Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • samgans
    replied
    redeeming lawful money since mid 2012

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Hi Johnny;


    Welcome to StSC!

    I was just looking at a FrivPen warning and got an updated Link to the same old Memorandum as recently cited. So I really don't spend much time on this thread.

    I get a lot of successful reports though. Just the other day...



    He sanitized them for use but I refrain from putting them on the forums because of a NY Tort Attorney who likes to publish the PACER docs on a skeptical website thinking he is affecting process. Since the purpose is to publish process there is no real problem but I don't like to see suitors' home addresses displayed to that mentality for ridicule.

    The good news however is that your metaphysics is what is really at work. There is a new example here, with documentation. This suitor never filed a Libel of Review to establish an evidence repository and may have encouraged the IRS agent to start FrivPen process. So he will likely re-file a more standard 1040 Form, set up an evidence repository and file the Redeemed Lawful Money Return next year instead. Once they get that ball rolling they would rather get the suitor into an administrative argument, just creating a sad FrivPen, ignoring the law.

    Lots of folks are getting full refunds on the evidence alone, the demands on the backsides of paychecks etc. but I am skeptical about going forward without a proper evidence repository (record).


    Regards,

    David Merrill.

    Hello, I wanted to thank you for explaining the concept of lawful money and how to redeem for L. money, it's amazing how a bit of knowledge can go such a long way, thank you very much david!! (I just received the refund for state and local tax, federal refund I received over month ago, full refund of course direct deposited)

    samuel gansburg

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Hi Johnny;


    Welcome to StSC!

    I was just looking at a FrivPen warning and got an updated Link to the same old Memorandum as recently cited. So I really don't spend much time on this thread.

    I get a lot of successful reports though. Just the other day...

    David,

    This morning I have news of federal refund (attached) as result of lawful money tax return filing. Have wonderful example docs from start to finish, just need to sanitize. So a big THANK YOU! there.
    He sanitized them for use but I refrain from putting them on the forums because of a NY Tort Attorney who likes to publish the PACER docs on a skeptical website thinking he is affecting process. Since the purpose is to publish process there is no real problem but I don't like to see suitors' home addresses displayed to that mentality for ridicule.

    The good news however is that your metaphysics is what is really at work. There is a new example here, with documentation. This suitor never filed a Libel of Review to establish an evidence repository and may have encouraged the IRS agent to start FrivPen process. So he will likely re-file a more standard 1040 Form, set up an evidence repository and file the Redeemed Lawful Money Return next year instead. Once they get that ball rolling they would rather get the suitor into an administrative argument, just creating a sad FrivPen, ignoring the law.

    Lots of folks are getting full refunds on the evidence alone, the demands on the backsides of paychecks etc. but I am skeptical about going forward without a proper evidence repository (record).


    Regards,

    David Merrill.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johnny
    replied
    Redeemed Lawful Money Reduction

    Hello David,

    I'm new here. Is using line 21 on 1040 form "redeemed in lawful money reduction still working provided all checks have been properly stamped? Was wondering if there is any more successes since 2009?
    Thanks for all the interesting comments and work, Johnny

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    This suitor is in International Settlements at a huge international bank. I believe about the time we were waiting for the refund he inquired with his co-worker's sister, the IRS attorney and she remarked how his file was secured above her pay grade. Interesting that was a First for her. And unheard of - sealing a file from IRS attorneys. But maybe they discovered they knew each other too?

    He turned out to be one of the three suitors involved in financial advice/banking that led me to the conclusion that people in the financial industry attract Frivpens. Not that the IRS has a legal right - just that if someone is making a living from endorsers of private credit the IRS is emboldened to try something. Now I inquire before helping somebody through a Libel of Review.

    All in all though, I cannot promise anything about the actions of others.

    Leave a comment:


  • froze25
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Updating you all.


    This fellow got a latter about 45 days ago saying the IRS would be considering his Return for another 45 days. He sounded optimistic that the IRS will be sending his full Refund, however late.

    I noticed how long the IRS contemplated sending him his Refund for the latter half of 2009:


    What ever happened to this Suitors Refund, The offered him Half he did a R4C any word after?

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    This is an interesting BUMP!

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied
    Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
    Nope ... more like all your data being on the cloud ... so govy can sniff at will ....

    End terminals, to some degree, are moving back towards being dummy terminals ....
    And perhaps less intelligent operators to boot (thin clients in the head)?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	zombie-students.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	67.5 KB
ID:	40792
    Last edited by allodial; 09-28-13, 07:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    I think of that as de-centralization but I believe you have it better perceived:




    Also, the choice must be made - are you serving God or Mammon?


    Click image for larger version

Name:	restrictions.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	40791
    Disqualified OrganizationsMandatory Exception from the Code for people like the Pope (Bishop of Rome), Mayor etc. - corporations sole.

    I am sure if you search for The Good Church around here you will get the cites.

    Leave a comment:


  • shikamaru
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Shikamaru - like spiritual data?
    Nope ... more like all your data being on the cloud ... so govy can sniff at will ....

    End terminals, to some degree, are moving back towards being dummy terminals ....

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Okay... I get it.

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied
    Perhaps this might help ....





    Last edited by allodial; 09-27-13, 11:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
    The funny thing about computers is right now things are moving back towards strong centralization with cloud computing, virtualization, and such ....

    Thanks Allodial - processing...

    Shikamaru - like spiritual data?

    Leave a comment:


  • shikamaru
    replied
    The funny thing about computers is right now things are moving back towards strong centralization with cloud computing, virtualization, and such ....

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Our clear connection of this priestcraft with the thread topic came clear to me around 1994. There was a short rash of churches being burned in the southern States. Robert RUBIN, then the Secretary of the Treasury declared the burnings an act of domestic terrorism. The term may have been invented at that time. What always caught my eye was how the Secretary of the Treasury was stepping up instead of some other political figure.
    In the State of Florida the State Treasurer / CFO is also the "go-to" guy for arson (Note: slide 5). Harming property or that of 501(c)(3) registrants in the State called United States might be in the domain of the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. Interesting though to consider a 501(c)(3) 'church': tax exemption, weekly swarms of cash coming in and being deposited... like..a bank.
    Last edited by allodial; 09-27-13, 10:54 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Chex;


    Your post fits nicely there. Thank you!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X