DMV Certifications

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BONMAN
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 11

    #31
    Originally posted by walter View Post
    competent authority, eh,

    how did they become an authority?
    First I am unclear as to whom you are refering to as "THEY"??

    If I may; Please endulge me for just a moment with a likely scenario;
    1. A child is born
    2.The mother and or father is a "COMPETENT AUTHORITY", the child belongs to them;
    3. The mother and or father being a "COMPETENT AUTHORITY", applies for a "LICENSE", "(in the form of a "Birth Certificate")
    ONE MUST GIVE PERMISSION TO THE STATE (LICENSE) IN ORDER TO FOR THE "STATE" TRESSPASS ON ONES PRIVATE RIGHTS,
    4. The "LICENSE" "(in the form of a "Birth Certificate")GIVES PERMISSION (authorization) to the "STATE" to "TRESPASS" upon the PRIVATE RIGHTS of the applicant


    BLACKS 1910
    LICENSE. In the law of contracts.
    A permission, accorded by a competent authority,
    conferring the right to do some act
    which without such authorization would be
    illegal, or would be a trespass or a tort.


    sCENARIO #2
    1. A Child is born (most likely on land that has been tranfered by land patent)
    2.The mother and or father is a "COMPETENT AUTHORITY", the child belongs to them;
    3. The mother and or father being a "COMPETENT AUTHORITY", DOES NOT apply for a "LICENSE"(in the form of a "Birth Certificate")
    4.The child grows older and desires a "DRIVER LICENSE"
    5. License agency states the child must provide a "Birth Certificate" otherwise the State License agency cannot DO BUSINESS with the applicant
    6. The child or "COMPETENT AUTHORITY", must "GIVE" the "STATE" "LICENSE" (authorization) to TRESSPASS upon the PRIVATE RIGHTS of the child, otherwise it would be illegal,
    7. So in by the act of providing "LICENSE" (authorization) to the "STATE" one gives up "PRIVATE RIGHTS" in favor of "PUBLIC"
    8. Driver License is evidence of this fact, ( also Birth Cert., car tabs, Registered Land,etc.), also interestingly at the same time the "STATE" gives the applicant permission to "USE" the PUBLIC roads for Commercial purpose, i.e., Profit or Gain, PRIVELDGE ACTIVITY, since the Driver License, car tabs, etc., are Business License's
    9. The applicant is issued a "BUSINESs LICENSE" in the FORM OF "SOLE PROPRIETOR"

    Unless one commits a crime there is no reason or authority or the "STATE" or its agency to interact with you until you provide "LICENSE"

    Comment

    • EZrhythm
      Senior Member
      • May 2011
      • 257

      #32
      Those are nice scenarios and mostly accurate except that the BC is not a license, it is a security instrument and certification of a pledge.
      There is no "license" given by the BC alone. "License" is given with subsequent process such as when applying for a STATE OF... ID card, Driver License or ANY other process in which one declares that they are a "resident" within the STATE ( <---Political/Corporate "STATE", not territorial State). This includes enrollment in STATE schools or even obtaining STATE regulated services such as insurance.

      *Declaring one self a "resident" also establishes the rebuttable presumption that one is engaging in commercial activities or otherwise, "in commerce" at ALL times. The theory that one is only "in commerce" while transporting passengers or cargo for hire is moot.

      Example- While riding a bicycle at night without a light one is stopped by an officer and asked for ID. If ANY type of ID or information is offered that lends evidence that one is a "resident" then that person is presumed (rebuttable) to be in commerce within the STATE and is subject to the STATE codes/statutes. These codes are all regulated under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

      Comment

      • Chex
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 1032

        #33
        Like #9 states:

        (9) "Financial asset," except as otherwise provided in Section 8-103, means:

        (i) a security;

        (ii) an obligation of a person or a share, participation, or other interest in a person or in property or an enterprise of a person, which is, or is of a type, dealt in or traded on financial markets, or which is recognized in any area in which it is issued or dealt in as a medium for investment; or

        (iii) any property that is held by a securities intermediary for another person in a securities account if the securities intermediary has expressly agreed with the other person that the property is to be treated as a financial asset under this Article.

        As context requires, the term means either the interest itself or the means by which a person's claim to it is evidenced, including a certificated or uncertificated security, a security certificate, or a security entitlement.

        more

        (7) "Entitlement holder" means a person identified in the records of a securities intermediary as the person having a security entitlement against the securities intermediary. If a person acquires a security entitlement by virtue of Section 8-501(b)(2) or (3), that person is the entitlement holder.

        (b) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (d) and (e), a person acquires a security entitlement if a securities intermediary:

        (1) indicates by book entry that a financial asset has been credited to the person's securities account;

        (2) receives a financial asset from the person or acquires a financial asset for the person and, in either case, accepts it for credit to the person's securities account; or

        (3) becomes obligated under other law, regulation, or rule to credit a financial asset to the person's securities account.
        Last edited by Chex; 11-28-12, 04:11 PM.
        "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

        Comment

        • BONMAN
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 11

          #34
          Originally posted by EZrhythm View Post
          Those are nice scenarios and mostly accurate except that the BC is not a license, it is a security instrument and certification of a pledge.
          There is no "license" given by the BC alone. "License" is given with subsequent process such as when applying for a STATE OF... ID card, Driver License or ANY other process in which one declares that they are a "resident" within the STATE ( <---Political/Corporate "STATE", not territorial State). This includes enrollment in STATE schools or even obtaining STATE regulated services such as insurance.
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • walter
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2012
            • 662

            #35
            the evidence that the BC is not a license is that it can not be revoked,

            look at every license one can hold given from the state,
            they all say on them that they are property of the issuing agency and MUST be returned upon request,
            even the passport has it on it,


            the BC says on its face that it is a CERTIFIED EXTRACT FROM THE REGISTRATION OF BIRTH

            Bouviers Law Dictionary

            EXTRACT.
            A part of a writing. In general this is not evidence, because the whole of the writing may explain the part extracted, so as to give it a different sense; but sometimes extracts from public books are evidence, as the extracts from the registers of births, marriages and burials, kept according to law, when the whole of the matter has been extracted which relates to the cause or matter in issue.



            when titles are registered the government makes an abstract,



            ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
            A brief account of all the deeds upon which the title to an estate rests. See Brief of Title.

            BRIEF OP TITLE,
            practice, conveyancing. An abridgment of all the patents, deeds, indentures, agreements, records, and papers relating to certain real estate.

            2. In making a brief of title, the practitioner should be careful to place every deed and other paper in chronological order. The date of each deed; the names of the parties; the consideration; the description of the property; should be particularly, noticed, and all covenants should also be particularly inserted.

            3. A vendor of an interest in realty ought to have his title investigated, abstracted, and evidence in proof of it ready to be produced and established before he sells; for if he sell with a confused title, or without being ready to produce deeds and vouchers, he must be at the expense of clearing it. 1 Chit. Pr. 304, 463.



            now do you see how they became the AUTHORITY?

            Comment

            • David Merrill
              Administrator
              • Mar 2011
              • 5954

              #36
              Originally posted by walter View Post
              the evidence that the BC is not a license is that it can not be revoked,

              look at every license one can hold given from the state,
              they all say on them that they are property of the issuing agency and MUST be returned upon request,
              even the passport has it on it,


              the BC says on its face that it is a CERTIFIED EXTRACT FROM THE REGISTRATION OF BIRTH

              Bouviers Law Dictionary

              EXTRACT.
              A part of a writing. In general this is not evidence, because the whole of the writing may explain the part extracted, so as to give it a different sense; but sometimes extracts from public books are evidence, as the extracts from the registers of births, marriages and burials, kept according to law, when the whole of the matter has been extracted which relates to the cause or matter in issue.



              when titles are registered the government makes an abstract,



              ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
              A brief account of all the deeds upon which the title to an estate rests. See Brief of Title.

              BRIEF OP TITLE,
              practice, conveyancing. An abridgment of all the patents, deeds, indentures, agreements, records, and papers relating to certain real estate.

              2. In making a brief of title, the practitioner should be careful to place every deed and other paper in chronological order. The date of each deed; the names of the parties; the consideration; the description of the property; should be particularly, noticed, and all covenants should also be particularly inserted.

              3. A vendor of an interest in realty ought to have his title investigated, abstracted, and evidence in proof of it ready to be produced and established before he sells; for if he sell with a confused title, or without being ready to produce deeds and vouchers, he must be at the expense of clearing it. 1 Chit. Pr. 304, 463.



              now do you see how they became the AUTHORITY?
              perpetual inheritance:


              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
              www.bishopcastle.us
              www.bishopcastle.mobi

              Comment

              • BONMAN
                Junior Member
                • Apr 2011
                • 11

                #37
                Originally posted by walter View Post
                the evidence that the bc is not a license is that it can not be revoked,

                look at every license one can hold given from the state,
                they all say on them that they are property of the issuing agency and must be returned upon request,
                even the passport has it on it,


                the bc says on its face that it is a certified extract from the registration of birth




                now do you see how they became the authority?
                my "driver license" and "birth certificate" says no such thing upon it............
                Although a license is a "priviledge" which can be revoked at any time.........
                A birth certificate admits residence, "res", which then confers or admits citizenship
                citizenship can be revoked, changed.........

                FIRST YOU MUST GIVE THEM (the State),"LICENSE" TO TRESSPASS ON YOUR RIGHTS, (at least here in the U.S., dont know about the great white north)...............

                AGAIN WHERE IS THE AUTHORITY LOCATED IN THE "LAW" .........
                I HAVE PRESENTED IN THE ATTATCHMENT IN ABOVE POST THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE AUTHORITY AS USED IN "THIS STATE"(washington RCW'S), WHICH CLEARLY STATES THAT A "LICENSE" IS A "CERTIFICATE"(i.e., BIRTH CERTIFICATE), THIS IS ALSO IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FEDERAL "LAWS" ............

                WITH ALL DUE RESPECT : A DICTIONARY DEFINITION DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY , IT MERELY HELPS TO DETERMINE THE APPLICABILITY OF A "LAW", STATUTE, etc., etc., .............................

                WHAT IS A BIRTH CERTIFICATE NEEDED FOR IN THE FIRST PLACE, ...YOU ARE YOU, I AM ME,...
                THE REGISTRAION TAKES YOU FROM "PRIVATE" TO "PUBLIC"...........
                ONE BECOMES PART OF OR JOINS WHAT EVER ONE REGISTERS WITH ..........

                QUESTION: WHO BENIFITS FROM THE REGISTRATION ??------ BENIFICIAL USER ????
                YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION (common law) IS MADE PUBLIC (statutory law)

                REGISTER
                To record, or enter precisely in a designated place, certain information in the public records as is mandated by statute. A book of public records.

                A register contains various types of information that is available to the public, such as births, dates, and marriages.

                The term register is also used as a designation for the public official charged with the duty of maintaining such records.

                West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008

                Why are you mixing birth certificates with land titles i dont see the connect ........
                Or how "they" became the authority.................
                Last edited by BONMAN; 11-30-12, 03:19 PM.

                Comment

                • BONMAN
                  Junior Member
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 11

                  #38
                  Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                  • David Merrill
                    Administrator
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 5954

                    #39
                    My Patroon ancestor also built a Manhattan estate with a large stone wall that became the namesake for Wall Street. I wonder if I can ties his plantings into 55 Water Street some time too!
                    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                    www.bishopcastle.us
                    www.bishopcastle.mobi

                    Comment

                    • walter
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 662

                      #40
                      Originally posted by BONMAN View Post
                      my "driver license" and "birth certificate" says no such thing upon it............
                      Although a license is a "priviledge" which can be revoked at any time.........
                      A birth certificate admits residence, "res", which then confers or admits citizenship
                      citizenship can be revoked, changed.........




                      FIRST YOU MUST GIVE THEM (the State),"LICENSE" TO TRESSPASS ON YOUR RIGHTS, (at least here in the U.S., dont know about the great white north)...............




                      QUESTION: WHO BENIFITS FROM THE REGISTRATION ??------ BENIFICIAL USER ????





                      Why are you mixing birth certificates with land titles i dont see the connect ........
                      1.
                      in canada it says on the back of the DL that the DL is the property of the issuing state and must be returned upon request,
                      check out a passport closely because in fine print somewhere it has it on it to,
                      if you were born on the land of the country claiming it then nationality can only be revoked by your request,
                      you do not want to be stateless,

                      Article 15.

                      (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
                      (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.


                      notice they don't say citizenship but nationality?


                      2.
                      not necessary a license to trespass on your "right", more of a jurisdiction traverse,
                      exchange of rights, different worlds, different status,

                      Article 2.

                      "Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty."

                      notice the highlighted "birth or other status" ?


                      3.
                      first your parents benefit from the birth being registered when they apply for the BC,
                      its the carrot being dangled in front of their face,
                      the state says if you want baby bonus checks, health care, income tax dependent deduction, etc, then you must first have a BC,
                      the jurisdiction hop, move from one side of the fence to the other because the grass looks greener on the other side,

                      then the state benefits from charging the account with statutes,
                      usufruct,
                      both sides are using the NAME,

                      4.
                      the BC, DL and land titles are all registered the same way, a trust agreement in title splitting,





                      @ DM
                      that's is an interesting book you posted,

                      Comment

                      • Chex
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 1032

                        #41
                        Thanks Bonman I like these RCW provisions as in June 26, 1952. So what has changed?
                        "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X