New Promissory note

[Michael Joseph]

Absolutely.

Therefore just as Peter walked on water.....but only with his full faith and focus and trust placed in Yehoshuah....the children of the King of kings are free.

I do not forsake Torah - I embrace it - it is my way of life - my love. For my love is about giving - not taking. As such, I am called to the Order of Melchizedok - and I take my seat in the college of priests convened under our Majesty and Great High Priest - Yehoshuah our King and Redeemer, our Creator, our Father and the government shall be upon His shoulder.

Therefore what is left is Equity. If i promise to do a thing, I should perform. Therefore I am no longer naked, but clothed in Christ before the Heavenly Courts, my Advocate is Yehoshuah before my Accuser Ha Satan. It is an easy thing for God to change the mind of a man. Thing is my accuser is right - I have broken the Law - but I am faithful to confess my sin in honor of my Father and I request mercy in the Promise to honor my Mother. So then I no longer willfully sin but I repent of habitual sin - that is NOT to say that I do not sin, I do. That is not to say that Torah is no more, for my sin is recognized and I repent against habitual willful transgression.

Psa 98:2 Yehovah hath made known His salvation: His righteousness hath He openly shewed in the sight of the nations.

Psa 98:4 Make a joyful noise unto Yehovah, all the earth: Make a loud noise, and rejoice, and sing praise.

Psa 98:5 Sing unto Yehovah with the harp; With the harp, and the voice sing praise.

Psa 98:6 With trumpets and sound of cornet Make a joyful noise before Yehovah, the King.

Psa 98:7 Let the sea roar, and the fulness thereof; The world, and they that dwell therein.

Psa 98:8 Let the rivers clap their hands: Let the hills be joyful together

Psa 98:9 Before Yehovah For he cometh to judge the earth: With righteousness shall he judge the world, And the peoples with equity.

For the office of the Son was indeed occupied by the same One who spoke to Moses - Yehovah the Savior = translated into Yehoshuah

Rev 17:15 And he saith to me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, represent peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

All this talk of money is absurd. Money is the INVENTION of State. The citizenry have no sovereignty they are equal in regard to themselves in regard to their status [estate] but they have no standing in the sovereignty - nothing is new under the sun. What was is. Unless you have staked your claim in the Earth either political or territorial, then you are a subject. End of Story. Now the question remains will you get on with it or will you keep complaining.

No offence to you Chex, I am not writing directly to you but I write indirectly to the Reader. Those who shy away from FULL LIABILITY because they FEAR will not inherit the Kingdom. End of Story!

Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Notice to be fearful is to lack FAITH or said another way it is to lack Confidence or Trust in our MIGHTY KING. Therefore just as the command was given to Israel go in and begin to Possess - consider the land set before you is abandoned - it is controlled by Claims standing IN SILENCE. Consider the statement "Go forward and TAKE dominion". Will you discover the secret in TAKE?

Shalom,
Michael Joseph


P.S. If you have understood this post, then you will understand why and how the Court holds you in Contempt. If you don't get it re-read until you do. Hint: The Trustee is always deemed guilty FIRST and he must prove his innocence. Will you sing the Song of Moses?

P.S.S. The Land I write of is NOT the Earth it is your body = Temple.

2Ch 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

[Anthony Joseph]

Those men and women who serve in capacity of officer/agent for the Government of the United States are not required to understand any religious offering. I believe said men and woman can only acknowledge 'man' and his claimed 'property', whether corporeal or incorporeal; and, any other language, however truly spiritual it may be, is ignored.

I believe man is universally understood as being 'a creation of God' in His image; man represents God on earth. Property is a right, or use of a thing, proper to the man claiming it and exclusive of all others. Only man has rights; those who entered into an 'office' have NO rights while operating in that capacity; they only have privileges, duties and obligations. The primary duty of the Government of the United States is to secure, protect and restore property of man.

The most important issue is, in my opinion, to stand as a man and hold one's court in honor; and, keep said court no matter what venue one finds himself at. The courthouse is NOT court; court is what is being held AT the courthouse which is only a building. Said building is a public venue and the people make up the public. Yes, those who are members of the BAR have majority control over the business conducted at said building(s), yet that does NOT mean they OWN it.

If one is told one is "in contempt of court", what does that mean? Whose court is one in contempt of? If one is not in one's own court, one should know the rules. If one is in one's own court, the rules are set by him/her and others can be found in contempt if said rules are not abided by. The magistrate serves the court and keeps order, making sure the rules are followed; and, bears witness to the court proceedings.

We, as man, need to learn how to move, hold and keep our court(s) of record at common law in honor; and, we need to learn how to change/flip jurisdiction when someone attempts to prosecute a claim against us in a statutory/code court. The venue (building) is of no consequence; it is whose court is being held that matters.

Nothing on earth has a higher standing than man; we just need to learn how to act as man, no matter where we find ourselves.

There is no "them" or "they"; and, 'IRS' or 'United States' has NEVER done a thing or uttered a word, EVER. Hold the men and women who actually 'speak' and 'do' accountable for their actions. The 'cloak' or 'mask' or 'office' they may claim is not your concern; i only see and hear a man or woman doing me wrong/harm, injuring my property or interfering with my inherent unalienable rights.

Right is right and wrong is wrong; no man has a right to do the hereinbefore mentioned acts against another man. That is terrorism.

Terrorism = interference with the proper function of government.

If one is self-governing, who is the terrorist?

[Michael Joseph]

One absent a valid claim has no Property. And therefore that one is USING an ESTATE granted to him from those who do have Property! Those that do have property ADMINISTRATE their property in their courts. If you are one absent property using an Estate that you did not establish then you had best use it in accordance with the rules and policies that said Administration has set forth.

This is so simple to me. For the life of me I cannot understand how this very simple concept escapes so many people. Until one establishes Property in Full Liability, that on WILL ALWAYS BE SUBJECT to others as they make USES of Estates provided by a Kingdom or State. Can't you see that to be in management over an Estate is the LOWEST OF THE LOWEST - well maybe not as low as slave. But certainly one in that Capacity is clearly subject to the Rule of one who holds the Property whereof the Estate is derived! Fee Simple Estate is NOT Allodial property.

One who is self governing does not make use of Estates provided by others unless there is a VARIATION OF AGREEMENT - with the Heads of State.

One who is Grantee is by operation of Law Trustee undertaking for the Trust. You know this AJ. Just look at the TWO trusts that form in Salvation. Who is Grantor of the 1st and who is Grantor of the 2nd? Consider this and you will then see where the Kings came up with the CQVT.

As long as you insist on playing within this sphere that so many do here - well their actions indicate that they are indeed subjects - look up Villein - nothing new under the sun. American [of or pertaining to the United States] Villein. Free in regard to each other but subjects in regard to their Lord = Heads of State. Repugnant you say? Then pray tell, why do so many consent to it? Is it their ignorance or is it their willingness to remain ignorant? Either way, once one comes to this knowledge, then there is only two decisions, consent to be ruled or rule. To rule you must make a claim.

This path is so clear. The Popes did it. The Sovereigns that created the Constitution Trust Contract did it. It is simple in concept but sometimes hard in practice due to fear. Which I can appreciate. Seems like such a huge hurdle to clear - why not just continue to make a use of the Estate. Well welcome to the bottom rung of the ladder! Continue to fight against that. Or just make peace with it and submit to the Administration and abide by its bylaws. Simple. If you consent, then you are Trustee - and if you are Trustee then keep those laws - and please do keep your mouth shut in court about ..... blah, blah, blah.... no one cares and noone is listening. You will be held in contempt. Because you have no broken your promise to perform and in Equity that is a big NO NO. Until you convene your own State or Kingdom with its own court with its own property with its own estates, then you are as a child in someone else's house. And that child is NOT going to be allowed to tamper with the system setup by others.

If you desire to Rule, then Rule. Complaining about the system is a complete waste of time. And questioning the system is worthless. You consented to be ruled by your inaction - implying you wish to be ruled - and if you don't like that then do something about it.

Hard words but nevertheless the truth! I have shown in the foregoing the Kingdom in which I abide. It has a name and it has a King and I am a priest after the Order of Melchizedok walking in the Law of my King. I consent to be Ruled by my King. Led by the Spirit a willing vessel in submission in obeisance to His commandments and His instruction.

Shalom,
Michael Joseph

[amosfella]

MJ don't get me wrong here but I don't think the irs cares one bit what religion you been redeemed from unless your going with the requirements for exemption.

Actually, I think what he said is extremely relevant. Also, it's a major component in moving yourself out of their system.

One has to look at it from the idea of the state as father of all... The state is dead. To be considered alive, a man must have a live father. Life cannot come from death. Remember the movie Van Helsing?? The vampire brides that live by sucking the lives from others, and they desperately want their children to have life. Interesting analogy. I have to watch that movie again now...

[Anthony Joseph]

Man is higher than Pope, Sovereign, Prime Minister, President, etc. All of these things were created by man.

A claim must be verified in living voice and pressed on the record else it is not a true claim. One must be fully liable for the claim(s) one makes on the record in living voice. Paper is nothing without man to verify what is written upon it. Who will step forward, in living voice, and make claim, on and for the record, to what i; a man, claim as my property? Who will stand before witnesses in open court and challenge my claims? Only another man can come forward and do this; and, said man must verify that his claim is true with full liability.

All the original writers and signers of the "Declaration' and 'Constitution' are dead. Will anyone here be so bold as to verify the exact intent and meaning of these writings? Without the original writers to verify, anything offered regarding these documents is only hearsay and a guess at best.

Who will come forward and claim wrong, harm or trespass simply because i claim the name given to me by my mom and dad is my property? Our family name in antecedent to this Nation's formation. Mom and dad gave me a name and i may choose to use it as i see fit; as a man, i am unbound and unlimited in my capacity. So long as i do no wrong or harm to another man or injure his claimed property, i am free to do as i please. i may choose to act in a certain capacity at one moment and exit the same capacity the next moment; it is i, and NO other man, who determines what and who i am at any given time. If i keep the golden rule, who has any verifiable claim against me? One must prove, with a third party and impartial witness (out of the mouths of two or three shall the truth be established), on and for the record, that i; a man, did wrong or harm to another man. If that isn't done, there is no claim.

That being said, i repeat that the key to all of this having any force or standing requires us to learn and know how to move, hold and keep our court(s) at common law, dealing only 'man on man'. If a man allows anyone to hide behind a cloak, mask or office, said man cannot move or hold his court according to common law; said man will be bound or subject to statutes/codes/etc.

[doug555]

Man is higher than Pope, Sovereign, Prime Minister, President, etc. All of these things were created by man.

A claim must be verified in living voice and pressed on the record else it is not a true claim. One must be fully liable for the claim(s) one makes on the record in living voice. Paper is nothing without man to verify what is written upon it. Who will step forward, in living voice, and make claim, on and for the record, to what i; a man, claim as my property? Who will stand before witnesses in open court and challenge my claims? Only another man can come forward and do this; and, said man must verify that his claim is true with full liability.

All the original writers and signers of the "Declaration' and 'Constitution' are dead. Will anyone here be so bold as to verify the exact intent and meaning of these writings? Without the original writers to verify, anything offered regarding these documents is only hearsay and a guess at best.

Who will come forward and claim wrong, harm or trespass simply because i claim the name given to me by my mom and dad is my property? Our family name in antecedent to this Nation's formation. Mom and dad gave me a name and i may choose to use it as i see fit; as a man, i am unbound and unlimited in my capacity. So long as i do no wrong or harm to another man or injure his claimed property, i am free to do as i please. i may choose to act in a certain capacity at one moment and exit the same capacity the next moment; it is i, and NO other man, who determines what and who i am at any given time. If i keep the golden rule, who has any verifiable claim against me? One must prove, with a third party and impartial witness (out of the mouths of two or three shall the truth be established), on and for the record, that i; a man, did wrong or harm to another man. If that isn't done, there is no claim.

That being said, i repeat that the key to all of this having any force or standing requires us to learn and know how to move, hold and keep our court(s) at common law, dealing only 'man on man'. If a man allows anyone to hide behind a cloak, mask or office, said man cannot move or hold his court according to common law; said man will be bound or subject to statutes/codes/etc.

Yes, the office of "man" is directly under the Creator in authority and standing!

Perhaps we have overlooked something when the Messiah referred to Himself as the "son of man".

Is this a reference to the "office of man", and the authority of that office?

Notice Mk 2:27-28 and Lk 6:5 and Mt 12:8 - "The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath".

Isn't that setting a context of authority?

And it is stated as such 3 times in the Bible so we best pay attention.

I am listening to some audios by David Clarence on the "office of man" to learn his take on this (2 audios are on this webpage).

You are welcome to listen too, and then we can discuss this further...

And learn how to make claims in our court of record to assert our dominion under the Creator as a man.

[Anthony Joseph]

For clarity sake only; not to be stickler...

Should we use the word "office" as it pertains to 'man'?

My intent is to not diminish our 'standing' or 'capacity' when we claim to be what we are.

office

standing

capacity

[amosfella]

Going back to the note itself, it would seem to tell you how to how to pay it off and actually own the property you mortgaged. It requires payment in lawful money, but they assume that you are paying them with FRNs/Bank of Canada Notes unless you specify you are paying with lawful money, you cannot have the full title to the property as you didn't pay them back in the required form of payment in the contract. Therefore you have no right to the property you borrowed the money to purchase when you have paid off the note.

Does anyone else see that??

[Anthony Joseph]

Why do people sign two (2) documents which "promise" to "pay" at a "closing"?

(1) promissory note

(2) mortgage

both have verbiage which "promises" to pay. Why the need for two separate documents essentially "promising" the same thing?

[Michael Joseph]

And man became a living soul

[David Merrill]

Thank you Michael Joseph;


I only add that the Veil was rent, a symbol of direct access.



P.S. My paleo-Hebrew rendition of the Bible is on its way. I am going to get into the Book of Hosea!

[Michael Joseph]

I only add that the Veil was rent, a symbol of direct access.



P.S. My paleo-Hebrew rendition of the Bible is on its way. I am going to get into the Book of Hosea!

Hosea of course means Salvation or Savior. So it is a very important book as they all are of course. However, let me just say that the Great Book of Hebrews expands on the rented veil. Since the veil was rent IN Jesus' flesh, we can now come boldly before the throne of grace. But consider under the Levitical priesthood ONLY the high priest was allowed that privilege. Now a NEW order of priesthood has been established; however, the same laws apply in terms of clean and unclean. One should clean up his house [temple] if one desires a relationship with God. For our God is a consuming fire - meaning He will not abide sin. However, we have a Great High Priest in Yehoshuah so that IF we are ONE - in Trust - with Yehoshuah - we submit and obey - then we can approach the mercy seat in Christ which is to say IN the Order of Melchizedok.

Our Soulish aspect of who we are must submit to Christ and then our Mind is Regenerated or Renewed or you might say "born from the Spirit above" this is a supernatural event and cannot be done by the Will of man. For there are only TWO trusts fundamental - Trust in God - or Trust in what is opposed to God.

For we read in Hosea - that our Great God desires us to learn the Knowledge of Elohim. Ye shall worship in KNOWLEDGE and in TRUTH. Many today are only interested in what they can do with the Spirit - just as Simon Magus was - and we know what happened to him. There are many today who have found a way to "climb up over the wall" to access the Spirit world - thru breathing, thru denial of sensory perception - and many other means and methods - drugs [sorcery and pharma]; however there is only ONE Faith - The Faith. And that way is in Yehoshuah Messiah.

A child must be taught - so one still in the outer court must be shown the way into the Sanctuary and then into the Holy of Holies. Remember the deep reverence and respect of our Elohim is the beginning of Knowledge.

Consider the Harlot in Hosea and then the Harlot in Rev 17. Consider that she was given a Bill of Divorcement - but her children who, in Choice, return will be gathered back in Mercy and in Love. Ammi and Ruhamah. And they will be called My People and Loved. And they will not longer call Him Lord or God or any other term in Baal - but they will call Him HUSBAND.

A student cannot truly comprehend the New Testament unless that student has studied - thoroughly studied - the Old Testament. Notice it was Joseph who was used to bring salvation to all of his brothers. Joseph was of the House of Israel - NOT the house of Judah. So to my brother Judah, I say that Yehoshuah is NOT a lawbreaker - he never did away with the Law - the made it actually harder to keep in reality - for He showed that the outward expression is NOT what God looks for but the INWARD - so as a man THINKS so he is. Therefore to even think about coveting, or lusting, or greediness, or malice or anger, or fornification is just as if the act was actually performed.

Therefore we see a Kingdom of consciousness and we should not allow any other man to judge our own hearts. For to judge another is a chief sin - for it is steeped in pride - and it takes our King off of the throne and places the would be judge upon it - for Yehovah our Elohim [Judge] is capable at Law and in Mercy.

Shalom,
MJ

P.S. Office means duty. So the office of any living soul is to worship and obey Yehoshuah.

Let me see if I can't nail that down a bit.

Exo_1:16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.

Midwife is the TITLE of the Trustee - "the office of" is the duties or you might say obligations. Therefore Midwife is an Estate granted by the King derived from Property Rights established in the Throne.

[doug555]

"Office of..." = "Duty of" = "whole duty of man" (Eccl 12:13) = "Office of man" = "Son of man" (Mt 16:13)

http://www.biblestudytools.com/search/?q=%22office+of%22

Hmmmm... very insightful... makes me think more deeply about this "office of man" issue... and the power of that office as an agent-priest of the Most High (Rev 5:9-10) called in this generation...

Thanks Michael Joseph!

[Anthony Joseph]

So long as "duty of" or "whole duty of" is to our Creator and our fellow 'man', i am in total agreement.

[Anthony Joseph]

(If I missed any sanitizing, please let me know)

So now keen on lawful money, I look for the phrase whenever I'm reading anything. That along with "Dollars of the United States", "Federal Reserve Note", "Person", etc. Anyways, I was reviewing a new commercial loan I received (I know, loans are bad), but I was interested in what I read in the first section "Promise to Pay." They make the "borrower" in the note, me, promise to pay the "lender", a credit union "pay to, or order, in LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."

I think they do this so as not to pay tax, or to possibly use the funds received as a reserve for further lending, I just thought it was interesting. They pay in FRN's yet want Lawful money back...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]1548[/ATTACH]

The contract (note) is written so as to obtain credit of value (lawful money) from the source (man) by way of his signature; and, said note is then negotiated as an asset and deposited as such. By bank charter, said asset allows for fractionalization of the credit by at least ten times the amount. This new balance, at a factor of at least ten, can be "loaned out", or created as available funds on the banks books, as a result of the initial instrument signed by the man.

Then there is the 'mortgage' - a dead pledge. The man agrees to "pay" AGAIN by way of dead pledge. We are conditioned to accept the process put before us and we sign "agreements" we do not fully understand. This is our fault. However, a man has the right to rescind any agreement which he believes does him harm. Also, who is the injured party making claim that i; a man, owe a debt to?

Will Bank of XXXX now come forward and verify the debt is true, is post due and that i; a man owe it? Come forward now Mr. or Mrs. Bank of XXX and verify the debt and claim so i can settle it.

Crickets...