Rod Class on RBN - Freedom Frenzy - DL & More :

[Trust Guy]

Friends , this is the best show ever for an introduction to our lay and educated Compatriots . If you are a Court Player , or just someone trying to figure out what in the name of sanity is going on around here , please listen to this at least once .

One gem . Fellow asked Judge if he was Judicial or Administrative . Judge said Judicial . Fellow said then you are familiar with the 11th Amendment . You have no judicial power to hear any case in Law or Equity or Controversy created by the State. Judge walked off the Bench .

Another got the answer Administrative . Fellow said now you understand that under the Administrative Procedure Act , I have to be the Plaintiff in this Court Room as it is an Administrative Agency that is bringing a charge against me , and under the Administrative Procedures Act , I have to bring the charges against the Agency , not the other way around . Judge dismissed .

Download or Listen .
05/26/2011 11:27 AM EDT 1:29:19 EPISODE426 - AIB RADIO RBN BROADCAST SHOW

How it all started with one traffic ticket and tying his approach together . Subjects threaded together :

Statutes , Public Law , State of Emergency , Bankruptcy , Trading With the Enemy Act , State Title , Maintenance , Prepaid Accounts , Trust & Trustees , Administrative Law & Rules , Administrative Hearing / Court , Federal Rules , Code of Federal Regulations , Judicial Review , Public Policy , Private Agencies , Executive Branch , Title 42 , Civil Rights , Confiscation Act , Reconstruction Act , Liber Code , Military Jurisdiction , Strawman .

Over - Under - Around and Through .

Rod cut the commercials out after the first several and switched to the direct line . Some interesting exchanges that were not on the web cast .

[shikamaru]

Good job, Trust Guy .

I like Rod Class a lot.

[Trust Guy]

Glad you enjoyed it . Hope you caught a few goodies along the way .

[shikamaru]

Am I reading this right or do I need new prescriptions?

11th Amendment of the US Constitution

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

Is this from where the concept that we have no Article III courts at the federal level save the Supreme Court?
Does this mean what I think it means? None of the federal courts are judicial courts per the 11th Amendment? They are all administrative courts operating under color of law?

[Trust Guy]

In a nut shell . But there is a bit more to it . One needs to be well versed in the foundation .

This all goes to the origin and purposes of the American court system . How and why the Judicial Districts were established and who is / has controlling authority . And the underlying reasons for the 11 th. Amendment . State Courts and their subdivisions also are effected .

To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record , to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence . So few are able to do so , unless there is a Federal Depository Library near by . Rod and his contributors do that . When I was an avid student , I spent as much time , if not more in the proceeding records than cross referencing points and authorities . You can not read an Act and have full understanding of the implications .

Rod’s paperwork are quite helpful as outlines in formulating a study plan . As time allows I’ll bring some materials here to share .

[shikamaru]

In a nut shell . But there is a bit more to it . One needs to be well versed in the foundation .

This all goes to the origin and purposes of the American court system . How and why the Judicial Districts were established and who is / has controlling authority . And the underlying reasons for the 11 th. Amendment . State Courts and their subdivisions also are effected .

To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record , to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence . So few are able to do so , unless there is a Federal Depository Library near by . Rod and his contributors do that . When I was an avid student , I spent as much time , if not more in the proceeding records than cross referencing points and authorities . You can not read an Act and have full understanding of the implications .

Rod’s paperwork are quite helpful as outlines in formulating a study plan . As time allows I’ll bring some materials here to share .

This is similar to what "the Informer", James Montgomery, and their group did.
"the Informer" admonished that you need to hit the archives if you intend to study this.

[Chex]

Thank you Trust Guy for that information. As the broadcast was downloading I was checking on some of the key words you mentioned.

Found this and this .

Also came across this The Rule of Law - In Depth

[Trust Guy]

11th-Amendment-Notice-and-Affidavit 5 Pgs .


Drivers License& Plates 24 Pgs .


Judicial Notice - 15 Issues 113 Pgs .

[Trust Guy]

Is there any online info on how and why the Judicial Districts were established?

Now that you mentioned “To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record, to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence” that interested me entirely. Do you have any info on this as well?

Thanks for the links Chex . I'll be looking for more info to post and you'll see it here . Rod has at least several AIB TalkShoes on the subject . Right now it's time to get to the days chores.

[David Merrill]

Am I reading this right or do I need new prescriptions?



Is this from where the concept that we have no Article III courts at the federal level save the Supreme Court?
Does this mean what I think it means? None of the federal courts are judicial courts per the 11th Amendment? They are all administrative courts operating under color of law?

When a suitor files the Libel of Review and a "judge" is appointed, he or she asks the clerk of court, Is this an Article III judge?

Until lately the answer is invariably, Yes, this is an Article III judge. Lately the clerks are more inclined to answer, I don't know.

Which serves the same purpose, Ignorance/ignoramus. A Return of ignoramus from the federal clerk is just as effective to defer competence to the suitor as a lie - Yes this is an Article III (judicial) judge.

In a nut shell . But there is a bit more to it . One needs to be well versed in the foundation .

This all goes to the origin and purposes of the American court system . How and why the Judicial Districts were established and who is / has controlling authority . And the underlying reasons for the 11 th. Amendment . State Courts and their subdivisions also are effected .

To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record , to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence . So few are able to do so , unless there is a Federal Depository Library near by . Rod and his contributors do that . When I was an avid student , I spent as much time , if not more in the proceeding records than cross referencing points and authorities . You can not read an Act and have full understanding of the implications .

Rod’s paperwork are quite helpful as outlines in formulating a study plan . As time allows I’ll bring some materials here to share .

Thank you.

[shikamaru]

Source: http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/rules.html

Common Law: The courts have developed common law over time based on principles of justice, equity and the morals and ethics of the time. Scholars collect the common law into volumes called the Restatements.

The quote above is a a load of crap, pardon my French, in my opinion.
The development of Common Law was barbaric, haphazard, and accidental at times. It was just as much about politics as it was about "justice".
Justice, being a legal term of art, means rendering unto each man his due in this context. These men shall possess different statuses within the society, therefore the respective "justice" for each class will differ.
Common Law developed into monopoly law for the king after 1069 A.D.
Common Law became about sovereign prerogatives.

Statutory Law: Congress or state legislatures write statutes, which results in laws that are primarily influenced by special interest groups. A body of law is sometimes collected in a model code or uniform statute, such as the Uniform Commercial Code or the Model Penal Code.1

I can't believe the truth is written here .

Thanks for the contribution.

[Trust Guy]

[Trust Guy]

Original Coram Nobis - Original Corum Non Judice & Original Notice of Felony Complaint

[David Merrill]

I believe an experienced suitor met for a few hours with Rod and they had a very informative exchange.

There are some things I require to pass rules of evidence though. Follow carefully this snippet from this interview. My point being that if they got a judge to get up and leave his own courtroom, they may have been later arrested for Failure to Appear at the next hearing, that he set when he came back in.

According to that unsubstantiated account by Frank they should have stayed around for maintenance and cure, then for remedy by demanding canon law prevail and treat them like a man or woman...

But even that is fantasy and internet yarn.

Don't take this wrong but Rod has not had any of these things happen. He never had somebody ask whether or not the court was administrative or judicial and pull the Eleventh Amendment and have the judge leave the courtroom. That just did not happen because if Rod is not smart enough to go get he Register of Action and order up the transcript to convince somebody like me, even with a sanitized rendition that leaves enough of the record to be convincing, then he really is not somebody you want to be learning from.

There are so many of these wonder rumors around and it is so easy to put together a record so that you can prove success stories are really success stories that one can easily be wary and not become a victim of theories that sound like they work.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Trust Guy]

David ,

A member here has recently posted that he met with Rod .

I am merely relating war stories from others . Over the near 2 years I have been catching many of his web casts and archives , I have heard at least 2 dozen claimed first person accounts of situations in court . Child custody , mortgage and traffic most prominently . Some happy , some not , some continuing to appeal .

I brought the Constitutional Trust position to the AIB chat the last of Jan 2010 . It wasn’t till maybe June or later , that the various Trust aspects of government function was mentioned . And it wasn’t my particular information . It showed his crew had been looking into this subject .

I’ve had several other go rounds with them , most notably the contention regarding County Courts and Offices being traded on the stock exchange . Claims based solely on the listing and existence of Dun & Bradstreet records naming them Private Corporations . I sent info I had collected and contributed to the SJC thread on the subject , where we all covered that issue pretty well , and put it to rest . They seem to have looked into it and also laid that claim aside . Unless I missed a web call where it was claimed again. And that is quite possible .

The best I can say is they will stand corrected . Also , AIB is the only bunch searching all aspects of our Status and legal problems . Every one is welcome to contribute . And we do .

I will contact some people and see if they mind passing their case info along .

Be Well , TG