I am some dude latest recording Boris and usufruct

[george]

Great article on mixed jurisdictions

Mixed*jurisdictions : common law*vs*civil law (codified and uncodified)

http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/tetley.html

Puts a better perspective regarding the concept of Trusts vs Usufruct, in common law and civil law.

this connected a few dots for me. Im reading the reformation link now.

thanks

[David Merrill]

Yes! Thank you Gavilan! That looks like a worthwhile read. I hope to at least skim it today.


It reminds me about Proctor WISWALL and his paper for EBSWORTH & EBSWORTH a while back. I believe that aside from this link, the paper may have been scrubbed from the Internet.

Inquiry went hinky... Ms. WISWALL never responded further.

[xparte]

WE all looking for foundations lost that went deeper than Christian values not to be mistaken for religious foundations church or temple. fredrick would find a basis in the "will to power" that he described as "the essence of reality."
WILLPOWER that non dogmatic kit left in the garden with free will now being on without power .Manipulation starts with voice a infant is hungry or wet diapers he cries and a remedy appears at what point does baby just will the essence of his reality. crying to have his cigar lit find the remote with no knowledge of vice so what is it when kid cries even when his physical needs are met. Control seeded from birth not born in dogmatic sin but the foundation to manipulate is developing just the same our wilderness is full of wolves .NO MAN was capable of prior or would be capable of afterward - live a life absent sin.LB thats as good as it gets kristoffersen from rockin of the cradle rollin that hearse we are walking contradictions partly truth partly fiction the lonely way back home the garden state. no not jersey

[xparte]

Success is guiltlessness a stockholm syndrome.handicap the guilt a measure of fear. this fear is not evident in lodi or merrill some of their captivating posts is why the syndrome works for me.The best lessons one can learn are from imprisonment is if you view the world with golf ball inteligencia the ability to comprehend; to understand and profit from experience its success will be with a golf ball consciousness.Fearlessness When you stop thinking with conscious memory and trade it for cellular memory or expanding golf game you might better understand that my owning everything effects your ownership of anything naught.Levels of disharmonic truth owning fear shaking The labels "mind", "body" and "spirit" tombstones our legal shadows?

[Gavilan]

I had an interesting conversation with a gentleman from Bolivia, his trade is that one of a lawyer, he claims that he was trained in Spain.

Well, the point of the conversation was about the mixed jurisdictions, and he pointed out that American lawyers have much to be desired in their professional capacity, the adversarial system of litigation leaves them free to exploit their clients he told me. While in Civil law countries, they are placed under the burden of doing "inquisitorial" inquiries and making determinations in order to render "justice". He mentioned to me that under their civil law they had an obligation to "represent and assist the person".

Interestingly enough, I did a search for "represent and assist" and came up with this order from a county court of West Virginia:

http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/calendar/2014/briefs/sept14/12-1292order.pdf

Read that, and it will become clearly evident how a civil law state properly prosecutes a "person" under their jurisdiction. In that particular case the State of West Virginia through its prosecutor went after the person JUSTIN SEAN GUM for the murder of James Grove Gum, II.

[allodial]

I agree. I enjoy what I coin, "Slogans of Jesus". This collection of Gospel logos called The Gospel of Thomas seems so pure of commercial priestcraft, I cannot help but to recommend it.

There is organic priestcraft and there is commercial. Priestcraft may have at its foundations to do with requiring all rulers to tread carefully when dealing with men and thusly with souls to remember the limitations of their rulership lest they face wrath and indignation of God of Christ. Priest as one who makes a point to avoid being so entrenched in the mundane that he keeps the right perspectives as opposed to practitioners of secret rites whether sexual or otherwise (they get too immersed). The priest as his brother's keeper--in the sense of protecting their souls as if for God's own sake). Priest as consultant to the soul and encourager of placing limits on carnality.

I believe that too few Christians appreciate the cultural and political climate where Jesus was immersed. Jesus was being reclaimed by the exiled King of Israel, Archelaus HEROD ....

Simoniaism (Simon Magus and cohorts) and associated Romano-Babylon didn't want to make it too obvious to its victims. Perhaps the bastard come 70 A.D. would be Essau (Edom)?

[Gavilan]

Ok. So, Boris is on about surrendering your interest onto the United States. I ask the question, once you surrender the interest, then how do you go about trading for your needs?

As a trustee? On behalf on a trust where the man is the beneficiary? And back into the system, no?

[David Merrill]

Surrender requires faith that the "enemy" will be a better outcome than continuing the fight.

The enemy is your fear.

Surrender => Forgiveness => Redemption =>

There is organic priestcraft and there is commercial. Priestcraft may have at its foundations to do with requiring all rulers to tread carefully when dealing with men and thusly with souls to remember the limitations of their rulership lest they face wrath and indignation of God of Christ. Priest as one who makes a point to avoid being so entrenched in the mundane that he keeps the right perspectives as opposed to practitioners of secret rites whether sexual or otherwise (they get too immersed). The priest as his brother's keeper--in the sense of protecting their souls as if for God's own sake). Priest as consultant to the soul and encourager of placing limits on carnality.



Simoniaism (Simon Magus and cohorts) and associated Romano-Babylon didn't want to make it too obvious to its victims. Perhaps the bastard come 70 A.D. would be Essau (Edom)?

Visit by ministerial authority.

[walter]

Ok. So, Boris is on about surrendering your interest onto the United States. I ask the question, once you surrender the interest, then how do you go about trading for your needs?

As a trustee? On behalf on a trust where the man is the beneficiary? And back into the system, no?

When I follow the rabbit trail i end up in U.C.C. - ARTICLE 8.

[Gavilan]

When I follow the rabbit trail i end up in U.C.C. - ARTICLE 8.

You know, walter:

For some reason, your comment brought to my mind a memory about a conversation I had with a lawyer years back. I asked him if he practiced administrative law, and if he knew the administrative code. He looked at me and said that he didn't know anything about it, and it was not necessary to know about it in his view.

I looked up Article 8, of the U.C.C. and it dawned on me that I can issue a security for any amount and if I find a buyer for it, that's what the market would have priced it at. LOL, Here is a billion cookie certificate issue by me, promised to make good on it tomorrow, and tomorrow never comes.

[walter]

You know, walter:

For some reason, your comment brought to my mind a memory about a conversation I had with a lawyer years back. I asked him if he practiced administrative law, and if he knew the administrative code. He looked at me and said that he didn't know anything about it, and it was not necessary to know about it in his view.

I looked up Article 8, of the U.C.C. and it dawned on me that I can issue a security for any amount and if I find a buyer for it, that's what the market would have priced it at. LOL, Here is a billion cookie certificate issue by me, promised to make good on it tomorrow, and tomorrow never comes.

If you issue it you are liable for it.
Maybe there is a security with your NAME on it already out there?

Maybe the word "tomorrow" is the same as "infant"?
Tomorrow never comes and so an infant never grows.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 3: Right to life
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.


and in that order.

[allodial]

If it is "your NAME" then that can connote ownership and suretyship.

[David Merrill]

I enjoy the caliber of developmental modeling around here! Allodial mentions Power of Attorney THEY might already have in THE NAME. This is fundamentally what fell through with the entire STRAWMAN REDEMPTION. If you created it (debt), then how do you properly abandon its operations when it is already activated in the debt marketplaces?

Look carefully:




Three posts develop a clear portrait:

You know, walter:

For some reason, your comment brought to my mind a memory about a conversation I had with a lawyer years back. I asked him if he practiced administrative law, and if he knew the administrative code. He looked at me and said that he didn't know anything about it, and it was not necessary to know about it in his view.

I looked up Article 8, of the U.C.C. and it dawned on me that I can issue a security for any amount and if I find a buyer for it, that's what the market would have priced it at. LOL, Here is a billion cookie certificate issue by me, promised to make good on it tomorrow, and tomorrow never comes.

This smacks of POMC (Public Office Money Certificates), Comptroller Warrants (Montana Freemen) and simply returning the Treasury declaring it (alleged debt) is and was always their property (the SSN).

If you issue it you are liable for it.
Maybe there is a security with your NAME on it already out there?

Maybe the word "tomorrow" is the same as "infant"?
Tomorrow never comes and so an infant never grows.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 3: Right to life
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.


and in that order.

Re: Helen's poem about WAITING. The dangers of Futurism?

This really brings to my mind the perfect model "Jesus Lives" - in the scenario where he awoke, never having died, in a tomb with a candle, food and water; slathering on frankincense and myrrh for two and a half days to tolerate the stink...

Nobody dies. Michael Joseph explained here recently his journey to this same place. Religion has to instill fear; that is all.

If it is "your NAME" then that can connote ownership and suretyship.

When you turn power of attorney over in irrevocable trust, you can expect the attorney to continue to sell it to China. To the untrained eye, it would make no sense to sell a $20M lien to China for $50M! Now compound that with continued endorsement. You just keep on writing (endorsing) bearer bonds on the surety of your value - EDOM - ESAU - REDMAN

Selling/Trafficking in the souls of men.






P.S. View the FRN as an insurance policy that nobody knows how to make claim upon. That is what is going on with Title 12 USC 411. One is redeeming by making demand (claim). Calling in the note for value (lawful money). This is what brings patriots to start arguing in admiralty jurisdiction and why that fails. Why argue decorum around the courtroom if you have failed to make a claim?


DeLovio v Boit - all insurance (bottomry) is argued in admiralty.

[David Merrill]

The Trafficking is called "paper gold" - SDR's are referred to:

Large Photo of Offering.


My definition for SDR's is, The measure of a society's conditioning to blindly endorse the private credit from the local central bank. Notice how the SDR's show up in the two foremost documents.

[allodial]

The Trafficking is called "paper gold" - SDR's are referred to:

Large Photo of Offering.


My definition for SDR's is, The measure of a society's conditioning to blindly endorse the private credit from the local central bank. Notice how the SDR's show up in the two foremost documents.

Hysteria? Maybe they will just pile up some FRNs and line up some screaming girls and....

... make them or "Ameros" or "Euros" famous again? You know, like the Beatles. Or maybe that is what bitcoin is? Maybe narcotics are such a big deal is because they provide a large, cash-rich parallel market (think: reinsurance).

When you turn power of attorney over in irrevocable trust, you can expect the attorney to continue to sell it to China. To the untrained eye, it would make no sense to sell a $20M lien to China for $50M! Now compound that with continued endorsement. You just keep on writing (endorsing) bearer bonds on the surety of your value - EDOM - ESAU - REDMAN

I've always been amazed at how few people seem to fix on that 'dam' means blood..'. Blood is the life of the body. Think: sweat labor. Consider blood being poured into artificial entity machines (jobs) much like cash pours into a casino: pour pour pour pour it in until out comes a paycheck which blindly endorsed might result in a floating debenture over all of the endorser's stuff (you know stuff purchased with the last paycheck).

P.S. View the FRN as an insurance policy that nobody knows how to make claim upon. That is what is going on with Title 12 USC 411. One is redeeming by making demand (claim). Calling in the note for value (lawful money). This is what brings patriots to start arguing in admiralty jurisdiction and why that fails. Why argue decorum around the courtroom if you have failed to make a claim?

Don't forget the notion of the entire market (from retailers to wholesalers to stock exchanges) being a big maritime court. Consider the power in the belief is that there is something to buy or what you wanted to buy last week will still be available when you get your paycheck.

DeLovio v Boit - all insurance (bottomry) is argued in admiralty.

In the stock market, there is such a thing as short selling (and buying on margin). They made it possible (since its inception AFAIK) to profit monetarily from the failure of a company.

Selling/Trafficking in the souls of men.

Stock exchange... 'stock' is synonymous with cattle. Remote energy transfer and exchange conduits? Last I checked all those NYSE companies are ...



...people powered. Blood is the life of the body or the life of the body/flesh is in the blood--however the saying goes.