank For Redemption

[motla68]

Not that Rock needs anybody speaking for him but I believe it is his name because his parents named him Rock Anthony.

Were you there when they did that, Where is the proof that you know this to be true?

[David Merrill]

Not that Rock needs anybody speaking for him but I believe it is his name because his parents named him Rock Anthony.

[motla68]

Each stamper has a marking of my signature.

Is it really your name if someone can dictate which name you can have to use?

link to the story:

http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/20/new-zealand-bans-weird-baby-names/

Interesting, US Bank refused to make me a copy of the new signature card. Never the less I will receive paper checks then restrict & copy each and everyone of those bad boys. PS...good to see you over here hughg. Apparently some refuse to open there minds to new info that compliments "other" info/history. When I came across this material a HUGE piece of the puzzle was suddenly revealed!

Asking for copies of or requesting to novate existing bank agreements may be more trouble than it's worth.

Please see this post.

[Brian]

I redid my Signature card for my LLC. The guy at the desk looked at it, had to go make sure it was "okay", and then came back and told me they had to make sure it was in my "best interest"??
I had them make a copy of it for me.

Interesting, US Bank refused to make me a copy of the new signature card. Never the less I will receive paper checks then restrict & copy each and everyone of those bad boys. PS...good to see you over here hughg. Apparently some refuse to open there minds to new info that compliments "other" info/history. When I came across this material a HUGE piece of the puzzle was suddenly revealed!

[David Merrill]

Thanks for the chuckle!

[shikamaru]

.... told me they had to make sure it was in my "best interest"??
I had them make a copy of it for me.

Ah .... the wonders of powers of attorney!!

I like to tell them, "Thank-you for your concern, but you can save your concern".
"Tell you what ... save the concern you give to me and give it to the next person. He can have double your concern".

[David Merrill]

My experience was that without an account, the Signature Card is a secret. It took 15 minutes on hold for the attorney to get back to Elisha. I made the mistake of using my camera for the audio so that when it came time to snap the photo, the audio ended. Otherwise I would have gotten her admonishing me about photographing the Agreement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6yorZgAUC0

[Frederick Burrell]

Great job, hughg. Your best interests. lol. fB

[hughg]

I redid my Signature card for my LLC. The guy at the desk looked at it, had to go make sure it was "okay", and then came back and told me they had to make sure it was in my "best interest"??
I had them make a copy of it for me.

[Frederick Burrell]

Yes I did get a stamped copy also, the bank teller made a copy, didn't even have to ask. They were so helpful. lol. In regards the address they have it on file as I have an account with them.
Frederick Burrell.

[David Merrill]

Now what about Signature? (regarding the agreement card) I am having an issue where the current account I am trying to do this to has the SSN attached to it. The Bank will not take just my name without some form of ID and I dont want to use the approved govt ID as I have not got a new one yet.
I like the E(8) Restricted Appearance.
An appearance to defend against an admiralty and maritime claim with respect to which there has issued process in rem, or process of attachment and garnishment, may be expressly restricted to the defense of such claim, and in that event is not an appearance for the purposes of any other claim with respect to which such process is not available or has not been served.
So It would be John Henry, Fed. Rule E(8) specially as JOHN DOE or maybe just specially as would be fine.

Click for this post.

That is clever - citing Rule E(8). I am not sure if it is effective because redeeming lawful money is for Fed banks. There are no limitations on who can avoid a certain contract, within the scope of banking or I suppose in general too. It seems that would be universal. Redemption of lawful money is avoidance of contracting with the Fed. It expressly conveys the demurrer to the obligations of the US on the signatures on each bill exclusively. As opposed to a silent demurrer. It is not a matter of your character and it involves no Refusal for Cause. [Hollywood has its uses.]

What I mean is that John Henry, Fed. Rule E(8) specially as JOHN DOE is a good innovation, provided there is enough room on the Form.

I like signing John Henry. That's the truth. Then you just add on whatever the bank requires by their advisements and restrictions. If they don't like the truth, then ask them what the minimum amount of lies they require you add on to make it work. Maybe John Henry dba JOHN H. DOE will mean you have to open a business account? Maybe you can sign John Henry for an interest-free checking account only?

Hi treefarmer

I simply walked into the bank with my written demand that all transactions involving my account be done in/with lawful money. Had the clerk date stamp it and asked that it be sent along to the law department. So far I have received nothing back from them. It really doesn't matter what they do at this point as I have made my demand for all trans. to done in lawful money. period. You do not need their permission. Frederick Burrell

Exactly.

The only item I see there is to be sure they have an accurate mailing address for the timely R4C. If you have heard nothing, then they are engaged in the new agreement (acquiescence). The only other thing I am thinking is that you got a date stamp Received/Filed on your copy too? Hope so.


Thanks for sharing;

David Merrill.

[Frederick Burrell]

Hi treefarmer

I simply walked into the bank with my written demand that all transactions involving my account be done in/with lawful money. Had the clerk date stamp it and asked that it be sent along to the law department. So far I have received nothing back from them. It really doesn't matter what they do at this point as I have made my demand for all trans. to done in lawful money. period. You do not need their permission. Frederick Burrell

[Mark Christopher]

Now what about Signature? (regarding the agreement card) I am having an issue where the current account I am trying to do this to has the SSN attached to it. The Bank will not take just my name without some form of ID and I dont want to use the approved govt ID as I have not got a new one yet.
I like the E(8) Restricted Appearance.
An appearance to defend against an admiralty and maritime claim with respect to which there has issued process in rem, or process of attachment and garnishment, may be expressly restricted to the defense of such claim, and in that event is not an appearance for the purposes of any other claim with respect to which such process is not available or has not been served.
So It would be John Henry, Fed. Rule E(8) specially as JOHN DOE or maybe just specially as would be fine.

[Treefarmer]

Congratulations Hbert997.
That's encouraging news.

I've recently gone through a banking experience where I tried to get my demand for lawful money on the signature card, but utterly failed.

I hope it works out for you.
If it does, please let us know.
Bright blessings