Coresource Solution - attempts to disclose from man on the land since 1968

[motla68]

If the Registered Owner is CQVT, a creation of and in the State; and, the Rights of Use = Property is registered IN the State and the Survey is also registered IN the State then the Seal of Authority is the State Seal; therefore nothing has left the State - IN REGARD TO - Property. What is Property again? - Right of Use.

Trust Model

The Property is not the Form of Matter.

Beautifully written MJ, I enjoyed the separation in thought here:
" The Legal Title manages the Rights of Use or manages the Property. And the Equitable Title Uses the Right of Use or Uses the Property.
The Equitable Title is in the Registered Owner. And the State, as Trustee issues a Certificate of Title upon the Registered Owner. Now the Registered Owner may transfer the Right of Use into another Trust; yet the management of the Right of Use never leaves the State! "

Within the statutes the name though the name on the Certificate of Title is the one with Beneficial interest. For us to be this we would have to consent to being a statutory employee, so who owns the Person, the seal for the name on the COLB is the birth state. Someone in our study group found in canada statutes the registrar general is the one with signing authority of the name, this makes sense in linking it to the following post: http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...&p=515#post515
You are correct in the sense of right to Equitable use though, but that right is not by any of man's forms, this is where the unalienable natural law comes in: Genesis 1:26 - 28

True man and paper our inheritable separate, but what we do in providing for the society is for the benefit of all just as what others do has an effect on us on the natural law side of things.

In reference to the above biblical verses quoted:
HEIR. One born in lawful matrimony, who succeeds by descent, and right of blood, to lands, tenements or hereditaments, being an estate of inheritance. It is an established rule of law, that God alone can make an heir.
1856 Bouviers Dictionary

We have found some key areas where the bible scriptures are hidden within such as the above example.
Also as we are connected through Natural Law, we are godhead over the creations that took from the natural resources of our inheritance:

Psalms 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.

But not godhead over each other:

Deuteronomy 6:14 Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you;

Underneath the masks of persona we are all the same. When one strips themselves of these things and stands upon peace being the "first" in "giving" the other opportunity to settle honorably, good things happen. From giving comes forgiveness. This is difficult for many to do because are Ego has been trained so long to fight.
MJ, you have learned this yourself not long ago from what I remember, you made peace and used the given names without paper or plastic.

Have a blessed evening.

[David Merrill]

Utility has its demands. Law is mathematics, the study of reproducible mental objects...

I have heard echo from a couple people who do not believe in Private Law, but we do it all the time, but break it as well. Someone shares with you an amicable agreement in private, now that is law, somehow in your dealing with each other you cannot not agree on a particular thing so you bring it to a third party, you could have chose one man in confidence as a mediator in private, BUT you bring it into a Public Court instead. When private matters are brought into the public it is telling the court that you are not competent enough to settle this in private so now you are here and have to deal with our rules of how this will turnout.

I always insist on handling things in the private first and I let them (the DA and court know it), before coming down to meet the appointment of summons I announce my visit and for what purpose I am there by notice through the mail, then when I arrive it is just then a simple matter of doing what I said i was going to do in asking them to settle honorably " in private " before it is brought into public where they could be exposed to public scrutiny as well as i. If you really operate as a peaceful inhabitant and have this intent, things go much more smoothly.
So none of this has to do with public court room rules or procedures, it is a private amicable
agreement settled in private for some ticket a dumb ass cop made a public matter to put it bluntly.

PRIVATE. Not general, as a private act of the legislature; not in office;
as, a private person, as well as an officer, may arrest a felon; individual,
as your private interest; not public, as a private way, a private nuisance.
- 1856 Bouviers Dictionary

I cannot show you what i had wrapped in that paper, but I can tell you about it again.

- Robin-egg blue paper, wrapped 4 fold.

- Inside what was wrapped:

1. printout from online showing the certified mail previously delivered by notice of my visit and purpose for me being there.

2. copy of presentment (ticket) that had CS language written upon it that was sent in with the notice by certified mail.

3. copy of instrument printed out from the DMV that the vehicle was registered with the state.
( nothing i wrote on it)

4. copy of Birth Certificate

- All 4 sheets were stapled together.

The CS language written on the presentment is mentioned several times in the audio files on our talkshoe group, go there to hear "why" you would put this on the presentment.

Does this help any at all? If not then I guess we are done.

Contents of the blue paper in this forum:

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?166-Deposit-Your-Pledge-Into-a-Bank-and-Freely-Elect-to-be-Bankrupt-and-Insolvent&p=1256&viewfull=1#post1256

Canon 1557

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll must always be on robin-egg blue paper in recognition and respect of its status as a Divine Notice with the full authority of One Heaven, in particular the Sacred Rota and twelve Apostolic Prothonotaries as well as Apostolic Prothorabban of the Divine Sanhedrin.

Canon 1563

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll must always be on robin-egg blue paper and glued strongly to the reverse of a copy of the 1st page of any notice, demand, summons sent by the inferior Roman Person.

There is other authority we are researching, it is not complete yet so cannot show that part.

Tell me what part of this is hiding anything and not telling you why?

The New Covenant begins with a formative treatise by an Occupation Tax collector named Matthew. The Epistles are from the formation of the Roman Welfare State by a man named Shaul; who renamed himself Paul. There was an intentional canonization and encryption as the Babylonian Talmud took on written form, from the oral law. Rather than enter upon the same Mantra and Schism, let's communicate about this. Sunday school may be oriented around Denial, but you will have to face these facts sooner or later if you like anything about the Coresource Solution at all.

Motla68 might have just shown us what is in the blue envelope! His behavior is in my opinion that of a man who believes he can see glimpses, but those that showed him those glimpses convinced him these are true; just did not equip him with the tools to convince others. But from the quotes attached we discern that he knows more than he will teach us here and that has led to rejection. - The proverbial throwing out of the baby with the bathwater!

Some tools lost to the mythology along The Way:

But that is only a snippet from Click Here.

Would it make sense to anybody that the Roman Catholic Church, canonizing through a Masonic King James (1611) would develop naturally from Paul's craven quest to save his own hide, from his own lack of faith? He spent the last five years of his life hiding from his own kinsman (the Sanhedrin) who wanted to kill him over his Roman citizenship.

Therefore I think rather than to ignore Motla68, censorship, moderation, banishment, ostracism... We might simply pursuade him it is the brain trust he might be more interested in. Literally a party in interest by sharing the template in the robin egg-blue wrapper.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[shikamaru]

If all property is vested in the State, this is Communism.

[David Merrill]

If all property is vested in the State, this is Communism.

When there is government, an organization to protect the property rights, then there is no other choice. It must have a registry of the properties it is to protect. That is the direction I want the Property Tax thread to get back to eventually, after exhausing the other possibilities. - Privately pay the mill tax on the services you would like, selecting them from last year's CAFR.

That topic btw took some wonderful turns on the "private" brain trust side - email broadcasts. I will likely bring some Crosstalk back into that thread here to produce some more development here.

[Anthony Joseph]

When there is government, an organization to protect the property rights, then there is no other choice. It must have a registry of the properties it is to protect. That is the direction I want the Property Tax thread to get back to eventually, after exhausing the other possibilities. - Privately pay the mill tax on the services you would like, selecting them from last year's CAFR.

That topic btw took some wonderful turns on the "private" brain trust side - email broadcasts. I will likely bring some Crosstalk back into that thread here to produce some more development here.

No other choice in that "governement" has been recognized, accepted and chosen as the protecting mechanism of what we stake claims to. My opinion is that the "government" is a dual role capacity formation; it will either charitably protect the interests and claims of self-governing and competent men inhabiting the land in peace, or it will accept the pledge of those who take on the role and subject character of "resident" or "citizen" from within that formation. It will gather, harness and harvest the labor, property, energy and sweat equity of all "willing volunteers" onto itself and be the controller of and over these "volunteer pledgers" and their property/substance.

The main nexus to becoming a "pledger" is signature endorsement of the private credit of the FED; Franklin Delano ROOSEVELT's "NEW DEAL". He even admitted that the people would need to be "persuaded" to "deposit their salary checks in new accounts" in order to make "progress". This reveals the voluntary nature of endorsing private credit, although the "persuasion" has taken on the form of intentional deception, dishonor, concealment and bully tactics upon the unsuspecting populace who are conditioned and trained by the government-controlled public school system, society and culture to accept "being a pledger" as normative and patriotic. These lies are disguised as truth and the ruse begins at the very moment a child is born. Then, they are taught and conditioned to be a "good pledger" their entire life.

[David Merrill]

No other choice in that "governement" has been recognized, accepted and chosen as the protecting mechanism of what we stake claims to. My opinion is that the "government" is a dual role capacity formation; it will either charitably protect the interests and claims of self-governing and competent men inhabiting the land in peace, or it will accept the pledge of those who take on the role and subject character of "resident" or "citizen" from within that formation. It will gather, harness and harvest the labor, property, energy and sweat equity of all "willing volunteers" onto itself and be the controller of and over these "volunteer pledgers" and their property/substance.

The main nexus to becoming a "pledger" is signature endorsement of the private credit of the FED; Franklin Delano ROOSEVELT's "NEW DEAL". He even admitted that the people would need to be "persuaded" to "deposit their salary checks in new accounts" in order to make "progress". This reveals the voluntary nature of endorsing private credit, although the "persuasion" has taken on the form of intentional deception, dishonor, concealment and bully tactics upon the unsuspecting populace who are conditioned and trained by the government-controlled public school system, society and culture to accept "being a pledger" as normative and patriotic. These lies are disguised as truth and the ruse begins at the very moment a child is born. Then, they are taught and conditioned to be a "good pledger" their entire life.

Reading that, I believe readers may understand why I become agitated with Motla68 for asserting that there is some kind of extra accounting going on. The SDR's are based in that conditioning our entire lives.

[motla68]

The main nexus to becoming a "pledger" is signature endorsement of the private credit of the FED; Franklin Delano ROOSEVELT's "NEW DEAL". He even admitted that the people would need to be "persuaded" to "deposit their salary checks in new accounts" in order to make "progress". This reveals the voluntary nature of endorsing private credit, although the "persuasion" has taken on the form of intentional deception, dishonor, concealment and bully tactics upon the unsuspecting populace who are conditioned and trained by the government-controlled public school system, society and culture to accept "being a pledger" as normative and patriotic. These lies are disguised as truth and the ruse begins at the very moment a child is born. Then, they are taught and conditioned to be a "good pledger" their entire life.

See, you guys have bits and pieces of the truth. This is good. The whole idea of authenticating the Certificate of Live Birth in which we now have a new link found to get this done:

http://www.state.gov/m/a/auth/

It is to obtain the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt from their own hand, that we are not the pledger, it is they who signed and authorized the instrument who are the pledger.
This was another linkage to the Paderford vs. City of Savannah case where it shows " only states have a right to complain " and that we were not a party to the constitution,
Natural law vs. Social contract.

[David Merrill]

See, you guys have bits and pieces of the truth. This is good. The whole idea of authenticating the Certificate of Live Birth in which we now have a new link found to get this done:

http://www.state.gov/m/a/auth/

It is to obtain the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt from their own hand, that we are not the pledger, it is they who signed and authorized the instrument who are the pledger.
This was another linkage to the Paderford vs. City of Savannah case where it shows " only states have a right to complain " and that we were not a party to the constitution,
Natural law vs. Social contract.

I have to hand it to the members here. We are patient enough with your arrogance to set still while Coresource Solutions attempts to teach us how to learn. 200 Posts and that is what your explanation is Motla68; you are so wise that you offer us links so we might learn to fish and feed ourselves.

[motla68]

I have to hand it to the members here. We are patient enough with your arrogance to set still while Coresource Solutions attempts to teach us how to learn. 200 Posts and that is what your explanation is Motla68; you are so wise that you offer us links so we might learn to fish and feed ourselves.

No, arrogance is not the intent here and No I do not put myself above you all in inequality. I am sharing with you my own experience of what I have learned through hard work and due diligence of my own. Do you recall the saying I have mentioned here before, that goes something like this: " Feed a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he eats for life " ?
It does an injustice upon humanity to just show you something, but if I can help people bust out of the molded box that men of power and control have created for them to keep them distracted of who they really are then I have succeeded in becoming one who has pleased his creator most high.

[Anthony Joseph]

See, you guys have bits and pieces of the truth. This is good. The whole idea of authenticating the Certificate of Live Birth in which we now have a new link found to get this done:

http://www.state.gov/m/a/auth/

It is to obtain the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt from their own hand, that we are not the pledger, it is they who signed and authorized the instrument who are the pledger.
This was another linkage to the Paderford vs. City of Savannah case where it shows " only states have a right to complain " and that we were not a party to the constitution,
Natural law vs. Social contract.

Please explain why there is the requirement, in your opinion, that the "Certificate of Live Birth" be "authenticated" as the only means to prove or show that we never intended to be, or are no longer volunteering or acquiescing to the character of, the "pledger".

Why isn't are own declared, properly formed and recorded testimony enough to rebut that presumption?

[motla68]

Please explain why there is the requirement, in your opinion, that the "Certificate of Live Birth" be "authenticated" as the only means to prove or show that we never intended to be, or are no longer volunteering or acquiescing to the character of, the "pledger".

Why isn't are own declared, properly formed and recorded testimony enough to rebut that presumption?

It is not necessarily required, but is sure nice to have when you go in to inform the probate court or similar authority of your election in what you say is backed by their boss's mouth. You know how they like that word " Frivolous" .
In most everything I do am sure to have some kind of back up plan in case things take a turn for the worse, do not ever forget that. Even though we do what we do and have a belief in it, we suggest having silver bullion on hand just in case the system completely crashes before the mistake is corrected with everyone.

[David Merrill]

There is no such presumption to defeat. It is only the demand for lawful money that plays process in the Coresource Solution:

[motla68]

There is no such presumption to defeat. It is only the demand for lawful money that plays process in the Coresource Solution:

This is only one small piece of it, you are missing the big picture at large. Somehow the new guy in the group gets it but you do not. You were headed in the right direction with the elections and that it is all a religious ceremonial for them, but now your back to trying to put Coresource Solution back in a box and label it like a government would do to try and define it for some personal EGO.
Maybe the posts on natural law versus social contract law had made something click for you a little bit there, you might need to go back to that and see where you got lost at.
Go back to learning the distinctions how one benefits one and the other benefits the other.
I am ineligible for the benefits of social contract law but natural law is inherited upon my arrival on this earth.

[David Merrill]

This is only one small piece of it, you are missing the big picture at large. Somehow the new guy in the group gets it but you do not. You were headed in the right direction with the elections and that it is all a religious ceremonial for them, but now your back to trying to put Coresource Solution back in a box and label it like a government would do to try and define it for some personal EGO.
Maybe the posts on natural law versus social contract law had made something click for you a little bit there, you might need to go back to that and see where you got lost at.
Go back to learning the distinctions how one benefits one and the other benefits the other.
I am ineligible for the benefits of social contract law but natural law is inherited upon my arrival on this earth.

Incorrect. I am not missing the picture at all. I keep correcting your error with that official letter. That letter is real, and you should use it for a reality check Motla68.

You sent a papering package to your local sheriff with a contribution so he set it on his desk for a few weeks not knowing what to do with it. Since you sent money with it he thought it was disrespectful to just throw it out. When you met him and explained, that just meant it was okay to throw it out, now that you had negated its effect in law by verbal novation.

You are the one who is not getting the picture.

But I have to thank you for being you Motla68! You are the prodding that promoted this thread about Property Tax. It is now obvious to see how big of a breakthrough I am thanking you for showing me with your experimentation four years ago!

I am not putting Coresource Solution back into a box. It does not exist to me. There is nothing to put back into the box. You are keeping Coresource Solution secret by not revealing the actual documentation on the sheriff's desk, or whatever the contents are in the robin egg-blue wrapping paper. [Do you actually expect that the DA has studied Canon Law to the extent he understands it is in full force and effect?]

The remedy you keep confusing with Coresource Solution was written into the Fed Act in 1913. Coresource Solution actually uses it and another thing you taught me is that the remedy is the same for Australia. Thank you again. Coresource Solution is the baby of Robert Arthur MENARD and all you need to do is look where it got him - nowhere.

Robert Arthur Menard of North Vancouver has been prohibited by the Supreme Court from appearing as counsel, preparing documents for use in proceedings, and identifying himself in any way that suggests he is a lawyer. He was also ordered to pay costs.

[motla68]

For all who are interested one of Coresource Solution's methods works like the idea of the Privy Purse. Some people cannot wrap their head around the indemnification process of depositing receipts which causes and increase of assets in the Treasury thus one becomes indemnified of the expenses. Let look at it from another angle, when on increases the assets of a Privy Purse then one becomes indemnified of expenses, such as depositing a house into it then the Privy Purse takes care of the expense of things such as Leaky Roofs.

Read about the Privy Purse here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_Purse

The next article you will read here is about a Windsor Estate whom is still under Siege much like here in the states under Lincoln's Army was able to get their Leaky Roofs repaired:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/bu...pagewanted=all

If you take an interest in this to want to learn more about it, then PM me and I can give you some additional resource to research the subject.