Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

[David Merrill]

...mistakes can also be learned from by two sides.

I learned something today.

DOCUMENTS SIGNED IN BLANK I. A RECURRING question in commercial and property law is which of two innocent people is to suffer for the fraud of another. The purpose of this article is to consider one particular type of fraud, namely the incorrect completion of a document signed in blank. Four types of documents seem particularly vulnerable to this practice-bills of exchange, share transfers, insurance proposal forms and hire purchase proposal forms. The problem arises when an individual signs a document in blank and that document comes into the hands of another (the intermediary). Subsequently the intermediary fraudulently, or perhaps mistakenly, fills in tha blanks incorrectly and the document is passed on to a third party. The latter may enter the picture in various ways. The document may be a contractual offer which is addressed to him, or the intermediary may have assigned an apparently valid contract between the signatory and himself to the third party, or the third party may be the holder of a bill of exchange which has been negotiated to him. In any event, the question that then arises is whether the signatory is bound by the terms appearing in the document as against the third party. Looking at the situation in terms of offer and acceptance, and ignoring for the time being the principles of agency and estoppel, it is apparent that the offer made by the signatory is different from that accepted either by the intermediary or the third party. On this basis there is no concluded contract.

[Christopher Thomas]

Successful Download..well in the process..

David Merill, Thanks for the Welcome...I read "Quatlosers" posts..some people might not only be brainwahed but maybe hypnotized..they're still sound asleep..

Allodial, Thanks for the info..I will learn the functions and post oneself's own attempt to handle one's own affairs..mistakes can also be learned from by two sides..surely what not to do and leader to correctness of repeating that same mistake..I think,therefore I am so I shall not be "insane"..I just totally made that up. got an app..leafly..pretty accurate.."may cause creativness..lol..in saying that im open to opinion..

My current "payday" routine is usually pick the cheque up go home, "Stamp & Scan" cheque, Go to the gas station and receive redeemed, go home, Stamp and Scan [frn's]. seems like more once I typped it. however, the "extra stuff" adds up..literally. anyways i'm wondering about true and correct reproduction of more than one page as one document..is there a way that I can scan originals and number them in the pdf to show more than one page on the print out?

Im so confused about this dba filing...One is record-owner once appears to show there is no abandonment...then one is now entitled to use that property [title] so why would i want to go to the state for another title?

[allodial]

Hope everyone is well...This is actually "Christopher-T:Farley"..I deleted the email account because when I set it up I was free with personal info. anyhow..sorry for being strange..I got a new job..I filled out the w-4, however in the signature part..Redeemed lawful money..on the I-9 I put the Estate..mainly cause I was nervous and HAD to fill it out there instead of taking it home to think about it...plus not sure what I was thinking..I just didnt want to answer the citizen and the ss as "mine" I wanted to clearify those titles are...I am exempt from FWIT and honored...FL don't have state..and wanted to find out about the states that do..My cheques was the third mistake...I stamped on the back of the paycheque "redeemed lawful money pursuant to 12 usc 411"...however I also stamped each private credit note that was given in exchange and scanned all..soo since it is transaction based.. have I corrected the cheque endorsement by endorsement of the private credit notes? I also am working on this General Post office Registered mailing for "warrant claim of title" and it is getting re routed everywhere..I want to post all the docs im speaking of but cant figure out how to mark out all personal info without damaging hard copies.

You can use a scanner, then use a program like GIMP or photoshop to make true black boxes over the personal info. Save only graphic, raster images (jpg, gif) rather than vector.

[David Merrill]

Hi Christopher Thomas;


It is good to have you back here... especially in your true name!

[Christopher Thomas]

Soo many mistakes...

Hope everyone is well...This is actually "Christopher-T:Farley"..I deleted the email account because when I set it up I was free with personal info. anyhow..sorry for being strange..I got a new job..I filled out the w-4, however in the signature part..Redeemed lawful money..on the I-9 I put the Estate..mainly cause I was nervous and HAD to fill it out there instead of taking it home to think about it...plus not sure what I was thinking..I just didnt want to answer the citizen and the ss as "mine" I wanted to clearify those titles are...I am exempt from FWIT and honored...FL don't have state..and wanted to find out about the states that do..My cheques was the third mistake...I stamped on the back of the paycheque "redeemed lawful money pursuant to 12 usc 411"...however I also stamped each private credit note that was given in exchange and scanned all..soo since it is transaction based.. have I corrected the cheque endorsement by endorsement of the private credit notes? I also am working on this General Post office Registered mailing for "warrant claim of title" and it is getting re routed everywhere..I want to post all the docs im speaking of but cant figure out how to mark out all personal info without damaging hard copies.

[David Merrill]

I am posting a rendition of this thread on www.lawfulmoneytrust.com and would like to bump the thread here. The most recent FrivPen Memorandum is from 2014?

I found it attached to the Opening Post.

Does anybody get frivolous penalty letters anymore? I have only seen one billing and I don't think it was about "frivolous arguments". The lack of news is great and the trend is that when the IRS delays, interest and penalties are added pursuant to the time the Treasury delays sending the Refund.

[pumpkin]

Government officers, employees and even sub contractors, are trustees of the public trust. The people are the settlors / beneficiaries of that trust. Fiduciary duty requires that the trustees always act in the best interests of the settlors / beneficiaries. That most certainly includes not abrogating their rights. Though they seem to have cast a shadow of commerce across this relationship, they cannot act commercially and just ignore their duty. Since the rights are private (takes a party of interest for standing) the duty is owed individually. If their actions are not in the best interest of the man or woman and their rights, they breach their fiduciary duty. A strictly commercial entity can act in its best interests. The best interests of the public trust however is the interests of the people themselves since they are its creator.

[David Merrill]

"Keep in mind that endorsement is the signature contract. Contracts are protected in Article I, Section 10.

Therefore the class must be non-endorsers redeemed in lawful money."

You must also keep in mind the parties and the relationship between them. A duty was owed from the very beggining. When trustees embark into commercial contracts, from within their official offices, it must be in the best interest of the settlor / beneficiary.

That is an edifying post...

Please describe the parties in more detail - for both an endorser and a non-endorser?

No troubles getting refunds here. I haven't paid income tax since 2007. Lawful Money works like a charm.

http://www.ctcwarrior.com/1040_2013_victory.pdf

[pumpkin]

"Keep in mind that endorsement is the signature contract. Contracts are protected in Article I, Section 10.

Therefore the class must be non-endorsers redeemed in lawful money."

You must also keep in mind the parties and the relationship between them. A duty was owed from the very beggining. When trustees embark into commercial contracts, from within their official offices, it must be in the best interest of the settlor / beneficiary.

[David Merrill]

I am One suitor who would NOT want to participate in a class action since the IRS is honoring my demands for lawful money.

Exactly! But like with April's Memorandum if suitors start having troubles getting Refunds then we might be able to address this with Class Action or even qui tam.

[doug555]

Originally Posted by pumpkin
I am seriously considering a class action lawsuit against the IRS. by the rules of court.

With who, when, where? What do you have in mind? I don't have FB.

Suitors comes to mind. A Class has to have the same characteristics for all intents and purposes.

Order up your stamp and use it instead of, as your signature whenever possible. Be in the class that is outside the Federal Reserve Districts.

I am One suitor who would NOT want to participate in a class action since the IRS is honoring my demands for lawful money.

[Chex]

Last edited by David Merrill; Today at Today at 03:35 PM.

How did you edit my post above?

[Chex]

I am seriously considering a class action lawsuit against the IRS. by the rules of court.

With who, when, where? What do you have in mind? I don't have FB.

Suitors comes to mind. A Class has to have the same characteristics for all intents and purposes.

Order up your stamp and use it instead of, as your signature whenever possible. Be in the class that is outside the Federal Reserve Districts.

[David Merrill]

I am seriously considering a class action lawsuit against the IRS.

My suggestion is to demand a preliminary injuction in the state courts against the IRS. This way it cannot be removed to federal court, as the anti-injunction act forbids the federal courts to entertain an action against any federal tax collecting agency. The state constitution is the power here, also the compact between the people and the states, The Ordinance of 1789. The compact in in Article 4 which irrevocably places the authority to collect a direct tax in the hands of the state legislatures. Also demand findings of facts and conclusions of law, if not required by the rules of court.

Keep in mind that endorsement is the signature contract. Contracts are protected in Article I, Section 10.

Therefore the class must be non-endorsers redeemed in lawful money.