Saving to Suitors DEFINED

[heraldharbinger]

Hello

I am seeking to know what "Saving to Suitors" means, looked around a bit, tried the search bar for 'Saving to Suitors and it went to a paypal donation result.

Thanks in advance

[David Merrill]

Thank you Harold;


The short version is to show the banner. So we will install this at the top, and fix up any problems misdirecting readers to the Donate button... Sorry.

[heraldharbinger]

TY

No apology needed , I'd say its a brilliant name given its origin


although the reference "as well as upon the high sea's" establishes the need for choice of law as a priority in any/all exercise of rights/remedy


Out of the state. In reference to rights, liabilities, or
jurisdictions arising out of the common law, this phrase
is equivalent to "beyond sea" (q. v.). In other connections,
it means physically beyond the territorial limits of
the particular state in question,

(state of mind is the first question, land or sea, sea or beyond the sea)


Q.V. An abbreviation of "quod vide," meaning "which
see".


and what rabbit hole would neglect to add a symbol (?) which see?
Sedes Sapientiae?



The high seas, solicits a maritime choice of law right from square one, which could move the venue out of state, physically beyond the territorial limits and into the twilight zone where common law is not competent to give it "remedy"

remedy still exists though to suitors which see which sea










I apologize, it really is a brilliant name

[Michael Joseph]

Thank you Harold;


The short version is to show the banner. So we will install this at the top, and fix up any problems misdirecting readers to the Donate button... Sorry.

[ATTACH]4382[/ATTACH]

Juxtapose the United States districts against this:


Title 12 Section 222AND




Title 12 Section 223AND



Title 12 Section 224

[David Merrill]

No apology needed , I'd say its a brilliant name given its origin


although the reference "as well as upon the high sea's" establishes the need for choice of law as a priority in any/all exercise of rights/remedy


Out of the state. In reference to rights, liabilities, or
jurisdictions arising out of the common law, this phrase
is equivalent to "beyond sea" (q. v.). In other connections,
it means physically beyond the territorial limits of
the particular state in question,

(state of mind is the first question, land or sea, sea or beyond the sea)


Q.V. An abbreviation of "quod vide," meaning "which
see".


and what rabbit hole would neglect to add a symbol (?) which see?
Sedes Sapientiae?



The high seas, solicits a maritime choice of law right from square one, which could move the venue out of state, physically beyond the territorial limits and into the twilight zone where common law is not competent to give it "remedy"

remedy still exists though to suitors which see which sea










I apologize, it really is a brilliant name

The foundational "fluff" for the Libel of Review is still that when one approaches a man or woman on the land, from somewhere else (the districts/Fed) they must do so through the district courts of the United States. Of course the little enclave called "mailbox" is sufficient. But then, that becoming common knowledge would lead everybody to redemption even faster.

[pumpkin]

and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land.

Is that referring to the common law? And if so, is that also predicated upon express reservation?

[Michael Joseph]

and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land.

Is that referring to the common law? And if so, is that also predicated upon express reservation?

does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.

[David Merrill]

does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.

Elegant and poetic!

It is suiting that as Rosh HaShannah and Yom Kippur approach on this seventieth Jubilee since the invasion of Canaan that we find this indictment regurgitated on the Record, in the same Court.

Some times, like the US Treasury Vault video (indicating value in US notes), I wonder if you can all appreciate seeing things that you are not supposed to be viewing.



First though; remember the name - Bradley MANNING.





And from the Notice of Lien, about the Sealed Warrant: