"I am denying you, your rights" - Texas Judge

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • loveunderlaw
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 315

    #1

    "I am denying you, your rights" - Texas Judge

    This guys fatal mistake was not establishing proper venue and letting the "judge" know that he was the trustee for that guy's legal person. Of course it would probably not have mattered anyway to the "judge" as he doesn't respect his oath of office. So shameful and enraging to say the least.

  • Chex
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 1032

    #2
    Who? with their ink pen writes this S@&T a$$$ laws?
    "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

    Comment

    • ctaylor
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2014
      • 3

      #3
      Faster means more profit

      Notice how fast the judge moves the case out of his court.
      On to the next victim. The less time they spend on each case, the more money they make.
      Nothing in the courts is about justice.
      Everyone needs to tie the courts up by not paying their "tickets" and contesting everything.
      But, ultimately we need to all complain loudly to those people in the state offices making these laws and sanctioning the courts.
      And, if they don't listen, we need to boot them out of office.

      Carol

      Comment

      • David Merrill
        Administrator
        • Mar 2011
        • 5952

        #4
        Welcome Carol! I am glad to see posting here.

        I prefer to consider it administrative or judicial. If you show incompetence then you default to administrative process without judicial review.
        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
        www.bishopcastle.us
        www.bishopcastle.mobi

        Comment

        • Chex
          Senior Member
          • May 2011
          • 1032

          #5
          loveunder law search this Treasury Department Seeking Survival Kits For Bank Employees
          "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

          Comment

          • Jethro
            Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 87

            #6
            The man (playing the role of "judge") must be held personally liable in instances like this. Until that's done, these people have little to fear and will not respect the rule of law.

            Comment

            • David Merrill
              Administrator
              • Mar 2011
              • 5952

              #7
              That is possible through the constitutions and statutes - by focusing on the Oath of Office process. Here in Colorado there are statutes describing Form of Oath. If the official is in violation of statute then there is no sovereign or judicial immunity. Then one can hold the official personally accountable.
              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
              www.bishopcastle.us
              www.bishopcastle.mobi

              Comment

              • loveunderlaw
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2013
                • 315

                #8
                Thanks Chex, I'll have to do some reading on that !

                Comment

                • loveunderlaw
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 315

                  #9
                  Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
                  That is possible through the constitutions and statutes - by focusing on the Oath of Office process. Here in Colorado there are statutes describing Form of Oath. If the official is in violation of statute then there is no sovereign or judicial immunity. Then one can hold the official personally accountable.

                  Personal accountability will always makes them lose their nerve, usually they will attempt to pass any punishments\lawsuit settlements off to the public if they can get away with it.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X