LAW states registration not required

[outlierquest]

"regardless of testosterone levels" lol Way to chastise the Mr. Man types

[Jethro]

I have seen the letters back from the State Department and they say that according to their records and place of birth etc. the petitioner is a US citizen and getting the proper passport is approved.

That's perhaps their key statement: according to their records. They seem to be telling us they have some evidence -- or a presumption -- of petitioner being a "US citizen". Correcting the error in their records by providing evidence one is not a "US citizen" would perhaps yield different results; namely, a proper non-US citizen passport.

[David Merrill]

That's perhaps their key statement: according to their records. They seem to be telling us they have some evidence -- or a presumption -- of petitioner being a "US citizen". Correcting the error in their records by providing evidence one is not a "US citizen" would perhaps yield different results; namely, a proper non-US citizen passport.

I think you must look at it from the State Department's perspective. If somebody is born or naturalized on the districts then they are within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment. They do not provide the mythical American National passport. I think another way of saying it is that if you are an American National you do not require a passport at all. If international flight tickets were free and I had time to sit in holding cells being treated like a terrorist I would do some scientific experimentation myself. I find the thought of traveling to Iran or Israel pretty intimidating.

[allodial]

If one writes JOHN APPLE SMITH for "Applicant" and provides a CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH the applicant will be construed to an entity born (i.e. chartered/created) per the particulars of the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH. If you sincerely believe that you are that person then maybe fine who am I to tell you who you is or who you ain't is?--and would you like some refreshing fluoridated water to go with that?



If one does not know who or what one is then who can tell anyone anything? If you are John Apple then ...why are you so sure that you are the Applicant? Care for a game of Boggle?

[Darkcrusade]

It turns out I WAS WRONG!

There is a Gold Clause Resolution of 1933!!

Resolutions are generally, not law unless passed by a president after both houses of congress agree on it. It has a temporary affect on matters. [Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed., pg. 1310]

I didn't do my research thoroughly enough.

For this, I apologize to the board and to motla68 most of all .

That's why I love you guys. I learn so much. Learn so much more in error.

Good stuff . Keep it coming and most of all, keep me on my toes.

I've been gone for some little time and i wonder was that MOTLA68 last posting? Has he been kicked from StS??? Anyone? TY

[shikamaru]

I've been gone for some little time and i wonder was that MOTLA68 last posting? Has he been kicked from StS??? Anyone? TY

He's still around. I'll leave it at that.

[Chex]

shoot on sight: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...alse-data.html

[powder]

as usual (these days) late to the game.

There is a thread in success stories about 'self insurance'.

i have seen a commercial bus in Vancouver BC (some time ago) with a red license plate with EXEMPT at the top left, and the 'numbers' part of the plate was OHIO DOT #. (Ohio DOT was on the left at an angle occupying the spot of a number).

[powder]

as a general comment:

Why do those with knowledge as the questions?

How are you supposed to think for yourself if you do not understand how to arrive at the answer?

You have to be able to comprehend the situation, recognize invisible contracts - which was missed in this thread, and assess the best answer. If you cant think on your feet in a forum setting - forget it.

I personally used the self insurance in an encounter and the "officer" offered a citation for no insurance - 3 times - i countered with it is valid. it is private contract. no citation for no insurance was issued (about a 2000 $ fee).

[shikamaru]

as a general comment:

Why do those with knowledge as the questions?

How are you supposed to think for yourself if you do not understand how to arrive at the answer?

You have to be able to comprehend the situation, recognize invisible contracts - which was missed in this thread, and assess the best answer. If you cant think on your feet in a forum setting - forget it.

I personally used the self insurance in an encounter and the "officer" offered a citation for no insurance - 3 times - i countered with it is valid. it is private contract. no citation for no insurance was issued (about a 2000 $ fee).

You'll have to give us some of your war stories one of these days.

[Frederick Burrell]

as a general comment:

Why do those with knowledge as the questions?

How are you supposed to think for yourself if you do not understand how to arrive at the answer?

You have to be able to comprehend the situation, recognize invisible contracts - which was missed in this thread, and assess the best answer. If you cant think on your feet in a forum setting - forget it.

I personally used the self insurance in an encounter and the "officer" offered a citation for no insurance - 3 times - i countered with it is valid. it is private contract. no citation for no insurance was issued (about a 2000 $ fee).

Can you tell me more about your self insurance process. thanks. fB

[EZrhythm]

That's perhaps their key statement: according to their records. They seem to be telling us they have some evidence -- or a presumption -- of petitioner being a "US citizen". Correcting the error in their records by providing evidence one is not a "US citizen" would perhaps yield different results; namely, a proper non-US citizen passport.

VERY GOOD or even a declaration of status, witnessed and recorded in a public venue, certified copies carried/issued. Properly rebut the presumptions, that's what it's all about!

[EZrhythm]

Can you tell me more about your self insurance process. thanks. fB

There is a thread in Success Stories regarding self insurance.

[Chex]

Starting in 2014, virtually every legal resident of the U.S. and those who will be should face up to their civic responsibilities. "We're no longer going to subsidize the care of those who can afford to buy insurance but make a choice not to buy it."

Incorporating the effects of new federal legislation The Supreme Court upheld Obama's law as constitutional in a 5-4 decision this summer, finding that the insurance mandate and the tax penalty enforcing it fall within the power of Congress to impose taxes.

The penalty will be collected by the IRS, just like taxes.

The budget office said the penalty will raise $6.9 billion in 2016, Romney says insurance mandates should be up to each state. http://news.yahoo.com/tax-penalty-hi...194442599.html

Self insurance takes on a whole new meaning now doesn't it?

[Dumitru Ivanov]

Self insurance is a must in this economy.
It has its risks, to be sure, but at least for risky professions it's highly recommended.
___________________________________
Dumitru from Customs trucks