Certificate of Origin

[xparte]

your papers please paranoiac states or Alternative forms not if a DRIVER underwriting a NAME if its not worth doing its not worth doing well . Secular separation how may we ADDRESS you.

[David Merrill]

The paperwork once presumptive now is trust. David identify the trust but NEVER A Driver. since this MERRILL DAVID is a variance of your Christian Name upper cased denotes a living trust estate trust. This conveyance is plated and registered the traffic stop LEO collects this electronically onboard. Then the engagement the survey are you MERRILL DAVID Vehicle Trust but VAN PELT DAVID MERRILL identifies a DRIVER .The registered owner identified No DRIVER identification presented . The signature is David Merrill. NOT DBA the DRIVER OR THE TRUST

I think that I see it. I like the "living trust estate trust" in DAVID MERRILL. Here are some clips that help:

That is incomplete but helps get an idea of living trust expression. However the very term can be its definition: Trust as a Living Idea. Trusts and estates are the idea around an object. The book belonged to my mother. She left it to me in trust. She also told me about my heritage, extensive research into our family tree, trusting that the knowledge might live on through me.

Now what you touch upon can come alive in a variety of interpretations. And I doubt I have the same one you intend but I love to play around with ideas here. Then take the ideas into execution with new suitors and at www.lawfulmoneytrust.com because if I were to invest tuition and time into a law degree then I would be entrusted to become licensed and therefore the use of the intellectual property of the Bar would still be owned by the Square Mile:

In summary, the instant metaphysic is that a charge arises from a breach of trust, and that creates the construction of the TRUST. To actually have a heart beating and breathing lungs within the constructive trust - a living trust - is one of those obvious things, so blatant it seems like I awaken from a dream. And I realize that I have never thought of it before you mentioned it like this.

Living trust, to me extended to the idea that somebody can trust somebody with Power of Attorney and that trust can override a written Executorship, should the executor be rediculous; like living in a far off state or that age has made the executor feeble of mind since the signing. Trust living on in the trustee...

The instant metaphysic of a constructive trust arising from a breach of the peace and dignity of the state. That trust has wrists for handcuffs and arises from the breach because now a charge of debt (death/doubt) arises out of broken statute. LIVING TRUST.

Therefore the clerk of court, during this Shutdown cannot accept a marked bill:

Therefore it looks like a $400 theft; but is actually honoring the law boundary? I wonder who fished the redemption out of the wastepaper basket!

[xparte]

applicants not arrested for, charged with, or convicted of a criminal offence.

In summary, the instant metaphysic is that a charge arises from a breach of trust, and that creates the construction of the TRUST. To actually have a heart beating and breathing lungs within the constructive trust - a living trust - is one of those obvious things, so blatant it seems like I awaken from a dream. And I realize that I have never thought of it before you mentioned it like this.

Living trust, to me extended to the idea that somebody can trust somebody with Power of Attorney and that trust can override a written Executorship, should the executor be rediculous; like living in a far off state or that age has made the executor feeble of mind since the signing. Trust living on in the trustee...

The instant metaphysic of a constructive trust arising from a breach of the peace and dignity of the state. That trust has wrists for handcuffs and arises from the breach because now a charge of debt (death/doubt) arises out of broken statute. LIVING TRUST.

Therefore the clerk of court, during this Shutdown cannot accept a marked bill:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5049[/ATTACH]

Therefore it looks like a $400 theft; but is actually honoring the law boundary? I wonder who fished the redemption out of the wastepaper basket!

[David Merrill]

depends on the circuit in which the
bankruptcy case is pending.Therefore the clerk of court, during this Shutdown cannot accept a marked bill: Government Pass Thats spiking the buckle gringo .

Took a day or two but I get it.

KEY is Five. Four personal bankruptcies and then the fifth was that he gave the property to a dummy. So who is to decide if he is cleared for another personal bankruptcy or he has to wait seven years? The Fox? Or the Hen-house?

The front man running interference is Angela CAESAR, the clerk of court for the USDC in DC. Now that the US cannot declare another bankruptcy for seven years (Deuteronomy 15:1-3) her job publishing these garnishments seems a much bigger burden.

What is in the red box?

It is a full circle alright. Back in the 1995 31-Day Government Shutdown though, I was calling the Redeemed - "Man on the Land" and expressing the Law of the Flag at Exodus 13:16.



So a new suitor files that Defendant MNUCHIN as principal for the Collections IRS/MASON judiciary must file in the USDC prior to exercising a claim to the Man/Redeemed has her simply pocketing the $400? Just because it is US Notes in the form of FRN's? Interesting! Maybe she just sent it to the Treasury to be destroyed? I can see that Angela might have her hands full with no "judge" to take the fall. Silence from the US Circuit speaks volumes.

[xparte]

Insolvency notes just taken out of service .

Took a day or two but I get it.

KEY is Five. Four personal bankruptcies and then the fifth was that he gave the property to a dummy. So who is to decide if he is cleared for another personal bankruptcy or he has to wait seven years? The Fox? Or the Hen-house?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5053[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5051[/ATTACH]

The front man running interference is Angela CAESAR, the clerk of court for the USDC in DC. Now that the US cannot declare another bankruptcy for seven years (Deuteronomy 15:1-3) her job publishing these garnishments seems a much bigger burden.

What is in the red box?

It is a full circle alright. Back in the 1995 31-Day Government Shutdown though, I was calling the Redeemed - "Man on the Land" and expressing the Law of the Flag at Exodus 13:16.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5056[/ATTACH]

So a new suitor files that Defendant MNUCHIN as principal for the Collections IRS/MASON judiciary must file in the USDC prior to exercising a claim to the Man/Redeemed has her simply pocketing the $400? Just because it is US Notes in the form of FRN's? Interesting! Maybe she just sent it to the Treasury to be destroyed? I can see that Angela might have her hands full with no "judge" to take the fall. Silence from the US Circuit speaks volumes.

Many municipal corporations (city, county, state) have quietly chosen to operate without malpractice bonding in violation of state corporate public hazard bonding laws CEO Trumps\ all three (city, county, state) When its a contract LTD or its a incorporated trust Inc. When liability is limited. Inc is built in. The charges accommodate the trust. As unique as it is its legal .

[David Merrill]

Like this? As I understand it, the defendant has to bond the case!

[xparte]

[David Merrill]

Thank you for the skinny about all those bonds. That is interesting reading.

I have a suitor who many years ago had Pete HENDRICKSON stay with him to coach him through some very tired and worn out arguments. He paid the assessment for his day in the district court. He lost his assessment as the "judge" agreed with the IRS about the assessment.

I think that is what I am talking about regarding bonding. If I go into court I am expecting that the "judge" will be practicing law and the clerk will be executing the rules of court as they are published.

It is that my Mind overrules. At least that is how it feels, so much that it convinces me. Without any creative authority as I realize the nature of the "SO HELP ME GOD." deviance on the federal oaths, it comes into play that way. The clerk is reading these filings and believing me, that there are no judicial officers. The clerk probably asks the "judges" why their oaths are different than that prescribed by law. So the "judge" tells the clerk - "You know that we, the Judges are your boss, right?"

The clerk has a conundrum to ponder. If the Judge was bonded, then he would be in authority as a judge, but it is the clerk who enters it into the Records of the Court and who publishes that Record on PACER. So now a suitor has sent $400 and no refund, no explanation. It looks like maybe the clerk assigned a case # and was threatened:



Another suitor did some searching through the rules and there are methods to Strike or Reverse utterances but the docket report must reflect the truth.

a notation will be made on the docket to alert counsel and parties of the outcome
Thanks for all the information you are providing us with.
breach of trust by clerk; govt. shut down allowed TRUMP and MNUCHIN used it to get out of personal garnishment.

So the clerk is being threatened if he or she executes process of garnishment and summons?

A suitor is being promised papers refused by a "motions judge" will be returned to him in the mail. But that trial judge is not the judge named who refused to touch it:

09/11/2017 1
NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT UNDER RULE B(1)(c) ( Filing fee $ 47.00 receipt number 4616087109) by TRUE NAME (zsb) Modified on 9/15/2017 document contains personal data (zrdj). (Entered: 09/13/2017)
09/27/2017 2
NOTICE of Proof of Delivery by TRUE NAME (zsb) (Entered: 10/04/2017)
10/31/2017 3
NOTICE of Garnishment Rule B(1)(c), Refusal for Cause by TRUE NAME. (md) (Entered: 11/19/2017)
11/30/2017 4
NOTICE of Garnishment Rule B(1)(c), Refusal for Cause by TRUE NAME. (md) (Entered: 12/08/2017)
12/08/2017 5
NOTICE of Refusal for Cause by TRUE NAME. (md) (Entered: 12/08/2017)
12/12/2017 ENTERED IN ERROR.....Case Reassigned to Judge John D. Bates. Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (md) Modified on 12/12/2017 (md). (Entered: 12/12/2017)
12/12/2017 Case Reassigned to Unassigned. Judge John D. Bates is no longer assigned to the case. (md) (Entered: 12/12/2017)

The "Motions Judge" will not put anything in writing or even allow his name onto the docket report! You can't make this stuff up!

[shikamaru]

Living trusts do not protect one from creditors. It does enable one to avoid probate, but not estate taxes.

The best protection from creditors, in my opinion, are to utilize yourself as a private bank and to keep your debts low or non-existent with various vendors and creditors.