Birth Certificate - What it is

[EZrhythm]

The BC is a certified copy of an original registration of, and TITLE to, the PERSON...

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/...e-of-title.asp

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/security-interest.asp

The FIRST MIDDLE LAST was pledged at birth (registration).
The people unknowingly claim themselves and their property to be the collateral on legal claims when they claim that they are the FIRST MIDDLE LAST which is merely a name for accounting purposes.

Sample scenario-
Judge calls out, "Is JOHN WILLIAM JONES here?" John William replies, "Here!"
Instead, if John William replies, "I am here about that matter." He has not made a statement lending to evidence that he is (surety/collateral/trustee) for the FIRST MIDDLE LAST.

[walter]

" BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a PUBLIC RECORD that a CROWN ORGANIZATION was ORGANIZED on that date."

words from john scott duncan

[allodial]

" BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a PUBLIC RECORD that a CROWN ORGANIZATION was ORGANIZED on that date."

words from john scott duncan

You might be onto something. The certificate typically is from the registrar to evidence an entry in the register or rolls.

[EZrhythm]

Except that it is not a public record. And it represents an "Individual" as opposed to an organization.

[allodial]

Except that it is not a public record. And it represents an "Individual" as opposed to an organization.

In most U.S. States it is a private record with the particulars thereof to be guarded just like a social security card. Depending on the context an organization can be an "individual".

[walter]

Except that it is not a public record. And it represents an "Individual" as opposed to an organization.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/fulltext.html

In order to get a driver's license you must first show a BC.
They need a "public record" of WHO they are dealing with before any DL is handed out.

[walter]

In most U.S. States it is a private record with the particulars thereof to be guarded just like a social security card. Depending on the context an organization can be an "individual".

an agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada;

[David Merrill]

PERSON as a corporation that can sue or be sued...


Ergo the True Name as a class action.

[walter]

"Living Father"

Through the rules of capitalization "Living Father" is now a Title.
And Title is ownership.

[walter]

Came across this and I think it might add to the topic of the BC.


Nemo dat quod non habet, "no one gives what he doesn't have"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_dat_quod_non_habet

Recording statutes

When dealing with real property, most American jurisdictions have codified recording statutes that will enable subsequent purchasers to divest title from the party with common law title if they qualify for protection under the recording statute. Three varieties of recording statutes exist: 1) Race statutes, 2) Notice statutes, and 3) Race-Notice statutes.

A race statute will divest common law title from a person with superior title if the subsequent purchaser recorded their deed prior to the person with superior title. A notice statute will divest common law title from a person with superior title if the subsequent purchaser had no notice (either actual or constructive - otherwise known as bona fide) of the true owner's title. A race-notice statute requires a subsequent purchaser to be bona fide and record first.

[shikamaru]

Is a birth certificate a quasi-corporate sole?

[EZrhythm]

It is a certificate representing a security interest in an individual person. "Individual" and "person" being a legal entity, fiction, etc.

[David Merrill]

It is a certificate representing a security interest in an individual person. "Individual" and "person" being a legal entity, fiction, etc.

I can see how a template of trust law might indicate this is true. However you indicate there might be some kind of monetary value or even any value whatsoever to this certificate?

I went through all this with a Canadian Freeman named Robert MANARD. There is a clause in the constitution there about "Security of the Person" he misconstrued miserably. You might be able to view this video by searching around for it - Security of the Person. The 5:00 Minute Mark had Rob telling the viewer (1:00 Hour Mark too) that the Canadian Birth Certificate was a stock certificate worth quite a bit of money - untrue.

He seems to have given up his quest to assert this myth.

[Michael Joseph]

I can see how a template of trust law might indicate this is true. However you indicate there might be some kind of monetary value or even any value whatsoever to this certificate?

I went through all this with a Canadian Freeman named Robert MANARD. There is a clause in the constitution there about "Security of the Person" he misconstrued miserably. You might be able to view this video by searching around for it - Security of the Person. The 5:00 Minute Mark had Rob telling the viewer (1:00 Hour Mark too) that the Canadian Birth Certificate was a stock certificate worth quite a bit of money - untrue.

He seems to have given up his quest to assert this myth.

Any beneficial interest certificate is only evidence of interest. The value of the property which one holds a share in can only be known when said property has a buyer. That is the beauty of trust. The BIC holder only holds an interest in personality. And that is generally reflected in avails proceeds etc. therefore the BIC itself is valueless. Therefore not taxable. The rich use this simple strategy. It is quite effective when one has a skilled trustee.

[David Merrill]

A fluent knowledge about trust law is quite enjoyable and interesting. I even believe there is a powerful metaphysics called Law driving engines unseen.

When one starts making claims for value though, upon another estate there might be major problems.



P.S. I think that may be at the heart of my uneasiness when I see people prying at government like a stock valued corporation. Negative averment too, which is in all the Accept for Value mythology.