Tweet
Thank you ag maniac! I will indeed ponder the verbiage for potential utilization...
-
-
IRS criminal behaviour
I have followed David for many years and stamp the checks "redeemed per 12 USC 411, as agent"
But... when dealing with the IRS, i am a firm believer in the kitchen sink approach.
that starts by:
1) Sending a self executing contract in the form of an affidavit with something like Paul Andrew Mitchells 31 questions to the IRS commissioner by proof of service, Certified Mail, to the Commissioner, with a notarized affidavit that has your revocation, and termination of your signatures from the beginning of time as your recission of the first election to be taxed for fraud, failure to disclose, and discrimination by employers of your right to work if you refuse to fill out a witholding statment.
2) Sending the same to the Congressman and Senator from your area. (how will i manage my affairs if you dont answer these questions).
3) Sending the same to the Inspector general of the Secretary of the Treasury.
4) After 30 days sending an opportunity to cure giving another 10 days to rebut the affidavit of obligation. Finally a default judgement based upon silence, tacit agreement and maxims of law. Have 3 adult witnesses be your witnesses to any responses and issue as a tribunal a certificate of default judgement.
5) After the 45 days or? and Default has occured then filing your W2's as exempt on information and belief, and qualify your autograph All rights retained, nonassumptsit, by: ____________________.
6 I file notice and demands in affidavit form, to return my property instead of tax returns (too many traps on a 1040) after showing photos of stamped checks redeemed and and affidavit of no tax liability by silent acquiescence, laches, and estopple, from first Obligation affidavits, the section 83 definition for income (David Myrlands stuff) being the excess of the exchange of services for an arms length agreement of what my services are worth and no "income" (excess) was paid to me, and the fact that no territorial constitutional jurisdiction exists to apply Congressional law on me in the geographical area known and defined in the California Constitution of 1850, and that taxation has been declared by the Supreme Court as an "exaction" (unlawful extortion), etc. demanding to show cause any oath of office by the Commissioner, or who is sending any letters, the authority to violate the 4th, 5th, 1st (redress of greivance) and the State repetition of the same, impair the obligation of a contract between me and my boss, by a third party intervener (IRS), unlawful orders are bills of attainder (judgement without jury trial), IRS is not judicial branch (cant issue orders) and cannot make rules (not legislative branch) etc.
7) I file a 1 or 2 page FOIA, demanding to have the IRS show any documents purporting to act as an "assessment" or "notice of Lien", or "lien", or "notice of levy" or "Levy" ,and any factual evidence i am an employee of the Federal government, and the full legal names and address for service of process for anyone making any claims upon me.
8) in response to the FOIA i have a signed statement that the IRS does not have to "create" documents that would be required to answer my request and it "appears" you are challenging your responsibility to pay taxes.
I replied, thank you for the admission you have no assessments for the 10 years requested and that no liens or levys exist (even tho your garnishing on a bogus levy) and if in fact any factual evidence comes out in the future at any trial I will be charging you (IRS FOIA officer) with concealment 18 USC 2071, 1001 of material facts, have a nice day.
The kitchen sink re IRS taxation:
1) The IRS was never created by Congress and have no oath of office making them impersonating public officials (treasury officers).
2) the Congress has no jurisdiction to legislate laws that apply outside of Washington, D.C. (see my video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVooIVtYvnkComment
-
So, the "exigent circumstance" that makes court review impracticable is ... the court's judge has altered the oath?Comment
-
Thank you both! I am combining both posts quoted to show the contrast. The Kitchen Sink approach is reflective of many years of research and requires some sort of honor behind whoever is hearing the matter. So the Exigent Circumstances would indeed be indictment that there is not.Originally posted by marcel View Post
Originally posted by MaxF View PostComment
-
Great; thank you. The exigent circumstance wasn't exactly clear to me from the garnishment template. And likely not to the clerk of court either. Unless you tell her/him. But perhaps that knowledge is irrelevant to them going about their job as clerk/keeper of the record.Last edited by marcel; 01-18-18, 09:45 PM.Comment
-
Maybe the clerk won't issue summons and garnishment for fear of being charged with contumacy. And tried for unmasonic conduct.Comment
-
That makes me wonder.
I found some research about George WASHINGTON and his oath. He added impromptu "So help me God."
As I better understand history, the meaning I put behind this utterance changes.Comment
-
Originally posted by ag maniac View Post
After these many years, still chasing down the 2015 refund due & VOILA !! --> just got off the phone w/ an examiner who informed me a check WITH INTEREST [ about 1500 I reckon ] would be sent out Friday 3/20....will be avidly checking the mailbox next week......always nice to get a TREASURY CHEQUE in the mailComment
-
That always gets me chuckling! Thanks for the report Ag.Originally posted by ag maniac View PostComment
-
Received muh refund check ... TY2019 lawful money tax filing ... WITH INTEREST.
Comment
-
-
Reminder that 2021 lawful money tax returns are due today, April 18, 2022. Unless you're a mason. They mark time differently.
Comment
-
This year's Dirty Dozen list is out...
Strangely it's only four items long.Comment
-
Thank you Marcel!Originally posted by marcel View PostThis year's Dirty Dozen list is out...
Strangely it's only four items long.Comment
-
There's a dozen spread across six links https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/dirty-dozen
Here you go:
1. Use of Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust (CRAT) to Eliminate Taxable Gain. In this transaction, appreciated property is transferred to a CRAT. Taxpayers improperly claim the transfer of the appreciated assets to the CRAT in and of itself...
2. Maltese Pension Arrangements Misusing Treaty. In these transactions, U.S. citizens or U.S. residents attempt to avoid U.S. tax by making contributions to certain foreign individual retirement arrangements in Malta (or possibly other foreign countries). In these transactions, the individual typically lacks a local connection...
3. Puerto Rican Captive Insurance. In these transactions, U.S owners of closely held entities participate in a purported insurance arrangement with a Puerto Rican or other foreign corporation with cell arrangements or segregated asset plans in which the U.S. owner has a financial interest.
4. Monetized Installment Sales. These transactions involve the inappropriate use of the installment sale rules under section 453 by a seller who, in the year of a sale of property, effectively receives the sales proceeds through purported loans. In a typical transaction, the seller...
5. PANDEMIC RELATED
Economic Impact Payment and tax refund scams: Identity thieves who try to use Economic Impact Payments (EIPs), also known as stimulus payments, are a continuing threat to individuals. Similar to tax refund scams, taxpayers should watch out for these tell-tale signs of
Unemployment fraud leading to inaccurate taxpayer 1099-Gs: Because of the pandemic, many taxpayers lost their jobs and received unemployment compensation from their state. However, scammers also took advantage of the pandemic by filing fraudulent claims for...
Fake employment offers posted on social media: There have been many reports of fake job postings on social media. The pandemic created many newly unemployed people eager to seek new employment. These fake posts entice their victims to provide their personal financial info...
Fake charities that steal your money: Bogus charities are always a problem. They tend to be a bigger threat when there is a national crisis like the pandemic.
Taxpayers who give money or goods to a charity may be able to claim a deduction on their federal tax return. Taxpayers must donate to a qualified charity to get a deduction, not the beggar at the street corner with a cardboard sign.
6. UNSCRUPULOUS TAX COMPANIES
Ghost preparers: Although most tax preparers are ethical and trustworthy, taxpayers should be wary of preparers who won't sign the tax returns they prepare, often referred to as ghost preparers. For e-filed returns, the "ghost" will prepare the return, but refuse to digitally sign as the paid preparer.
Inflated refunds: Not signing a return is a red flag that the paid preparer may be looking to make a quick profit by promising a big refund or charging fees based on the size of the refund.
7. SUSPICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS
Text message scams: These scams are sent to taxpayers' smartphones and can reference things like COVID-19 and/or "stimulus payments." These messages often contain bogus links claiming to be IRS websites...
Email phishing scams: The IRS does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial information. The IRS initiates most contacts through regular mail...
Phone scams: The IRS does not leave pre-recorded, urgent or threatening messages. In many variations of the phone scam, victims are told if they do not call back, a warrant will be issued for their arrest. Other verbal threats include law-enforcement agency intervention...
8. SPEAR PHISHING is an email scam that attempts to steal a tax professional's software preparation credentials. These thieves try to steal client data and tax preparers' identities in an attempt to file fraudulent tax returns for refunds.
9. Concealing Assets in Offshore Accounts and Improper Reporting of Digital Assets: The IRS remains focused on stopping tax avoidance by those who hide assets in offshore accounts and in accounts holding cryptocurrency or other digital assets.
10. High-income individuals who don't file tax returns: The IRS continues to focus on people who choose to ignore the law and not file a tax return, especially those individuals earning more than $100,000 a year.
11. Abusive Syndicated Conservation Easements: In syndicated conservation easements, promoters take a provision of the tax law allowing for conservation easements and twist it by using inflated appraisals of undeveloped land (or, for a few specialized ones, the facades of historic buildings), and by using partnership arrangements devoid of a ...
12. Abusive Micro-Captive Insurance Arrangements: In abusive "micro-captive" structures, promoters, accountants, or wealth planners persuade owners of closely held entities to participate in schemes that lack many of the attributes of insurance.
13. Lawful money redemption: A growing number of Americans believe they can simply redeem their income into "lawful money" - as allowed by The Federal Reserve Act - and therefore have no taxable income. This redeemed lawful money would thus be considered US notes in the form of FRNs, or, public money. As opposed to the private credit of the Federal Reserve whose use carries the excise tax more commonly known as the "federal income tax." As more people opt-out, this could be considered abusive to the bank and the fund, who rely on your money, as well as making the entire tax code of Title 26 ... wait. Hang on...Last edited by marcel; 06-23-22, 03:23 AM.Comment
Comment