Lawful Money Setoff > Parking Ticket

[Life's-a-Psyop]

I found motla68's creative handling of presentments to be very intriguing, particularly for its simplicity. In the many lively exchanges between motla68 and David Merrill on the subject, new insights were emerging. David was distilling down the process as to what effected setoff. It became apparent that the lawful money verbiage was the key, which brings lawful money remedy to a whole new level.

This inspired me to test it out and the annoying parking ticket that had been sitting on my desk would fit the bill. I tried stamping the ticket, but it smeared because it is that slick type of thermal paper. So, I now had a ticket with an illegible ink smudge on it. I fixed it by printing the verbiage on a 1x4 inch address label and sticking it over the mess. I then mailed it off in the envelope provided.

Time line
6/29/11 Online screenshot of ticket info
6/30/11 Mailed ticket
7/17/11 Online screenshot of "ticket not found" (it disappeared about 2 weeks after mailing)

As far as the possibility of it being sent to collections, there has been no evidence of that and according to their policy, fines have to go unpaid 60 days before they are sent to collections.

It appears that the public servant trustees did their job!



Image Links >>

http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/7271/online1o.jpg

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/38/online2.jpg

http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/9122/ticketside1.jpg

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/1721/ticketside2.jpg

[David Merrill]

That post is a pleasure to read!

I will PM Motla68 with a link here. Possibly he will get an email and get a look.



So far though, I am having trouble making out the images. I am especially interested in seeing the stamp sticker. If the attachments feature reduces it that much, maybe you can link through imageshack like I do.

[motla68]

Fantastic job there Psyop ! Not exactly how I did it but you got the job done just the same. Yes, I did get David's message, thank you for posting.
If you got any other items outstanding on the record you can also get a copy of driving record and for each items account # use a 1099-C on it, this cleans it off the record, closes that account. The paper forms are triplicates, one you keep, one goes to the county court (NOT DMV) because the county court clerk is a public trustee, 3rd copy goes to CID office for IRS. Now that you know you can do that do not abuse it though or they will shut you down and you will have to go through some red tape to get the same thing done, live as a peaceful inhabitant, when you need the key of knowledge it will be there for you.

I have been a busy man lately working on some other things besides taken care of the family that is why i had not been on here in a while, have been really busy with removing the birth name from the debtor side to the creditor side and eventually into pure equity, it has been quite a thrill ride so far, but once i do will probably just hire an accountant that knows how to do all that stuff, but at least I will know what is being done so that i can oversee there is no fraud.

Coresource has almost completely gone local, no more on the internet other then to post meeting announcements, this comes from a lot of reason besides hearing a recent conference call of an older gentleman who had spoken about when the internet first went public his local group had one of the first patriot sites to ever go online and talked about the monthly visits from federal agents and they eventually told him that is why the internet went public was to keep track of their type of groups activities. Sure they can still track things we do, not denying that, but I am not going to make it easy on them.

Cheers and congrats to your success!

[motla68]

That post is a pleasure to read!

So far though, I am having trouble making out the images. I am especially interested in seeing the stamp sticker. If the attachments feature reduces it that much, maybe you can link through imageshack like I do.

Hey David, I am looking at the second image, the column on the right in the middle sort of, it says that it was not found.

[David Merrill]

I am embarrassed. The sticker is so neat, all I read was Property of the State and thought it part of the ticket/citation.

[Life's-a-Psyop]

Happy Friday!

Thank you, David And Motla for the great feedback!

Per David's suggestion, I uploaded the images to imageshack. I use Linux and they have a nifty Linux uploader to facilitate multiple image uploads. Thanks David.

http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/7271/online1o.jpg

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/38/online2.jpg

http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/9122/ticketside1.jpg

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/1721/ticketside2.jpg

[David Merrill]

Does anybody mind if we put the Linux on its own thread? This thread topic is more fascinating in my opinion.


Post LINUX stuff here please.

[Life's-a-Psyop]

Experiment #2 > License Plate Tabs

I ran the same experiment for license plate tabs, and yesterday I received the typical form letter stating "you forgot to enclose your check". Well, duh!

Actually, I was expecting this same response from the parking ticket experiment.

...whatever.

[motla68]

I ran the same experiment for license plate tabs, and yesterday I received the typical form letter stating "you forgot to enclose your check". Well, duh!

Actually, I was expecting this same response from the parking ticket experiment.

...whatever.[/QUOTE]

As an executor of the estate you have to give them a little more direction then what you did on the parking ticket, not only do you say property of the state, but you ask them to deposit into the treasury for settlement and include a xerox copy of a certificate of live birth. Reason being is that it is the state that is pledging the credit, not you.

[QUOTE=Life's-a-Psyop;4152]

If you do not push the issue with them they will forever call your bluff that your not really serious about what your doing.

[David Merrill]

I do not believe the birth certificate acts as an account which the Treasury can settle from.

The Testimony of Walker Todd should be examined. Find the passage below and form your interpretation in context.

I do not believe it and am not buying it. Therefore I am just supplying you the material to evaluate it from expert witness testimony.

[Treefarmer]

I ran the same experiment for license plate tabs, and yesterday I received the typical form letter stating "you forgot to enclose your check". Well, duh!

Actually, I was expecting this same response from the parking ticket experiment.

...whatever.

Thank you for sharing your fascinating experiments with us, Life's-a-Psyop.
This is great stuff.

May all your endeavors turn out well.

[David Merrill]

Motla68;


I have not really made the connection why you keep showing this image with various assertions.






Please explain what this certification signifies about trust law. You seem to be using it to establish some kind of executor relationship?

[motla68]

We had a couple small splinter groups in other parts of the country who had not used the lawful money language on a couple hospital presentments, one of them when was billed and refused service went back and tendered the bill back with a copy of the Certificate of Live birth, he presented it as a gift and told them the name is ward of the state, from that point on they were about falling over themselves to offer any service they could additional. He needed a triple heart bypass surgery and it was given to him and he never seen a bill after that. This was in Ohio

The other man his wife had been in the hospital because of cancer, she had died after all the treatments and they presented him with a bill of a little over a quarter million dollars. He did the same thing as the first guy did and never seen a bill again.
This was in Texas.

The reason I keep posting that is the connection I mentioned this weekend about the licensing, the hospitals are chartered by the state, the state is the one putting up the faith and credit for the name, look at it again, what do you suppose " elsewhere " means in the last sentence ?
What I am proposing here is that the hospitals were not doing business with the man, the man just had " use " of the name, the hospitals were doing business with the state, because they are licensed/chartered by the state to do business. " Usufructuary "

I know your next question is going to be for the scientific proof, but I talked these men and they do not want to put any of it on the Internet. Sorry I cannot provide, but you asked. This new text they are using for presentments attached here is the only thing they would provide:
GIFT TAX STAMP_5.doc

replevin bond
: a bond given by a plaintiff in a replevin action to cover losses to the defendant or court officer seizing the property in the defendant's possession and transferring it to the plaintiff in the event that the plaintiff loses the case

[David Merrill]

We had a couple small splinter groups in other parts of the country who had not used the lawful money language on a couple hospital presentments, one of them when was billed and refused service went back and tendered the bill back with a copy of the Certificate of Live birth, he presented it as a gift and told them the name is ward of the state, from that point on they were about falling over themselves to offer any service they could additional. He needed a triple heart bypass surgery and it was given to him and he never seen a bill after that. This was in Ohio

The other man his wife had been in the hospital because of cancer, she had died after all the treatments and they presented him with a bill of a little over a quarter million dollars. He did the same thing as the first guy did and never seen a bill again.
This was in Texas.

The reason I keep posting that is the connection I mentioned this weekend about the licensing, the hospitals are chartered by the state, the state is the one putting up the faith and credit for the name, look at it again, what do you suppose " elsewhere " means in the last sentence ?
What I am proposing here is that the hospitals were not doing business with the man, the man just had " use " of the name, the hospitals were doing business with the state, because they are licensed/chartered by the state to do business. " Usufructuary "

I know your next question is going to be for the scientific proof, but I talked these men and they do not want to put any of it on the Internet. Sorry I cannot provide, but you asked. This new text they are using for presentments attached here is the only thing they would provide:
[ATTACH]639[/ATTACH]

replevin bond
: a bond given by a plaintiff in a replevin action to cover losses to the defendant or court officer seizing the property in the defendant's possession and transferring it to the plaintiff in the event that the plaintiff loses the case

Actually since other members are enjoying and thanking you, I will lighten up about proof. The examples you speak of here are with hospitals and medical services coming under the penumbra of eleemysonary trust organizations.

Proof? I have a lot of examples - I think an old thread or Download - something about Inside David Merrill's Head. I don't really try to prove things over the Internet either but you might take up my lead about showing us graphic examples, assuming you would like to please me.

[motla68]

I can understand why you would cross out item #4, but not items #3 and #6 , this seems to be refusing both private and public services at the same time?

Thank you for the info on what type of trusts, will look into that more. My initial discoveries back in 03/04 were from finding something called the Hill Burton Act in which I pretty much forced the hand of a hospital to setoff a debt. The general information of this act only gives a certain exclusivity for being able to do this, BUT after reading the Act itself I found that " any " hospital receiving federal benefits must adhere to the rules when servicing indigenous peoples, a copy was provided of the Act and also a copy showing the proof to them that they did received federal benefits they did setoff the account and sent me a bill showing a 0.00 balance. I figure they just did not want to go through the hassle of dealing with that and me finding something else if it failed or something. The name has been flagged somehow because they have not billed me for any other time after that, even when I had to bring my son in a couple times.

After telling these guys what I had done and the other success we had more recently they came up with their own plan of action.