Private Sidewalk Saves Bike Trail

[David Merrill]

So Nimrod instead of Ham is not a slip of the tongue?

[allodial]

So Nimrod instead of Ham is not a slip of the tongue?

Good question. Nimrod would have been Ham's grandson. Canaan having been cursed rather than Ham. Wouldn't be surprised if they all resembled one another in some fashion like typical great grandfather, grandfather and grandson. Not to mention the idea of a grandfather having been also 'regardable' as a 'father'. Doctrine/beliefs/character being of import. Perhaps he was saying Nimrod instead of Cain because he was 'under oath' ..a little misdirection? Overall, he seemed quite fixed on Nimrod as the target of worship. Then..there is Sargon..which many regard to be none other than Cain [Sargon being 'Shah (King) Cain' slightly corrupted].

Nimrod was a very significant man in ancient times, the grandson of Ham and great-grandson of Noah. Nimrod started his kingdom at Babylon (Gen. 10:10). Babylon later reached its zenith under Nebuchadnezzar (sixth century BC). Pictured above are mudbrick ruins of Nebuchadnezzar's city along with ancient wall lines and canals in modern day Iraq. (source)

And Cush begat Nimrod, who began to be mighty in the earth. 1 Chronicles 1:10

source)

Related (sorta?):
Why Cain Built A City?
Megapolisomancy (1978);
Megapolisomancy (Temple of Doom; Schnoebelen; ~1:49:58 )

[allodial]

re: original sin

Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions. Ecclesiastes 7:29

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Gen. 1:27

"Total depravity" and the Doctrine of Original Sin contrasted with Ecclesiastes 7:29 and Genesis 1:27. Of course this is meant to be pertinent to the living in contrast with dead fictions and the right of the living with respect to the land. This is not deny the notion of mankind's need for salvation, deliverance, regeneration, tutelage or the like during his lifetime has men (or women) come into accountability.

Train up a child in the way he should go, And when he is old he will not depart from it. Proverbs 22:6

[David Merrill]

re: original sin




"Total depravity" and the Doctrine of Original Sin contrasted with Ecclesiastes 7:29 and Genesis 1:27. Of course this is meant to be pertinent to the living in contrast with dead fictions and the right of the living with respect to the land. This is not deny the notion of mankind's need for salvation, deliverance, regeneration, tutelage or the like during his lifetime has men (or women) come into accountability.

Train up a child in the way he should go, And when he is old he will not depart from it. Proverbs 22:6

That is the blessing George WASHINGTON extended to Peter VAN PELT after the American Revolution.

[David Merrill]

BUMP

I want to remind the readers of the framework.

The property owner original plat would have included, even by presumption that the property line would extend to the middle of the railroad tracks. This is the inheritance due the property owner who installed a (prescriptive) easement. The property owner is an individual however so by designating the sidewalk "PRIVATE" the church steps in as Mandatory Exception to the revenue code, the Rustic Hills Homeowner's Association. That is to say, all the homeowners in association enjoy access to the bike path.


P.S. Please allow me some grace to amend and correct myself... It may be untrue to presume a property line ever reaches to the center of the railroad tracks. From the video though, I am presuming that the homeowner/HOA poured the concrete between the property line and the concrete bicycle path. I think that is important to the claim, that I am saying is true.

[allodial]

Even if the property line fails to extend to the center of the railroad tracks, easements or rights of way across railroad tracks are very common. Railroad crossings are easements to the railroad property (whether implied, prescriptive or otherwise). So you're pretty much on the money: a railroad crossing easement can extend not only to the center of the railroad it can extend across it entirely. I suspect they will view the bike path easement and the crossing easement as two separate types of easement or separate easements. But nonetheless: easements. A railway propery tract (easement) can extend some 10' to 20' or more feet on either side of the track.



re: The Rock Island System
Likely you won't be surprised (1) that I bothered to look or (2) at what I found:

1. City of Colorado Springs was established *AFTER* the Civil War
2. the entities owning the Rock Island system were formed *BEFORE* the Civil War (see Wikipedia)


The Rock Island rail system as of 1965

Related
Landlocked by Railroad