Consent to Service of Process

[Anthony Joseph]

"... 'saving to suitors', in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it..." - 1789

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." - Bill of Rights, Article 9

Not only do i believe i have these rights, you will find your law agrees with me [for your benefit see xxxxxxxxxxxxx, etc].

[Michael Joseph]

speaking of the State of NC - You should check out THIS LINK

I have spent many an hour in the State archives - and when I really started getting close, the custodian told me that information was secret and could not be disclosed to the public. This, my friend tells me that the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence [of Trust] is written in a manner that cannot be understood without the keys to unlock all of the capitalized nouns.

In my opinion, if you think you can decode those documents without those keys, then you are just fooling yourself.

Property Rights are for those who have taken dominion. If you have failed to do so - then simply put - you have not established any rights. And what you consider to be agreement is nothing but civil rights and privileges extended to a citizenry.

Shalom,
MJ

P.S. There is a HUGE difference between "freedman" and "freeman". And "man" BECAME a "living soul".

[Anthony Joseph]

What do you define as "taking dominion" as it relates to claiming property and/or rights?

[Keith Alan]

@Freed

I think I may have led you to think I was disassembling or deconstructing THE NAME, which was not my intention. Please notice that the California Corporations Code offers two options: resign as agent of the unincorporated association, or revoke the designation of an agent previously designated. These options, along with returning the driver's license and registration should definitely make the line between THE NAME and myself very clear.

I'm still reading and contemplating these options. It may be that I decide to forego either option and pursue another course of action.

At any rate, I would only be refusing to consent to service of process.

Now it just so happens the same Corporations code also provides the opportunity to designate another agent. My thinking is the Governor would be the proper person to designate to receive services of process. Who else?

Now about property ownership; it seems to me that this state, and the State, do indeed have security interests in the property I presently hold, since I obtained nearly all of it by using banking credit and/or Federal reserve notes. There are in existence running accounts of all income and expenses made by THE NAME, so the accounts are still open, awaiting settlement and closure.

Finally, you mentioned a vehicle code that requires drivers to have driver's licenses. California also has a code section stating that drivers must have a driver's license. But I also note that the code only applies to residents, which THE NAME surely is. But I am an inhabitant. So if I, the inhabitant, withdraw consent to receive service of process, and further designate the Governor as my agent, then all the bases are covered. I think.

[Keith Alan]

speaking of the State of NC - You should check out THIS LINK

I have spent many an hour in the State archives - and when I really started getting close, the custodian told me that information was secret and could not be disclosed to the public. This, my friend tells me that the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence [of Trust] is written in a manner that cannot be understood without the keys to unlock all of the capitalized nouns.

In my opinion, if you think you can decode those documents without those keys, then you are just fooling yourself.

Property Rights are for those who have taken dominion. If you have failed to do so - then simply put - you have not established any rights. And what you consider to be agreement is nothing but civil rights and privileges extended to a citizenry.

Shalom,
MJ

P.S. There is a HUGE difference between "freedman" and "freeman". And "man" BECAME a "living soul".

I think that is a very astute observation and conclusion. I'm beginning to see that 'we the people' is an unincorporated association, to which residents can never fully belong. The 1789 Constitution proclaims it is for the benefit of the signatories and their posterity, almost completely ignoring everyone else except for government officials.

[Anthony Joseph]

the people are mankind

i; a man, am one of the people

i; a man, have rights that only i can claim; and, that i believe are inherent

no man has a right to interfere with another man's claimed rights

the laws that bind the United States government in no way disparages or denies this

[Keith Alan]

the people are mankind

i; a man, am one of the people

i; a man, have rights that only i can claim; and, that i believe are inherent

no man has a right to interfere with another man's claimed rights

the laws that bind the United States government in no way disparages or denies this

Yes, but most people declare themselves to be residents of the State, which is somewhat less permanent than inhabitants, and not necessarily citizens (although the 14th is invoked for them, ie they enjoy civil rights).

[Anthony Joseph]

don't be "most people"

[Keith Alan]

@Anthony Joseph

Haha indeed!

[Freed Gerdes]

MJ, I checked out the link you provided, but I didn't get much out of it. It just recognizes that business trusts can hold property, which just means that a business trust has the same status in the fictional world of legal entities as any other legal fictional entity. If you have found further hidden meaning there, please elaborate. And if you were approaching some veil imposed by a librarian within the state archives, suggesting some vein of secret information, please provide its approximate location, so that others might go there and try to mine it.

As to the huge difference between freedman and freeman, are you going all ad hominem here? I see only the difference in the path taken. If you are making a play on my screen name, please note that I use many variations on my name when asked for screen names at web sites which require one. I have used Freid, Frad, Fraud, Freud, Ferd, etc. (this practice allows me to determine which sites sell their subscribers lists to advertisers). I just happened to select Freed for this web site as a little internal sarcasm. I define free as being able to select at will which laws I will agree to be subject to. My purpose in visiting this site is to explore the means and methods by which I can convey to others in a non-violent way the status I have selected for myself. Due to the invasive and pervasive reach of the statutory government, most of this pursuit involves steps taken to shed the load of implied contracts imposed by our regulated and brainwashed society. For example, on my last visit to a nearby craft beer bar, I offered to pay in silver, which was violently rejected since 'silver isn't money.' But the bartender and several patrons informed me violently that FRN's are money... a society can only advance when a significant percentage (generally thought to be about 10%) understand how the social contract should be constructed for the benefit of all members. This requires that some/many members of society have accepted their duty to become informed about their responsibilities as citizens. US society is failing in this regard, as a majority of its members have chosen the false security of slavery. I try to offer guidance to those who seem to be seeking it, but otherwise keep my own counsel.

Freed

[ag maniac]

Well Freed, your guidance is well received !!

[Keith Alan]

FWIW, my definition of free is: having the power to do what is right.

[froze25]

FWIW, my definition of free is: having the power to do what is right.

Mine is having the ability to say "NO" without some type of recourse or force used against you.

[David Merrill]

I like the right of ownership, but especially including being free of the conditioning that there are certain things you are required to have:

I have no DoB.
I have no SSN.
I have no Last Name.
I have no Birth Certificate.

[Freed Gerdes]

The key is ownership, starting with yourself. All government actions start with a claim of ownership of you, the citizen. See this web link:

http://www.notbeinggoverned.com/government-slavery/

Our mission is to locate the specific claims the government has made and rebut as many as possible. No man can own another man, and no fictional entity can have judicial authority over a live person. So we continue to learn how these various frauds were perpetrated, so they can be unwound, exposed, rebutted. The US has a Constitution, which limits how the government can make claims and demands on its citizens (who created the government). Once all the claims that are based on debt servitude are rebutted, the citizen can approach those freedoms identified in the Constitution.

Freed