Filing 2018 Taxes Advice

[David Merrill]

Hi All,

Most recent update is that they are holding my Federal Refund because I haven't filed my 2016 and 2017 returns, I have just completed them and am shipping them out tomorrow. What's funny is that online the "Where's my refund" web page doesn't provide any information, I had to file a records request as to why my refund wasn't showing any updates, and I received in the mail the letter stating they were holding the refund.

Thank you for these details.

Redemption is acquiring a new level of investigation and contemplation. Assuming that trained attorneys and investigators are capable of at least interpreting my perspective, in light of the Albany Remand too, we have uncovered that Brett Michael KAVANAUGH signing a correct verbatim 1789 oath was at best, a feeble attempt to rectify judicial oversight.

Like Michael Joseph points out, this administrative law and equity judiciary is appropriate under trusts and trust law. So the problem is that they are pretending to be judicial officers by altering the oaths in one way or another, on both state and federal bonding processes. This is fraud, and in the best light there is bonding, but under a hidden principal (NEPHALIM, "Sons of God", Dragon Court). KAVANAUGH was appointed by a non-President (ROBERTS is only pretending to be Chief Justice) and his witness Andrew McCleod KENNEDY is cleverly without bond.

Above I shine a kind light on the behaviors.

I have become convinced that the KAVANAUGH oath was to trick me. I try avoiding putting myself in the middle of effective geopolitical engineering, on the assumption that my imagination and decalcification of my pineal gland (DMT) keep me riding the fringe. Try explaining the Chief of the FOIAONLINE sending the rejection to the oath he had just sent within the hour? Is that classical counterintelligence? - To cause me thinking he is being fired, to panic like that?

Three or four other factors (suitors) and their endeavors to be treated redeemed play into my thinking. But that too is part of my thinking, quite literally a brain trust and development of parallel and quantum (divine feminine) thinking through healthy white matter (glions/myelin) on the right hemisphere (bouncing a ball in my left hand for many years now). I have quite literally been intending to develop my ability to do this, to spot patterns of behavior like driving you into an intentional interaction signed under perjury.

We have the Dragon Court watching and under contract.

The Sons of Cain, the Sons of God of Genesis 6 survived the Flood (Numbers 13:33) and are working out of Budapest and Transylvania, since 1408. I believe that we are notifying the Principal behind the SO HELP ME GOD capitonym. The IRS agents, investigators and attorneys are all "contemplating" the law and what binds anybody to the voluntary compliance, while the agents are behaving fraudulently (deviant oaths).

This should be good!!

P.S. Like I pointed out, Dabney is also appointed by non-President TRUMP. And she has dated KAVANAUGH too, for what that might be worth. Roberts signed the civil oath for KAVANAUGH, so why not the 1789 conforming oath too? Why resort to senior, not associate* justice KENNEDY, KAVANAUGH's predecessor? Now it turns out that KENNEDY is without bond, the DoJ has rejected to provide his oath...

I presume CONCORD is moving Dabney for Order to Show Cause why the DoJ should not be shut down for felony jury tampering (Mueller Report) because CONCORD wishes to continue doing business in the US. But now we have Dabney acting the DoJ's defense attorney? Look at the attached docket report and minute order. Due today, the twelfth.

I like to imagine that readers here are seeing at least some of this through mine, and the brain trust's eyes.

* This is an additional oddity that any attorney will easily spot, but expect the layman to miss. KENNEDY signs KAVANAUGH's oath of office as Associate Justice when KENNEDY has been a Senior Justice for several months now, at the time. A Senior Justice is basically aging and can keep his "Lifetime" appointment and salary by keeping on at one third the workload, as supervised by the Chief Judge - Mr. ROBERTS.

Additionally, Mr. KAHN (derivation of COHEN/Priest) is a Senior Justice and has done or said nothing in the Albany Remand since he CLOSED it after clerk BAERMAN opened several USA v SEALED DEFENDANT NAMES garnishments. Then BAERMAN was cruelly replaced, with his biography page used for the Help Wanted Ad!

[Christopher Jonathan]

Hi All,

another update, got a second letter from the IRS stating they are now holding my 2018 tax return because they want to verify my income, income tax withholding, tax credits and business income. It says in the letter that they will contact me if they have any questions, and not to contact the IRS office in regards to this matter before 60 days. So much for the hope of this going smoothly lol

Anyone else have anything of the similar matter? I suppose I'll just wait and see what happens at this point. Thanks all

[lorne]

. In United States v. Rifen, 577 F.2d 1111 (8 th Cir. 1978), the court affirmed a conviction for willfully failing to file a return, rejecting the argument that Federal Reserve Notes are not subject to taxation. "Congress has declared Federal Reserve notes legal tender . . . and federal reserve notes are taxable dollars." Id. at 1112. The courts have rejected this argument on numerous occasions.

This is what you're looking for...

Contention: U.S. notes are not income.

Some assert that U.S. notes are not taxable income under the Revenue Acts of Congress; that a worker who redeems a paycheck in U.S. notes (lawful money) owes no federal tax on that income.

The LawRelevant Case Law:

United States v. Rickman, 638 F.2d 182, 184 (10 th Cir. 1980) - Court affirms "that Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender and are redeemable in lawful money."

Milam v. United States, Appellees, 524 F.2d 629 (9th Cir. 1974) - Holder of $50 Federal Reserve Note sought to require Federal Reserve board to redeem the note in gold or silver. Court affirms that "Appellant is entitled to redeem his note, but not in precious metal."

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/524/629/430631/

United States v. Condo, 741 F.2d 238, 239 (9 th Cir. 1984) - Taxpayer argued that receipt of Federal Reserve Notes did not constitute "income", the bass ackwards argument of Contention above. Of course FRNs are taxable. George Mercer wrote a letter to taxpayer Armen Condo who was highly unreceptive, continued using FRNs, and the court upheld his criminal conviction.

https://famguardian.org/Publications/InvisibleContracts/ArmenCondoLetter.htm

Conclusion: True

[David Merrill]

Hi All,

another update, got a second letter from the IRS stating they are now holding my 2018 tax return because they want to verify my income, income tax withholding, tax credits and business income. It says in the letter that they will contact me if they have any questions, and not to contact the IRS office in regards to this matter before 60 days. So much for the hope of this going smoothly lol

Anyone else have anything of the similar matter? I suppose I'll just wait and see what happens at this point. Thanks all

My suspicion lately is that the DoJ is keeping tabs here and the Albany Remand, seeing that we have no judicial oversight to run to - except maybe the Dragon Court (NEPHALIM) and then maybe above that, the Truth. So they are experimenting.

This is what you're looking for...

Contention: U.S. notes are not income.

Some assert that U.S. notes are not taxable income under the Revenue Acts of Congress; that a worker who redeems a paycheck in U.S. notes (lawful money) owes no federal tax on that income.

The LawRelevant Case Law:

United States v. Rickman, 638 F.2d 182, 184 (10 th Cir. 1980) - Court affirms "that Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender and are redeemable in lawful money."

Milam v. United States, Appellees, 524 F.2d 629 (9th Cir. 1974) - Holder of $50 Federal Reserve Note sought to require Federal Reserve board to redeem the note in gold or silver. Court affirms that "Appellant is entitled to redeem his note, but not in precious metal."

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/524/629/430631/

United States v. Condo, 741 F.2d 238, 239 (9 th Cir. 1984) - Taxpayer argued that receipt of Federal Reserve Notes did not constitute "income", the bass ackwards argument of Contention above. Of course FRNs are taxable. George Mercer wrote a letter to taxpayer Armen Condo who was highly unreceptive, continued using FRNs, and the court upheld his criminal conviction.

https://famguardian.org/Publications/InvisibleContracts/ArmenCondoLetter.htm

Conclusion: True

I am copying this post over to What does the IRS agent think?

[LearnTheLaw]

There is a yearly renewal for Gold and Silver. Bronze is free and provides some extra reading and videos beyond Visitor. The Lesson Plan as a suitor on the brain trust is independent of the yearly renewal costs for Lawful Money Trust dot COM.

Step 2 of the Lesson Plan is mastering a special skill - Refusal for Cause. The right of refusal.

• true identity
• record forming - Refusal for Cause
• redeeming lawful money

I mention that because it is usually the part that takes a while. So a new suitor might forget if there are no presentments and I am glad to help and remind indefinitely over the years. With folks like mentioned herein enjoying no income tax I have realized my true value as First Redeemer and Trustee of the Resulting Trust too, in my geopolitical social engineering.

If a suitor wants to be joindered into the Albany Remand I will discount the $2K price by what I have already charged that particular suitor. But that is only if I can utilize that suitor's character or circumstances strategically. For example Michael James is geographically strategic with Castle Church and the garnishment on Steven Terner MNUCHIN as US Governor of the IMF (UN) triggered restructure in bankruptcy of the US Government. Basically a "You're Fired!" notification from reality TV.

Some of the Rectification of Judiciary is going into effect very well.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5347[/ATTACH]

The State of Colorado has corrected the Form of Oath too.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5348[/ATTACH]

So the brain trust is fetching entertainment plus a feeling of inclusion with making changes in the evolution of human development.

Thank you...

[Christopher Jonathan]

My suspicion lately is that the DoJ is keeping tabs here and the Albany Remand, seeing that we have no judicial oversight to run to - except maybe the Dragon Court (NEPHALIM) and then maybe above that, the Truth. So they are experimenting.



I am copying this post over to What does the IRS agent think?

[lorne]

Quick update, Looks like my state refund was approved a couple weeks ago, the check magically showed up in my USC checking Acct in Wells Fargo,

As the refunds come in from TY2018 lawful money tax returns, remember the website that helped you and consider the DONATE button up top. Thanks!