Why Women Destroy Nations, Civilizations

[David Merrill]

So I find it confusing now...


Do women destroy nations, or do they restructure them for female ownership rights? One seems petty and cruel while the other seems quite strategic and manipulative. I might consider I stalled out to go invent biocosmetric sonoluminescence. Which I am grateful for by the way.

[allodial]

Feral vs civilized vs regenerate? Or is it the men that allow them to get away with it?

[Moxie]

I wonder how Bruce JENNER pulls of getting so much attention when these transgenders are running around EVERYWHERE?

My opinion: The Kaitlyn Jenner "coming-out" magazine covers were designed for the masses who are not aware that transgenderism has been around for centuries. That way, when they see "Kaitlyn", who looks half man and half woman, not even a convincing woman! they think, "Wow! That's what transgenders look like! Half man and half woman! Ew! But it's on the cover of People, so it must be ok to do this now." That way, the transgenders who have fooled the masses for decades (like Marilyn Monroe!) can keep blending in and fooling people while curious straight people feel more comfortable experimenting with this in public.

The goal is depopulation.

[Moxie]

So I find it confusing now...


Do women destroy nations, or do they restructure them for female ownership rights?

My opinion: transgenders posing as women and the straight women who jump on their political bandwagon do both. Transgender men and regular men help, too. BUT... neither can reproduce. All they can do is adopt children and turn them into transgenders.

Transgenders in the entertainment industry follow satan, this is the trade off of "making it big", they imitate the baphomet, and satan is all about deception. To be both man and woman at the same time is deception. Leading a straight man or woman to believe a transgender is straight is deception. To destroy God's design is their goal. Their fishing lures are music, movies, beauty, sex, politics, etc.

If pastors were smart, they would study this stuff and expose it to Christians. But no, they bury their head in the sand. Too bad. If a man was addicted to porn, and it was destroying his marriage, tell that man that he's been pleasuring himself to trannies and prove it to him. I bet that truth would stop things faster than any pastor's guilt trip could.

That man might plea, "But my wife had 5 kids and she just doesn't look the same down there!" Tell that man: "The movie/magazine you're looking at -- that "woman" gets $$$$$$ worth of plastic surgery done down there and the industry pays for it. It's all silicone, nip tuck. And that's not a woman you're looking at. Why do you think plastic surgeons are a dime a dozen? This is why! They're not just for some lady who wants a nose job. The stuff you never hear about is where they make their money.

The man might say, "But Michelle and Barrack Obama have children! How can they be trannies?" Those are not their children. George Clooney and Amal Amudin are not having a baby like the check-out magazine says. It's ALL fiction designed to get you to believe these are real couples. It's so people will identify with them and emulate them. "Oh, Amal Ammudin is so beautiful I'm going to name our first daughter after her!" Lady: you're naming your daughter after a tranny.

See how it works?

[Moxie]

I started noticing about ten years ago how the women on covers of magazines started to look a bit more masculine. It really amped up I'd say around 2009. Back in the late 80s, early 90s, believe it or not, as part of an investigation I came across a situation on at least one Midwestern state university that had a cabal that would send trannies after Christians especially Blacks Christians to see if they could fool them. Same university had a propensity to assign Christians to gay blocks in dorms or under gay RAs and oddly enough the veritable cabal of gays all kept it secret and that of course meant university management were involved and knew the religion of the intended victims (if they put it in a form or asserted preferences for a roommate having the same beliefs) and thusly working with a group of students and keeping the secret from them AND the police being manipulated somehow to avoid or thwart prosecutions. To them it was just a sick game that they justify in the name some ideology of supremacy or another. (As for the young Christian girls, the lie of feminism would be their poison of choice.)

If you've heard anything about University of Missouri, Columbia aka Mizzou, well let me put it this way it wouldn't surprise me AT ALL if bigots drugging and sodomizing Black male students wasn't somewhere in the Mizzou closet of skeletons collection as to what catalyzed the problems on campus. But see its not fashionable to report it in the MSM because sodomites are "supposed" to be "harmless" rather than predatory and because the cabals that refuse to enforce the law when these things are reported add insult to injury. Can you imagine what parents would do if they knew that kind of thing went on at any university? It wouldn't surprise me if president that resigned knew the kinds of things that were going on.

The Gay Agenda seems to be a cover for the Trojan Horse of normalizing male owner ship ownership other males. There is much evidence that the sodomites believe themselves to have 'married' the person they sodomized as if it were some way to 'consummate' a master-slave relationship (look into the reports regarding sodomy-related inductions in ISIS, etc). On that note, sodomite influence over media and fashion industry has reflected the caustic hatred for shown for women by homosexual males who hate the competition (i.e. females): so they push for overly skinny models pushed to dyslexia, normalization of the heroine addict look, etc--its like they enjoy seeing the women suffer (extreme narcissism mixed with rebellion against anything and everything wholesome--psychopathology). And interestingly enough they have admitted these things in their own writings. There are plenty of homosexual men who hide their homosexuality because they don't want to tip off potential victims. If someone got revenge they'd call it "gay bashing", hide the truth and pretend as if were was just random 'hate crime' against "innocent gays". To really put it in perspective: consider how pointing a gun in someone's face would be taken as a cause to kill someone but a buggerist with a deadly disease who knowingly exposes 300 men to the disease is given a light sentence as if he stole a Twinkie. If they kept to themselves it would be one thing, but they don't.

What sick minds can find that kind of thing acceptable? No doubt in my mind, the Great Purge will come soon.

P.S. Those who think body gender is some kind of irrelevant thing in Christ's view might do well to consider that if a trustee entrusts you a specific set of equipment and you rebel against the trusteeship and either abandon your estate or damage the trust corpus: do you think the trustor will be OK with that? Also, if the mere act of spilling seed was a sin on the part of Onan, then clearly spilling seed into the body-sewer of a another man would be a sin, wouldn't it? Equality in the spiritual sense isn't some excuse to ignore the gender differences. Before some 'genius' runs off into the deep end regarding eunuchs, I'll put this forth: if someone were to become a Eunuch "for the sake of the kingdom" doesn't [1] mean becoming a semen receptacle for another man; [2] would be simply giving up the sexual reproductive facet of his life altogether. If a eunuch is still a man then surgery to make a woman look like a man or vice version doesn't change their bodily gender.

Related:
The Myth of the Rule of Law

YES exactly! This stuff is for real.

[Moxie]

Matt Damon was born female: a tutorial.

https://youtu.be/S6Jpzz41xu8

[David Merrill]

Matt Damon was born a woman: a tutorial.

https://youtu.be/S6Jpzz41xu8

Thank you. For a moment I was starting to buy into transgender surgery being rampant. I believe the baby boy was Mattathias Yohannan by name. When he tells me he was born a woman I might start thinking it over.

I admire DAMON as "the water guy". He campaigns widely about slaking thirst. Which is cool, I know who Matthew is! All the other's - well they just plain are too good at their craft to know for sure... who they are. That Anthony HOPKINS guy, for example is such a talented actor I have no clue who he actually is.

[allodial]

He wittingly or unwittingly promoting Water Tyranny.

[Moxie]

Matt Damon will never tell you he was born female, lol....he can't tell you, he's under contract. No matter what Wikipedia says about "him." :-)

That's the point of this whole deception.

But alas, many find it difficult to let go of long-cherished idols.

But don't take my word for it that Matt's a woman, or that transgenders are rampant; each needs to do their own due diligence and study the different bone structures between men and women and the reasons behind gender-bending.

[shikamaru]

More meat for your stew:

The reason why virgins are highly prized for marriage and reproduction:

A promiscuous woman has the DNA of past men in her system. This male DNA in her system could impact the development of future children issued from her.

telegony

I think mens' instinct know this, hence the revulsion of most men for wifing women in the "hoe zone".

Obviously, a woman deemed less will not receive much in investment from men in general.

[BLBereans]

Matt Damon will never tell you he was born female, lol....he can't tell you, he's under contract. No matter what Wikipedia says about "him." :-)

That's the point of this whole deception.

But alas, many find it difficult to let go of long-cherished idols.

But don't take my word for it that Matt's a woman, or that transgenders are rampant; each needs to do their own due diligence and study the different bone structures between men and women and the reasons behind gender-bending.

I believe going to far with the all-encompassing accusations of nearly every single member of "Hellywood" actually diminishes the point of the OP and premise behind bringing it forth. These You Tube channel creators ("Apostle Laura Lee" and others) are most likely controlled dis-info agents who purposely exaggerate the issue so as to turn away people (who might just be "waking up") from the entire idea of the destruction this neo-trangenderism abomination can, and will cause, to the already fleeting natural family unit in America.

If you are from a long line born in America, you may not realize that many Europeans and other foreign peoples, from a generation or two ago, were of small stature compared to the 6' and over men in America which is quite common. Bone structure study and all that may have some merit but I think the video really reaches to convince when these things could have alternative explanations as well.

I'm no fan of "Hellywood" and I am fully aware of the use of its mediums to propagandize and indoctrinate so as to turn people away from Our Creator God, His Divine Order and His Holy Will, however, the internet is rife with dis-info which may seem like it supports the cause it claims to represent but yet is a calculated distraction and detour from truth.

BTW, I believe the wording of the OP does NOT imply that ONLY women destroy Nations, Civilizations; it just discusses the reasons and methods of women who do it as opposed the the reasons and methods men do it.

In my opinion, the main "reason" is the same in the end for both male and female who attempt to destroy; to ALWAYS promote the antithesis of God's created and Holy Order.

This scheme began in the Garden and culminated at Babel... there is nothing new under the sun.

[shikamaru]

Something tangential to add:

Your type of money will greatly impact the morality of your nation.

Could you see where money based on substance would have an impact on the morality of nation in contrast to money based on promises to pay?

[David Merrill]

More meat for your stew:

The reason why virgins are highly prized for marriage and reproduction:

A promiscuous woman has the DNA of past men in her system. This male DNA in her system could impact the development of future children issued from her.

telegony

I think mens' instinct know this, hence the revulsion of most men for wifing women in the "hoe zone".

Obviously, a woman deemed less will not receive much in investment from men in general.

May I point out that nations are in general, in pretty good shape - in spite of women destroying them. I appreciate the perceptions about pheromone effect on neurotransmission. The transgender stuff, some folks might prioritize it above other things. It was off track as far as my interests go but then biocosmetric sonoluminescence might be just that to most readers here.

Your type of money will greatly impact the morality of your nation.

Could you see where money based on substance would have an impact on the morality of nation in contrast to money based on promises to pay?[/QUOTE]

Alfred Norman (ADASK) brought up something from the Bible about that God retains ownership of silver and gold. So otherwise in my mind, it has no substance. If I snorkel and find a wedding band, it is nothing to me unless I wish to wear it for sentimental reasons - weird - or sell it at the pawn shop for US dollars to trade for food and gasoline; things I consider substance.

My point being that nothing has substance unless it can be converted into or preserve energy like a roof overhead.

Otherwise I like where it is going...

Does debt being considered to have substance affect the morals of a nation?

Enter: Special Drawing Rights backing the US Dollar.



Hey! Thanks for telegony. That opens my eyes to some facets of cellular memory.

[BLBereans]

It is not ONLY women that destroy Nations, the premise of the OP is to show the how and the why behind women's motives as opposed to men's.

To say that nations are in general, in pretty good shape seems to be a statement based in "carnality" as others on this forum like to state. The superficiality of "security" and "abundance" in this world is a ruse and can evaporate pretty quickly unless you have secured your own source of food, water, shelter and energy off-the-grid.

Without a doubt, the type of money used by a nation is an indicator of the morals of a nation. Debt is like sin; the more you accumulate without redemption, the more immoral you are.

So, the more "money" you claim and store (absent redemption) in a debt-based money system, the more in debt you are and the more immoral you are.

In order to provide evidence of one's intent to seek out and demand redemption as relates to this nation's currency, when one finds it necessary to "transact" in the commercial realm, one must use his or her "person" as the transmitting/transacting entity. If one uses the "person" to blindly endorse more debt, the debt accumulates and the "person" is treated as an enemy of the state; what else would it be if the "person" continues to burden the nation with more and more debt with each transaction?

When used this way, the "person" is a "false profit" (yes, I intended to spell it that way) and one's debt/sin accumulates exponentially over time.

When one uses the "person" to make demand for redemption (lawful money), the debt/sin should extinguish if the one's entrusted to redeem actually fulfill that obligation.

Sound familiar? That is the world's corrupt use of the Real and True Redemption that exists when one asks, seeks and knocks on the door for our Lord and Savior the Anointed Christ, and Son of the Living God, to redeem us of our sins.

God's redemption is real and the One entrusted to fulfill, has already done so; no need to demand, just genuinely ask and you shall receive.

[David Merrill]

It is not ONLY women that destroy Nations, the premise of the OP is to show the how and the why behind women's motives as opposed to men's.

To say that nations are in general, in pretty good shape seems to be a statement based in "carnality" as others on this forum like to state. The superficiality of "security" and "abundance" in this world is a ruse and can evaporate pretty quickly unless you have secured your own source of food, water, shelter and energy off-the-grid.

Without a doubt, the type of money used by a nation is an indicator of the morals of a nation. Debt is like sin; the more you accumulate without redemption, the more immoral you are.

So, the more "money" you claim and store (absent redemption) in a debt-based money system, the more in debt you are and the more immoral you are.

In order to provide evidence of one's intent to seek out and demand redemption as relates to this nation's currency, when one finds it necessary to "transact" in the commercial realm, one must use his or her "person" as the transmitting/transacting entity. If one uses the "person" to blindly endorse more debt, the debt accumulates and the "person" is treated as an enemy of the state; what else would it be if the "person" continues to burden the nation with more and more debt with each transaction?

When used this way, the "person" is a "false profit" (yes, I intended to spell it that way) and one's debt/sin accumulates exponentially over time.

When one uses the "person" to make demand for redemption (lawful money), the debt/sin should extinguish if the one's entrusted to redeem actually fulfill that obligation.

Sound familiar? That is the world's corrupt use of the Real and True Redemption that exists when one asks, seeks and knocks on the door for our Lord and Savior the Anointed Christ, and Son of the Living God, to redeem us of our sins.

God's redemption is real and the One entrusted to fulfill, has already done so; no need to demand, just genuinely ask and you shall receive.

Thank you. That is a very soothing, comforting post.