EU Holds Emergency Meeting to Discuss Donald Trump

[allodial]

EU Holds Emergency Meeting to Discuss Donald Trump
Source: GlobalResearch.ca; Date: 15 November 2016.

(source/more)

[David Merrill]

Have you considered that the Tenth Circuit EXECUTIVE - David TIGHE - is of the Executive Branch, reporting directly to the President? Executive oversight of the chief justice of the Tenth Circuit - Timothy TIMKOVICH?

Look at Pages 40-43!



While according to the Rules, there are exceptions where David TIGHE might avoid publishing my Complaint on PACER - of which impeaching all the federal judges at once is included I am sure; One item I noticed is that the Tenth Circuit Executive reserves the right to return any and all attachments that he feels are irrelevant to the Complaint. None have been returned.

Here is another point - aside from the Refusal for Cause on the new SDR program I coin DRYEP (pronounced Dry Up). Take a look at the docket report attached and count something like 350 trust and personal accounts, all of them drained and almost certainly laundered through the STATE OF COLORADO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION. - The same corporation still owing me $20M of the now, $23M. Ronald Dean had his funds returned within a week upon the Verified Statement of Claim and Right attached.

The EU might just be nervous because TRUMP is a businessman, not a politician. I knew better than than to think Hillary might have solutions. Bill is still on her face. He blatantly accepted $200M in Chinese campaign contributions to get reelected. I complained to the Sanhedrin at the time and they appeared to defend with, "We cannot accept newspaper reports (AP) as evidence."

Some times though, I think it more disturbing how Bill was impeached for far worse than NIXON and just got up and went to work the next day... It came off remarkable that REHNQUIST would not attend the subsequent State of the Union Address.

My point is that settlement of the $23M is much more likely with an honest businessman, than with the CLINTON Administration.

[allodial]

From what I have observed, Communists like to steal/take, equity isn't their concern--actually paying someone equitably isn't in their modus operandi. Honestly, every single Communists (except one) I have met IRL was a murder or perpetrated attempted murder, a sexual pervert and a career criminal (even ones that had money and didn't have a reason to steal)--all of them were liars. Many of them kept their Atheistical Comunist beliefs secret even from their family members whose lives they resoundingly set out to destroy or undermine. From over a decade of analysis and observation the most key problem besetting Black communities in the USA are closet Communists that pretend to have their welfare at heart--they have heavily infiltrated the Democratic Party.

And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common....Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

---Acts 4:32, 34-36

Acts 4:32-36 describes a non-secular event among a family-oriented priesthood during hostile occupation at a time when they knew the state of Judah was about to meet its end (come 70AD) There was a pooling but after that pooling distribution was made unto very man according as he had need: that meant that at the end people would have different amounts because not everyone had the same level of need. The text says nothing about everyone getting an equal distribution. It says that distribution was made unto every man according as {that man} had need. Nothing suggests any law had been passed. Nothing suggests that every man got the same amount of money or resources. That meant that the result of the pooling was unequal distribution according to the situation of each recipient. Just the same as in the midst of a catastrophe I and others were to gather all resources within 100 miles and pool them and then make a determination as to the skills and abilities of those who approached us and hand them over equipment or the like so according to their skills, needs, requirements.

That text could actually serve as proof that they all knew what was going to happen by 70AD (rather than thousands of years in the future) so they all CASHED OUT and made distributions among the saints/brethren based on each saint/brethren's ESCAPE and SURVIVAL NEEDS of each man. Since they were going to be leaving Judea, they cashed out. If Roy need $500 to get to Britain they gave him $500. If Susan needed $50 to get to her sick mom in Corinth, she got $50. If a family was very poor and low on food, they got $5,000 for food, clothes, shoes, to pay rent etc.

Communists try to sell that text as a proof text for Biblical basis for communism. But when you trash false Futurism, you see the reason they sold their houses was not only to be charitable but because THEY WERE GOING TO ALL LEAVE JUDEA BECAUSE THEY KNEW JUDGEMENT WAS PENDING. Jesus had warned them to 'head for the hills'.

[walter]

http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/soros-meeting-washington-elites-trump-resistance/

[allodial]

Seems to be the thing to do if you are one of the rats.

Not sure what you are referring to. The George Soros meeting or? I'm not sure how heeding a warning of pending divine judgment or catastrophe has anything to do with being "one of the rats".

[walter]

Not sure what you are referring to. The George Soros meeting or? I'm not sure how heeding a warning of pending divine judgment or catastrophe has anything to do with being "one of the rats".

The boat is sinking, the rats can jump ship or try to stop the ship from going down.
Make no mistake that the ship is going down.

[allodial]

The boat is sinking, the rats can jump ship or try to stop the ship from going down.
Make no mistake that the ship is going down.

Maybe they've never heard the following...

Except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain. Psalm 127:1

[David Merrill]

I think TRUMP is a capitalist, if any extreme label applies. Truth is though, I stopped watching him when he was firing people on reality TV.

[walter]

I think TRUMP is a capitalist, if any extreme label applies. Truth is though, I stopped watching him when he was firing people on reality TV.

All billionaires have to be a capitalist in some form.
Trumps tv show was no doubt unwatchable for me.
I don't understand why billionaires work instead of enjoying life work free.
Its not the money it must be the power.



GUIDE TO THE GEORGE SOROS NETWORK

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ory.asp?id=589

[David Merrill]

I am tingling, as lienholder and author.

The end of the SOROS clip finds him deducing he is not God. But he does not believe God exists...

So just take a moment with my Olympus Ordeal:

Delegation of Authority for Jubilee.
Service on the Triumvirate.
Notice of Lien.
Service on China and the Crown through the State of Israel (Zionism).

I have been showing you about the alleged Authorship lately:




So thank God between SOROS and me I am the one with the God Complex!!

[allodial]

I think TRUMP is a capitalist, if any extreme label applies. Truth is though, I stopped watching him when he was firing people on reality TV.

Honestly, I never watched the show--except for a portion of an episode where I was 'trapped' at someone's home for a moment.

All billionaires have to be a capitalist in some form.
Trumps tv show was no doubt unwatchable for me.
I don't understand why billionaires work instead of enjoying life work free.
Its not the money it must be the power.

The idea that people having lots of money is about sitting at home and doing nothing but drugs and hookers is a myth. Having lots of money means doing something with it, managing it, managing people. Very few wealth people I know just sit around doing nothing: they do charity, plan residential developments, run a store/shop/paint company, design kit cars, teach, etc. (there is a book -> The Millionaire Next Door)

The Liberal Whiney idea of people with money all being evil is a myth. Marxist Communism is about social market barrier on doing ANYTHING but manual labor except for a small few.

I insist that that the communism vs capitalism is a distraction ...an empty argument for whether public corporations hoard everything for the state or whether private corporations hoard everything for the state. The choice is Evil A or Evil B. The concealed option: natural and inherent right of freedom of exchange and trade throughout a society where equity is promoted by the state as a neutral party (i.e. where being super wealthy doesn't you can't hoard everything and oppress everyone else; having the only source of sugar in 500 miles doesn't give you a license to extort and gouge others and prostitute their daughters and where speculative trading is either highly regulated or is against the law--imagine such a society where the role of the government is restricted to promoting law and equity and conserving the peace without active involvement in trade).

I must make it clear, I have been afforded the opportunity to see first hand that people handling billions of dollars --the sane ones--are mainly funding things like roads, bridges, charities, healthcare port upgrades--you don't necessarily know they exist but if they didn't exist you would likely know it. Not all of them are into the NWO or Dark Side Occult. People forget, that the most high has the upper hand rather than any psychopath the TV screen makes seem larger than life.

[walter]

The idea that people having lots of money is about sitting at home and doing nothing but drugs and hookers is a myth. Having lots of money means doing something with it, managing it, managing people. Very few wealth people I know just sit around doing nothing: they do charity, plan residential developments, run a store/shop/paint company, design kit cars, teach, etc. (there is a book -> The Millionaire Next Door)

That is a generalizing statement.

I know some children of some off the richest people in Canada that are close to 50 years old that can't do a damn thing beside washing dish's. They prefer sitting at home doing drugs remembering the days of fly to NY from Paris to have lunch on the concord and then fly back to Paris to party for the night just because they can.

They had children them selves just to access the trust accounts because mommy and daddy were cutting them off. This person stopped paying the rent to the condo she was renting from another friend of hers because she knew the own who moved to the USA wouldn't be able to make the mortgage payments with out the rent money and then waited it out till the bank took possession and then got it on a bank sale instead of buying it from her friend in the first place. Real piece of work. Her grandma would have tea every Sunday with the prime minister.

Then there is another friend who just refused an offer to sell his business for 80 million because he said it wasn't enough and in the same breath saying its not about the money. Then what is it about?

While another friend who just turned 50 said I am done working. Sold the show and has 8 million in the bank and said freedom 50 here I come.

In general what I have found out is that many super rich peoples children have some of the biggest mental health issues. Lots of them hate their mom and I think why is because mom let a nanny raise their children for them.

Just like anything their are all sorts under that rainbow.
Making money like the billionaires do I believe is an addiction.
Its the only thing they know how to do.
They don't know how to stop and smell the roses.
They don't see the beauty of a leaf blowing in the air.

[walter]

So thank God between SOROS and me I am the one with the God Complex!!

Thank God indeed. Had a good laugh at that one david.

[allodial]

That is a generalizing statement.

There are SOME that are like that but not ALL.

I know some children of some off the richest people in Canada that are close to 50 years old that can't do a damn thing beside washing dish's. They prefer sitting at home doing drugs remembering the days of fly to NY from Paris to have lunch on the concord and then fly back to Paris to party for the night just because they can.

They had children them selves just to access the trust accounts because mommy and daddy were cutting them off. This person stopped paying the rent to the condo she was renting from another friend of hers because she knew the own who moved to the USA wouldn't be able to make the mortgage payments with out the rent money and then waited it out till the bank took possession and then got it on a bank sale instead of buying it from her friend in the first place. Real piece of work. Her grandma would have tea every Sunday with the prime minister.

Then there is another friend who just refused an offer to sell his business for 80 million because he said it wasn't enough and in the same breath saying its not about the money. Then what is it about?

While another friend who just turned 50 said I am done working. Sold the show and has 8 million in the bank and said freedom 50 here I come.

In general what I have found out is that many super rich peoples children have some of the biggest mental health issues. Lots of them hate their mom and I think why is because mom let a nanny raise their children for them.

Just like anything their are all sorts under that rainbow.
Making money like the billionaires do I believe is an addiction.
Its the only thing they know how to do.
They don't know how to stop and smell the roses.
They don't see the beauty of a leaf blowing in the air.

If the parents could be described as 'thieving, immoral scum', what to expect of their children? I know of 'poor people' who exhibit just as lazy and rotten in behavior if not moreso. They lie about how much money they have and use their children (who they mistreat) to get free things, and beg of their neighbors to feed their children after spending $10,000 at a casino the night before. The issue is morality rather than money or economic class.

There are those in 'wealthy neighborhoods' who do drugs, snort coke, are into hookers and...there are those who are abhor such things.



Who do you think would prefer Marxist-Communism: the good, noble, moral wealthy or the immoral, lazy, drug addicted, mentally disturbed? The good, noble and moral wealthy know the law of reaping and sowing and teach their children to be PRODUCTIVE so even if they don't have money they can still be useful to themselves and others. The lazy, immoral and drug addicted, it see,s would more likely need a very captive audience to support their "lifestyles" and they would also be motivated to steal what their noble and moral neighbors have.



I know someone who attended a very expensive, private school, he related how he found himself utterly disgusted by how dirty and messy some kids were, he would actually help the maids or custodians clean up while many others just left messes. After that, he refused to live on campus anymore. The students from poor families were messy and lazy too. Just depended on how they were raised.

[xparte]