Tweet
Notable Marxist-Communists themselves have said that 'state capitalism' is 'communism'. An important question is why should resources of a land be hoarded or controlled by any one group? Consider this model: Capitalism = resources hoarded by a few private concerns and Communism = resources hoarded by public concerns. What's wrong with small to medium sized farms and small to medium sized business operations? A society's right to free trade and exchange would necessarily require access to resources, equipment and the like. If someone says "well I dont want to do anything to benefit your society unless I can make ridiculously large profits off of it". If they aren't interested in reasonable profit and the greater good, who needs them?
What is wrong with resources being distributed among small-to-medium sized business rather than hoarded by conglomerates? There is a major distinction between capitalism and organic free trade and exchange among members of a society. One is a resource control paradigm, the other is speaks of natural necessity and order.
What is wrong with resources being distributed among small-to-medium sized business rather than hoarded by conglomerates? There is a major distinction between capitalism and organic free trade and exchange among members of a society. One is a resource control paradigm, the other is speaks of natural necessity and order.
Comment