DL was NOT provided or used as ID

I am not saying it is different. I have full confidence in abatement for misnomer and R4C Anthony Joseph. I think you know that.

I am saying scout it out before you go to resolve this. In the alternative you will likely some day be pulled over or maybe run into a sobriety checkpoint. Maybe Chex is onto something if you intend to continue driving with an expired license.

Base your decisions on intelligence. Not speculation.

I do not intend to continue with an expired license. I intend to be dropped off at the DL bureau/courthouse and inquire about helping to settle the matter and reinstate the DL in the manner described herein, prepared with cash or check in hand, so I am not pulled over in the future and experience the scenarios you depict. I cannot conceive how that action on my part (walking into DL/court as a friend to help) will end up in an arrest. I do, however, sincerely appreciate the advice, help and concern about that as I feel it is genuine and heartfelt.

If I decide to not scout it out first and end up handcuffed, it will be my own responsibility for that decision.

My point is this: if the judge has, as you say, a bench warrant waiting for an 'appearance of the person', then I am still in the same boat as I am now. I will have to choose to continue on without a valid DL card and hope to avoid being pulled over, or, I will have to at some point try to help settle the matter which will result in an arrest. My scouting of that information doesn't change the scenario; the same circumstances will remain as they are now and all that is left is the decision by me about which way to go. Either go on without it, or face possible arrest for walking in and attempting to help settle.

If arrest is awaiting, I cannot avoid it no matter what intelligence I gather before hand, unless I decide to walk the path that Michael Joseph and Chex have offered as an alternative. Even that choice could result in arrest, however, they will be forever stuck by "no arraignment".

[David Merrill]

I am not saying it is different. I have full confidence in abatement for misnomer and R4C Anthony Joseph. I think you know that.

I am saying scout it out before you go to resolve this. In the alternative you will likely some day be pulled over or maybe run into a sobriety checkpoint. Maybe Chex is onto something if you intend to continue driving with an expired license.

Base your decisions on intelligence. Not speculation.

[Richard Earl]

I guess my curiosity is what communications took place between the police/court and Tallahassee. In some way, it seems your R4C has travelled to the licensing office.

The court has apparently entered a default judgment and maybe a Failure to Appear charge. The bench warrant may be setting on a shelf and it will roll off to the clerk if AJ registers an appearance. Because of the entered paperwork though, there may be not active warrant, if they come looking for Anthony Joseph SURNAME that is out of line.

Hopefully my concerns are unfounded. If you do not want to scout it out first (intelligence) then fine. Hopefully you will get some audio record for us, however it goes.

I would have received some sort of notice that there is either a "failure to appear" action or a bench warrant out there for the SURNAME, ANTHONY JOSEPH trust vessel in response to my process. Instead there has been absolute silence other than Tallahassee notifying me that the DL card has been suspended.

If one has unpaid parking tickets and decides to "settle" before the next time one gets "pulled over", the scenario most likely does not involve jail or arrest.

The only correspondence sent so far has eluded to the same type of fact; the fines have not been paid in the "allotted" amount of time, license is now suspended, to reinstate please do thus and so... "we want cash".

The last time I dealt with something like this was when I first started becoming "aware" of how the system works. I attempted a "Ticket Slayer" method when I was "ticketed" for a collision some many years back. It was a case of someone stopping extremely short in the middle of the road to make a last minute turn. Unfortunately, I was caught in between and couldn't stop in time to avoid the car in front of me who had to jam on her brakes to avoid the "last minute turner". A Florida Trooper ticketed me for "RECKLESS DRIVING" and I submitted a "ACCEPTANCE UPON PROOF OF CLAIM" response to the summons. The result was a scheduled court hearing some two months later. I was operating from the seat of my pants but I remember attempting to get the oaths of office of every county judge who may be assigned to the case and getting the runaround about that. The one thing that stuck with me about that is when I called the judges office number to inquire about his oath of office and the secretary giving me a hard time about me not giving her a "last name". I told her my name is Anthony Joseph and I had no last name and she was getting rather belligerent about that. She finally put me on hold and when she came back on the line, there was a total 180 degree attitude and she explained to me exactly how to obtain the judges oath of office in a very apologetic and polite manner. That occurance has stayed with me and is ingrained in my memory forever; I stood my ground about my name and it manifested positively.

The day of the court hearing came and I paid attention to the "lack of testimony" dismissals for those who had no citing officer show up to court. When the NAME was called for the DL card I held, I remember distinctly that the judges assistant whispered to him, " this is the one with the 'paperwork' ". When I approached I made it known that the citing officer was not present. There was a brief stare in my direction, as if he was pissed that he couldn't nail me on my 'paperwork', and then the judge dismissed for "lack of testimony". I left and paid no fine.

Why should this time be any different as far as the potential for arrest? This time there is NO court date, NO case number, NO court action, NO notice of warrant, NO notice of ANYTHING other than the DL card is suspended. It will be reinstated as soon as the 'tickets' are "paid or satisfied". They await that action. My stance will be to instruct the trustee to fulfill the obligation since I am absent consent or trespass upon that office. If the judge dishonors his/her office and forces me to "pay", so be it; that transgression and my original intent will be on the record. My action from then on will be under threat and duress and my reasons for reinstating the DL card will be righteous in nature and NOT for personal profit or gain; I receive or gain NO benefit from using the DL card.

[Treefarmer]

I gain no benefit from reinstating the DL card. The STATE gains all the benefit from that action. My intents and purposes are righteous in nature and NOT for profit or gain. My use of that card prevents the roving agents/LEOs from committing unlawful trespass and kidnap/arrest against me. I am helping my fellow man and woman to not sin against me and I am protecting my children from unnecessary roadside strife and anguish which they are too young to understand.

My use of the DL tool is strictly at arm's length.

I agree that no benefit is gained from having a DL. This makes me think that I cannot be the beneficiary in this scenario.
I've been giving this topic a lot of thought because I'm currently in the process of getting a CDL, and so far every step of the way has stunk to high heaven, including the reason why I should need a CDL in the first place.
According to the CDL manual itself, my activity (transporting 14 or fewer paying mountain bike instruction customers to and from a trail in an old re-painted short bus) does not require a CDL.
I've contacted the Tennessee Department of Safety about this in writing and they refused to provide me with a written response in this matter. But they informed me by email and in a phone call that all I would need is an "F" endorsement on the class-D DL.

By contrast, the Tennessee State Troopers who inspect the vehicles of the outdoor outfitter companies for which I work have taken it upon themselves to demand CDLs for anyone driving a former re-purposed short (Headstart) school bus, no matter what the CDL manual or Department of Safety say.

It seems to me that the STATE is the beneficiary of the DL and we are being tricked into the office of trustee when we sign in the NAME of "our person" and provide "our SS number". Because we appear to enter into the office of trustee, which they offer to us (after all, getting a DL is "voluntary"), we then become stuck with the office of fiduciary.
They collect all the license fees and they get to invent ever more "laws", some of which are impossible to obey all at the same time, so that they can keep running up the punitive charges on us "drivers" and collect huge amounts of revenue.
I believe this makes them the receivers of benefits, and us the trustees who have to do all the paperwork and the paying, but who receive nothing of value in return.

Say it isn't so, but be ready to make your answer square up with the reality of DL fees, traffic fines and road blocks and stops.

[Treefarmer]

When you have Refused the Public Benefits of the Drivers License and declared that you are only using Lawful money, your Private Drivers License will be Flagged that they cannot Publicly charge you, "you are free to go just be careful and have a nice day".

Notify:
Department of Transportation
Attorney General
Chief District Judge

You: of the family You
A Private "Nation of One"

Are you presenting this statement as a theory that you are toying with, or are you indicating that you have taken actions along those lines of thought which have yielded certain results for which you have evidence, anecdotal or otherwise?

[Richard Earl]

AJ, do you have a current register of actions since receiving the suspension?

edit: Nevermind, I see where we are.

[David Merrill]

The court has apparently entered a default judgment and maybe a Failure to Appear charge. The bench warrant may be setting on a shelf and it will roll off to the clerk if AJ registers an appearance. Because of the entered paperwork though, there may be not active warrant, if they come looking for Anthony Joseph SURNAME that is out of line.

Hopefully my concerns are unfounded. If you do not want to scout it out first (intelligence) then fine. Hopefully you will get some audio record for us, however it goes.

[Richard Earl]

Does the driver's license not get suspended only after a judgement is against you? What prompted the registrar to suspend the license in the first place, unpaid tickets with no judgement?

Ergo...


My Point!


You were issued some kind of citation or summons as I recall from the opening post. You refused it for cause and now we are presuming that abatement (for misnomer) held up and will hold up while you are pleading that you want the privilege of driving without being the fiduciary responsible for your actions while doing so?

This is why they call it a bench warrant. Well, you should think of it this way. The judge might have a warrant for your arrest setting there awaiting Registration of Appearance. If you knew about it in advance you would:

1) never show your face (facade/person) again, and make sure you never, ever get stopped in traffic, or;

2) be prepared with that bail amount, lawful money in your pocket and somebody witnessing and able to write that out in a check form if they no longer accept cash.

The fellow I mentioned is not a suitor, but he is local. The DA and traffic judge who recognized his jurisdiction arguments as Sovrun Citizen/Nutjob may have just been presuming he is a suitor. So they might have made up the No Cash rule just for him that one day.

If you want to go in uninformed, based on the presumption that you will not be arrested, then that is your choice. I was just reminding you that I suggest you scout out the paperwork in Records thoroughly first. If your scout takes in a camera, you can save a lot of quarters, he can call you while photographing and buy certified copies of documents you want in the USDC evidence repository before you Register an Appearance.

I do not think there is any way you can plead for your driving privilege without making an appearance as SURNAME, ANTHONY JOSEPH. Your position, argument if you will, is this hypothetical mental model that the Registry is actual Ownership of it - through Birth Certificate, Department of Revenue (Driver License) and Social Security Administration. - That the Owner should step forward and be responsible - you are the beneficiary...

Even if so, the Owner has told you to obey the traffic laws and you have signed surety of that when you wanted the Card to begin with. Just because I want to learn more about this mental model does not mean I believe it exists. Or that it covers infractions like traffic violations. If you have a SSN attached to your Driver License, that is a DoR taxation vehicle.

Which brings us to preparing you with an affidavit like I showed the other day. Are you encouraged enough to look that judge in the eye - under the penalty of perjury - and say, I do not have a Social Security Number, sir. - [Just because you used to and will continue to use your driver license card for competency purposes only? - Which brings us back to agreeing to stop at STOP notices etc...] I mean really; what does getting sustainance checks from the government when you are old have to do with competency?



Regards,

David Merrill.

What are the possible grounds for arrest and what could be nature of the "charge" for going to the DL bureau/courthouse and inquiring about reinstating the DL card? I ask this sincerely since I cannot think of an answer myself.

There is no case #, there has been no notice of "failure to appear", there is no mention or notice of any form of action whatsoever. If my process abated the cause whereby there exists no case or open action in court, then why/how could there be a bench warrant?

It seems to me that the DL card is now suspended/invalid - awaiting the payment or satisfaction of the summonses/tickets in question in order to revalidate it. If payment/satisfaction is all they are after and no actual crime has been committed, then I will offer my assistance in getting that done. If the mental model of the trustee paying for the infractions as per the trustee duties and obligations does not manifest positively, then that means the judge/trustee will force that obligation on me which means lawful money cash from my pocket and that will be on the record.

They want cash (revenue), first and foremost, it seems to me; getting handcuffed for merely asking about how to help in reinstating the DL card is a bit excessive in my opinion. I could be wrong but it seems unlikely.

I am only trying to comprehend the rationale behind your suggestions and advice as I do want to do this thing the right way. As always, I thank you for your help in that regard.

[Chex]

smuggled in from birth; has foreign mother gravid from a U.S. soldier. Infant has foreign b/c.

The U.S. soldier drops the ball and does not certify state issued licensefunctioning properly.

Is this adolescence up till now an alien lawfully admitted for residence in the United States although the adolescence is not a natural born citizen even though this adult is thirty-five years of age?

The adult is now married to an U.S. citizen status does not change, has to hire an immigration lawyer for active citizenship now on waiting list.

What strikes me funny this is for an identification card in the IC 9-24-16-2 (i) ineligibility to be issued a Social Security number; not for a IC 9-24-6 and then you have this

Then you have this university saying under the Q & A: When I am ready for the written test, what do I have to take to the BMV?

I can see why so many people get frustrated when they need something to make a living with.

I have not found what amended by P.L.14-1992, SEC.50

[David Merrill]

There is no basis or grounds for arrest of any kind since there has been no notice of a hearing or court date and no action whatsoever accept the suspension of the DL. As far as I understand, a suspended DL is not grounds for arrest unless one is "driving" and pulled over by an agent/LEO. It is not a requirement to have a DL unless one "drives". If I chose to never get behind the wheel of a car again, could I ever be arrested simply because the DL I used to use is suspended?

There is no "failure to appear" scenario so I am confused as to why one would think I could be handcuffed simply for inquiring about reinstating the DL card. What am I missing here?

Ergo...


My Point!


You were issued some kind of citation or summons as I recall from the opening post. You refused it for cause and now we are presuming that abatement (for misnomer) held up and will hold up while you are pleading that you want the privilege of driving without being the fiduciary responsible for your actions while doing so?

This is why they call it a bench warrant. Well, you should think of it this way. The judge might have a warrant for your arrest setting there awaiting Registration of Appearance. If you knew about it in advance you would:

1) never show your face (facade/person) again, and make sure you never, ever get stopped in traffic, or;

2) be prepared with that bail amount, lawful money in your pocket and somebody witnessing and able to write that out in a check form if they no longer accept cash.

The fellow I mentioned is not a suitor, but he is local. The DA and traffic judge who recognized his jurisdiction arguments as Sovrun Citizen/Nutjob may have just been presuming he is a suitor. So they might have made up the No Cash rule just for him that one day.

If you want to go in uninformed, based on the presumption that you will not be arrested, then that is your choice. I was just reminding you that I suggest you scout out the paperwork in Records thoroughly first. If your scout takes in a camera, you can save a lot of quarters, he can call you while photographing and buy certified copies of documents you want in the USDC evidence repository before you Register an Appearance.

I do not think there is any way you can plead for your driving privilege without making an appearance as SURNAME, ANTHONY JOSEPH. Your position, argument if you will, is this hypothetical mental model that the Registry is actual Ownership of it - through Birth Certificate, Department of Revenue (Driver License) and Social Security Administration. - That the Owner should step forward and be responsible - you are the beneficiary...

Even if so, the Owner has told you to obey the traffic laws and you have signed surety of that when you wanted the Card to begin with. Just because I want to learn more about this mental model does not mean I believe it exists. Or that it covers infractions like traffic violations. If you have a SSN attached to your Driver License, that is a DoR taxation vehicle.

Which brings us to preparing you with an affidavit like I showed the other day. Are you encouraged enough to look that judge in the eye - under the penalty of perjury - and say, I do not have a Social Security Number, sir. - [Just because you used to and will continue to use your driver license card for competency purposes only? - Which brings us back to agreeing to stop at STOP notices etc...] I mean really; what does getting sustainance checks from the government when you are old have to do with competency?



Regards,

David Merrill.

Dear Anthony Joseph;



I am not certain this is happening or not but you may be pulling the oldest attorney trick on yourself! I am sure I mentioned that you better scout first. If you have setting this up on your mind - to go have this meeting unequipped with intelligence then you are becoming your own worst enemy. The attorney trick is to apply sophistry to the unimportant points until you forget about the important ones.

But then, maybe it is my imagination and you have not forgotten about sending in a friend to get the Register of Action and call you from the courthouse Records while photographing your entire case file - texting you details so you can tell them what you want in your USDC evidence repository before you go show your face (person is facade).

It would behoove you for example, to know if the clerk will handcuff you the moment you show your person.



Regards,

David Merrill.

There is no basis or grounds for arrest of any kind since there has been no notice of a hearing or court date and no action whatsoever accept the suspension of the DL. As far as I understand, a suspended DL is not grounds for arrest unless one is "driving" and pulled over by an agent/LEO. It is not a requirement to have a DL unless one "drives". If I chose to never get behind the wheel of a car again, could I ever be arrested simply because the DL I used to use is suspended?

There is no "failure to appear" scenario so I am confused as to why one would think I could be handcuffed simply for inquiring about reinstating the DL card. What am I missing here?

[David Merrill]

I am still interested in any comments regarding this post...

I thought of one more issue that might arise here; the reinstatement of the DL may require that the "new" rules apply regarding necessary documents and info. A birth certficate, social security card and a utility bill, all obviously an attempt to indict through legal information.

My thoughts are when these documents and information are requested, "I can provide them to meet your requirement, and for your benefit only, absent capacity as trustee or fiduciary".

When you have Refused the Public Benefits of the Drivers License and declared that you are only using Lawful money, your Private Drivers License will be Flagged that they cannot Publicly charge you, "you are free to go just be careful and have a nice day".

Notify:
Department of Transportation
Attorney General
Chief District Judge

You: of the family You
A Private "Nation of One"

Dear Anthony Joseph;



I am not certain this is happening or not but you may be pulling the oldest attorney trick on yourself! I am sure I mentioned that you better scout first. If you have setting this up on your mind - to go have this meeting unequipped with intelligence then you are becoming your own worst enemy. The attorney trick is to apply sophistry to the unimportant points until you forget about the important ones.

But then, maybe it is my imagination and you have not forgotten about sending in a friend to get the Register of Action and call you from the courthouse Records while photographing your entire case file - texting you details so you can tell them what you want in your USDC evidence repository before you go show your face (person is facade).

It would behoove you for example, to know if the clerk will handcuff you the moment you show your person.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Chex]

When you have Refused the Public Benefits of the Drivers License and declared that you are only using Lawful money, your Private Drivers License will be Flagged that they cannot Publicly charge you, "you are free to go just be careful and have a nice day".

Notify:
Department of Transportation
Attorney General
Chief District Judge

You: of the family You
A Private "Nation of One"