No Income Tax paid - 3 years and counting.

[Darkmagus]

Includes/Including Document

I thought I would share an expansive pdf file on the use of "Includes/Including". Take a look, it's been very helpful for me.

Darkmagus

[Robert Henry]

Darkmagus,

I will bite, even though I can't speak from direct experience of this, yet (eagerly awaiting tax season to file my first such return after redeeming half of this years paychecks!).

The surest proof of redemption, as I understand it, is the copies of the front and back of your non-endorsed checks that you will include with your return.

This, to me, is elegant simplicity.

There are a couple of examples of proper, though sanitized, returns with redemption schedules floating around this site, if you look around a bit.

So what exactly does a RLM tax return look like? (for those who file them). How is it made clear that the funds in question are indeed "Lawful Money"?

[Chex]

American rule of law, read the brief here, the government's response here and the reply to that response here.

[JohnnyCash]

I have just entered my 8th year as a successful NONTAXPAYER! No wage garnishments, no liens, no levies, no penalties, no CP letters.

http://ctcwarrior.com/SSA_2015_3.jpg

I come before you tonight humbled by this win. It would not have been possible without the work of other freedom-fighters who came before me and published their work. Thank you David, Pete, Rick and all [including the quatlosers offering a token of their affliction] who've helped me achieve such an unprecedented victory.
Thank you very much. God bless, and go Patriots!

PS. I did not rebut the 1099-MISC amounts I received for 2012 or 2013. I simply did not include those amounts on a Form 1040 since it was redeemed lawful money and there was no obligation.

http://jesse2012.com/my109912.jpg

http://jesse2012.com/my109913.jpg

[doug555]

I have just entered my 8th year as a successful NONTAXPAYER! No wage garnishments, no liens, no levies, no penalties, no CP letters.

http://ctcwarrior.com/SSA_2015_3.jpg

I come before you tonight humbled by this win. It would not have been possible without the work of other freedom-fighters who came before me and published their work. Thank you David, Pete, Rick and all [including the quatlosers offering a token of their affliction] who've helped me achieve such an unprecedented victory.
Thank you very much. God bless, and go Patriots!

PS. I did not rebut the 1099-MISC amounts I received for 2012 or 2013. I simply did not include those amounts on a Form 1040 since it was redeemed lawful money and there was no obligation.

http://jesse2012.com/my109912.jpg

http://jesse2012.com/my109913.jpg

Congrats!

One thing stands out though...

It appears that your Social Security & Medicare benefits will be greatly reduced by your "0" earnings. That makes sense if you not are wanting SSA & Medicare Benefits.

My SSA report for my past 3 successful lawful money demand tax years shows my full amount of earnings (in FRNs) credited for SSA, so it will yearly increase my SSA benefits for Retirement & Medicare, which I am paying withholding for and plan to use at age 66, and will also continue to redeem its FRNs transacted thereby. (Contact me privately about how I use TaxAct for this.)

So we are doing our 1040's very differently, and yet it appears that your previously-made point that the IRS won't touch any 1040 that has a lawful money demand reduction on it is certainly true! That's great! They don't want any "press" on it in the courts or news.

Like in the movie "National Treasure"... when the father warned about "keeping the status quo" in order to preserve their lives with their captors. This complies with Mt 13:30 - "let both grow together..." which appears to be the rule the system is honoring... because they know what happens if they don't.

[itsmymoney]

Doug555 and JohnnyCash (and all others),

Wanted to mention that I redeemed my check today with the 'all transactions' verbiage handwritten on the front of the check and the deposit slip. Teller looked hard at it but ignored it (thankfully). Didn't want to have to get into it with her, but 'just for tax purposes' appears to be a simple response. Of course that might spark more speculation, but so be it. I plan to file Affidavit upon seeing the entry posted in my bank statement. I'm still mad as hell for my 'empty' Demand Letter recorded 2 years ago at the County Recorder's office. I'd probably get refunds for 2013 and 2014 but better safe than sorry. However, starting next year I can start recouping the HUGE amount of 6702 penalties I paid for TY 2008 for repeatedly trying to fight that battle. I was punished, really, like many others. And I feel so cheated for all these years of not knowing I could RILM, but I'm very grateful for the opportunity going forward.

Thanks to you guys, David and all other suitors for this education!

Sincerely,

imm

[Freeman]

Quick question

Johnny,

Do you think you can message me privately? I have a couple questions I'd like to ask. Thanks!