Birth Certificate - What it is

[David Merrill]

I have a recent indication that PACER may be used by Canada federal courts too. Does anybody know?

The home page does not list any Canadian courts.

[walter]

I have a recent indication that PACER may be used by Canada federal courts too. Does anybody know?

The home page does not list any Canadian courts.

I know that every province has their own system of internet court case tracking.
Here is BC's.

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/search_judgments.aspx

I had a case number on there once but it has magically disappeared.

Check out this web site.
It has the best description on whats happening when a birth is registered.
http://www.justice.gouv.qc.ca/englis...iliation-a.htm

In order to create a "Filiation" there must first be a "Attestation of birth" (Doctor)
and a "Declaration of birth" (parent).

Also at the very end of the page they have this paragraph that is interesting.

1. Emancipation confers on the minor the freedom to dispose of his or her person as desired and a degree of capacity as regards certain administrative decisions. Emancipation does not confer all the rights enjoyed by persons of full age but releases the minor from the requirement to be represented in the exercise of his or her civil rights.

[walter]

I have a recent indication that PACER may be used by Canada federal courts too. Does anybody know?

The home page does not list any Canadian courts.

Case Law and Court Dockets

http://www.legalresearchandwriting.ca/caselaw.htm#caselaw

[xparte]

Payments

PACER Service Center
P.O. Box 71364
Philadelphia, PA 19176-1364


Send Us a Message

Have a comment? Find a broken link? Need help? Send us a message by filling out the form below. If you'd like a response, be sure to include your email address.
NameAVID MERRILL

Account Number:
Email:

Subject: David might ask PACER this directly

Comment: I have a recent indication that PACER may be used by Canada federal courts too. Does anybody know? at PACER

[xparte]

[David Merrill]

SATANISTS OWN THE FUTURES and a willingness to bankrupt your Christ.

I beg to differ. Today is a perfect example. I will tell more later. However this monumental process will be discussed in more detail on Lawful Money Trust behind the copyright security of membership. It of course comes off as a sales pitch and I cannot assert otherwise. But to you who can appreciate "You get what you pay for." - And for those of you who know how much more you pay attention after paying...


Thank you so much for bringing some of the materials about PACER to light. It will be fun around here, discussing the evidence repository no doubt. I am just saying that the more private trust matters and maybe even minutes of the constitutional Preamble trust will be more private and regulated.

[xparte]

And well you should anyone who is willing to let the Christ within be employed in a speculative futures bond market has redeemed what. It of course comes off as a sales pitch and I cannot assert otherwise. And you're nevertheless a salesman we all are i am guilty of selling the same ideals that a secularized crime has remedy it doesn't if the tools we use are secular.Evil for Evil getting what one pays fore Fore! The etymology for the word "Fore!" is not certain.Being out front or the front lines etymology is a suitors rank always one RED DIGIT away from grace.A spokesman is a salesman i am guilty of a private trust Lloyds of LONDON on the The Potomac the BRETTON WOODS act and TRUMP IS A humanitarian. are in the public trust.A death is never PRIVATE after its identified a public account isn't made private.A private official doesn't exist JUDGE CLERK EMPLOYEE are all dead in law. talking with tombstones or how is it we bring these oath less actors to life well bye adjournment of our private life.A private trust is a living one all adjournments are 3 clear days they kill you publicly 72hrs at a time.DEAD MEN WALKING around in robes a genetic genius.Whats is the GENIES power private wishes.GOBS of copyright or the heat from a private Christ.Humility 101 is truth fights nothing lies fight the truth.One might get what they deserve not what they desire.

[xparte]

How lawful is my private demand well this is one comparison Domestic credit to private sector refers to financial resources provided to the private sector by financial corporations, such as through loans, purchases of non equity securities, and trade credits and other accounts receivable, that establish a claim for repayment.Or what interest would the bearer of lawful money enjoy but a spiritual freedom the shekel is symbolic of a private interest as its lawful under God why else is its exchange necessary .How the courtyard and the temple are separated in Gods eyes. A private offering is not without ones demand to a public record as the lawful exchange is memorialized with a shekel.If Abraham was too laundered money he did it lawfully .

[David Merrill]

Three days is 72 hours...


Thank you for reminding me! Very timely. (har har har).

[xparte]

With all the adjournments your Calendar has subjugated your hardcore base too.just be mindful that three clear days is a powerful identification. A Subjugated identity has the Pagan adjournment its the ROMAN Remand Latin sized judgments. Its my hope clean hands is just a methodology to appreciate i find no fault with this Man and his blood is on you i wash my hands 72 hrs 72 virgins sacrifice its what the planetarium no longer owes as Christ is running a tab on and for the record just as well join him .Turn your water to wine .

[xparte]

[walter]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradual_Civilization_Act

Gradual Civilization Act

The Act to Encourage the Gradual Civilization of Indian Tribes in this Province, and to Amend the Laws Relating to Indians (commonly known as the Gradual Civilization Act) was a bill passed by the 5th Parliament of the Province of Canada in 1857.

The treaty built on the "Act for the Protection of the Indians in Upper Canada" passed in 1839, but required the "enfranchisement" of any recognized male Indian over the age of 21 "able to speak, read and write either English or the French language readily and well, and is sufficiently advanced in the elementary branches of education and is of good moral character and free from debt."[1] An "enfranchised" Indian would no longer retain the "legal rights and habilities of Indians" and would "no longer be deemed an Indian" but a regular British subject.[1] Such enfranchisement was mandatory, but any male Indian could be voluntarily enfranchised despite an inability to read or write, or a lack of school education, so long as he spoke English or French, and was found to be "of sober and industrious habits, free from debt and sufficiently intelligent to be capable of managing his own affairs."[1] Voluntary enfranchisement, however, required a three year probation term before it would come into legal effect.

Enfranchisement required that Indians choose a last name (to be approved by appointed commissioners) by which they would become legally known. The wife and descendants of an enfranchised Indian would also be enfranchised, and would no longer be considered members of the former tribe, unless they were to regain Indian status through another marriage.

Enfranchised Indians were entitled to "a piece of land not exceeding fifty acres out of the lands reserved or set apart for the use of his tribe" as allotted by the Superintendent General of Indian Affairs, and "a sum of money equal to the principal of his share of the annuities and other yearly revenues receivable by or for the use of such tribe."[1] This land and money would become their property, but by accepting it, they would "forgo all claim to any further share in the lands or moneys then belonging to or reserved for the use of [their] tribe, and cease to have a voice in the proceedings thereof."[1]


then click on "enfranchisement" and it takes you to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage

[David Merrill]

The name change is quite interesting.

[allodial]

The name change is quite interesting.

[ATTACH]3832[/ATTACH]

A class action suit for all mankind vs all humanity?

***

One of the Star Wars prequels has an interesting sequence whereby Annakin becomes, or is named, Darth Vader only moments after he takes an oath to the Sith Lord. In the TV show Arrow (or Green Arrow) sequences concerning the League of Assassins deals with the name change issue more than once. In one related series, a femme joins the Leage of Assassins, then the leader finds reason to release her at her request he tells her something like: "I release you. You can have your name and your past lives back." So effectively, "You are no longer B, you are now A." Honorable discharge?

Once when a woman married, she would cease to be a member of one household and become a member of another. Also, where applicable, women married and would take on their husband's "last name". A woman keeping her name might be letting you know that she is not committed as you might hope.

The Act to Encourage the Gradual Civilization of Indian Tribes in this Province, and to Amend the Laws Relating to Indians (commonly known as the Gradual Civilization Act) was a bill passed by the 5th Parliament of the Province of Canada in 1857.

The treaty built on the "Act for the Protection of the Indians in Upper Canada" passed in 1839, but required the "enfranchisement" of any recognized male Indian over the age of 21 "able to speak, read and write either English or the French language readily and well, and is sufficiently advanced in the elementary branches of education and is of good moral character and free from debt."[1] An "enfranchised" Indian would no longer retain the "legal rights and habilities of Indians" and would "no longer be deemed an Indian" but a regular British subject.[1] Such enfranchisement was mandatory, but any male Indian could be voluntarily enfranchised despite an inability to read or write, or a lack of school education, so long as he spoke English or French, and was found to be "of sober and industrious habits, free from debt and sufficiently intelligent to be capable of managing his own affairs."[1] Voluntary enfranchisement, however, required a three year probation term before it would come into legal effect.

Enfranchisement required that Indians choose a last name (to be approved by appointed commissioners) by which they would become legally known. The wife and descendants of an enfranchised Indian would also be enfranchised, and would no longer be considered members of the former tribe, unless they were to regain Indian status through another marriage.

Well it has been gone over and over the notion of driver's licenses and SSNs being regarded as prima facie evidence of being a franchisee. The dead and the living being unalike; Roman Maxim: "dissimilar things ought not be joined". The "last name" is joined with "true name" to make a totally different name--familiar but not the same.

Regarding those kinds of birth certificates, is the baby ever named or is only the personae/vessel/entity that is regarded to contain the baby named? No name, no pneuma (breath).

***

Corporations are likewise spiritual or temporal: spiritual, of bishops, deans, archdeacons, parsons, vicars, &c.; temporal, of majors, commonalty, bailiff) and burgesses, &c. Some are of a mixed nature, composed of spiritual and temporal persons, such as leads of colleges and hospitals, &c.

Lay corporations are of two sorts, civil -and eleemosynary. The civil are erected for a variety of purposes; as the king, to prevent an interregnum or Vacancy of the throne; a mayor and commonalty, bailiff and burgesses, and the like, for the advancement and regulation of manufactures and commerce. The eleemosynary sort are such as are constituted for the perpetual distribution of free alms, or bounty of the founder to them, of such persons as he has directed; as all hospitals, colleges, &c.

A corporation may he created by the common law, by the king's charter, by act of parliament, and by prescription. When a corporation is created, a name must be given to it; and by that name alone it must sue and be sued, and do all legal acts, for the name is the very being of its constitution; and though it is the will of the king that erects the corporation, yet the name is the Knot of its combination, without which it could not perform its corporate functions. Source: The Complete English Lawyer: Or, Everyman His Own Lawyer (1823).

[Michael Joseph]

Once when a woman married, she would cease to be a member of one household and become a member of another. Also, where applicable, women married and would take on their husband's "last name". A woman keeping her name might be letting you know that she is not committed as you might hope.

She takes the SEAL of her Husband.