Modification to R4C Clerk Instruction

[David Merrill]

Hello;


The clerk of court in Connecticut was reluctant to publish R4C's on the lame excuse that the Clerk Instruction was a Letter, not a Document. She also whined that seeing a red thumbprint was irregular, not suspicious - it just creeped her out.

We made some modifications and the R4C's are being published again.

[EZrhythm]

Great to know, Thank You for sharing, David!

[David Merrill]

You are welcome!

[David Merrill]

I presume the Reader will look closely enough at the attached Rejection to be encouraged rather than discouraged. Firstly notice that the original Libel of Review has been against a local court clerk (public trustee) determined in collusion with a mortgage company. Now it would seem that the judge is in collusion with the mortgage company! Furthermore, the clerk is afraid of the judge enough to break the rule, a little bit.

Next notice how the judge has ordered the suitor to refrain from filing his R4C's into the Closed Case. However the suitor continually goes to the courthouse and gets the papers marked FILED. So all that is happening is the clerk of court is being manipulated by the federal judge into not docketing the Filings and therefore not publishing the R4C's on PACER. In other words the suitor just needs to find a publication method for his FILED R4C's.

NOTICE: RECAP it turns out is not free. It loads to "Public Archives" and is free from there but PACER charges for the initial download!


Pay attention to a feature you can load up on your browser called RECAP - PACER backwards. This is where a clever attorney figured out that the US Government cannot legally profit from making public notice of the activities in the federal courts. So factor that in please. The judge is tampering with the US Government's publication service - tampering with an (electronic) witness.

The next step?

I think this suitor should gather all his rejected R4C's and open a Criminal Complaint in a neighboring state or Washington DC USDC for $46 and start the record for this judge's, and clerk's removal and maybe prosecution. I would be happy to see that happen!



Regards,

David Merrill.

[KnowLaw]

She also whined that seeing a red thumbprint was irregular, not suspicious - it just creeped her out.

She obviously doesn't understand law. The thumb print is a seal; and a biometric seal at that!

This is an opportunity to push it back in her face: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse!"

[David Merrill]

The thing is that she is docketing and publishing the R4C's so there is nothing to push back against.

[BarlyGurl]

need some help

I need some instruction on enforcing my R4C in justice court... the sheriff, clerk and judge have blatantly ignored my timely made registered certified and return receipt R4C's... I now have a default judgement letter and demand to pay.
Thanks in advance for your help.

[David Merrill]

Hello, and welcome BarlyGurl!

There are quite a few things to understand about contract and R4C - determining when R4C will function and not.

[george]

Hello, and welcome BarlyGurl!

There are quite a few things to understand about contract and R4C - determining when R4C will function and not.

David, thats it? what/where/how? what are they? where to learn what they are if not here? how to find these things if not here?

thanks

[BarlyGurl]

So, Here I am again. As George alluded, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO RESOLVE the ignoring of my R4C SUCCESSFULLY? Today, I was informed that my WA DL is suspended for traffic citations in OREGON. I executed proper and timely R4C's and they were ignored by the kangaroo court of non-record, conviction was published to the DOT and forwarded to my resident state. It was my insurance company who brought this to my attention..TODAY. I would really like some guidance here... the criminality of the faux court is what I want to overcome. It has been over a year now.

[Michael Joseph]

So, Here I am again. As George alluded, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO RESOLVE the ignoring of my R4C SUCCESSFULLY? Today, I was informed that my WA DL is suspended for traffic citations in OREGON. I executed proper and timely R4C's and they were ignored by the kangaroo court of non-record, conviction was published to the DOT and forwarded to my resident state. It was my insurance company who brought this to my attention..TODAY. I would really like some guidance here... the criminality of the faux court is what I want to overcome. It has been over a year now.

Let me see if I have this right. Someone signed up for a license so that someone might make a use of taxpayer funded roadways of which the Federal Reserve Board of Governors would have an interest. In application of said license someone by express trust [signature bond in fidelity] agreed to bind one's self to the motor vehicle code in the State which that one occupies upon. And now when said applicant [for benefits] has been shown to be in violation of his/her word, by witness of an officer [dejure] of the Federal Reserve districts, then that one assumes that he/she can just refuse a good faith notice issued from the very same venue of which said license was obtained?

If I was a judge I would ignore such a fruitless motion as r4c in this matter as well. Basically, this one gave his/her word and refuses to keep it. So be it. The benefit of license most likely will be revoked. Shoot if this matter came before my court I would have no other option but to do exactly that - justice must be done. And since God can't lie, man should not lie.

I am sure I don't comprehend all of the complexities of this matter but how can anyone within five or six sentences? How to resolve is to study to show one's self approved. Study, study, study learn the undergirding principles of law and equity. Of course the foregoing applies to any aspect of one's life in regard to promises made in UNDERTAKING in contract. If I undertake to mow your lawn and I promise to do so - whereof is your signature required? That is a one-sided contract - a promise which binds me to a legal duty and gives you an equitable expectation that I would perform upon my promises.

I find it humorous that some would say there is no State and then reference a State in regard to mailing address. Seems a bit double minded to me. What is it? Do you recognize the Ship of State or not? The judgment is in equity. Make a promise keep a promise. The Court does not have to be of record if the parties plead before the Court. Actions imply trust.

==============

Some folks benefit from joining this website. In doing so, they submit freely to the Terms of Use. Said folks create a persona which is NOT them but merely reflects an interest obtained [equity] in the person of which they make a use of to enjoy this website. If they are found in violation of the Terms of Use then their membership will be revoked by the website administration. And no amount of R4C [Refusal for Cause] is going to change that fact. One will argue that their membership is terminated before a kangaroo court of no record and to that end judgement falls upon that one's head by his or her own actions.

[xparte]

a phone # is useless when one needs too know how too use a phone first, knowledge on how to [use] a phone .The law book [use] its there book. the phone and book [use] belongs too a phone company r4c your phone bill [use] dial in or dialed out. this site is a disappointment and of know [use] until its put to good use. just as a phone or the law is a useless Bill . only the owner is billed or fined . stop calling or claiming it yours conn tel conn edison my phone my power my mistake.find out who you are not and then call back with a claim like i am

[george]

a phone # is useless when one needs too know how too use a phone first, knowledge on how to [use] a phone .The law book [use] its there book. the phone and book [use] belongs too a phone company r4c your phone bill [use] dial in or dialed out. this site is a disappointment and of know [use] until its put to good use. just as a phone or the law is a useless Bill . only the owner is billed or fined . stop calling or claiming it yours conn tel conn edison my phone my power my mistake.find out who you are not and then call back with a claim like i am

I still am trying to figure it out.. I have a difficult time with these things, more than most probably. there is not alot to go on here so I read and listen to others and I see R4C used in different ways. like Karl Lentz for instance, he doesn't use or probably not even aware of David's methodology but he goes right in and refuses it for a cause.

I; a man, not "debtor"

he has lots of audios available but instead of to busy or whatever, he is hard to figure because of his big headed way of explaining things but also seems to be some important pieces missing with his ways to.

its hard. if I ever figure it out, I will make it a point to teach it like kindergaten.

look up Karl Lentz on you tube barlygrl if you cant find what you need here, Ive heard many more success stories from his "students" than anyone else but he is a different breed though and takes some getting used to.

banhammer happy MJ? go for it! I aint got a problem with it or without it and if thats how ya fell, thats how ya feel.

[Chex]

GoyimScum 6 months ago
HA, ok I watched the whole video and can now say I've been convicted and discovered that I no longer believe I have any knowledge of the IRS or any taxes I may or may not owe. If the IRS believes I have done any wrong to a (Wo)man within the corporation, or owe them any depts, please send me a bill asap, hehehehe, this stuff is just so brilliant and is starting to make a lot more sense to me now, THX KARL!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a96xe8l3IKI

[xparte]

Thats it george the kindred garden was our true home now there is knowledge piled on truth in fairness to all the garden is evil how its dealt with is only opinion the garden variety or ego its how we carry ourself not how the garden grows plenty of good seeds spread one who grows his garden weeds his own ego = self? show me how to fish first show me the best spots can u give a guy a fish what if he stops fishing or he hates fishing. When were the bait george whats the catch