David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

[David Merrill]

David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

(designated FIRST MIDDLE LAST). We have relief. All actions are begun in commerce, on the presumption that all parties to it transact their energy in commerce. The individual CQV trusts were established by central bankers as the vessel / account for the American people to move their energy in global commerce...

The bond company went bankrupt. This is the nature of sustainable debt. Maybe better, "The New Common Law."

David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

Think "case law" and you might get it. Precedent; or stare decisis. So with BERNARD, like found earlier in this thread, Steven Leon is tasked with preservation of a term, Judiciary. But he cannot allow this to become precedent, that any entire "judge" career be termed vacant and completely reversible. So what he did was to assemble a completely new tribunal of unknown "judges" to rule there was no precedent given. No authority.

This is juxtaposition from the common law of England still founding Colorado territory:

But the Territory never properly formed. It required 30 days for the restructure to take hold just like all the Government Shutdowns. These days the territory is virtual.



The only real shutdown was from businessman CEO (not President) Donald John. It is the only one that lasted more than 30 days. Search by words yourself, the attachment.

These days think - Bretton Woods - when you think international bankruptcy in constellation, in admiralty. But you also have it right there in this thread that BERNARD pretends to be judicial. You cannot change your oath of office and still be bound. BERNARD has not changed his oath, but what he did was pull a fast one. Upon being ordered, he produced the oaths of the tribunal by prompting the reluctant Secretary of State - then he swapped out the tribunal without notice. And even held up the mail using COVID-19 in the prison system.

Ergo we find that the Patent #10,999,999 hits the nail on the head. We all fearfully vilify a particularly clever and contagious virus for suddenly killing the infant and elderly. We fear monger, as I have put it as The Inventor. Except of course MJ - chuckling at the masked masses. But the objective is to cause everybody to tremble and accuse those who do not become vaccinated with my competitor intrusive injections to be criminal. I have disassembled a multi-billion dollar industry by reviving ancient modalities of healing and preventing disease.

Now the rubber meets the road with managing energy flow, capital flow. Or as I put it back in 2003, capital integration.

How did the meeting go?

Ambrogio.Cesa-Bianchi@bankofengland.co.uk
Annamaria.deCrescenzio@oecd.org
Mark.Joy@bankofengland.co.uk
AKokeny@imf.org
Etienne.LEPERS@oecd.org
Dennis.Reinhardt@bankofengland.co.uk
Julia.SCHMIDT@banque-france.fr

Which is the better-described breach of trust. Not healing the world, when the cure is properly presented. So now Cheryl Marie might better see why the USPTO is mine. I am the Trustee. And as found in Doc 12, the lienholder.

[Michael Joseph]

A couple of days back the governor for the State of North Carolina issued an executive order basically stating that it is a landlords duty to notice a tenant of this new EO 171 which relates that if the tenant cannot pay the rent due to effects caused by Covid-19, then the landlord cannot evict said tenant for lack of performance on the rent.

You can read said EO here - CLICK HERE

Now consider the ramifications of such an EO and the constitution. Remember that the State cannot pass a law which interferes with the obligations of an existing contract. So what of the contract between the landlord and the bank? Will or can the bank foreclose if the landlord can't perform on the mortgage? Begging the question "Has the constitution been suspended due to emergency circumstances?"

If the answer is no to the foregoing question, then does the bank become the new landlord upon foreclosure? And will the current lease overreach a foreclosing of all the equities in the property? The governor who of course has politicized this Covid-19 foisted as much fear as politically possible stating that the "rural" people who are "generally white" should not assemble in groups such as "church, etc." Anybody with even half a brain can see thru this mask-erade as it is clearly an attempt to persuade those who would vote for Trump to not vote at all due to the possibility that they "might" get sick. In the name of "goodwill", it appears said governor is buying voters with taxpayer dollars. How much chaos is needed to usher in their beloved Socialistic State under one religion?

Honestly, I can't even believe how ridiculous this Covid business has gotten. Said governor even went so far as to say not wearing a mask is unpatriotic. Groaning inside. So stupidity has taken over. Because clearly common sense has been thrown in the street and is being trampled by those who would manipulate a people who refuse to use their own minds. But what is new under the sun?

I'm reminded of Jim Morrison (Lyrics to THE END) - The Doors

"Can you picture what will be
So limitless and free
Desperately in need of
some strangers hand
In a desperate land....

Lost in a Roman wilderness of pain
And all the children are insane
All the children are insane
Waiting for the summer rain, yeah....

The killer awoke before dawn
He put his boots on
He took a face from the ancient gallery
And he walked on down the hall"

===============

The bond used to be Fidelity. In consent, a bond can be an insurance policy to insure the bottom of the ship. But companies go bankrupt all the time and continue to work in restructure. So the question begging to be asked is: "If a company has filed for bankruptcy, then how do I use the courts to collect a debt that is noticed on UCC1?" Or better asked "How do I get a judgment against the actors in and for said company in their individual capacities such that said judgment can be filed on the County against their legal names?"

Clearly a $5000 bond used to understand the office of District Attorney is fungible but if it is exceeded in judgment, then how to collect individually? Can a man shirk liability of his actions? I would say no, but then again I am continually amazed at the nonsense portrayed these days by the actors wearing badges and feminine black dresses.

[David Merrill]

Now consider the ramifications of such an EO and the constitution. Remember that the State cannot pass a law which interferes with the obligations of an existing contract...

The Constitution is suspended in the actual theater of war. We cleared way for remedy with the Olympus Ordeal alright. However if you examine the Executive Orders regarding COVID-19 it is clear Donald John feels he can utilize Title 50 where the Trading with the Enemy Act resides in War and Military.

How much chaos is needed to usher in their beloved Socialistic State under one religion?

I call that commercial priestcraft and somehow or another the manna at Hathor Temple was abandoned and forgotten. Such a hoard must have been for the spiritual ascension of humanity. There is another instance where the Tribe of Dan started fabricating manna on Mount Hermon to the north and came under a severe attack from Jerusalem. These days it is fluoride in the toothpaste and drinking water.

Clean up and decalcify your pineal gland to see.

Honestly, I can't even believe how ridiculous this Covid business has gotten. Said governor even went so far as to say not wearing a mask is unpatriotic. Groaning inside.

That is a major point about my invention.

The bond used to be Fidelity. In consent, a bond can be an insurance policy to insure the bottom of the ship. But companies go bankrupt all the time and continue to work in restructure. So the question begging to be asked is: "If a company has filed for bankruptcy, then how do I use the courts to collect a debt that is noticed on UCC1?" Or better asked "How do I get a judgment against the actors in and for said company in their individual capacities such that said judgment can be filed on the County against their legal names?"

Even so, such judgments are null. Government is an irrevocable trust but when the trustee is in breach, there are options.

1. overthrow the government
2. set passive and be ruled by vacant trustees
3. become the solution - the resultant trustee

Clearly a $5000 bond used to understand the office of District Attorney is fungible but if it is exceeded in judgment, then how to collect individually? Can a man shirk liability of his actions? I would say no, but then again I am continually amazed at the nonsense portrayed these days by the actors wearing badges and feminine black dresses.

This is a good segue into Cheryl Marie's notice. I have attached Dan MAY's oath and bond. I should point out that when at the secretary's counter I wanted the bond and a lady pretending to be busy nearby said sternly, Oaths ONLY! I started to explain, OATHS ONLY!! When I said one more word - OATHS!!! ONLY!!!!

But with this bond note that it is only valid if properly signed and it is not. So it is easily dodged by the insurance company.

[David Merrill]

American form of government, established per the Decl of Indep, and the Northwest Ordinance concerning the acquired western land-mass.

It is easy to make that mistake, without having studied my work carefully. The territory became on February 28 and the Congress adjourned March 28 (1861) leaving the cure term short by a day, for the proper formation of the Territory.

(2) Your claim that the Colorado Territory never properly formed is precluded by your above reference to that Territory. The western land was originally divided into two general Territories (northern and southern), likely for the benefit of the army protecting the settlers and for the judges riding circuit, from a governmental management standpoint. The Northwest Ordinance provides for people to settle and together form a State Territory, or territorial State, and then for said people to apply for inclusion in the Union of States. To my understanding, Colorado was a territorial State, but not yet included in the Union of States at the start of the Civil War, having satisfied the requirement of the number of permanent settlers. That is why the seal shows both societal designations.

I concede to your notice, to keep the peace. I am sick and tired of being goaded into various wars. Even though I point out your mistake about the formation of the territory, you have a good point. But the common law of England was around before the ill-formed Territory...


The fiat began with Governor GILPIN on the non-territory, leaving Colorado a war chest for the Union side of a self-prosecution. If the American people lack knowledge how to energize their estates they are simply masks. Donald John's process of shutting down? That was so at the starting gate. Robert Glover is not the chief justice of the US Supreme Court and therefore the Inauguration was an act. Dinner theater.


This is why we manage the Reelection from virtual embassy and consul - diversity of citizenship under the 'saving to suitors' clause in a club. More on that afterward... But please remember that Donald John is not the President.

Spend a little time on the photos I just added at the bottom. Notice Olga is Russian/Ukrainian.

Patent numberhttps://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1485.html


Notice this example presented there showing Application No. 10/999,999, pertaining to UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION, for correction in avoidance of abandonment of claim.


Patent No.: 9,999,999
Application No.: 10/999,999
Issue Date: May 1, 2002
Inventor(s): Eli Y. Rosenthal


(6) You sent your invention description to the USPTO of the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. The Application number assigned is 17/023,866. The number 17 may internally designate a Utility Application.

After pointing out the two mistakes you have made leading you to this statement you have not changed your mind, then I concede to your reality. I am notified. Many times I am prepared for such a challenge and would simply point out the R4C pending waiver of tort on BRYAN and MARTINEZ oaths. Notice that they have altered their oaths.

US Patent #10,999,999, when no such US Patent number exists.

That is what I have notified the USPTO about. US Patent #10,999,999.

How can you be the trustee of this commerce-based

Yes. I have been duly notified of your reality. I concede. You are right. When it comes down to brass tacks though I will likely be unaffected. I have scripted a great response to somebody making comment in prosecution - That if they would note, this is before BRYAN and MARTINEZ, two alleged federal judges. If they are not telling me that US Patent #10,999,999 does not exist, it probably does indeed exist. They are trained attorneys who know about the resulting trust.

Like I said, through the breach of trust. BERNARD does indeed pretend to be judicial. It says so at the top of his biography I presented earlier in this thread.

this

I concede if you are prosecuting for the USPTO. You have given me notice of your reality and I am not going to deprive you or even bother trying to convince you otherwise. I listed a few emails and if you get a look at the domains you might start getting where I have been giving notice too - of my reality. And so they concede as they take in the results of the IMF summit.

And like you said, the Vaccine is awesome.

I have redacted specifics so that you do not confuse her. Either way though, I am sure your warnings would simply interest her the more.

[David Merrill]

In addition to the above --

If you're saying that the people who formed the Colorado territorial state compact had been noticing the people of the Union that they had reached the permanent-population number to qualify for separate territorial-government (land-dominion) status, rather than seeking Union status, then that issue was what would need to be verified. But until verified, their territorial status was not ill-formed. Their intent must be considered valid. So the silver used by the governor was a usurpation of the peoples' valid authority to exercise their societal right of dominion over the certain soil boundary, unless the people consented.

The formation was never ratified through Congress. It was play acting.

The US Patent #10,999,999 has been issued to my invention. I never actually published R4C on BRYAN. Even in this Notice of the patent, I just write below - Note, this oath has been altered from the Form of Oath. That contemplates I might disqualify him. For now, he is useful because he is publishing law from chambers for me.

This is what I meant by warring. If BRYAN and "Chief Judge" MARTINEZ are compliant with my authority as lienholder, then there is no reason or interest in pointing out your mistakes here. Thank you for insight on those governed by the Pope (CQV Trust) and the Venetians. The conveyances of energy are articulated clearly in your posts.


P.S. The R4C and Doc 15 were delivered yesterday at 7:40 am. 9500 1130 2198 0301 3226 75

[David Merrill]

patentreason or interest in pointing out yourme into dishonor, or worse, to leave me in what you pronounce is dishonor. I take issue with such disrespectful conduct on your part, and it matters not that you are the/a creator of this forum.

I pointed out the mistakes you are making, and basing presumptions upon.

You have failed to acquire my interest. I have nothing to prove to you. I am aware that may make you feel badly. Sorry about that, but I do not feel that puts me in dishonor. I am not obligated to prove anything to you.

I appreciate your construction of the CQV Trust and its energies. This corresponds with your theories about the Venetian family rulers.





It is like the ALL UPPER CASE conspicuous notice and UCC are the language of the dead. You can have a birth certificate which without a death certificate evidences a living man or woman, but you just spell the NAME IN ALL UPPER CASE and magically they have been missing for over seven years?

[David Merrill]

What happened to the Bond Company.

I am really enjoying this thread. Thank you Cheryl Marie. The CQV is a good venue to explain the history. CM and MJ both recall the Libel of Review and how we use the USDC for conduit into and then out of admiralty.

Of course MJ knows the benefit of tailoring the Libel of Review to the suitor's personal experience and understanding.


P.S. Additionally I remember to mention Are You Lost at C? - and the METRO 1313 Head of the Beast fax tree issue, being the municipal jurisdiction.

These are good to revisit now and again. On the tip of my brain is how the Crown always has the prerogative claim to flotsam, jettison and so one has to register anything found, any claim to it with the District Court. That is of course the mailbox, that little federal enclave, but the Crown (Venetians) would like that kept secret so they honor the LoR as an abatement.

Thank you for your continued support through highly informational emails and interactions.

I desire to have your opinion on the following matter.

On September 21st 2020 I was pulled over in a national park by a US Park ranger.

He attempted to issue or gain acceptance of a presentment ticket. I politely refused to sign and refused enter contract.

There was no argument from the park ranger about my refusal to sign.
He next tried to present me with copies of the contract and said that I must receive them. I again politely refused and did not take receipt.
At which time I was informed by the two Park rangers of potential damage and violence that could result if I did not take receipt. When asked if I understand, I said no (and I did not mention this to the park rangers but I said no because I over stand them).
So basically I kept refusing contract and saying no and they went away after telling me they would just mail it to me and if I didn't pay it a warrant would be issued for my arrest.

First you should know that for all commerce since 2006 I have used a PO box. I do not receive mail at any physical address.
The driver's license has the PO box as well as the registered vehicles.

I had been checking this PO box a bit more regularly as I anticipated a certified mail presentment but it has not arrived at the po box

On October 31st at a property that I only visit, but is titled in the name FIRST LAST, there was a certified mail envelope from the national Park in the USPS mailbox addressed to me. I'm a bit confused of why it was addressed to this physical address...

On the back was the perforated remnants of PS form 3811 domestic return receipt.
When I checked the certified mail number at the USPS website it claimed that it was delivered to an agent.

I have never signed for this certified mail. While thinking about this over the weekend I came to the realization that the USPS mailbox is likely considered a USPS agent.

I'm wondering how you think I should proceed to challenge this or if I simply write refused on it and leave in the usps agents (mailbox) control. It's the same idea as going to the post office and refusing it at the commerce / teller counter in my mind.

The DMM domestic mail manual states that certified mail that has been signed for can still be refused if unopened, but must be wrapped in a new envelope and postage paid. But again I have never signed for it or taken receipt.

Part of me thinks that this is just something that the local post office does for "convenience" in rural delivery areas so I'm thinking that there may be a process for that refusal locally.

My plan for today is to go to that post office and inquire about how to refuse, all while leaving the certified mail presentment in the agent's control.

Photos attached, I digitally redacted the physical address.

Happy to discuss this over the phone as well and am available today. # redacted.

what are your thoughts?

This is rich.

The proper way to handle this with the agent(s) is to write Refusal for Cause across the presentment and remove the Defendant's Copy for yourself before returning the R4C to the agent/principal. But this is so effective the agent may panic and things turn violent. Probably after a short conversation with the Park Attorney.

When opening a box, USPS, FedEx, private or UPS one is compelled by federal law to include a residential address. So the agent mentioned on the Return Receipt is likely the PO Box provider, who in turn disclosed upon the color or authority, the residential address.

Now, the best remedy from brain trust experience is R4C with a voluntary payment of the fine amount. Maybe overpay it to compel a receipt that will probably admit no confession of guilt has been entered. Typically the payment means a guilty plea.


The mailbox is the USDC in miniature: