Who needs a Driver License? (Official Goveernment responce)

[walter]

I e-mailed ICBC (Insurance Company of British Columbia) who claims the rules of the road and asked them an innocent question about who needs a Driver License.

I used the "i am ignorant and you are the almighty" approach so they will respond.

Here is the question and here is their answer.

Question:

Good day.

I am trying to explain to my offspring that a

driver's license is required for men and women to

travel on the roads.

It would help greatly if I can show them the

law that says men and women are required by law

to have a drivers license to travel on the roads.

Can you please forward me the info of my

request to explain this matter better then I can.

The more specific and direct the info is the

better chance I have in making then understand.

Thank you so much in advance for your help in

explaining this matter.




ICBC Answer:

Thank you for your email dated July 25, 2013.

As per section 2, Application of Act in the BC Motor Vehicle Act:

Application of Act

2 (1) In this section, "private road" means a private road used by the public for vehicular traffic with permission of the owner or licensee of the road.

(10) Despite this section, but subject to subsection (11), a person must not drive or operate a motor vehicle or trailer referred to in this section unless

(a) the person holds a subsisting driver's licence of a class appropriate to the category of motor vehicle driven or operated,

(b) the person is insured under a valid and subsisting driver's certificate, and

(c) the motor vehicle and the trailer, if any, are insured under a valid and subsisting motor vehicle liability policy evidenced by an owner's certificate.

(11) Subsection (10) applies only to motor vehicles or trailers or drivers referred to in this section that are designated by order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.


Regards,

If you have further questions about driver licensing, please feel free to call ICBC Customer Contact at 1-800-950-1498. A representative is available to assist you by telephone between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Pacific Time Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays.

[Chex]

Who needs a Driver License when you have a uniform?

Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Donna Jane Watts "Put your hands out of the window! Right now!" she yelled.

Watts is suing those police agencies and the individual officers under the federal Driver Privacy Protection Act, a 1994 law that provides for a penalty of $2,500 for each violation if the information was improperly accessed. "Ultimately what it comes down to is a violation of privacy," Desir said.

"It wasn't for any legitimate purpose on the part of the police officers and it was done by people in a position of trust."

http://t.news.msn.com/crime-justice/fla-trooper-who-stopped-cop-sues-after-harassment

What Constitutes a Violation

[salsero]

What make you believe you are a party to the US Constitution? Did you sign on to that document?

Also the ICBC gave a correct legal response: 2 (1) In this section, "private road" means a private road used by the public for vehicular traffic with permission of the owner or licensee of the road.

(10) Despite this section, but subject to subsection (11), a person must not drive or operate a motor vehicle or trailer referred to in this section unless

(a) the person holds a subsisting driver's licence of a class appropriate to the category of motor vehicle driven or operated,

DL apply to persons not men. If you are a person, you, the person, are required by law to obtain a DL to operate a vehicle on private roads. Since EVRYTHING IS OWNED by the international banksters, you, the person have permission to use their road or property according to their rules.

If you are a man or woman, then these rules can not apply to you, the man or woman.

A good question to ask any state is - what evidence do you have that I am a person? If the state agent asks you YOUR name and you state, I am John Doe, then you have consented to be a person that is required to follow their private law.

[Keith Alan]

Well, by answering with a name one might be consenting to being a person, but don't forget different persons have different status wherein one person may not be subject to another.

[Anthony Joseph]

man is unbound and unlimited in his capacity

if it is of benefit to "be a person", or act in a certain capacity, then so be it

when it is no longer a benefit, step away and remain as man

corporations were created to help man, not harm man; if the actions of a corporation, or other fiction in law (through the men/women acting as its agents), cause injury to your property, man has the inherent right to require said injury to cease and desist immediately

man may enter into, and come out of, any capacity he wishes to at any moment as long as he causes no harm or injury to another man while doing so

if you do not believe this, you must believe there is something/someone higher on earth than man under God

[Chex]

If you are a man or woman, then these rules can not apply to you, the man or woman.

OK then as far as the constitution goes in Section 10 who said that the corporations others states are.

"Did you sign on to that document"? No I was not invented yet.

But the good news is estuaries dollar economy anyways?

[walter]

Now my question to you salsero is where are you going to get enough gold and silver to back a 17 Trillion dollar economy anyways?

i am not salsero but this lady says there is a pile of gold sitting in Hawaii

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-1v6ZBFcgY&feature=player_embedded

with the road issues,
public means = government owned
private means = crown owned

[salsero]

OK then as far as the constitution goes in Section 10 who said that the corporations others states are.

"Did you sign on to that document"? No I was not invented yet.

But the good news is estuaries dollar economy anyways?

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-cen...al-tender.aspx

Looks like gold and silver are not backing the economy but rather it is backed by all the goods and services [could this be by all the men and woman who actually do the work?] WHILE OTHERS "PROFIT" FROM THE SLAVES?

When man stops putting his "trust and faith" in paper/gold/silver and puts his trust and faith in God, things will be a changing for the better on planet earth.

I am not looking to debate with anyone anymore. Either you believe the Creator created everything on this planet and has given everything FREELY to every man to be used or you believe that man is the authority and creator and gives to other men with exchange of "money". Just because "someone does not get exactly what I am saying" does not equate that I am wrong.

If you believe gold and silver need to back an economy that is man's concept of value and men must accept, agree and acknowledge this true. Go file a lawsuit and see how far you get. I think some folks forget who made the gold and silver and how does ANY man decide to claim that as his since he did not create it in the first place.

I am not looking to be right and make anyone "wrong" - but sometimes, we have to "think" a little bit and ask ourselves what is it we really want? If you want to own and be the boss, great go for it. If you want peace, and be productive and have equitable [under bankruptcy] relief, then go for that. I really do not see the both working very well together.