Filing 2018 Taxes Advice

[xparte]

[David Merrill]

Indeed, on the first baby steps of my Journey I was saying, "Doesn't 'national debt' imply international?"

Look.

[xparte]

[David Merrill]

I am as you say, "Dissappointed" with CONCORD as an artificial person. It seems small to quash the prosecution, and allow MEULLER a year to writhe only to try prosecuting him. - Hang him out to dry.

Maybe MEULLER needs to Refuse for Cause Dabney Langhorne FRIEDRICH and see if she will redact her oath before allowing the clerk to publish it on PACER, like Timothy BURGESS did a couple years ago.

[xparte]

an artificial person. the dead cant hurt the dead strap a guy into a electric chair and ask him if he has anything to say. his reply I guess this will teach me a lesson in property. in respects to persons not one person died in that chair dead and the living corporate death or the administration of that death. Seek not the law in your scriptures, for the law is life, whereas the scripture is dead. I tell you truly, Moses received not his laws from God in writing, but through the living word. The law is living word of living God to living prophets for living men. if she will redact her oath or be raised from the dead. the oath legally was to just fake her own death until r4c or the Lazarus effect exposing a 4 day fraud and the remedy miracle within 72hr 3 business days According to tradition, Lazarus never smiled during the thirty years after his resurrection, worried by the sight of unredeemed souls he had seen during his four-day stay in Hades. The only exception was, when he saw someone stealing a pot, he smilingly said: "the clay steals the clay." well diggin up oaths and the ability for redaction censoring or obscuring of part of a text for legal or security purposes. only a person can administrate oath only a person can affirm it thats not a miracle itself."How may we read the laws of God elsewhere than in the scriptures? Where are they written? Read them to us from there where you see them, for we know nothing else but the scriptures which we have inherited from our forefathers. Tell us the laws of which you speak Administrate , that hearing them we may be healed and justified." Christ said: "You do not understand the words of life, because you are in death. Darkness darkens your eyes and your ears are stopped with deafness. For I tell you, it profits you not at all that you pore over dead scriptures if by your deeds you deny him who has given you the scriptures.Oaths and Bibles teaching attorneys lessons is just denying or defying death saying u wont be dictated too and then borrowing a pen now thats redaction

[xparte]

When the author has never chose to establish a definitive redaction ...jumping ship Its a honored position exposing fraud on any judicial fog./amici curiae or the undead friends Private persons may appear as amici curiae unsolicited opinions . Standing or status its a dead pool.

[lorne]

This is a little piece I like to call...electric chair.

[xparte]

Jefferson said it's self-evident you put ten people on an island and a socially formed community exists of those ten people their welfare and security is the social object and normally their will is the social law? Will of the People to rule themselves, well then which of them has a natural claim to rule the rest. To say that the cleverest toughest or the boldest will rule is simply to beg the question, if his talents are used for the community for distilling the water or building a ship well then he's the servant of the community and the community is his sovereign.If his talents are used against the community for stealing owning the boat and poisoning the drinking water fluoride? Why should the community submit to him and is it likely that they will. That's how democracy works the services ask not what the democracy cant do for u ask why sovereignty is just a declaration of privileges. associate capitalism with democracy therefore capitalism must equal democracy and this is you know logic 101 failing right there, The mentality that democracy and capitalism are the same thing but democracy has to do with how we govern ourselves not about how corporations pay wages or how banks charge interests capitalism was originally just individualism which is why socialism is just called socialism because it was and still is the reaction against individualism.the capitalist praises competition only after he creates monopolies.in a normal society a man's interests will always be for his own home and his own family that'll be his primary interest. from there his neighbors his community government in other words democracy is from the bottom up not from the top down it's not based on individual interests it's not even based on community we've been made to think the the world outside the home is more important than the world inside self-government begins by thinking for oneself men in a state of decadence employ professionals to fight for them and professionals to dance for them and professionals to rule them in losing individualism freedom to self-government means self-control doin business as one was self employed but isn't but keeping wages self accounting and demanding ones remedy privileges is self evident on this community based benevolent site. The sight might not be secure but the community is. What every the ideal its just a individual spark of determined democracy plugging in or unplugged lorne its a seat or stand one must choice I appreciate the significance of getting burned at lessons learned .

[xparte]

[Christopher Jonathan]

David and company,

Take a look at this link and let me know your thoughts apparently we are "evading tax laws" found this after your broadcast today with the IRS "Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous" form, https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small...nts-section-ii. In United States v. Rifen, 577 F.2d 1111 (8 th Cir. 1978), the court affirmed a conviction for willfully failing to file a return, rejecting the argument that Federal Reserve Notes are not subject to taxation. "Congress has declared Federal Reserve notes legal tender . . . and federal reserve notes are taxable dollars." Id. at 1112. The courts have rejected this argument on numerous occasions.

[Michael Joseph]

. In United States v. Rifen, 577 F.2d 1111 (8 th Cir. 1978), the court affirmed a conviction for willfully failing to file a return, rejecting the argument that Federal Reserve Notes are not subject to taxation. "Congress has declared Federal Reserve notes legal tender . . . and federal reserve notes are taxable dollars." Id. at 1112. The courts have rejected this argument on numerous occasions.

There is no argument. Of course FRN's are taxable income. But United States Notes are defined as lawful money. And the only way you get a USN today is to make a demand for lawful money. Now since the USN is pegged to the FRN you now have a dual capacity note. How you got your note is the difference by operation of law. So we are in agreement with Rifen. The lessons and the forums at https://www.lawfulmoneytrust.com are quite clear regarding this matter.

Pegging a fiat currency [USN] to an asset backed currency [FRN] is strange practice indeed. Nevertheless the promise to perform is the only thing that understands the USN. The FRN is backed by securities and other property. The government of the United States promises to understand the USN. Stop and consider that promise carefully and you will see it is the USN that is fiat, not the FRN. The FRN is not created out of "thin air" as the soothsayers maintain.

The USN and the FRN are both legal tender. What does that mean? The term legal begs a trust. So legal tender begs a currency which may be used in order to do commerce within said trust. In other words, legal title may be transferred upon the exchange of a legal tender.

Difference

The FRN issues of a trust system and said system is an independent agency working under contract. Remember Art I Sect X? It is a SYSTEM with its own districts and cities. The USN also begs a trust system. Both notes are property of an Owner. Both notes are in the possession and use of a land tenant [inferior trustee] and both systems require of their trustees to give account of the use of property within a year.

Since the USN is pegged to the FRN - $7 USN and $7 FRN buys you the same decent loaf of bread. However, don't get it wrong, if you fail to make a claim for lawful money, then you got private issue. I like to think of FRN's as unredeemed chits. Think of it like this. In days gone by, the king would issue notes into circulation. The king's note was secured by the king's bank. Said note might get assigned 100 times or more thru the use of an ALLONGE [look it up] before said note was ever exchanged on the king's bank.

Now you are the king and you have hired on an agent called bank. You make your loan to said bank and you may issue your private issue of the account of which you moved the bank to create. Now your issue is your responsibility and your liability. Your private check may pass thru many hands before it gets negotiated - maybe for years even.

Thinking of a FRN or USN are these not as bearer instruments which do not require an allonge? Are not these notes secured by property or promise upon a "bank" of a higher power? Said higher power is a private independent agency of the government of the United States or drawn directly upon the United States. In either case who stands surety for both issue? The answer is the United States.

However, FRN's are lawful to use as a legal tender but are not Lawful Money [a compound noun]. In fact FRN's are not money at all "per se" they are promissory notes. But a USN is money drawn directly upon the government of the United States.

Tell me mirror what is the difference? Is it not how the note is obtained? Liar - Lawyer mirror tell me what's the difference - Kangaroo done stole the court with the inference! What is the inference? Is it not upon the term Lawful? Do you know the difference? If not re-read.

12USC411 speaks of Money. US v Thomas tells us FRN's are NOT money!

Riddle me this: Why are FRN's not money?

Before you answer please frame your answer within the proper trust structure so that we can comprehend the nature of the duties of the trustee in possession and use. Thank you for entertaining a fool. Grin.

For the man with the knowledge of the trust in spite of the opposition is seeking the harmony of the unity in the State.

Best regards,
MJ am I.

[Gavilan]

The FRN is not created out of "thin air" as the soothsayers maintain.

The FRN is not created out of "thin air" as the soothsayers maintain.

The FRN is not created out of "thin air" as the soothsayers maintain.



Bravo, bravo, bravo!

Finally, someone gets it!

[Gavilan]

Saying that money is created out of thin air is lazy thinking.

[Michael Joseph]

Saying that money is created out of thin air is lazy thinking.

Within the United States Trust money IS created out of "thin air". But in the Federal Reserve System [Trust] there is no such thing as money. In the former Lawful Money is fiat created on the Promise of the United States to repay. By "thin air" I mean a promise.

[David Merrill]

This might be difficult to grasp at first, the nature of the Naked Contract - endorsement of private credit. I believe that I can give Michael Joseph something to work with in the last sentence of the Original Thirteenth Amendment, and the term "Territory".

The Colorado Territory never quite survived the restructure. Consider that a proper restructure requires thirty-one days cure.

Therefore the trust transformed in venue and this is hidden (fraud by omission) in CODE - So help me God becomes SO HELP ME GOD.