Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gbw
    replied
    Fair enough, thank you for the responses, and the initial referral, David. If anyone else out there in this fine community wants to help a noob like me win for once, inbox me, I'll buy you dinner if you ever come to Los Angeles.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by gbw View Post
    Has anyone had any luck contacting Mr. Paz? No responses from phone or email. Thanks!
    Between his redemption clients and the brain trust he might be that busy. We are not in close contact but I think he is a planner. By that he expanded a small business through firmware and at-home delegation of workload to quickly trained employees. And by that I mean that redemption refunds are sure when processed through a professional tax accountant and more importantly they are extremely simplified. All those details about finding deductions and those trade secrets fall away. You simply match up the four figures - reported income, taxable income and reported withholdings are matched up to your claim. It is a mistake to complicate a 1040 Form further. The IRS will jump on any mistakes.


    In summary what I am telling you is Mr. PAZ may not be responding to business he cannot take. If he is working to capacity your attempts to reach him may be going into a queue for when one of his employees can get to you. Turning business down may not be in the plan.

    Leave a comment:


  • gbw
    replied
    Has anyone had any luck contacting Mr. Paz? No responses from phone or email. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Redelivery

    Without specifying a signature required on the Registered Mail one seems to open the door for redelivery to the agent.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	US Governor IMF Redelivery 1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	308.5 KB
ID:	45273

    Click image for larger version

Name:	US Governor IMF Redelivery.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	427.8 KB
ID:	45274

    It takes more intelligence to determine what the Principal YELLEN is thinking here, but remember she comes directly into the IMF as US Governor from the Board of Governors of the Fed. So she knows her way around redemption. Now looking at the dates you might guess we will need a few weeks time to determine what will happen at the IRS campus(es).

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
    A mortgage is a "dead pledge". It is property that produces income, but the income proceeds go to the creditor without buying down the debt.

    Redemption is the buying back of the pledge (property).

    In medieval times, the title of the property would change hands from debtor to creditor with clauses in the contract allowing the debtor to redeem the property from the creditor.
    Very good explanation. Wonderful!

    In conjunction with bottomry and Rules of Admiralty we can get a rounded portrait of central banking. Plus the Bretton Woods Agreements, SDR's and the Amendments all point us to understand the role of War and Emergency with martial rule.

    Leave a comment:


  • shikamaru
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Mr. PAZ (818) 743-8890 is geared up with an online redemption tax accountant service. He gets consistent results.

    Attached find the only exception - but look at Page 4 - he is bringing redemption to the DEATH PROMISE. Quite literally that means death promise.

    MORTGAGE


    Remember that debt (death) and redemption (life) are mutually exclusive ultimates. Where there is one, the other does not exist.
    A mortgage is a "dead pledge". It is property that produces income, but the income proceeds go to the creditor without buying down the debt.

    Redemption is the buying back of the pledge (property).

    In medieval times, the title of the property would change hands from debtor to creditor with clauses in the contract allowing the debtor to redeem the property from the creditor.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Professional Example

    Mr. PAZ (818) 743-8890 is geared up with an online redemption tax accountant service. He gets consistent results.

    Attached find the only exception - but look at Page 4 - he is bringing redemption to the DEATH PROMISE. Quite literally that means death promise.

    MORTGAGE


    Remember that debt (death) and redemption (life) are mutually exclusive ultimates. Where there is one, the other does not exist.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 04-02-21, 10:42 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    calculated contemplation

    This letter followed a delayed refund of withholdings.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IRS Letter interest taxable reporting.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	599.4 KB
ID:	45159

    I think it prudent to Refuse for Cause the form letter since it specifies that the income is taxable interest.


    P.S. I am confused about the phone camera angle:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IRS Letter interest taxable reporting.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	606.0 KB
ID:	45160

    Yeah. That's better!
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-21-21, 05:38 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Here is a form for people who were redeeming but filed as endorser. Frivolous Return Program law.

    An untimely claim for a refund/abatement on a non-frivolous Form 843 is received.

    Note: To be considered timely, taxpayer must file a claim for a refund on Form 843 within 3 years from the time a return associated with the penalty is filed or 2 years from the date the penalty was paid, whichever period expires later.
    Here is the link at the IRS.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-18-20, 09:38 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by lorne View Post
    To follow up on this, I filed my TY2019 lawful money tax return on paper and left the question at the top of Schedule 1 blank:
    At any time during 2019, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?

    Didn't answer it at all and yet I did receive my tax refund as requested. So it appears answering that question was voluntary after all, and TurboTax just decided to make the answer required when it really isn't.

    That is great! I am copying this over to What Does the IRS Agent Really Think?

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    On the W-4 front;

    The IRS waited until 12/4 to supply us with the new W-4 Form for 2021. They prepared us with a draft though:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	W-4 Exempt 2021 draft_Page_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	278.7 KB
ID:	44973

    Last year, for 2019, the W-4 Form was obscured about conditions for writing in "EXEMPT".



    Click image for larger version

Name:	W-4 Exempt 2021 draft_Page_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.43 MB
ID:	44976

    To be clear about the attached returns, the suitor filed 130 days ago, both state and federal but did not put any demand on the state (CA) return. Line 58. So the IRS went silent and sent in the state, returning a $500 refund instead of the withholdings of over $7K. The $500 refund is refused for cause.

    For the full explanation - stay tuned to this thread. Or check into my Lesson Plan ($2K) if you need some guidance. There is no need to involve your employer at all. Any IRS agent can call your employer and start a fight without any paper at all - a fight that will get you fired. Nasty business! If the IRS compels withholdings just consider it a savings account until you can file your return.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    W-4 Changes

    One suitor has received, or rather his employer has, a Lock-In Letter demanding a certain amount of withholdings.

    This is inconsequential as the money will be refunded pursuant to law. The suitor led me to an interesting link:

    Withholdings 2020.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    evolving devolvements

    The debt scavenger most reliably goes silent in the face of a proper Refusal for Cause.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Notice $21862 suspend benefits_Page_1.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	347.5 KB
ID:	44718

    Notice how there is no return address anywhere, making a proper R4C difficult to the novice at redemption.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Notice $21862 suspend benefits_Page_2.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	177.4 KB
ID:	44719

    This suitor knows who to notify, his Refusal for Cause:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Mailing List 05 12 2020_Page_1.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	149.9 KB
ID:	44720

    It is always the municipal office in charge, as the judiciary is a farce. STEWART, not KAHN.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • xparte
    replied
    When the wisdom gets imparted or impaired ? When our strength compliments us the compassion for a weaknesses sustains us. Its a small justice Just /us gringo

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by xparte View Post
    I am never surprised when i visit this site and that fishing discourse better known as The lesson plan a lesson plan or lessened up. Verbatim Employment its a form of commerce you is per / forming or acting like a federally formed employee onlyjust a Me can demand only a you gets the benefits from the privateers IRS internally you service to say agents. How verbally speaking is just volunteered information. Verbiage its legally binding standing and style demanding lawfully requires its own statutory style No agents for this station or office can give Me legal advice. Becoming your own agent with the lesson plan . Two distinctions i did it myself and i have donated a portion to (express redemption in terms of my own gratuitous benefit) Or having the distinction of becoming a suitor and expressing satisfaction or disappointment in being taught some expressed benevolence . I am suggesting if your worries are formed you've already expressed deferral . I however have no distinctions on benevolence if sharing is done privately thats distinct if its a I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this.. i distinctly see a private message as the expressive method for discourse. DBA vs DBOTP on the phone a true name isn't identified on a Business # Tax player payer slayer why talk to anyone its FrivPho calls
    I think sometimes after all these years I might be the best ever at interpreting xPartese. You got me this time.

    P.S. It is like instead of a spellchecker you downloaded a wordscrambler.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-28-20, 02:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...