Pete HENDRICKSON's Lost Horizons - Solutions?

[Chex]

http://www.inquisitr.com/884086/obam...able-care-act/

[David Merrill]

Good point!

[Chex]

The Temple Cleansed Again.

[This chapter is based on Matt. 21:12-16, 23-46; Mark 11:15-19, 27-33; 12:1-12; Luke 19:45-48; 20:1-19.]

At the beginning of His ministry, Christ had driven from the temple those who defiled it by their unholy traffic; and His stern and godlike demeanor had struck terror to the hearts of the scheming traders. At the close of His mission He came again to the temple, and found it still desecrated as before. The condition of things was even worse than before. The outer court of the temple was like a vast cattle yard. With the cries of the animals and the sharp chinking of coin was mingled the sound of angry altercation between traffickers, and among them were heard the voices of men in sacred office. The dignitaries of the temple were themselves engaged in buying and selling and the exchange of money. So completely were they controlled by their greed of gain that in the sight of God they were no better than thieves. http://www.whiteestate.org/books/da/da65.htmlsubsidies that low-income Americans will receivehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/theapoth...res-exchanges/

U.S. Office of Personnel Management: https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S....-a&channel=rcs

Elaine Kaplan was appointed as Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on April 15, 2013. She served as OPM's General Counsel from March 17, 2009 to April 14, 2013, before taking over from then-Director John Berry at the end of his four-year term. As General Counsel, Kaplan has provided legal and policy advice regarding all aspects of Federal personnel management to Director Berry and to officials across the Executive Branch. The Washington Post reported last month Berry may be in line to be the next Ambassador to Australia.

Multi-State Plans:http://www.opm.gov/about-us/our-mission-role-history/

[David Merrill]

It's a matter of reading that code and being in compliance with it or get your butt handed to you in court.

Of course that is a matter of being in contract. I still subscribe to getting your full refund without involving your employer but this W-4 is amusing.

[John Howard]

My humorous sanitized version.

I may be counting my chickens before they're hatched but I thought I might as well put that extra space on lines 5, 6 and 7 to good use.

[John Howard]

http://www.inquisitr.com/884086/obam...able-care-act/

Congress knows a bad deal when they inflict one on us. They originally exempted themselves from Social Security.

[David Merrill]

Interesting! That is the sort of thing I like to get source material on. Then I can grab a doc from the federal repository and share it here and with the suitors' brain trust too.

[Brian]

Interesting! That is the sort of thing I like to get source material on. Then I can grab a doc from the federal repository and share it here and with the suitors' brain trust too.

IF Social Security is a tax and Medicare/caid is also a tax and O blah blah care is also a tax then how can the government tax itself? Doesn't that violate some kind of cardinal rule? Kind of like how they don't tax municipal bonds as it would be one sector of government taxing another sector?

[Jaro]

Guys, you want solutions? No Problemo! For starters, just sign everything with
All rights reserved
All benefits accepted under protest
Without prejudice

And you can add that verbage to all your past applications, agreements and contracts with the US, by amendment.

If you're an SSN-carrying State resident/citizen of the District of Columbia, AKA the United States, then even demanding lawful money won't help you much, since as a corporate US citizen you're subject to their corporate gov't definitions, including defining their funny-money FRNs as lawful money.

So you gotta first kill or cripple the SSN and maybe the BC also. And it's easy to cripple the SSN. Just send them a note that you only use it under protest and under duress. In which case it no longer can be considered a benefit, tying you into their corporate matrix and its legaleze, and if it's not a benefit, using it can't create any liability.

So you've crippled the SSN, and can keep using it without any liability. And if the money-changers don't like that, they can CANCEL it. In which case you can apply for a 98-series EIN, to operate in their corporate Matrix as a foreigner (non-resident alien), who's not subject to taxation. So you WIN either way :-)

[Jaro]

Oh, and let's not forget that Congress' legislative authority doesn't extend past District of Columbia and territories. So if you're not their 14th Am. corporate citizen (federal benefit recipient), and are domiciled in a state of the Union, Congress' legislation doesn't apply to you, and neither should IRS's jurisdiction.

BTW, there's no such thing as a United States citizen, other than the 14th Am. citizen, since 1868. After that year, you're either a US (federal) citizen or a sovereign state Citizen, when INSIDE USA. State Citizens are only considered to be US citizens, OUTSIDE of USA.

So if you're inside of USA, and admit to be a US citizen, you're admitting to be a 14th Amendment (federal) citizen of a Democracy, and certainly NOT a state Citizen of the Union/Republic. In other words, in order to claim protection of the ORGANIC United States Constitution, you gotta be either a state Citizen or state Inhabitant.

[Robert Noad]

Lawful money

I am from South Africa one of the countries that has a Reserve Bank - private institution that prints the Reserve Bank notes and loan "money" to banks can someone please tel me how it would work here in SA?
Robbie on Land SA

[David Merrill]

Oh, and let's not forget that Congress' legislative authority doesn't extend past District of Columbia and territories. So if you're not their 14th Am. corporate citizen (federal benefit recipient), and are domiciled in a state of the Union, Congress' legislation doesn't apply to you, and neither should IRS's jurisdiction.

BTW, there's no such thing as a United States citizen, other than the 14th Am. citizen, since 1868. After that year, you're either a US (federal) citizen or a sovereign state Citizen, when INSIDE USA. State Citizens are only considered to be US citizens, OUTSIDE of USA.

So if you're inside of USA, and admit to be a US citizen, you're admitting to be a 14th Amendment (federal) citizen of a Democracy, and certainly NOT a state Citizen of the Union/Republic. In other words, in order to claim protection of the ORGANIC United States Constitution, you gotta be either a state Citizen or state Inhabitant.

That agrees with PADELFORD.

No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it.

Looking at the Constitution sure enough, it was ratified by States. The representatives of the States were elected or appointed by the state citizens sure enough.

Good point!

[David Merrill]

I am from South Africa one of the countries that has a Reserve Bank - private institution that prints the Reserve Bank notes and loan "money" to banks can someone please tel me how it would work here in SA?
Robbie on Land SA

We have a very bright suitor on the brain trust who is from South Africa. I will check into it!

[Jaro]

That agrees with PADELFORD.


"No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it."

Looking at the Constitution sure enough, it was ratified by States. The representatives of the States were elected or appointed by the state citizens sure enough.

Good point!

David, you as a state Citizen may not be party to the constitution, but you're still protected by it. That court cite just means that you can't sue the US civilly for damages. It doesn't mean that you're not protected by the organic US Constitution, or that you can't assert its protection, or that violation of your constitutional rights by public officials, isn't a crime.

[Jaro]

Robert, you can make a demand for lawful money, in any country that uses fiat currency. As a man you're entitled to get paid in REAL MONEY, silver and gold coins, NOT in their money SUBSTITUTE. Just because they're bankrupt and have no real money to give you, is not your problem. Just make your demand every time you deposit a check in one of their banks. Here's the special endorsement I use on all my paychecks:

Special Deposit.
Demand is made for lawful money,
pursuant to title 12 USC 411.
Jaro Smith; dba JARO SMITH

BTW, legal tender paper 'money', is a money substitute, just like tokens are money substitute in casinos. Which is why they can confiscate them without a court order. With real silver/gold money, they can't do that, unless you're under their corporate jurisdiction.