Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

[gdude]

OMG! Unbelievable, so sad.

Wow, this explains Hendrickson's conviction. I believe some of the juror's wanted to see the original statute, but the judge refused them! Citing it might confuse them...just listen to my instructions! We are #$%^%^

[Michael Joseph]

However, you should not read into these instructions, or anything else I may have said or done, any suggestion as to what your verdict should be.

That is entirely up to you.

The Jury does not have to listen to one word the Judge says. See now N.L.P. at its worst! This is why these cases form the Common Law. The Jury decides what will be common to their Venue. But lets be practical, when you got 12 men and women who are degreed within a Public School System, well they are TRAINED to conform to the Demands of the Authorities! This of course starts in the first grade when Johnny is introduced to the Police Officer and Fire Fighter and told IF YOU HAVE AN EMERGENCY - CALL US.

Which is a slick way of embedding a thought in a child's mind - I am incompetent to handle my own affairs - I need others to help me!

A mind needs to be exercised.

Jury Nullification


Shalom,
MJ

[allodial]

Importing RIVERA's work ....

Seems following RIVERA's advice resulted in some guy out in California getting his physical therapy license suspended with a berating from the responsible tribunal regarding psychological problems. RIVERA's theories seem to be missing this "Civil War" thing. To spare the guy embarrassment I wont post links. RIVERA doesn't seem to quite completely know what he's talking about. I get the impression of DALE LIVINGSTON + 5/16th Red Amendment.

[David Merrill]

Seems following RIVERA's advice resulted in some guy out in California getting his physical therapy license suspended with a berating from the responsible tribunal regarding psychological problems. RIVERA's theories seem to be missing this "Civil War" thing. To spare the guy embarrassment I wont post links. RIVERA doesn't seem to quite completely know what he's talking about. I get the impression of DALE LIVINGSTON + 5/16th Red Amendment.

Both of these pundits do seem to be a bit stuck pre-revolution. I attempted to convince LIVINGSTON one evening but he just could not stay on my track and felt attacked as soon as I brought up his attempts to air his cause on the Tim TURNER network. That was my mistake.

I could have avoided that and maybe gotten my point across.

[allodial]

Both of these pundits do seem to be a bit stuck pre-revolution. I attempted to convince LIVINGSTON one evening but he just could not stay on my track and felt attacked as soon as I brought up his attempts to air his cause on the Tim TURNER network. That was my mistake.

I could have avoided that and maybe gotten my point across.

If they were seeking or promoting truth you'd figure they'd have been open-minded. Could they possibly, instead, be literally seeking to procure a 'captive audience'? To reiterate, while I would tend to appreciate sincere scholarship, LIVINGSTON's writing style (i.e. lack of complete sentences and pUZzLiNG Abuse of, PUNCTUATION, and Case) throws off some serious bright, red flags. To be stuck in pre-revolution or in a pre-Civil-War modality could be simply due to some innocent oversight or lack of comprehension or part and parcel of deliberate and intentional misinformation.



The above graphic is a snapshop of one of LIVINGSTON's documents. Taken on its own merit, what serious legal scholar writes like that? Seriously? Is that even a sentence? (IMHO, The "called into service" issue comes into clear view and focus if viewed in the light of post-revolution U.S. history.)







Just to get a point across, I have included the above snapshots from the California Style Manual, 4th Edition: A Handbook of Legal Style for California Courts and Lawyers by Edward D. Jessen Reporter of Decisions for the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal.

P.S. According to the California Manual of Style, 4th. Edition underscoring should avoided for showing emphasis unless you are, say, using a 1930s typewriter--but, if you have ulterior motives.....


Coincidentally, ransom letters also pertain to captive audiences.

[allodial]

Perhaps LIVINGSTON lacks familiarity with the and the potential significance of thereof and the law of conquest as pertains to Japan circa 1945?

[David Merrill]

I only have one or two snapshots of LIVINGSTON to go on. You do remind me how intent he gets that there was some big evil conspiracy going on around the formation of our nation. I have acquired a bit of his utterances - The Nation that Never Was.

I have to agree that his material is skewed so much by either paranoia or delirium that it is not really worth the effort to understand. That was my objective in speaking with him - to show how the whole scenario about WASHINGTON and New York can be explained away through Freemasonry.


Take a careful look at this one book! With a few minimal keys one can unlock a lot:

[Chex]

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/....HywvLh7Q.dpuf

[David Merrill]

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/....HywvLh7Q.dpuf

That link holds a very lucid explanation but I want to focus on perceptions gained from having the Mason Library and Museum available. Also take to heart dreams and visions granted from whatever term you apply to God, or in my case the Holy Spirit. I direct your attention to the way the video jumps directly into the known portions of currency at the federal level at minute mark 7:00.

Along the lines of my recent postings here what I am speaking of is the granting of license from a higher authority (court of record) to a lower authority - criminal. Remember that all licensing is for the purpose to allow criminal behavior for the common good. On the macrocosm we find a Levitical priesthood in full support and wearing the mantle of authority to grant license to governments so that the central banks can have more currency in circulation than they have redeemable in value (gold).

Right here in the Fourth Judicial District only hours after I perfected my $20M lien we find another hologram (fractal) of the FDIC in Traveler's Insurance covering Dan MAY for $5K rather than the Comptroller of the State Treasury on a valid fidelity bond only hours before. It helps to watch how John William's allegiances evolve over the years, from way back when he was District Attorney over the Golden Rectangle, where the fiat really began...


Bogus Oath from 2005 (no mention of God).
Valid Oath at the time I perfected my $20M lien against the State of Colorado Capital Finance Corporation.

[That last link - Do you see the license I was revoking? The State of Colorado Capital Finance Corporation was soon dissolved.]

Finally John William evolved to what is plainly a stock certificate like a blank check with the State Comptroller:

The Levite methodology (as opposed to Melchizedek) is to insure (bottomry) in admiralty rather than to hold the value, or at least grant redemption in value; the Federal Reserve Note is as I have been saying all along backed by $42.22/troy ounce in gold. [This is why we sue (LoR) Jack LEW as the US Governor for the International Monetary Fund, not as a US Government Employee.]

The Levite license through Congress Masonry has allowed that albeit the FRN is backed by gold, only Melchizedek can actually own the wealth. Notice how the Original was served on the NYSE and the 30-Day Judgment fell exactly on September 11, 2001. All the rest, the Central Banking Wars is only the trustees trying to behave like Melchizedek.

[David Merrill]

P.S. In other words, What good is backing the FRN with gold (US notes too) if you cannot access the gold to redeem it?

[Chex]

P.S. In other words, What good is backing the FRN with gold (US notes too) if you cannot access the gold to redeem it?

http://sandymccollum.hubpages.com/hu...ichest-Country

Because gold is dispersed widely throughout the geologic world, its discovery occurred to many different groups in many different locales. And nearly everyone who found it was impressed with it, and so was the developing culture in which they lived. http://www.onlygold.com/TutorialPages/HistoryFS.htm

National Mining Association 101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Suite 500 East Washington, DC 20001. http://www.nma.org/pdf/gold/gold_history.pdf

At the time gold was discovered, California was part of the Mexican territory of Alta California, which was ceded to the U.S. after the end of the Mexican-American War with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on February 2, 1848, less than two weeks after the discovery. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Gold_Rush

The history of the United States dollar refers to more than 200 years since Continental Congress of the United States authorized the issuance of the US dollar on August 8, 1786. The term 'dollar' had already been in common usage since the colonial period when it referred to eight-real coin (Spanish dollar) used by the Spanish throughout New Spain. Although several monetary systems were proposed for the early republic, the dollar was approved by Congress to be released in a variety of denominated coins and currency bills. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History..._States_dollar

This is all so true

It takes a lot of this to buy even an ounce of gold.

[David Merrill]

I heard somewhere that gold is the stuff of exploding stars?

I sense a lot of the Club de Paris in your post.

You stir my mind to recall archetypes of Golden Calf imagery - with gold foil foiling the Israelites to ignore their spiritual leader on the burning mountain nearby communing with God...

[Chex]

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Golden_Calf

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0974984094/...l_3p3vbqhrvh_e

Look in side http://www.amazon.com/Gods-Money-Str...pr_product_top

Funny how the author uses chapter 13 in his book http://www.amazon.com/They-Own-All-I...der_1439233616 to describe the "Behind a fraudulent and corrupt "monetary" system lies a hidden creditor" banking and federal reserve act.

[allodial]

However, even if only gold coins were in circulation in any given state or kingdom or forum, the sovereign or ruler of such is who says and thusly it is that authority that makes it money. If I created crystal containers and stamped $20 on them and filled them with pure water and decreed them to be currency in the Land of Me, sure sure the water inside the crystal container has a value itself --BUT THAT IS BESIDES THE FUNDAMENTAL POINT-- being that it is *I* that determines that water contained in such and such a container stamped in such and such a manner to be worth $20 and is good for currency. A state/kingdom/city-state doesn't have an obligation to make gold or silver its currency although it might have to make sure the system is overall just and balanced.

The perceived value of gold or diamonds is 100% separate from the authority or sanction backing its use as a currency (i.e. melt-value is separate from declared value). Clearly gold nuggets and gold bullion isn't coin--it should be easy to comprehend. In the United States it is silver in a certain form that is a dollar per the Coinage Act of 1792.

Per the Coinage Act of 1792, a dollar is coin containing silver and the Gold Eagle coin's value is defined in terms of the dollar not the other way around. The lawful dollar was not originally defined in terms of gold.





See also: pound sterling and Spanish dollar.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]1336[/ATTACH]
It takes a lot of this to buy even an ounce of gold.[/CENTER]

An ounce of gold **is not money* although it may be valued in terms of money. Money has the backing of a sovereign or ruler of its associated forum.



That ain't money.



That is a photo of official coin/currency of the United States--i.e. money. Certified, stamped and underwritten. The industrial value is separate from its decreed value.

[David Merrill]

Thank you! I believe that it is useful to think in terms of license. A license is the method by which we make illegal activity legal.

I extend license to the Spiritual Leader in priestcraft (Vatican jurisdiction) over and infiltrating New Thought (teaching Unity) by not exposing him. His license in theory lasts as long as that, presuming any of the congregants care.