I am some dude latest recording Boris and usufruct

[allodial]

The voice she was hearing could have been a projection of those who were experimenting on her and the true purpose of the experiment to see how people could be made susceptible to cranial voice projections using drugs. When someone sets out on an experiment with the intent prove something wrong or with such strong bias, it is questionable: amoral (souless?) men with an amoral (souless?) purpose can likely produce nothing worthy of a sound mind adhering to. Furthermore, a godform or egregore is something men create not necessarily something the Most High creates. As in an entity created by men isn't necessarily of the same rank as an entity created by the Most High. From what I gather, futurists are the ones who insist John wrote Revelations AFTER 70 A.D. An attack on Revelations would AFAIK be an attack on Daniel, Ezekiel, etc.

Most of the people I knew who were going into pyschiatry (as students) believed they themselves were crazy and felt it to be a great career at figuring out themselves or hiding their insanity. Most of the psychiatrist or psychology professionals I have met have evidenced severe neurosis, God Complex or megalomania. Its well known in the medical industry that high level medical professionals often have a God Complex.

Give some men drugs or basic science (i.e voodoo, mesmerism, etc.) for manipulating people to do and some of them may think themselves to be God. The irony, for the atheist or the satanists ultimate self-evident proof of godhood is in the manipulation and control over other men--what does that tell us?

Related:
The Philip Experiment

[Michael Joseph]

So USUFRUCT begs the enjoyable use of another's property absent waste if perfect. So there are two aspects which must be considered the property and the right of use to enjoy. Consider notes in circulation. Do not those who makes its use enjoy the benefits of its use? Do these who make it's use own the notes? The answer is clearly no.

Are the notes money? According to all the research I have set my mind upon, the answer is no. But they can be! These function as "bills in circulation" or "promissory notes" or "bills of exchange" but not as money.....UNLESS the user makes claim. One must make a demand for lawful money to get lawful money.

If one qualifies for Social Security benefits but makes no claim, then those benefits are not coming. Who holds the legal title to those benefits? Clearly it is not the private man or woman. So then lets be very clear, the trustee holds legal title which is a way of saying the beneficiary has an equitable interest in the trustee! In other words, if a claim issues [demand for performance] upon the trustee in accord with the trust agreement, then the trustee is duty bound to perform.

PROPERTY is not THING. The object or form is not property! For instance a truck is not Property! Property is the subject of Rights and Interests in a Thing. Therefore the object of property can be a thing but the thing is not property! This is very important to comprehend. Before one has an intelligent discussion concerning Usufruct one must first define the things upon which is the concern of Property.

Then one must determine is the usufruct perfect or imperfect.

In order to do the foregoing one must determine two questions:

1. Specifically what is it that is desired?
2. How will one know when one has it?

Otherwise the argument is too vague. I wonder if no possessions can even be imagined?

How to Lose Property:

PROPERTY 10. - 1. It is lost by the act of man by, 1st. Alienation; but in order to do this, the owner must have a legal capacity to make a contract. 2d. By the voluntary abandonment of the thing; but unless the abandonment be purely voluntary, the title to the property is not lost; as, if things be thrown into the sea to save the ship, the right is not lost. Poth. h. t., n. 270; 3 Toull. ii. 346. But even a voluntary abandonment does not deprive the former owner from taking possessiou of the thing abandoned, at any time before another takes possession of it.


Comment: If one makes a use of notes to gain a purchase then the possession is in usufruct for the one who made the purchase made a use of another's property to gain an enjoyment of a thing or form.

It is obvious even to a casual observer that all property remains within the State and it is impossible for property to be alienated without the State once it enters into the Registry. If a numbered legal name was used to make a purchase then there may exist no capacity even to contract. There is only grantor/grantee.

"You can check in anytime you want but you can never leave....." or

Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

===========

Now consider what we have is sets within sets or subsets of sets. So the Right to Enjoy is the right to possess and make a use of property. There is a set which holds all the foregoing terms and it is in RIGHT. And Rights are the subject of Law and therefore at its crux is Morality and Justice.

Therefore a Legal Right in one corresponds to a Legal Duty in another. Therefore rights beg an entitlement to something. And therefore Rights being the subject of Law beg Trust.

===========

One day, hopefully, men will not need a Moral Code written in order to secure morality.


Best Regards,
MJ

[David Merrill]

Voluntary abandonment of rights. - DEBT.

You cannot fight your way off the battlefield - buying off debt with more debt.



Allodial: the theory you propose supposes that ACIM was pre-written and projected upon Helen. This would be a lot of trouble rather than cause and effect being the largest egregore around is prayed into existence, by men and women. Not so much theory though...

acoustic flaw detection 1966.pdf

I will never read ACIM alone - only in a group of people who seem to be looking for truth. This is the best interpretation for me and of course I perceive what I project into it. What I get though is the same Jesus of the Holy Bible without the guilt trip laid upon the ministry by Abraham/Sarah's incest and of course Paul's Benjamite resulting sacrificial system of guilt appeasement.

This is akin to the "Slogans of Jesus" as I coin The Gospel of Thomas. A joy/peace based system without fear is much more effective prayer, in my opinion.

[BLBereans]

It all goes back to the lie in the Garden, culminating with the abomination of the Tower - the heresy of "cosmic humanism" means I AM God; there is no higher authority than ME. This is also at the heart of all who diminish or deny the fact that Jesus of Nazareth was/is God incarnate who came and was born into this world to do what NO MAN was capable of prior or would be capable of afterward - live a life absent sin.

Therefore, because of Him, God's only begotten (unique, special) Son, those who choose to believe in Him are redeemed and will have eternal life as co-rulers with Him in an end-of-the-age and earth wide Eden as per God's original intent.

Therefore the destructors of Christen-dom need the veneer of spirituality to be able better to change the world. That is why they use all these cults and beliefs.wholesale atheism can never be sold to most Americans, most of whom have some belief in God. (quoted from Donald S. McAlvany, The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, February 1996, p 3)




source





"Good job" John...

[David Merrill]

A good foundation is helpful...

The Laws of Moses.


Read along commentary in English.

[walter]

Authenticating a birth certificate is for proving its of official issue and that is for sending it to foreign countries. Using a hair-brained process to simply signal to the government that you're 'one of those' isn't recommended.

When one moves from one country to another to live full time the government requests the SOLB from your original birth jurisdiction. The country requiring it does not ask for it to be authenticated.
The country does not ask for a BC.
This is what I found out between Canada and the USA.
Authenticating the BC to be the holder in due course is hair-brained alright.
Its down right ridiculous.

[walter]

An edifying complimentary work is DMT - And the Soul of Prophecy by Dr. Rick STRASSMAN. Here is a careful examination of nearly every prophecy of the Bible in context of two years of injecting DMT into volunteers, in clinical study.

One misses the mark I believe with the tolerance issue, having to double up doses. I am suggesting access to a, maybe the most powerful Memory Cluster (egregore) ever - Jesus CHRIST. - A very powerful GodForm. One should understand that Helen was a respected psychiatrist in leadership of Columbia University's Psychiatric Department. The last thing she wanted or needed was a reputation-breaker like that she was haunted by Jesus. So all the dosage did was to allow a natural function of biblical prophecy on a daily basis.

Two years of injection of DMT....oh my...that is insane.
One think about DMT is the body does not build up tolerance to it because the pineal gland produces it naturally.
One could do back to back hits all day long and no tolerance level builds up. No side effects.
The first would be just as strong as the last.

There was a professor in UBC that would go out at lunch hour and smoke DMT in his car every day.
He did this for a long time before he got caught.

Things will start to happen to someone who ate LSD or mushrooms everyday for very long time periods.
Even if they are not getting ripped any more. The known effect and feeling.
Very subtle changes start to happen and if it was done unknowingly these changes could drive one crazy.
Little things would start to make then self present and if you gave them energy you will start to create another world for your self that people around don't see. If one didn't know of this happening then anything could be possible.

[Gavilan]

You know, the banksters already had experience hoisting up a credit system. For example http://www.reformation.org/secrets-o...k-of-rome.html

William Peterson had been successful in installing an usurious system in England.

What we are basically doing is reverse engineer his system, which I am sure he learnt from some ancient practice, most likely from the legacy of the priests of Mesopotamia that were in charge of the temples' wealth. Just like Joseph had done in Egypt, that made the people sell themselves into slavery.

My point is, existence is a zero sum game. The LORD'S law is perfect, something we may think is unjust, it will have to be balanced somehow.

For example, those benefiting from the great wealth accumulation from being in the peculiar position of being a beneficiary of the usurious scheme that is the Federal Reserve System, will eventually have to pay or account for it's unequitable gains.

Redeeming lawful money is just a simple way of helping them not keep accumulating unequitable gains that they will have to pay later.

One way they try to assuage their consciousness is by having defendants state their plea's made under a plea bargain agreement "knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. "

[David Merrill]

My point is, existence is a zero sum game.

This may be what I was looking for!

I thought of e=mc² as a tremendous expenditure of energy. I might be spending a lot of energy creating it all instead?

I see a traditional correction from BL Bereans; and appreciate that, but it comes across as appeasement - protectionism for a business plan that has long since failed.

[xparte]

In the very beginning, before Adam and Eve, Lucifer was able to enter into every living thing that GOD had ever created. GOD allowed this because GOD was full of love, and wanted his sons to be able to experience what it would be like to be a bird or a lion or even a tree. Before Adam there was human kind, these men and women new GOD , but they also knew that they would die, and go back into the dust of the earth . And Satan was even allowed to enter into them. These human kind were more like the ape men and women that the geologists keep digging up and hiding from you in museums basement's , just to cover up the real truth about our origins. These human kind were hairy and had reddish hair. Neanderthal;
These were the men and women that Cain was afraid would kill him. It was one of these Cain chose to be his wife. So now humankind was mixed with mankind, Immortality was no more. GOD cursed the seed line of Cain, and put the mark of death on their foreheads.



GOD made Adam and eve in his own image, They were man kind, and they were fair and beautiful.
And GOD made it clear to Satan , that he was never to enter into them, unless it was their FREE WILL for him to do so . Adam and Eve were given immortality and the opportunity to be in GOD and to love him of their own FREE WILL. And Adam understood that fair well.

Satan has stolen your past, and everything that GOD wanted for you that was good.
Adam And Eve The story metaphorically describes the transition of human beings into mankind perfectly. It also shows us the next step in our evolution. The step from mankind into spirit kind. The story of Adam and Eve has hidden things in it, but the overall message is how our minds were created. It describes how we joined with the devil/our controlling mind, and how we can turn this devil/mind back into an angel. Human being a monster or just rowdy not the image God was going for probably our modern day Scotch and Irish might be seeded down. Scotchman is just a lost Irishman. metaphorically speaking we were created in the image of God male and female they created us so there are female images of God and there are female images of an angel we are in many different forms some of us have wings some of us do not Satan rebelled against Adam because Adam was created in the image of God you have to understand the tax and Eve is the mother of all living meaning she birth the female image of an angel and the spirit realm just like women birth the image of a child female child that is you need to study about the angelic realm as in Proverbs 8 we were formed many billions of years ago that was a great rebellion because Satan had to bear bowing to Adam and bowing Eve because they were created in the image of God representing. Godfather. father God the mother ELOHIM and representing humankind that's why he was on the mission to deceive and corrupt mankind because we were at the representation of the angelic world? in a heaven Mankind has been corrupted with humankind I am parsing how Cain was so pride driven.His offspring were the monsters. Entertainment based coment its a flooded nation working its way back to the garden.

[Gavilan]

Great article on mixed jurisdictions

Mixed*jurisdictions : common law*vs*civil law (codified and uncodified)

http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/tetley.html

Puts a better perspective regarding the concept of Trusts vs Usufruct, in common law and civil law.

[allodial]

Voluntary abandonment of rights. - DEBT.

You cannot fight your way off the battlefield - buying off debt with more debt.

Thus the importance of bonding or redeeming money yourself. When you provide a means to pay them bringing you restitution, you, effectively, are forgiving them.

Allodial: the theory you propose supposes that ACIM was pre-written and projected upon Helen. This would be a lot of trouble rather than cause and effect being the largest egregore around is prayed into existence, by men and women. Not so much theory though...[/CENTER]

It wouldn't be much different from everyday ghostwriting. The Beatles as a front for Tavistock: the screaming, excited girls was a big pre-arranged scheme (the screaming girls had no idea who the Beatles were--it was all psychology). The Cain-Esau (Edom)-Babylon Combine doing anything and everything to facilitate dis-missal of Joshua/Yesha the Anointed. Jim Jones, etc. Men being used as fronts to promote ideologies which amount to PSYOPs seem to be about as old as prostitution really. But there were things they learned during the 30s that upped the game.

The teachings of Joshua/Yesha/Yeshua/Jesus weren't about guilt, but were about guiltlessness. If Babylon-Cain System purveyors were adept at using guilt and debt as a means of political control, they probably weren't keen to give that up so they would have brought the guilt upon themselves. Any system that promotes guiltlessness and enhances the means a man has to maintain dominion over his body would be a threat to those who thrive off of guilt, mistakes, suffering, blindness, would it not? On that note, the doctrine of coverture, similarly, has been widely rejected by women with dire consequences for them (with coverture, a wife couldn't endorse private credit or get into debt without the approval of her husband or an unmarried her father or brother--so coverture was sorely attacked).

So they attack the New Testament, doctrine of coverture which is also found in the OT:

He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler. Psa. 91:4

P.S. There are plenty of lucid books written between the 1850s and 1930s that are for more practical and pragmatic than ACIM.

[David Merrill]

In the very beginning, before Adam and Eve, Lucifer was able to enter into every living thing that GOD had ever created. GOD allowed this because GOD was full of love, and wanted his sons to be able to experience what it would be like to be a bird or a lion or even a tree.

I substitute "FEAR" into "Lucifer" in order to process your comment.

Thus the importance of bonding or redeeming money yourself. When you provide a means to pay them bringing you restitution, you, effectively, are forgiving them.

To truly trust and surrender one must overcome their fear of possible repercussions.

The teachings of Joshua/Yesha/Yeshua/Jesus weren't about guilt, but were about guiltlessness.

I agree. I enjoy what I coin, "Slogans of Jesus". This collection of Gospel logos called The Gospel of Thomas seems so pure of commercial priestcraft, I cannot help but to recommend it.

If Babylon-Cain System purveyors were adept at using guilt and debt as a means of political control, they probably weren't keen to give that up so they would have brought the guilt upon themselves. Any system that promotes guiltlessness and enhances the means a man has to maintain dominion over his body would be a threat to those who thrive off of guilt, mistakes, suffering, blindness, would it not?

I believe that too few Christians appreciate the cultural and political climate where Jesus was immersed. Jesus was being reclaimed by the exiled King of Israel, Archelaus HEROD - as an abandoned bastard heir. The Kingdom was a savior king reclaiming the condition of the King of David, prior to Nebuchadnezzar's conquest of the mind.

Interestingly the new trust was in the standard format. Nebuchadnezzar entered Israel in 604 BC and twenty years later took the Temple Mount.

[xparte]

ones fears of god is his truth yet our lucifer's pride is substitute no intentions to fear truth If Babylon-Cain System purveyors were adept at using guilt and debt as a means of political control, they probably weren't keen to give that up so they would have brought the guilt upon themselves. Any system that promotes guiltlessness and enhances the means a man has to maintain dominion over his body would be a threat to those who thrive off of guilt, mistakes, suffering, blindness, would it not? Yes then Success is our biggest fear yet we seem to thrive on each others fears mistakes, suffering, guilt by association To truly trust and surrender one must overcome their fear of possible repercussions. Success is guiltlessness a stockholm syndrome.handicap the guilt a measure of fear.not evident in lodi or merrill some captivating posts is why the syndrome works. How handicapping a compliment works [He is a great kisser for a hairlip/ Stanhope]

[David Merrill]

Success = I own everything.

I do.

When you stop thinking with conscious memory and trade it for cellular memory you might better understand that my owning everything effects your ownership of anything naught.

https://youtu.be/Tja6_h4lT6A?t=285