Pete HENDRICKSON's Lost Horizons - Solutions?

[JohnnyCash]

Well, well, well. Bobbinville failed the test. Thank you Noah.
The self-described coin collector of 54 years specializing in German coins of the Second Reich ... erred on a Second Reich coin. Why am I not surprised.

I would just like to alert members that some posters are very likely not who they purport to be. It's easy enough to get a login & hide behind a fake-IP. Indeed if Martha Stout is correct, some users might be that 1/25th of the populace without a conscience, who can lie and not feel bad about it.. at all. And wouldn't such a user be useful to the banksters or the Cabal controlled U.S. Government who must rely on the compliance and conditioning of the masses?

You have been warned. I will leave it at that.

[David Merrill]

ooo very nice Noah, thank you. Yes David, the Q has lost most all entertainment value without you. Though it's perfectly understandable why they would banish. After all I waltzed in there a rank HENDRICKSON beginner, discovered the quatlosers had no real answer to redeeming lawful money & nothing but ridicule for you. So I parlayed that into remedy and a 6-year victory over the bankster's IRS. They couldn't risk that happening again!

And look who is following along with our conversation as revealed at FreedomWatch. Yes our beloved "jesse james" who you see adopted a nasty tone towards me (for what purpose I can only guess). Perhaps he forgot I'm immune to his venom.

Yes, I may be wrong about "bobbinville" ... but perhaps I see things others don't. What if half the logins here belong to the Q?
I wonder who bobbinville's expert is? Pottapauq?.

I imagine Poppycock is reading here daily if not a registered member. I think that with all the conversation we had I would recognize him very quickly should he start to post. I am blessed to have much healthier things on my mind.

I do not disqualify your intuition. Try imagining yourself in my position though. I do not enjoy contemplating banishing somebody, for whatever reason, and that may be especially because they tote an attorney's perspective and experience. I enjoy skepticism as it hones the effectiveness of remedy. - Rather than debunks it.

If somebody can debunk remedy as we describe it here, that is good too. I pursue truth.

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Quiet_Rubber_Stamp_1.jpg

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Quiet_Rubber_Stamp_2.jpg

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Quiet_Default_Judgment_1.jpg

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Quiet_Default_Judgment_2.jpg

[bobbinville]

Even if I was Pottapauq, so what? I've certainly avoided stirring up arguments like you see regularly on Quatloos; and as I said in my last post, that's not why I'm here. As for experts, there are plenty to choose from. If you're talking about the law, I have several college classmates who are lawyers (one, who works for the IRS, has been very helpful about how the IRS just doesn't bother with some people because the collection effort isn't worth the expected recovery. If coins, several of my friends are nationally prominent in the hobby.

As for being wrong about the German coin: I tend to concentrate on the minor coins, not on the German states silver/gold issues; and lately I have tended to work much more on Swiss coins (1850 to date). I only began a significant German collection within the last 10 years; before that, it was mostly British Commonwealth.

[David Merrill]

Even if I was Pottapauq, so what? I've certainly avoided stirring up arguments like you see regularly on Quatloos; and as I said in my last post, that's not why I'm here. As for experts, there are plenty to choose from. If you're talking about the law, I have several college classmates who are lawyers (one, who works for the IRS, has been very helpful about how the IRS just doesn't bother with some people because the collection effort isn't worth the expected recovery. If coins, several of my friends are nationally prominent in the hobby.

As for being wrong about the German coin: I tend to concentrate on the minor coins, not on the German states silver/gold issues; and lately I have tended to work much more on Swiss coins (1850 to date). I only began a significant German collection within the last 10 years; before that, it was mostly British Commonwealth.

and

As for whether any Quatloosians are over here under other guises... so what? If you believe in what you say, you should be able to defend it to anyone.

That is fairly convincing - not Jay but Poppycock

Isn't there a difference between numismatic value and the value of a piece of currency? I've got some US Notes; but there's no way that I would ever spend them because of their value as a collectible item.

Bobbinville's most recent post:

The only problem is that, even if the courts indeed don't care what the law says, it is the courts which make the decisions as to what the law is and means; so unless Doreen can convince a court that CtC is correct, she's in trouble. If you operate on the assumption that the courts are corrupt, then arguing a legal principle in them, which they don't like, is like playing craps with someone who brings loaded dice to the game.

The problem is that judges don't like to overturn precedent; so Doreen's best hope may lie in the political/legislative sphere.

With JohnnyCash's intuition in support it certainly makes sense that Poppycock would become bored with Q and find himself registering here. Quite directly then:


Are you Pottapauq?


I enjoy the probability that you are because it really does make comment how Q has become so boring without Harvester and Myself shredding Wserra's slurs. Of course Webhick has programmed the website chat area so that I am blind unless I borrow an IP by proxy or surf on anybody else's computer. - Which I also find highly entertaining that she would trouble with me; trying to keep me from reading such a boring website. So let's pretend that you intend to behave indefinitely... I will be treating you appropriately and reading your posts much more carefully for the gist that you are intending to attack remedy according to law.

The only problem is that, even if the courts indeed don't care what the law says, it is the courts which make the decisions as to what the law is and means...

It is amusing to me that I can address your first and last posts at once:

In the exercise of that power Congress has declared that Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender and are redeemable in lawful money.

and

United States notes shall be lawful money, and a legal tender in payment of all debts, public and private, within the United States, except for duties on imports and interest on the public debt.

I amplify your point with Colorado constitutional law being that only the county court judges are allowed to practice law at all. The appeals justices are bound to "authority" or case law (common law) stare decisis.

However I believe that my days of moderating you, or many others for that matter are coming to a close. I might well be casting an advertisement for all registered members ever here to take another look around and well, since they are already registered users there might be a flurry of interest in American Remedy. It could be that I would be overwhelmed from brain trust and other career interests to maintain this as "my" website feeling responsible for defending the integrity of remedy here by being a watchdog against the Poppycocks of the Internet.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[shikamaru]

Isn't there a difference between numismatic value and the value of a piece of currency? I've got some US Notes; but there's no way that I would ever spend them because of their value as a collectible item.

Market vs. stamp value

The essence of legal tender laws? The attempt to stop Gresham's Law?
This presumes we are speaking of precious metal specie vs. clad coinage.

[bobbinville]

No. I am not here to attack remedy, redeeming lawful money, R4C, AFV or anything of the sort. However, since people seem more focused on who I am rather than what I have to say, and seem ready to nitpick my posts on the assumption that I am Pottapauq, maybe it's time to say so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen goodbye. I had hoped to be here and offer the occasional nonconfrontational comment; but it's clear that I can no longer do so. In closing, though, I will say that I go onto this site, and Quatloos, not to be entertained but to be educated and informed.

Good luck, Suitors.

[shikamaru]

No. I am not here to attack remedy, redeeming lawful money, R4C, AFV or anything of the sort. However, since people seem more focused on who I am rather than what I have to say, and seem ready to nitpick my posts on the assumption that I am Pottapauq, maybe it's time to say so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen goodbye. I had hoped to be here and offer the occasional nonconfrontational comment; but it's clear that I can no longer do so. In closing, though, I will say that I go onto this site, and Quatloos, not to be entertained but to be educated and informed.

Good luck, Suitors.

Don't go .

Sure, we can be a rough bunch at times, but stand your ground!

By the way, welcome to the forums.

[David Merrill]

That was the presumption.

I have enjoyed establishing a sound basis about redeeming lawful money around here. Now I am debating whether or not to leave the foundation and let things take the course they will - only bringing up defense when it is brought to my attention.

Then again I could just drop it. Last I heard Q is doing some pretty good advertising for us here at StSC. If you read my post carefully it was encouraging you to stay and learn here. Being that you came here from there I will be looking for opportunities to explain the benefits of American Remedy as found in the law.

If you would like to discuss the intricacies of coins, great! I suggest that you might start new threads when posts start getting off the thread topic.

[JohnnyCash]

Aww, he is taking his ball and going home. Pity. Maybe he was afraid we'd ask another numismatic question.

[Noah]

That's a very nice piece, Noah. One of my specialties is German coins of the Second Reich. It looks like the Long Beard variety, which in 2006 was worth $250 in Fine condition. The "D" means that the coin was struck at the Munich Mint (which still strikes coins today).

Only 20,000 minted of both varieties. I would sell it for 2 bitcoin.

[bobbinville]

No; it's just that I'm tired of nitpicking like yours, and obsession over whether I am a Quatloosian in disguise rather than what I have to say. At any rate, any further posts from me will be of the most innocuous sort.

Actually, the picture in your post, being of a British half crown, is right up my alley, since I've specialized in British coinage (especially farthings; I've got all but three die varieties from 1860 on) for much longer than I've specialized in German coinage (and again, I concentrate on the national issues, not on the minor royalties, although I have a few of them). When I retire, I may well expand into the minor royalties, as well as trying to complete my Swiss (1850-) collection.

But then, David makes a good point about this thread getting off-topic; so I'll say no more about coins here.

[JohnnyCash]

Yes David makes lots of good points. Welcome back Poppinsville; it's great to have you posting again. I must say you brought that on yourself.

I'll stack my numismatic knowledge up against yours any day.

[David Merrill]

I will start a thread...


That is only an example though. Unless you wish intentionally to combine CtC with numismatics, just start a thread somewhere appropriate.



P.S. I called bobbinville Poppinsville? A subconscious slip I guess.

[Goldi]

Fraud vitiates all contracts and you are being held to an obligation made under fraud. It really does take redeeming lawful money to understand redeeming lawful money.

Yes, and the W4 or W9 you signed set you up to be obligated to a Subtitle A tax liability, collected by your employer operating as a withholding agent (as defined in 26 USC 7701a16). Had you known or been informed of exactly what that tax was and who it by law applies to and that you could opt out of it using a 26 CFR 31.3402(n) citation on the W4 or W9, you most certainly would have. And since there was no full disclosure, then you could not have formed an intent of purposeful availment to obligate yourself to a tax imposed on 26 CFR 1.1441, 1442 and 1443 described individuals/entities, and therefore the signature on that W4 / W9 is an unauthorized signature.

[TMI]

Team Law CAUTION!

Since my dropping of the ball as a "CtC-educated" filer (see my first post above), I've been looking here and elsewhere for alternative solutions to the IRS assault on my finances. In the category of "elsewhere," I found a website called "teamlaw.net".

Might I suggest CAUTION in considering Team Law. I don't know what they are now promoting, but Eric Madsen's promotion of filing 1041 in treating the SSN as a trust account back in the late 90's is causing trouble. See

http://www.irs.gov/uac/Examples-of-Abusive-Tax-Schemes-Fiscal-Year-2013

and drill down to Former Illinois Town Supervisor Sentenced for Tax Fraud. I know of another who's brother was caught up in this too.

Madsen's advice led to difficulty for me, which led me to PH's CtC. The statutory logic I find to be quite clean. My concern is hearing stories that people are running into trouble in the back end. Further, I went some time with no presumption and no need to file. Now, with this new 1099-K, radar is back on and the seed was sown, now reaping in the form of a NtcO'Lvy. Can you hear the sucking sound? I have two years to deal with and don't wish to wait much longer for fear of falling deeper into a $h!thole! I wish to stop the bleeding, but eating the red pill makes it very difficult to just throw up my hands. However, I have some precious cargo to lose now that I did not have in the earlier years.

Here is what I wish to know. In learning the Lesson Plan at StSClub, what might one form as an expectation to be able to accomplish through the use of your information?

I read through this thread so far with attachments. Help me understand the benefit of the trust and LOR when they approach from the living man, and yet my understanding is that the strawman is the entity under irs attack.

Further, have any of you studied creditorsincommerce.com?

Thanks in advance for your feedback.