Exactly what does the IRS agent think?
Collapse
X
-
Fair enough, thank you for the responses, and the initial referral, David. If anyone else out there in this fine community wants to help a noob like me win for once, inbox me, I'll buy you dinner if you ever come to Los Angeles.
-
Between his redemption clients and the brain trust he might be that busy. We are not in close contact but I think he is a planner. By that he expanded a small business through firmware and at-home delegation of workload to quickly trained employees. And by that I mean that redemption refunds are sure when processed through a professional tax accountant and more importantly they are extremely simplified. All those details about finding deductions and those trade secrets fall away. You simply match up the four figures - reported income, taxable income and reported withholdings are matched up to your claim. It is a mistake to complicate a 1040 Form further. The IRS will jump on any mistakes.Originally posted by gbw View PostHas anyone had any luck contacting Mr. Paz? No responses from phone or email. Thanks!
In summary what I am telling you is Mr. PAZ may not be responding to business he cannot take. If he is working to capacity your attempts to reach him may be going into a queue for when one of his employees can get to you. Turning business down may not be in the plan.
Leave a comment:
-
Has anyone had any luck contacting Mr. Paz? No responses from phone or email. Thanks!
Leave a comment:
-
Redelivery
Without specifying a signature required on the Registered Mail one seems to open the door for redelivery to the agent.
It takes more intelligence to determine what the Principal YELLEN is thinking here, but remember she comes directly into the IMF as US Governor from the Board of Governors of the Fed. So she knows her way around redemption. Now looking at the dates you might guess we will need a few weeks time to determine what will happen at the IRS campus(es).
Leave a comment:
-
Very good explanation. Wonderful!Originally posted by shikamaru View PostA mortgage is a "dead pledge". It is property that produces income, but the income proceeds go to the creditor without buying down the debt.
Redemption is the buying back of the pledge (property).
In medieval times, the title of the property would change hands from debtor to creditor with clauses in the contract allowing the debtor to redeem the property from the creditor.
In conjunction with bottomry and Rules of Admiralty we can get a rounded portrait of central banking. Plus the Bretton Woods Agreements, SDR's and the Amendments all point us to understand the role of War and Emergency with martial rule.
Leave a comment:
-
A mortgage is a "dead pledge". It is property that produces income, but the income proceeds go to the creditor without buying down the debt.Originally posted by David Merrill View PostMr. PAZ (818) 743-8890 is geared up with an online redemption tax accountant service. He gets consistent results.
Attached find the only exception - but look at Page 4 - he is bringing redemption to the DEATH PROMISE. Quite literally that means death promise.
MORTGAGE
Remember that debt (death) and redemption (life) are mutually exclusive ultimates. Where there is one, the other does not exist.
Redemption is the buying back of the pledge (property).
In medieval times, the title of the property would change hands from debtor to creditor with clauses in the contract allowing the debtor to redeem the property from the creditor.
Leave a comment:
-
Professional Example
Mr. PAZ (818) 743-8890 is geared up with an online redemption tax accountant service. He gets consistent results.
Attached find the only exception - but look at Page 4 - he is bringing redemption to the DEATH PROMISE. Quite literally that means death promise.
MORTGAGE
Remember that debt (death) and redemption (life) are mutually exclusive ultimates. Where there is one, the other does not exist.Last edited by David Merrill; 04-02-21, 10:42 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
calculated contemplation
This letter followed a delayed refund of withholdings.
I think it prudent to Refuse for Cause the form letter since it specifies that the income is taxable interest.
P.S. I am confused about the phone camera angle:
Yeah. That's better!Last edited by David Merrill; 03-21-21, 05:38 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Here is a form for people who were redeeming but filed as endorser. Frivolous Return Program law.
Here is the link at the IRS.An untimely claim for a refund/abatement on a non-frivolous Form 843 is received.
Note: To be considered timely, taxpayer must file a claim for a refund on Form 843 within 3 years from the time a return associated with the penalty is filed or 2 years from the date the penalty was paid, whichever period expires later.Attached FilesLast edited by David Merrill; 12-18-20, 09:38 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lorne View PostTo follow up on this, I filed my TY2019 lawful money tax return on paper and left the question at the top of Schedule 1 blank:
At any time during 2019, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?
Didn't answer it at all and yet I did receive my tax refund as requested. So it appears answering that question was voluntary after all, and TurboTax just decided to make the answer required when it really isn't.
That is great! I am copying this over to What Does the IRS Agent Really Think?
Leave a comment:
-
On the W-4 front;
The IRS waited until 12/4 to supply us with the new W-4 Form for 2021. They prepared us with a draft though:
Last year, for 2019, the W-4 Form was obscured about conditions for writing in "EXEMPT".
To be clear about the attached returns, the suitor filed 130 days ago, both state and federal but did not put any demand on the state (CA) return. Line 58. So the IRS went silent and sent in the state, returning a $500 refund instead of the withholdings of over $7K. The $500 refund is refused for cause.
For the full explanation - stay tuned to this thread. Or check into my Lesson Plan ($2K) if you need some guidance. There is no need to involve your employer at all. Any IRS agent can call your employer and start a fight without any paper at all - a fight that will get you fired. Nasty business! If the IRS compels withholdings just consider it a savings account until you can file your return.
Leave a comment:
-
W-4 Changes
One suitor has received, or rather his employer has, a Lock-In Letter demanding a certain amount of withholdings.
This is inconsequential as the money will be refunded pursuant to law. The suitor led me to an interesting link:
Withholdings 2020.
Leave a comment:
-
evolving devolvements
The debt scavenger most reliably goes silent in the face of a proper Refusal for Cause.
Notice how there is no return address anywhere, making a proper R4C difficult to the novice at redemption.
This suitor knows who to notify, his Refusal for Cause:
It is always the municipal office in charge, as the judiciary is a farce. STEWART, not KAHN.
Leave a comment:
-
When the wisdom gets imparted or impaired ? When our strength compliments us the compassion for a weaknesses sustains us. Its a small justice Just /us gringo
Leave a comment:
-
I think sometimes after all these years I might be the best ever at interpreting xPartese. You got me this time.Originally posted by xparte View PostI am never surprised when i visit this site and that fishing discourse better known as The lesson plan a lesson plan or lessened up. Verbatim Employment its a form of commerce you is per / forming or acting like a federally formed employee onlyjust a Me can demand only a you gets the benefits from the privateers IRS internally you service to say agents. How verbally speaking is just volunteered information. Verbiage its legally binding standing and style demanding lawfully requires its own statutory style No agents for this station or office can give Me legal advice. Becoming your own agent with the lesson plan . Two distinctions i did it myself and i have donated a portion to (express redemption in terms of my own gratuitous benefit) Or having the distinction of becoming a suitor and expressing satisfaction or disappointment in being taught some expressed benevolence . I am suggesting if your worries are formed you've already expressed deferral . I however have no distinctions on benevolence if sharing is done privately thats distinct if its a I am wondering if there is a solid way to fight against a FrivPen letter if one receives it after having filed a Lawful Money return. I'm still new to all this.. i distinctly see a private message as the expressive method for discourse. DBA vs DBOTP on the phone a true name isn't identified on a Business # Tax player payer slayer why talk to anyone its FrivPho calls
P.S. It is like instead of a spellchecker you downloaded a wordscrambler.Last edited by David Merrill; 03-28-20, 02:55 AM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: